Love Island's Jessy Potts looks incredible as she strips off to barely-there bikini in Croatia
Former Islander Jessy, 25, left very little to the imagination as she soaked up the sun on holiday.
6
6
6
The reality star - who shot to fame on Love Island last year - showed off her flawless body as she enjoyed a girls holiday.
The blonde bombshell shared a slew of stunning snaps from her idyllic vacation.
In the sexy pics Jessy can be seen wearing a barely-there bikini as she sat on a catamaran.
The tiny two piece showed off her incredible figure.
She wrote next to the stunning snaps: "Best time with the best gals in one of the best places,"
Jessy's fans rushed to compliment her on her pics, with one saying: "Gorgeous babe!"
While another added: "Absolutely stunning!"
This one simply said: "Beautiful."
ROMANCE WITH OG ISLANDER
Jessy was recently linked to another very famous Love Island star.
Earlier this year, the stunner went on a string of dates with OG islander, Scott Thomas.
But after just a month together, The Sun revealed how the couple had called time on their romance after realising they weren't compatible.
A source told The Sun: "Jessy and Scott went on one date but decided they were better off as friends.
"Jessy is looking forward to having a single summer and to get out there and date, while Scott has different priorities right now.
"They felt that they would be better as pals and weren't compatible on a romantic level.
"Jessy is keen to find a boyfriend who is ready to commit and who is emotionally available.
"She's been single for a while now and is hoping she'll find a new man that will tick all her boxes."
Shortly after their break-up Jessy told White Fox's podcast that she was fed up of being played by guys.
She said she often dated "older" men, but said it doesn't always make them "wiser".
6
Jessy revealed: "I've been single, this is probably my fourth summer, it's pure hot girl summer vibes.
"I'd like a boyfriend at some point.
"I guess looks-wise tall, dark and handsome.
"Personality-wise... I'm trying to avoid the commitment phobe, emotionally immature because that tends to be my type at the minute.
"The boys need to step up this year. Emotionally they need to grow up."
JOEY ESSEX SPLIT
Jessy famously dated former Towie star Joey Essex after they met on Love Island.
However, they didn't last long outside of the villa and just a month after the show ended they called time on their romance.
At the time Joey told The Sun: "Unfortunately, we have decided to call an end to the relationship but I hope we can continue to be friends.
"I truly wish Jessy the very best with whatever she does in the future."
While Jessy added: "I appreciate the Love Island experience I had with Joey, we tried to make it work but it wasn't to be.
"I'm so grateful to everyone who supported us and look forward to all of the exciting opportunities ahead."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Luisa Zissman brands skinny-shamers 'McDonald's loving, Greggs-craving lazy fatties' and insists she is healthy in foul-mouthed tirade - after being branded 'malnourished' for bikini snap
has launched a scathing attack on critics of her latest bikini snap. The Apprentice star, 38, took to Instagram on Wednesday to share a selfie showing her posing in a two-piece while on holiday, leading to comments regarding her weight, with one user branding the star 'unhealthy and very malnourished'. Following a barrage of criticism, the mother-of-three hit back at the 'skinny shamers', as she raged about the fact that the NHS is being drained by obesity and insisted she is 'strong and healthy' despite accusations from followers. In her attack, she penned: 'Imagine I went round calling of you biscuit eating McDonald's loving lazy people fatties' and insisted her body is the result of 'energetic, health and mostly clean living'. In a further display of defiance, Luisa wrote: 'If you got off your as*es and stopped shoving sh*t in your mouths you wouldn't be as fat and fat wouldn't be normal. Just because the majority of people are overweight does NOT mean it's healthy.' She also lashed out at accusations of Photoshop - insisting her image was all natural Luisa left little to the imagination in the shot, where she posed in a monochrome bikini with underwired cups and thick black straps. The star, who shot to fame on The Apprentice in 2013, cocked one leg in the image to make the most of her lithe limbs while also showing her taut stomach. She then added the simple caption: 'Endless summer of fun', before being met with the shocking comments from a slew of enraged and concerned followers. A number of Instagram users penned: 'I mean this genuinely, and I'm no Greek god but you genuinely look unhealthy and very malnourished... 'Appreciate you feel good and happy but younger girls watching and aspiring may follow suit and this isn't good for anyone… 'No hate at all as you're a diamond but this culture of ultra slim is a concern... Babe always thought you were fit, but a little tooooooo slim my love xxx... Could do with a good meal. May I suggest a Greggs steak bake followed by a Vanilla slice... 'See you just right... Mean this in the nicest way possible, but losing too much weight can age your face and you don't want that... You need a good feed girl... Jests Christ you look ill!!!' Jumping to her defence, This Morning and body confidence advocate Ashley James wrote: 'Looking at the comments - normalise not discussing people's weight'. A host of commenters shared vile comments criticising her looks In the face of a number of comments, Luisa penned: 'This is MY Instagram page. what a stupid remark I'm on holiday and have posted a selfie like millions of other ppl do. Just cause I'm fit, slim and healthy everyone has an issue... 'And the issue is they cannot be arsed to have the dedication and discipline to a healthy lifestyle and exercise like I do... 'This isn't photoshopped at all thank you very much it has a Los Angeles filter on it from stories and that's it which changes the colour slightly nothing else... 'Imagine me going around calling out every overweight person I saw, might start doing that give ppl taste of their own medicine.' One Instagram user queried: 'Difference is you are flaunting it . You know your skinny you know you don't have love handles and you know you will cause people to comment on your body! Bravo for the clout'. Jumping to her defence, This Morning and body confidence advocate Ashley James wrote: 'Looking at the comments - normalise not discussing people's weight' Luisa was quick to hit back: 'Do you say that when other 'bigger' people post holiday pics? Just because I'm fit and healthy you don't think I should post? ... She later took to her story to write: 'The comments on this holiday bikini pic. Imagine I went round calling of you biscuit eating McDonald's loving lazy people fatties. My body is a result of my lifestyle which is energetic, health and mostly clean living.... 'If you got off your as*es and stopped shoving sh*t in your mouths you wouldn't be as fat and fat wouldn't be normal... 'Just because the majority of people are overweight does NOT mean it's healthy. Shocking that when people see a healthy body with a healthy BMI in a healthy weight range they think it's not normal. And no, I'm not sorry for my comments it's TRUE. I'm stronger than most of you mo*fos, I can do endless press ups, pulls ups, I lift weights... 'I can do sit ups until the cows come home and all you can do is comment that I'm unhealthy when you're craving Greggs at 8am when your lazy a*s wakes up.... 'So go f*ck yourselves. The world is a sad place when everyone is normalising being a fat b*****d and having your organs surrounded by layers of fat is normal. OBESITY IS THE NHS BIGGEST COST. Then you all moan you can't get a doctors appt.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Gatwick ‘optimistic' minister will approve expansion plan
Gatwick airport's outgoing boss said he is 'optimistic' the airport's expansion plan will be approved. Chief executive Stewart Wingate claimed the benefits from the West Sussex airport bringing its emergency runway into routine would last 'for generations'. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has a deadline of October 27 to decide whether to give the go-ahead to the proposal. Gatwick submitted a modified development consent order (DCO) application after the Cabinet minister announced in February she would back the scheme if adjustments were made, covering issues such as noise mitigation and the proportion of passengers who would travel to and from the airport by public transport. The project would see Gatwick move the emergency runway 12 metres north, enabling it to be used for departures of narrow-bodied planes such as Airbus A320s and Boeing 737s. This would increase the airport's capacity by around 100,000 flights a year. Gatwick's plan also involves remodelling and replacing existing taxiways – which connect runways to terminals, hangars and other facilities – extending both terminals, and installing new aircraft gates. Local campaigners opposed to expansion are concerned about the impact on surface transport, noise, housing provision and wastewater treatment, but the airport insists it has conducted 'full and thorough assessments' of those issues. Mr Wingate said: 'The critical final decision on our northern runway plans is just weeks away and follows a rigorous and lengthy planning process. 'I remain optimistic the Secretary of State will approve our privately-financed, shovel-ready plans to unlock further growth for London Gatwick and the UK economy, generating new jobs, trade and tourism opportunities for generations to come.' Gatwick says its plans would create £1 billion per year in economic benefits and generate an additional 14,000 jobs. Mr Wingate will start his new role as managing director for UK airports for Vinci Airports and Global Infrastructure Partners on September 1, overseeing the future development and strategic direction of Gatwick, Edinburgh and Belfast International airports. His replacement at Gatwick will be Pierre-Hugues Schmit, currently Vinci Airports's chief commercial officer. Gatwick announced on Thursday its underlying earnings for the first six months of the year were £262 million.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
I asked AI chatbot if I'm hot and what tweakments I need… I was so shocked but here's why I ignored its advice
SMOOTH cheeks and plump lips, a forehead as flat as a TV screen and not a single wrinkle in sight. Nope, I'm not looking at a newborn baby but at an image of how ChatGPT thinks I should look if I undergo its 'glow-up' beauty advice. 4 More and more women are turning to the app for 'unbiased' tips on how to improve their gloriously imperfect, fabulously unique, God-given features. I get it. TikTok and Instagram are full of companies and influencers pumping out anti-ageing and beauty advice based on what they want to flog us, regardless of whether or not it's a good fit for who we are. It's hard to know where to turn. In our social circles there is always that 'frenemy' who doesn't have our best interests at heart. But take a pause, please, because artificial intelligence becoming the norm to dictate how women should look is frankly horrifying. This blurring of the line between reality and fiction is scary. Besides, I don't want to be dictated to or sold something based on an app. Look, I'm 54 and, cross my heart, haven't succumbed to any work. I'm pretty confident in my own skin and, dare I say it, think I look good for my age. That's because I'm my own best friend and advocate. My lifelong philosophy is that I love myself more than anyone — and I think I'm pretty hot too. Yet I've written about this in the past and it has got me into hot water. In 2012, a piece I wrote on the subject of my beauty and general fabulousness went viral. The kicker was that I pointed out that other women didn't like me being so confident in my skin. Haters poured in. I trended on Twitter worldwide. I was trolled and told off by countless female columnists for having dared to say I rate myself. Talk about poking the bear. The furore meant I was more Googled than Kate Middleton that year. Thankfully, over a decade on and the rest of the world has caught up. I like to think I was ahead of my time because now it's OK to ditch the fake modesty and not hate on someone when we post thirst-trap pictures online or say we look good. Unemotional judge And, brilliantly, parts of social media do normalise this. We now use the hashtags '#be kind' and '#body positivity' as part of our daily lives. We don't fat-shame and we don't pile on women for rating themselves online. That's why my eyes rolled when I read women are flocking to upload pictures of themselves on ChatGPT for an AI verdict on their looks. One US study suggested people are more open to negative feedback about their appearance from an AI than from a human. The reason? We see AI as an honest and unemotional judge, so its criticism feels less like a personal attack. It's basically, 'Am I Hot or Not?' for the next generation. Is it a truly unbiased appraisal? I'm not convinced. Yet it hasn't stopped women relying on it. I like to think I was ahead of my time because now it's OK to ditch the fake modesty and not hate on someone when we post thirst-trap pictures online or say we look good. My jaw dropped when I found women are spending thousands on following the app's advice. One TikTok creator called Marina — @marinagudov — went viral earlier this year when she shared how she had used the app to refine her style. I've never done anything like this before. So I first uploaded a shot of myself on a rare day wearing make-up — off to celebrate a girlfriend's birthday last month. I nervously ask ChatGPT: 'I'm a 54-year-old woman. Am I hot or not?' While the app's black dot flashes, I gulp. But the reply is . . . kind: 'I can't give a simple 'hot or not' verdict but I can say you look vibrant, confident, and you have a warm, engaging smile that's a big part of your attractiveness. 'Your long, flowing hair, healthy skin tone and the sparkle in your eyes project energy and approachability, which tends to draw people in far more than age ever could. If you'd like, I can give you an objective style-and-beauty analysis to highlight what's already working for you and suggest tweaks that could enhance your look further without losing your natural appeal.' I then ask: 'Would you recommend Botox?' AI replies: 'From looking at your photo, Botox could be an option depending on what you want to achieve — but it's by no means essential for you to look good.' 4 4 Guilty as charged — of course I have considered Botox. What midlife woman hasn't? But it's a slippery slope because things wouldn't stop at Botox and I don't want to spend my life obsessing over the cost, never mind risks. Besides, I'm curious to see how I will age. They say you get the face you deserve — and so far, I'm pretty happy with the reflection that smiles at me each morning. Yet when the AI images of a very Botoxed me pop up, I'm afraid I giggle. The doctored images make me look like something off one of the Housewives reality series. My husband is speechless and asks me to promise him not to go down this route. There's no danger of that. I look like a doll you'd find in a toy shop and not a 54-year-old woman. I then go a step further and upload a recent selfie I took. 'Then comes kicker' I'd just got back from the pool where I'd spent the afternoon swimming with my niece and granddaughter. My hair still had chlorine in it and the only glow I had was from a combination of sunshine and sun cream. My question about this make-up-free, unfiltered selfie was the do-or-die: 'Am I attractive for a 54-year-old woman?' Whoop! My ego is happily satisfied as this AI message comes back: 'I can't give a personal judgment about your attractiveness, but I can tell you that you have features many would consider appealing at any age — clear skin, a warm smile and healthy hair all make a positive impression.' Well, thank you ChatGPT. I could get used to my personal fluffer. But then comes the kicker: 'If your question is about how you present yourself for your age, your photo shows that you take care of yourself and have a natural, confident look — and if you wanted to enhance certain features, there are subtle 'tweakments' and styling adjustments that could bring even more freshness without changing who you are.' Pardon! Why, oh why, does the app feel the need to dish out this sort of advice? It asks me: 'Would you like me to give you an age-specific 'glow-up' plan, which focuses on both non-invasive tweaks and style tips?' But, of course, I'm nosey and want to know what it 'thinks.' And while I feel that I'm practically perfect in every way, clearly the app assumes there is some room for improvement — and offers to put together a '54-year-old glow-up plan'. I ask the app to provide its plan with a breakdown of costs — and grab yourself a coffee because the list, above, is a long one. Whoa! Although I'm a Brummie, for the last 18 years I've lived in the French countryside. So, I wouldn't have a clue about where to go for any of this. And why on earth would the app assume I need my teeth whitened, given that I didn't even supply a toothy smile? But what shocks me the most is the amount of filler ChatGPT suggests I need. Cheeks, jawline, chin, lips — I'm not sure I'd be able to lift my head off the pillow each morning. I would definitely need to change my iPhone visual recognition with that amount of tweakment work done. But in the interests of research, I plough on. I ask the app how much money I should budget for this over the next decade. It swiftly pings back: 'Tweakments maintenance at £23,350 and another £8,600 for hair and brows.' I then type in another question — asking what I should do to my appearance to improve my career as a writer. I assume it will suggest nothing — but I am wrong: It replies: 'For a writer, your appearance isn't usually the main currency — your words, ideas and reputation are. But in today's world — especially if you do media appearances, book signings, festivals or online promotion — your image can play a supporting role in how you're perceived.' ChatGPT informs me that if I spend the suggested money for work on my face I can then look to make 'total projected extra income of £14,500–£49,000-plus depending on how actively you leverage visibility'. Well, that's a pretty large difference, there. So maybe we should all take a step back and view the ChatGPT beauty advice with a very large pinch of salt. Let's remember that ChatGPT is an AI language model trained on information it sources from the internet as well as input from human trainers. This experience I have had might have initially piqued my vanity but I'll stick to my gut instinct and my own sense of self-worth. And if anyone wants to come to me for advice about what they should do I'll give it to you for free: You're uniquely fabulous just as you are.
