
India's ban on Jane Street raises concerns over regulator role
The tax evasion charge comes on the heels of market regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), seizing 48.43 billion rupees ($570m) and banning four Jane Street-related entities from operating in the market for alleged price manipulation in the National Stock Exchange (NSE).
SEBI's order has roiled the Indian markets, raising questions about regulator surveillance and investor protection in the world's largest options trading market. Trading in India's weekly equity index options has slumped by a third on the ban on Jane Street, the Reuters news agency reported on Thursday.
Trading of equity options lets investors buy or sell a stock at a predetermined price and date. As the Indian market rapidly grew to handle more than half of all global options trades, retail investors entered the market too.
Questions of price manipulation have dogged this rapid rise but remained vacuous until a New York court case in April 2024, where Jane Street alleged that its rival, Millennium Partners, had stolen its algorithms that helped it make in the Indian options market. A whistleblower, Mayank Bansal, then made presentations to SEBI showing Jane Street's trading patterns. Bansal had agreed to speak to Al Jazeera about his interaction with SEBI on the matter, but then backtracked.
On July 3, in a detailed interim order, the regulator said that 'by preponderance of probability, there is no economic rationale that can account for this sudden burst of large and aggressive activity … other than the intent to manipulate the price of securities and index benchmark'.
SEBI has alleged that Jane Street accumulated large long positions in stocks that are a part of the NSE's Bank Index and built large short positions in index options at the start of trade. Around market closing time, it would reverse its trades in the cash and futures segments, pushing down the index and earning large profits in the options segment.
This activity was blurred by its offshore entities making some of these trades.
'Lawyers [can] push back with SEBI on jurisdiction-related issues, but when underlying [Indian] securities are issued, SEBI can take action,' Joby Mathew, managing partner at the law firm Joby Mathew and Associates and a former legal officer at SEBI, told Al Jazeera.
Jane Street has disputed SEBI's findings and has hired lawyers to represent it before SEBI in the case. It has deposited the 48.43 billion rupees ($563m) of allegedly ill-gotten gains in an account pending the investigation and final report.
'Such processes typically take eight to 24 months,' especially in 'complex manipulation cases', Sumit Agarwal, a former SEBI officer and cofounder of Regstreet Law Advisors, told Al Jazeera in an emailed response.
But the investigation can only be part of a broader questioning of Jane Street and the regulator's role in identifying and curbing such trades sooner and protecting retail investors.
'Highly speculative and volatile'
As India's options market grew, retail investors were drawn to it, enticed by the growing volumes, the prospect of quick gains and less fettered trades than the equities market, where a rapidly rising stock could hit circuit breakers, leading to a halt in trading to prevent manipulation.
Mathew says his clients from the options trading segment range from students to award-winning cardiologists who may not have a refined knowledge of the market but were sold on the idea by traders or social media influencers. Most ended up losing money.
Deven Choksey, managing director at the Mumbai-based stock brokerage KR Choksey Shares and Securities, says retail investors form nearly half the Indian options market, while Jane Street and other sophisticated institutions form a little more. 'It's like a bullock cart facing a race car. Their meeting is bound to cause accidents.'
If Jane Street is found to have manipulated the market, its earnings would have come through losses for retail investors.
Bhargavi Zaveri, a financial regulations researcher formerly at the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy and currently a doctoral researcher at the National University of Singapore, says retail investors have made losses in the options segment, but the total amount is not clear.
Identifying and compensating investors can be hard in such cases. So even if the final order goes against Jane Street and the 48.43 billion rupees fine goes into an investor protection fund, it may be hard to distribute it onwards to retail investors who incurred losses. The best protection may be to stem irregular trades early, experts say.
'SEBI has a surveillance system and they can well monitor the markets in a timely way.,' says Choksey.
SEBI's interim order is based on trades made by Jane Street between January 1, 2023 and March 31, 2025, a period in which retail investors may have incurred substantial losses, going by SEBI's estimates.
Regstreet's Agarwal says, 'SEBI's own 2024 consultations flagged expiry day options as highly speculative and volatile.'
India has fortnightly expiry dates for options, which is when they have to be settled. That is when Jane Street allegedly manipulated prices.
In a February 6 letter, SEBI told Jane Street, 'The above trading activity prima facie appears to be fraudulent and manipulative.' But it did not issue its order curbing Jane Street until July 3.
SEBI's recent measures limiting weekly expiries, tightening spreads and higher margins 'reflect a push for greater protection' for retail investors, Agarwal says.
But the best way to protect retail investors would be to have them trade separately from proprietary trading firms in the options segment, Choksey points out.
'India is unique … and in no market will you see so many retail investors. So, SEBI must create product differentiation by customer segment.' to protect retail investors Chiksey says.
Challenges in proving manipulation
In an internal email, Jane Street reportedly told employees it was using 'basic index arbitrage trading' and called SEBI's allegations 'extremely inflammatory'. It has hired Mumbai-based law firm, Khaitan and Co, to represent it before SEBI.
Proving price manipulation involves showing intent, which can be hard, and experts are divided on whether a SEBI investigation will be able to demonstrate that. 'Trading to incur losses makes no sense, and so it indicates manipulation,' says Mathew, the former legal officer.
But NUS's Zaveri says it is not so clear. 'I think three problems are being conflated here. One, the size of the options segment being manifold the underlying cash segment. Two, that retail investors have made losses on the options segment, which I'm not sure have been quantified. Three, Jane Street arbitraged between an illiquid cash and highly liquid options segment.'
According to her, the three occurrences may not prove the intent to manipulate.
Under Indian law, proving manipulation is challenging and 'Jane Street can argue its expiry day trades were legitimate index arbitrage recognised by regulators, making a manipulation finding difficult without clear intent evidence,' Regstreet's Agarwal says.
Any action by SEBI could affect Jane Street's reputation. Last month, an investigation by Bloomberg found that Jane Street cofounder Robert Granieri was duped into funding weapons for an attempted coup to overthrow the government in South Sudan.
If SEBI's final order lays out any action against Jane Street, 'they may well have to disclose it in their filings, which will affect them elsewhere in the world', says Mathew.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
At least six killed in crowd crush at Hindu temple in India's Haridwar
At least six people have been killed and dozens injured in a crush after a large crowd gathered at a popular Hindu temple in northern India's Uttarakhand state. The incident at the Mansa Devi Temple in Haridwar city occurred on Sunday after a high-voltage electric wire reportedly fell on a temple path, triggering panic among the large crowd of devotees. 'The sight of the wire falling caused immediate panic, and a desperate scramble to escape led to the stampede,' local police official Ritesh Saha told The Times of India newspaper. Vinay Shankar Pandey, a senior government official in Uttarakhand, confirmed the deaths. Hospital officials said one person was electrocuted, while others died in the ensuing stampede, Indian media reports said. Police and emergency services rushed to the scene after the incident and launched a rescue operation. Nearly 35 injured people were transported to a nearby hospital, officials said. 'The situation is now under control,' Pandey told The Associated Press news agency by phone from Haridwar. 'But the panic led to tragic consequences.' Authorities are investigating what caused the overhead wire to collapse and whether proper crowd management protocols were in place. The temple town draws millions of visitors each year. 'It is extremely distressing to receive news of a stampede on the route to the Mansa Devi Temple in Haridwar,' Uttarakhand's Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami posted on X. Crowd surges at religious gatherings are not uncommon in India, where massive groups often congregate at temples or pilgrimage sites, sometimes overwhelming local infrastructure and security measures. In June, a sudden crowd surge at a Hindu festival in the coastal state of Odisha triggered a stampede that killed at least three people and injured several others. The previous month saw six people crushed to death in the western state of Goa after thousands gathered for a popular fire-walking ritual. In January, at least 30 people were killed in an early morning crush at the Kumbh Mela, a Hindu mega-festival in Uttar Pradesh state's Prayagraj district.


Qatar Tribune
4 days ago
- Qatar Tribune
India, UK sign FTA with aim to enhance bilateral trade to $120 billion by 2030
Agencies London In a historic step, the India-UK free trade agreement (FTA) was signed in the presence of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The trade deal which was agreed upon in May this year, was signed on Thursday during PM Modi's visit to the United Kingdom. The agreement has been finalised with an aim to enhance bilateral trade to $120 billion by 2030, effectively doubling the current trade volume between both nations. The free trade agreement signed today will help in facilitating reduced tariffs on exports of labour-intensive goods including leather, footwear and clothing, whilst reducing import duties on British whisky and automobiles. The trade agreement was formalised with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in attendance, with Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal and British counterpart Jonathan Reynolds signing the document. The agreement requires the British Parliament's endorsement before implementation, a process anticipated to take approximately one year, according to a PTI report. The agreement ensures that 99 percent of exports from India would receive duty-free access to British markets. On a braid basis tariffs on UK's exports to India will come down from 15 percent to 3 percent, implying cheaper goods available for Indians. Such bilateral trade arrangements typically involve both doing away with or substantially lowering customs duties on the majority of traded goods. Additionally, they aim to simplify regulations in order to encourage service trade and mutual investments. India's agricultural industry is positioned to benefit in a big way. India's global agricultural exports stand at $36.63 billion, whilst the UK's total agricultural imports are $37.52 billion. However, UK's imports from India are merely $811 million. The British market presents lucrative opportunities for specialised Indian agricultural products, including tea, mangoes, grapes, spices and seafood items, amongst others. The India-UK FTA has sections addressing different aspects of trade; this includes goods, services, innovation, government procurement, and intellectual property rights. The FTA's key provisions include halving import duties on UK-produced whisky and gin from 150 percent to 75 percent to begin with, followed by a further decrease to 40 percent within a decade. Additionally, tariffs on automobiles will see a big reduction from over 100 percent to 10 percent. This is subject to quota restrictions. The agreement also aims to facilitate market access and cost-effective trade for businesses and Indian consumers via reduced import duties on various products. These include cosmetics, aerospace components, lamb, medical equipment, salmon, electrical machinery, soft drinks, chocolate and biscuits. The agreement will create export prospects for domestic sectors that employ substantial workforce, encompassing textiles, marine products, leather goods, footwear, sports equipment and toys, gems and jewellery, engineering products, automotive components and engines, alongside organic chemicals. The services component of the trade deal will facilitate the movement of diverse professionals, including independent professionals—such as yoga instructors, musicians, and chefs—business visitors, investors, contractual service suppliers, intra-corporate transferees, as well as their partners and dependent children who are granted the right to work. India and the UK have also finalised discussions on the Double Contribution Convention Agreement, which is also known as the social security agreement. This arrangement would mean that Indian professionals working temporarily in Britain will not have to make duplicate payments towards social security funds.


Al Jazeera
4 days ago
- Al Jazeera
UK and India sign free trade agreement during Modi visit
The United Kingdom and India have signed a trade agreement that will reduce tariffs on goods from textiles to whisky, cars and spices and allow more market access for businesses. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer hailed the agreement on Thursday as a 'landmark moment' for both countries. Starmer hosted Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at his Chequers country estate, northwest of London, where the UK and Indian trade ministers, Jonathan Reynolds and Piyush Goyal, formally signed the agreement. Starmer and Modi announced in May that they had struck a free trade agreement after three years of stop-start negotiations, with both sides hastening efforts to clinch a deal in the shadow of tariff turmoil unleashed by United States President Donald Trump. The deal must still be ratified by the UK Parliament. 'This is not the extent or the limit of our collaboration with India,' said Starmer. 'We have unique bonds of history, of family and of culture, and we want to strengthen our relationship further, so that it is even more ambitious, modern and focused on the long term.' Starmer also said the deal was 'the biggest and most economically significant trade deal' the UK has made since leaving the European Union in 2020, though the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has forecast that UK exports and imports will be about 15 percent lower in the long run compared with if Brexit had not occurred. Modi, standing alongside Starmer during a media appearance, described the deal as a 'blueprint for our shared prosperity'. For India, the deal represents its biggest strategic partnership with an advanced economy, and one which could provide a template for a long-mooted deal with the EU as well as talks with other regions. The two countries also announced almost 6 billion pounds ($8nm) in trade and investment deals in areas including AI, aerospace and dairy products, and pledged to work more closely together in areas such as defence, migration, climate and health. The UK and India hope the accord will boost trade between the two countries by 25.5 billion pounds ($34.4bn) and eventually add 4.8 billion pounds ($6.5bn) a year to the UK economy. The UK government said the deal will reduce India's average tariff on British goods from 15 percent to 3 percent. Import taxes on whisky and gin will be halved from 150 percent to 75 percent before falling to 40 percent by year 10 of the deal. Automotive tariffs will fall from more than 100 percent to 10 percent under a quota. India's Ministry of Commerce and Industry said in May that 99 percent of Indian exports will face no import duty under the deal, which applies to products including clothes, shoes and food. Britain and India are the sixth and fifth largest global economies respectively, with a trade relationship worth about 41 billion pounds ($55.3bn) and investment supporting more than 600,000 jobs across both countries. During Modi's two-day visit, Starmer and the Indian prime minister were also likely to discuss last month's Air India disaster in which 241 people died when a London-bound flight crashed after taking off from Ahmedabad in western India. Some 169 Indian passengers and 52 British nationals were killed in the June 12 crash, one of the deadliest plane disasters in terms of the number of British fatalities. Starmer and Modi have met twice recently, at the G7 summit in Canada last month and at the G20 meeting in Brazil last year. Modi was also due to meet with King Charles III during his brief stay in the UK, his fourth visit since becoming India's leader in 2014.