Delayed PSC races heat up as candidates take aim at Georgia Power rate hikes, data center growth
Several candidates are vying to defeat a pair of incumbent Republican Georgia Public Service commissioners in an election that challengers say will become a referendum on rising Georgia Power bills.
Consumer watchdogs worry that the state's largest utility will continue to raise rates on residential customers as it girds for a wave of data center growth that will spike demand for electricity over the next decade.
Qualifying for the Public Service Commission races wrapped up Thursday with Commissioner Tim Echols, who represents a wide swath of east Georgia, and Commissioner Fitz Johnson, who represents metro Atlanta, declaring their reelection bids.
Echols will face challenger Lee Muns in the June 17 Republican Primary for the commission's District 2 seat.
The winner of the GOP primary will advance to a Nov. 4 general election against Savannah Democrat Alicia Johnson, who is unopposed in her primary.
This fall, Johnson will face the winner of the June 17 District 3 Democratic primary between DeKalb County clean energy advocate Peter Hubbard, former Atlanta state Rep. Keisha Sean Waites, technology advisor Robert Jones and Daniel Blackman, who will wage a second campaign after narrowly losing the 2020 election in a runoff to longtime Commissioner Lauren 'Bubba' McDonald.
The PSC general election will be included on ballots for the Nov. 4 municipal election.
The statewide election is taking place on an irregular schedule for PSC races that typically result in staggered six-year terms in five commission districts. This year's primary and general election will mark the first time since 2020 PSC contests will appear on Georgia ballots.
Echols' 2022 election was delayed by a lawsuit challenging the commission's at-large district election process as being unfair to Black voters.
Commissioners represent – and must reside in – one of the five districts but are elected statewide.
This years' PSC candidates said they'll work hard to drum up interest because turnout will be lower than when there are higher profile races for governor, Congress, and the White House on the ballot.
The challengers said they'll be campaigning as the best candidate to fight on behalf of the public in Georgia Power cases that the current five member Republican commissioners have routinely given the green light to increase utility costs and fossil fuels.
Echols, who is running for his third term on the PSC, said he'll campaign on his support of Georgia Power's reinvestment in its power grid and natural gas system.
Echols said he's been supportive of clean energy technologies like electric vehicles and solar energy and is proud of voting in favor of increasing affordability initiatives for Georgia Power seniors and low-income customers.
'We also want to continue to make Georgia the best place to do business because when these companies come they provide jobs and when companies compete like Hyundai and Gulfstream in Savannah, the consumer wins because they make more per hour,' he said.
Through his career in the construction industry, Muns says he learned how to build power plants in the most cost-effective way.
Muns served five years on the Georgia Professional Standards Commission and is a former Columbia County school board member.
Muns said state regulators will have important decisions to make on the growth of mega data centers, the driving force in Georgia Power's 2025 calls for significantly increasing its energy capacity over the next decade.
'In Georgia, we've got aging facilities,' Muns said. 'We're fortunate. We've got two nuclear power plant reactors that have come on board. But the thing that's concerned me as I followed that process was the significant (Plant Vogtle) cost overruns.'
Alicia Johnson said her 25 years of policy advocacy in Savannah will help her pursuit of more clean, sustainable, and affordable energy in Georgia.
She criticized the commission's approval of six Georgia Power rate hikes since the start of 2022.
'We believe that the underlying costs can be assumed by the companies themselves and not rolled over into the homes of everyday Georgia citizens who are now choosing between prescriptions and groceries, who are making choices between, paying their rent or their mortgage and getting gas,' Johnson said.
Fitz Johnson was appointed by Gov. Brian Kemp in 2021 to fill a vacancy on the commission and will stand for reelection for the first time.
Heading into his first bid to keep his seat on the regulatory panel, Fitz Johnson acknowledges the pushback from many Georgia Power customers about higher utility bills.
He said it's important for the PSC to properly balance the needs of ratepayers while Georgia Power's long-term Integrated Resource Plan case and the electric rate cases are decided this year.
'As part of our rule with the data centers… they are going to have to guarantee that contract so we don't have the overbuild of infrastructure,' Johnson said. 'Georgia Power, and I'm sure the power companies around the state, are doing a lot of pre-planning to make sure that we don't overextend ourselves, to make sure that the fit is just right.'
Johnson attributed some of the rising utility costs to inflation and said he hopes to see rates stabilize under the Trump administration.
Blackman spent the last few years serving under President Joe Biden as a regional administrator for the Environmental Protection Agency where he implemented $3.5 billion in federal funding for projects that includes electrifying school buses and for water infrastructure in DeKalb County.
He said he aims to add new transparency to the extent that data centers are boosting household utility rates, while advocating for low-income energy assistance programs and helping build a secure electric grid that makes up the network of infrastructure that powers homes and businesses.
'Our grid is extraordinarily important,' Blackman said. 'Whether we're protecting it from a national security risk or an extreme weather event, my goal is to campaign on a platform that ensures we can have a reliable grid without overburdening the ratepayers.'
Waites is an Atlanta Democrat who served in the Georgia House of Representatives from 2012 to 2017. She resigned from the House in September 2017 to make a run for chair of the Fulton County Commission before finishing in second place. After being elected to the Atlanta City Council in 2021, Waites resigned in 2024 to launch a bid for Fulton County Superior Court clerk.
Hubbard, who works as a clean energy advocate for nonprofit Georgia Center for Energy Solutions, said he is running for the District 3 seat since the PSC 'ignores' evidence he's presented while intervening in Georgia Power Company's Integrated Resource Plan cases since 2019.
Hubbard has pledged in campaign statement that he 'will put an end to the grift and disinformation that are raising your power bills.'
'Residential power bills in Georgia have gone up $60 per month in just the last three years. This is because the current Public Service Commission approves each fossil fuel plan that Georgia Power Company gives it,' Hubbard said.
Robert Jones said he's prepared to become the District 3 state regulator after gaining experience in energy and communications regulation in California.
He criticizes the current commission's decisions allowing Georgia Power to shift some construction cost risks to consumers and the company's fight against the expansion of household rooftop solar power growth. Jones said as commissioner he would advocate for rooftop solar and reducing fossil fuel use.
'I think as an investor-owned profit making utility, they should assume more of the risk for their capital investments,' Jones said. 'I think the commission erred by rejecting net metering on solar power. Rooftop solar power is where we need to be going in Georgia. It's not a threat to Georgia Power.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
a few seconds ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Compares Himself to Richard Nixon in New Post
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. President Donald Trump drew comparisons with former Republican President Richard Nixon when he posted a photo of himself pointing at Russian President Vladimir Putin in a side-by-side with Nixon doing the same with Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev. Trump has previously compared himself publicly to Nixon in interviews, saying he learned from Nixon and contrasted his own political support to what he described as Nixon's lack of backing during his downfall, according to Forbes. Newsweek reached out to the White House by email on Thursday for comment. Why It Matters Trump met with Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, last week to discuss the invasion of Ukraine and seek a way towards a peace deal. Many criticized the president both for his red carpet rollout to greet the Russian president as well as the aftermath, which saw Trump walk away without a deal after saying that he would see such a result as a failure. The two world leaders spoke for two-and-a-half hours and addressed details of a potential ceasefire, and they took no questions immediately after the talks ended. US President Donald Trump smiles during a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on August 18, 2025. US President Donald Trump smiles during a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on August 18, 2025. Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images What To Know Trump has vigorously defended his summit with Putin, writing on Truth Social on Sunday: "It's incredible how the Fake News violently distorts the TRUTH when it comes to me. There is NOTHING I can say or do that would lead them to write or report honestly about me. I had a great meeting in Alaska on Biden's stupid War, a war that should have never happened!!!" However, the criticism has persisted even as Trump works towards a potential trilateral meeting that would bring Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky face-to-face for the first time since the invasion started in 2022. Trump again defended his "peace through strength" approach by posting a picture of himself and Putin in a mirror to one of Nixon and Khrushchev. He wrote nothing in the post. Photo comparison posted by President Donald Trump on Truth Social showing himself and Russian President Vladimir Putin in juxtaposition with a photo of President Richard Nixon meeting Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev. Photo comparison posted by President Donald Trump on Truth Social showing himself and Russian President Vladimir Putin in juxtaposition with a photo of President Richard Nixon meeting Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev. via President Donald Trump Truth Social On Truth Social, the president's native platform, many praised Trump with their own meme responses, with many of those posts repeating the "peace through strength" line that the president has used in the past while also denigrating former Democratic Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. On X, opinions varied more, with some finding the comparison unflattering – not because of Nixon's history, which saw him resign from the presidency after his involvement in the Watergate scandal emerged, but because of the way Nixon and Trump have each approached their respective Russian counterparts. Phillips P. Obrien, a professor of Strategic Studies at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland, wrote that the "remarkable thing about these pictures Trump just tweeted is that he thinks people won't see the difference between Nixon and Khrushchev disagreeing and he and Putin joking. Putin is clearly laughing." Another user highlighted that Khrushchev and Putin themselves are representative of different geopolitical approaches, with Khruschev responsible for returning Crimea to Ukraine while Putin annexed the region in 2014. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump, in a subsequent Truth Social message, wrote: "It is very hard, if not impossible, to win a war without attacking an invader's country. It's like a great team in sports that has a fantastic defense, but is not allowed to play offense. There is no chance of winning! It is like that with Ukraine and Russia. Crooked and grossly incompetent Joe Biden would not let Ukraine FIGHT BACK, only DEFEND. How did that work out? Regardless, this is a war that would have NEVER happened if I were President - ZERO CHANCE. Interesting times ahead!!! President DJT." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wrote on X, in part: "Now, each day carves out the contours of future security architecture for Ukraine. Weapons, funds, cooperation with partners, forces on the ground, in the air, and at sea. And every day, there will be new steps taken by partners to support Ukraine. Thank you to everybody helping." French President Emmanuel Macron earlier this week wrote on X: "In Washington, alongside President Zelensky and with our partners, we reiterated to President Trump our commitment to continue uniting our efforts for a strong and lasting peace that preserves Ukraine's interests and the security of Europeans. This peace will necessarily involve providing Ukraine with robust security guarantees, on which we have decided to work very concretely with the United States. It is also clear in our minds that pressure on Russia must continue as long as this peace has not been established."
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How should Democrats engage in the redistricting arms race? Texas, Ohio leaders weigh in
As a nationwide redistricting arms race unfolds, Ohio Democrats say they're ready to fight back against unfair GOP maps when the battle hits the Buckeye State. Across the nation, politicians are jockeying for control of the U.S. House of Representatives in 2026 by redrawing the districts where candidates run for office. Republicans hope to shore up support heading into the midterm elections, which have traditionally gone poorly for the party in power. Texas Republicans are approving a President Donald Trump-backed map to add GOP congressional seats. Vice President JD Vance asked Indiana Republicans to add one GOP seat there. Meanwhile, California Gov. Gavin Newsom aims to create five new Democratic seats in the blue state to offset losses in Texas. Some Democrats have been divided on how to respond. But Texas Democratic Party Chair Kendall Scudder says he looks forward to blue states "throwing down" to create more Democratic districts elsewhere. "I don't think that California went far enough," Scudder said during a news conference with Ohio Democratic Party leader Kathleen Clyde. "I think they should absolutely obliterate Republicans in blue states whenever they are drawing these maps, because that is the only language that these people speak anymore." Clyde was less fiery in her response. "While I'm certainly focused on Ohio, I do think Democrats should feel free to do what is best for their state to fight back against this national Republican power grab," Clyde said. Ohio redistricting starts soon. How will Democrats respond? Ohio is poised to redraw its congressional map this fall because of anti-gerrymandering rules that voters approved in 2018. Without Democratic support, Ohio's first map lasted only four years. Like in Texas, Republicans will control all aspects of redrawing Ohio's congressional map. Ohio's current congressional delegation includes 10 Republicans and five Democrats. With a new map, Republicans could pick up two to three more seats, depending on how aggressive they are. Ohio Republican Party Chairman Alex Triantafilou said voters can feel good about redistricting here. 'Ohio voters can have full confidence in the bipartisan, constitutionally established Redistricting Commission as it carries out the responsibility of redrawing our congressional districts," he said. Ohio Democrats have few cards to play, as Republicans control the state legislature, most of the Ohio Redistricting Commission, and all but one seat on the Ohio Supreme Court, which is tasked with determining if the new map violates anti-gerrymandering rules. But Clyde said Ohio Democrats won't compromise and vote for a gerrymandered map. "No Democrat should vote for a map that doesn't represent the will of the voters, and Democrats are unified in our opposition," Clyde said. More: Redistricting: Ohio must draw a new congressional map. Republicans hold all the cards Clyde also outlined options if Republicans approved a map that unfairly increases GOP seats in the state. Ohio Democrats could sue, have Ohioans vote on the map using a process called the referendum or pursue another redistricting reform ballot measure. Texas Democrats, for their part, are already planning to sue over their new congressional map. "We are going to throw down and fight every step of the way. If the maps pass in Texas, we'll see them in court," Scudder said. State government reporter Jessie Balmert can be reached at jbalmert@ or @jbalmert on X. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: What options do Democrats have in red state redistricting?


The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
Montana Republicans call for 50 percent tariff on Russian palladium imports
The Montana congressional delegation is urging President Trump to introduce a 50 percent tariff on Russian palladium imports, after a multinational mining group with a presence in the state submitted a similar request earlier this month. GOP Sens. Tim Sheehy and Steve Daines alongside Reps. Ryan Zinke and Tim Downing sent a Thursday letter to the Trump administration, asking officials to 'stop Russia's predatory trade practices and protect American jobs and critical mineral production.' 'Specifically, we urge you to immediately impose a 50 percent tariff on imports of unwrought palladium from Russia in response to their ongoing market manipulation and dumping,' the lawmakers wrote. Russia is currently one of the largest suppliers of palladium to the U.S., and its exports have increased by 42 percent over the last year, according to Reuters. Palladium is a chemical element used in catalytic converters, which converts 90 percent of harmful emissions from car exhaust. Sibanye-Stillwater, the mining company, said prices for the element are at risk of skyrocketing, skewing the global market in favor of Russia and South Africa, which is another large supplier of the chemical. 'Russia currently dominates global palladium production and has exploited this position to undercut American producers,' the GOP group wrote. 'By flooding the U.S. market with underpriced palladium bolstered by heavy state subsidies, lax environmental regulations, and government-controlled mining rights Russia is attempting to wipe out domestic competition and secure monopoly control of a mineral critical to both our defense and energy future,' they added, noting a 'catastrophic' impact on Montana workers. Sibanye-Stillwater's July 30 case will be considered by the federal government within the next year, per the letter, but the Montana Republicans said a 'final remedy' is needed sooner. They've asked the White House to respond promptly. Still, the Trump administration remains locked in peace negotiations with Russian President Vladimir Putin regarding the war in Ukraine. Earlier this month, the president decided to forego secondary sanctions on the Kremlin without explanation.