Swiss gold industry warns against Swatch boss's US gold tax proposal
Following U.S. tariffs on Swiss goods, Swatch CEO Nick Hayek proposed a retaliatory export tax on Swiss gold bars destined for the United States. However, the Swiss Association of Manufacturers and Traders in Precious Metals expressed skepticism, fearing economic harm and damage to Switzerland's reputation as a free trade advocate.
Reuters Gold bullion bars (file photo) Switzerland's gold industry on Thursday voiced skepticism about a proposal by the boss of watchmaker Swatch to introduce a levy on gold exports to the United States in retaliation for U.S. tariffs on Switzerland.
U.S. President Donald Trump last week imposed tariffs of 39% on imported Swiss goods, causing shock and dismay in the Alpine republic, a major refining and transit hub for gold.
The U.S. Customs and Border Protection afterwards said Washington might put tariffs on the most widely-traded gold bullion bars in the United States. However, Trump said on Monday that gold would not face tariffs.
Swatch CEO Nick Hayek told Swiss newspaper Blick that Trump's announcement indicated that tariffs on gold would be painful for the U.S. president. "Now is the time to go on the offensive. Switzerland should order a 39% export tax on gold bars for the United States," Hayek told the paper. "That's where we have to get at him. That's his Achilles' heel."
The Swiss Association of Manufacturers and Traders in Precious Metals (ASFCMP) said that while ideas to better balance bilateral trade were welcome, careful consideration needed to be given to Switzerland's longer-term interests. "An export tax on Swiss gold destined for the USA would not only harm Switzerland economically, but also damage the reputation of a country that has consistently promoted and defended free trade," ASFCMP President Christoph Wild said. The Swiss Economy Ministry declined to comment on the proposal, but said the support of business representatives was in general welcome and helped underscore the close economic ties between the U.S. and Switzerland. Trump justified his 39% tariff by pointing to Switzerland's sizeable trade surplus with the United States. Part of that is due to gold exports. Hayek said that even if a gold levy failed to move Trump, it would cut the U.S. trade deficit with Switzerland. "If Trump doesn't give in to our pressure, we'll at least improve the trade balance with the U.S. if the Americans no longer import gold bars via Switzerland," he told Blick. Switzerland is continuing to hold talks with U.S. officials aimed at lowering the U.S. tariffs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fibre2Fashion
17 minutes ago
- Fibre2Fashion
18% decline in 'Made in USA' influence since 2022: TCB survey
US consumers are increasingly less swayed by country-of-origin labels—including 'Made in USA'—than they were three years ago, according to The Conference Board (TCB) report. The influence of the 'Made in USA' tag on buying decisions has dropped 18 per cent since 2022. 'Country-of-origin cues still matter—but their influence is slipping,' said Denise Dahlhoff, PhD, director of marketing and communications Research at The Conference Board and author of the report. 'As price concerns intensify, many US consumers appear to associate 'made in' labels with elevated prices due to generally higher domestic production costs as well as tariffs on foreign-made goods. Increasingly, consumers prioritise value and affordability over emotional affinity for certain countries, including their own.' The share of consumers saying they are more likely to buy based on where a product is made has fallen sharply. In 2025, around half say knowing a product is made in the US would prompt them to purchase—an 11-point drop from three years ago. 'Made in USA' on purchases has fallen 18 per cent since 2022, with older and White consumers driving the decline, according to The Conference Board. Price concerns outweigh patriotic sentiment, though younger buyers show slight optimism. Affluent consumers favour upscale origins, Canada leads foreign preferences, while low-cost producers see limited appeal. The support has fallen most among Americans aged 55+, a group once most loyal to domestic brands. Among White consumers, the decline was also pronounced, suggesting growing price sensitivity. Younger Americans, however, are showing slightly more positive sentiment, linking US-made goods with sustainability and job creation. The TCB report found affluent buyers valued upscale country origins like France, Germany, and Japan—though this effect weakened among households earning $200,000+. Canada emerged as the most favoured foreign source, followed by Mexico, while China remained the least preferred among the US' top import partners. The low-cost manufacturing nations such as India, Vietnam, and Bangladesh continued to have limited appeal. The latest findings from The Conference Board are based on a survey of 3,000 US adults. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (SG)
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump rates meeting with Putin a ‘10 out of 10'
US President Donald Trump rated his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin on an interview with Fox News on Saturday a '10' out of 10, calling it 'a very warm meeting' that showed 'very good progress' toward peace in Ukraine. The two leaders met in Alaska in a bid to advance efforts toward ending the war in Ukraine. Speaking aboard Air Force One ahead of the summit, Trump said his goal was to 'save a lot of lives.' Following the talks, Trump described the discussions as 'extremely productive,' while acknowledging that 'we're not there yet' on reaching a final deal. 'There were many, many points that we agreed on… A couple of big ones that we haven't quite gotten there, but we've made some headway. So, there's no deal until there's a deal,' Trump said, as reported by Fox News. Putin echoed this sentiment, saying the meeting took place in a 'constructive atmosphere of mutual respect.' Both the leaders have made progress on unspecified issues after holding nearly three-hour talks. However, none of them detailed the specifics. Standing alongside US President Donald Trump after their first meeting since the latter returned to power, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that he believed the war in Ukraine would never have begun had Trump remained in the White House after the 2020 election. 'Today, when President Trump says that if he was president back [in 2022], there would be no war, and I'm quite sure that it would indeed be. I can confirm that,' Putin said, according to the BBC. Looking ahead, Trump said the next steps involve further discussions with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other NATO leaders. During the interview he said that he would advise Zelenskyy to 'make a deal.' 'They're fighting a big war machine, and we, I think, are close to a deal, but I don't like saying it… I always say 50-50 because so many things can happen,' Trump said. 'But I think President Putin would like to solve the problem.' Trump also mentioned being presented with a book containing the names of 'thousands of people, prisoners, that will get released' as part of potential agreements. (With inputs from Fox News, BBC)
Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
Russia ‘lost oil client' India: Trump claim on whether tariffs brought Putin to table in Alaska
US President Donald Trump claimed on Friday that Russia lost an "oil client", India, when asked if "there is an economic side" to Russian President Vladimir Putin agreeing to hold a meeting in Alaska. In an interview with Fox News, Trump was asked, "Would you sense that Putin comes to this table maybe in an economic pinch? Maybe the things you've already done have put him in an economic pitch. Is there an economic side to this as Russia hoping to open up?" Trump responded by saying, "Well, he [Putin] lost an oil client, so to speak, which is India, which was doing about 40% of the oil." 'China, as you know, is doing a lot [ of oil trade with Russia]...,' he said. Trump had earlier threatened sanctions on Moscow and secondary sanctions on countries that buy its oil if no moves are made to end the war in Ukraine. China and India are the top two buyers of Russian oil. Donald Trump said on Friday he did not immediately need to consider retaliatory tariffs on countries such as China for buying Russian oil but might have to 'in two or three weeks.' "…if I did what's called the secondary sanction or a secondary tariff, it would be, you know, very devastating from their standpoint. If I have to do it, I'll do it. Maybe I won't have to do it," Trump said. Trump's comments came ahead of his meeting with Putin in Alaska on Friday. The two leaders held three-on-three meeting on Friday to discuss Ukraine war. After the summit, Trump was asked if he was now considering such action against Beijing after he and Putin failed to produce an agreement to resolve or pause Moscow's war in Ukraine. He said, "Well, because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that," Trump said after his summit with Putin in Alaska. 'Now, I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now. I think, you know, the meeting went very well.' Earlier this month, Trump threatened buyers of Russian energy with additional tariffs as a means of pressuring Putin into peace talks with Ukraine. The US president already doubled duties on Indian products to 50 percent starting August 27 over its purchases of oil from Moscow. But raising tariffs on China would risk breaking a trade truce that Trump on Monday agreed to extend for another 90 days. That agreement saw Washington and Beijing lower duties on each others' goods that reached astronomical levels in the spring, which spooked global markets. China has defended its imports of Russian oil as lawful and necessary for its energy security.
