Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell interviewed by US Justice Department official
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Friday wrapped up two days of interviews with Epstein's convicted associate.
But there were already all kinds of reasons to be sceptical of this move and what it could produce, given the motivations of the two sides involved.
And President Donald Trump epitomised all of them in a major way on Friday.
While taking questions on his way to Scotland, Trump repeatedly held open the possibility of pardoning Maxwell for her crimes.
'Well, I don't want to talk about that,' Trump said initially.
When pressed, he said, 'It's something I haven't thought about,' while conspicuously adding, 'I'm allowed to do it.'
This wouldn't be the first time Trump has appeared to dangle a pardon over someone providing evidence that could impact him personally and politically. (In this case, he has demonstrated past personal ties to Epstein, and his administration is scrambling to clean up its botched handling of the Epstein files after previously promising to release them.)
A similar situation played out during the Russia investigation, when Trump repeatedly left open the possibility of pardoning key witnesses like Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn and Michael Cohen. Critics alleged this amounted to obstruction of justice.
Special counsel Robert Mueller's report didn't draw conclusions on possible obstruction, but it did cite Trump's pardon comments as 'evidence' that Trump's actions 'had the potential to influence Manafort's decision whether to cooperate with the government.'
Manafort indeed wound up being a decidedly uncooperative witness, with a bipartisan Senate report saying his repeated lies hamstrung its own investigation. And Trump later pardoned him, in a move that could certainly be understood as a reward for his lack of cooperation.
That bit of history looms large here, given the parallels.
But Trump is really just exacerbating an already dubious situation. There were already plenty of reasons to be sceptical of this move to interview Maxwell, and nobody involved seems particularly bothered to address those problems or even combat the perception of them.
The first reason is the state of play in Maxwell's criminal case.
It might seem far-fetched that Trump would ever pardon a convicted child sex-trafficker like Maxwell (even though he did 'wish her well' after she was charged). But there are other things his administration could do to help her. Among them would be taking actions in her ongoing appeal of her 2021 conviction.
The Trump Justice Department has already taken highly suspect actions in another criminal case involving someone Trump wanted something politically from: New York Mayor Eric Adams.
The administration earlier this year moved to dismiss the charges against Adams, while suggestively citing its desire for the New York Democrat to assist in its crackdown on illegal immigration.
Multiple prosecutors resigned in protest, with one claiming it was a 'quid pro quo' in her resignation letter. And the judge in the case appeared to sympathise.
'Everything here smacks of a bargain: Dismissal of the indictment in exchange for immigration policy concessions,' the judge said.
Maxwell's lawyer, David Oscar Markus, has also been remarkably solicitous of Trump and the administration.
Openness to a pardon
Last week he called Trump the 'ultimate dealmaker' while claiming that the Justice Department had violated a deal with Maxwell.
This week, he praised the Trump administration's 'commitment to uncovering the truth in this case' and said he and Maxwell were 'grateful that the government is trying to uncover the truth.'
Markus on Friday also suggested an openness to a pardon.
'The president this morning said he had the power to do so,' Markus said, 'and we hope he exercises that power in a right and just way.'
Indeed, also relevant here are the lawyers involved.
Critics have cried foul that the DOJ official interviewing Maxwell was Blanche, rather than a non-political prosecutor who has been involved in the case who would have much more expertise. Not only is Blanche a top political appointee of Trump's; he's also his formal personal lawyer.
'The conflict of interest is glaring,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Thursday on X. 'It stinks of high corruption.'
What's more, Blanche appeared on a podcast last year with Markus and labelled him a 'friend.'
'You are by far the best out there,' Blanche said.
But one of the biggest reasons to be sceptical is that Maxwell is someone the Trump Justice Department – the first one, at least – labelled a brazen liar.
Back in 2020, the DOJ charged Maxwell with two counts of perjury – on top of the more serious charges she faced – while citing a 2016 civil deposition she gave.
In the deposition, Maxwell claimed no knowledge of Epstein's 'scheme to recruit underage girls for sexual massages,' despite later being convicted of helping in the effort. She also claimed she didn't know about Epstein possessing sex toys, which was contradicted by witnesses at her trial.
Maxwell's lawyers at the time said 'the questions asked were confusing, ambiguous, and improperly formed.'
She was never actually tried for perjury. After her conviction on the more serious charges, prosecutors agreed to dismiss the perjury charges if her conviction stood, citing a desire to avoid further emotional trauma for the victims.
But the Trump Justice Department in 2020 still called her credibility into question.
In a 2020 filing, it said Maxwell's lies 'should give the Court serious pause' about trusting her. It also said Maxwell's 'willingness to brazenly lie under oath about her conduct … strongly suggests her true motive has been and remains to avoid being held accountable for her crimes.'
All of that would seem relevant to today, especially given Trump's demonstrated willingness to wield his power to help people who help him – whether using pardons or anything else. Maxwell, who has years left in her 20-year prison sentence, clearly has motivation to say things Trump wants.
That doesn't mean the interviews of Maxwell couldn't glean something important. Even witnesses with credibility problems can provide important information, if it's corroborated with other evidence.
But right now, Trump and Co. aren't trying very hard to make this situation look kosher. And Trump's pardon comments take that to another level.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Coalition calls for Senate inquiry after Labor backflips on US beef exports ban
The Coalition wants a Senate inquiry into the government backflip to allow US beef exports into Australia, citing the 'concerning' timing of the decision amid stalled tariff negotiations. Labor has rejected claims the link to ongoing tariff discussions, stating the decision follows a lengthy review undertaken by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, which found new tracing protocols eliminated risks posed by beef sourced from Canada and Mexico but slaughtered in the US. However Nationals Leader David Littleproud says an inquiry is required to give 'assurance' that 'Labor isn't sacrificing our high biosecurity standards'. The probe would look at the threat of importing beef which has potentially been exposed to diseases, the risk assessment taken by the government, standards and protocol for US beef imports and the risk posed by future outbreaks. 'The timing of this decision, just as the Prime Minister seeks to obtain a meeting with the US President, is concerning,' Mr Littleproud said. 'Our biosecurity cannot be a bargaining tool. The protocol outlining the import conditions, only released today, provide little detail on the science and the traceability requirements.' Nationals senator Matt Canavan said an inquiry was needed to 'fully understand the urgency and advice behind the government's decision'. 'It's imperative we understand what impact Labor's decision will have on Australia's reputation as having the world's best and safest beef,' he said. 'Our biosecurity standards are world-leading and our beef producers deserve to know whether they are being sacrificed at the political alter.' Speaking during question time on Monday, Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said Labor had 'not compromised on biosecurity at all, in any way, shape or form,' and said Mr Littleproud a former agriculture minister, would be aware of the review processes. 'He would know about the industry engagement that has occurred throughout this process,' she said. 'The other thing that he would know is that the US and Australia traceability systems are equivalent and that the decision has been taken based on science … and of course all food imported into Australia must be safe and compliant with our food standards. 'The member opposite would know that the department's security assessment is done in the usual manner as it is done for every other imports into this country.' This comes after Trade Minister Don Farrell mistakenly said US President Donald Trump had directly asked Mr Albanese to remove the ban on US beef exports. Moments later Mr Albanese clarified that the issue was not directly raised in either of the three phone calls he's had with Mr Trump. Instead, he said Mr Trump had made the statement during his Liberation Day tariff announcement. Announcing the levies, which hit a 10 per cent levy on general Australian imports in April, Mr Trump singled out Australia's treatment of US beef. Originally published as Coalition calls for Senate inquiry after Labor backflips on US beef exports ban
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
A timeline of the Trump administration's shifting stance on releasing the Epstein files
The Trump administration's shifting stances on the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking case have landed it in immense political trouble. During the first six months of Donald Trump's second term, his government has gone from promising to release the so-called 'Epstein files', a collection of documents compiled by law enforcement over decades of investigations, to saying no further disclosures to the public would be appropriate. After a public backlash, the US government is now talking to Epstein's co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell in an apparent attempt to glean new information. Read on for a representative, but not exhaustive, timeline of Trump officials' statements on the Epstein case since he took power on January 20. January 30 'I will do everything, if confirmed as FBI director, to make sure the public knows the full weight of what happened in the past and how we are going to countermand missing children and exploited children going forward.' That was Mr Trump's nominee to lead the FBI during his confirmation hearing, before a panel of senators. He was responding to Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn, who had specifically asked him about the Epstein case. 'I have worked on this for years, trying to get those records of who flew on Epstein's plane and who helped him build this international human sex trafficking ring,' she said. 'I know that breaking up these trafficking rings is important to President Trump. 'So will you work with me on this issue, so we know who worked with Jeffrey Epstein in building these sex trafficking rings?' 'Absolutely, Senator,' Mr Patel replied. February 21 'It's sitting on my desk right now to review. That's been a directive by President Trump.' During an interview with Fox News, Attorney-General Pam Bondi was asked directly about the so-called Epstein 'client list', which the Justice Department now says doesn't exist. 'One of the things that you alluded to, and this is something Donald Trump has talked about – the Department of Justice may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients. Will that really happen?' asked host John Roberts. 'I'm reviewing that. I'm reviewing the JFK files, MLK files. That's all in the process of being reviewed,' Ms Bondi said after the quote above. Noteworthy, perhaps, is that tranches of files relating to the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. have indeed been released in the subsequent months. Ms Bondi has since claimed she was referring to the Epstein files broadly, not the 'client list' specifically, when she spoke to Fox News. February 27 'A lot of flight logs, a lot of names, a lot of information.' About a week after Ms Bondi's interview, a group of handpicked pro-Trump influencers were invited to the White House and given binders full of Epstein-related documents. It turned out most of them were already available to the public. The binders were essentially full of repackaged, old information. The recipients were Chaya Raichik, who runs a handful of social media accounts that mock progressives; Rogan O'Handley, whose online name is 'DC Draino'; comedian Chad Prather; former TV host Liz Wheeler; right-wing commentator Mike Cernovich; and conspiracy theorist Jack Posobiec, best known for spreading the outlandish 'Pizzagate' theory. The quote above is from another, different interview Ms Bondi gave to Fox News, on the eve of the documents' release. The binders were labelled with the words 'phase one', the implication being that more phases would follow. None ever did. 'The department remains committed to transparency and intends to release the remaining documents upon review and redaction,' the Justice Department said at the time. February 28 'We have flight logs. We have information, names. That will come out.' Speaking to British broadcaster Piers Morgan, Mr Trump's personal lawyer turned White House counsellor Alina Habba was unequivocal in saying more files would be released. 'America needs to remember one thing: we are going to be 'promises made, promises kept',' said Ms Habba. 'I believe in accountability.' She alluded to charges being brought against individuals other than Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in the future, saying people would 'go through their time in court'. March 1 'We will get everything. We will have it in our possession. We will redact it, of course, to protect grand jury information and confidential witnesses. But (the) American people have a right to know.' Another quote from Ms Bondi, from another Fox News interview, during which she assured viewers they would eventually see the 'full Epstein files'. March 3 'It's a new administration, and everything is going to come out to the public. The public has the right to know. Americans have the right to know.' Same person, same place. April 22 '100 per cent of all of these documents are being delivered.' This one comes from Donald Trump, speaking to reporters in the Oval Office. May 7 'There are tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children, or child porn, and there are hundreds of victims.' Ms Bondi was asked to respond to the concerns of Republican Congressman James Comer, who had told a podcast he thought the Justice Department 'does not have' relevant Epstein documents, and that was why 'they have not been released'. The Attorney-General said FBI officers were still working through 'the volume' of material. She said that process was taking time and that – not reluctance – was the reason for her delay in releasing more files. May, exact date unknown According to The Wall Street Journal, Ms Bondi briefed Mr Trump on the files at some point in May and told him his name appeared in them multiple times. She told the President a number of other high profile figures were mentioned too. 'Officials said it was a routine briefing that covered a number of topics, and that Trump's appearance in the documents wasn't the focus,' The Journal reported. At this meeting, Ms Bondi also relayed the decision of senior Justice Department officials to not proceed with releasing more Epstein files to the public. Mr Trump reportedly said he would defer to that decision. May 18 'I'm not going to tell people what they want to hear. I'm going to tell you the truth. And whether you like it or not is up to you. If there was a big, explosive 'there' there, we would have told you.' Mr Patel and his deputy Dan Bongino, both appointed by Mr Trump, did a joint TV interview in which they told viewers Epstein did kill himself in prison. Both men had previously stoked conspiracy theories suggesting he was murdered. 'I have reviewed the case. Jeffrey Epstein killed himself. There's no evidence in the case file indicating otherwise,' Mr Bongino added in a social media post. 'I'm not asking you to believe me. I'm telling you what exists and what doesn't.' May 19 'I know the Attorney-General has committed to releasing those files. I would defer you to the Department of Justice on her timeline. But when she has made a promise in the past, she has kept it, and I'm certain that she will in this case as well.' This was White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, referring to Ms Bondi. May 29 'There is nothing in the file at this point.' Mr Bongino again said that Epstein killed himself, and promised the government would soon release new video footage from the prison on the night he died. 'I'm just telling you what I see in the file,' he told Fox News. 'I just want to be crystal clear on this. I'm not asking anyone to believe me. I'm telling you what's there and what isn't. 'There is nothing in the file at this point, on the Epstein case, and there is going to be a disclosure on this coming shortly. 'We are working through some – there is video. That is something the public does not have.' This video would later be released, but as minutes were missing from it, and the camera in question was not actually pointing at Epstein's cell, it was not enough to satisfy sceptics. June 4 'On the Epstein files, listen, I know this is a hot potato for folks. I totally understand. My comments were clear. I'm not paid for my opinions anymore.' Mr Bongino, there – again during a Fox News appearance – was alluding to his previous job as a right-wing podcaster. Host Sean Hannity had pressed him on 'the Epstein file issue', saying his viewers wanted 'answers' on the case. 'The evidence we have in our files clearly indicates that it was, in fact, a suicide,' Mr Bongino told him. The Deputy Director did not address the Epstein files more broadly. June 5 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' The billionaire Elon Musk, in the middle of an acrimonious exit from the Trump administration after his stint running the cost-cutting 'department' DOGE, sent out this inflammatory tweet. Mr Musk, who was Mr Trump's largest political donor by far during last year's election campaign, has a rather long history of making extreme claims about those with whom he is feuding. So the credibility of his claim was hard to gauge. He later deleted it. June 6 'We're not going to push that s*** back out there. It's not happening, because then he wins. Not doing it. You want to hate me for it, fine.' This was Mr Patel, on Joe Rogan's podcast. And the 'he' in question was Epstein. The FBI Director told listeners 'we're going to give you everything we can', but was quite obviously downplaying expectations. July 7 'No further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.' This was the turning point, regarding public opinion. In a memo, signed by no one, the Department of Justice and FBI announced they were essentially closing the Epstein case, and no third parties would be pursued. 'The files relating to Epstein include a large volume of images of Epstein, images and videos of victims who are either minors or appear to be minors, and over 10,000 downloaded videos and images of illegal child sex abuse material and other pornography,' the memo said. 'Teams of agents, analysts, attorneys, and privacy and civil liberties experts combed through the evidence, with the aim of providing as much information as possible to the public while simultaneously protecting victims. 'Through this review, we found no basis to revisit the disclosure of those materials, and will not permit the release of child pornography. 'The systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list'. There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties. 'One of our highest priorities is combating child exploitation and bringing justice to victims. Perpetuating unfounded theories about Epstein serves neither of those ends. 'To that end, while we have laboured to provide the public with maximum information regarding Epstein and ensured examination of any evidence in the government's possession, it is the determination of the Department of Justice and the FBI that no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.' July 8 'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy's been talked about for years.' Mr Trump was incredulous when asked about the Epstein case by reporters. 'Are people still talking about this guy? This creep? That is unbelievable,' he said. 'I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this.' The remarks came during devastating floods in Texas. July 15 'No. No. She's given us just a very quick briefing, and in terms of the credibility of the different things that they've seen.' Mr Trump was asked, directly, whether Ms Bondi told him he was in the Epstein files. He denied it, without any qualification. He was also asked to explain why his own supporters were still talking about Epstein. 'I don't understand it, why they would be so interested. He's dead for a long time. He was never a big factor, in terms of life,' said Mr Trump. 'I don't understand what the interest or the fascination is. I really don't.' July 16 'Their new SCAM is what we will forever call the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax, and my PAST supporters have bought into this 'bulls***' hook, line and sinker.' The President escalated his rhetoric the next day in a lengthy social media post, telling his fans he no longer wanted their support if they cared about the Epstein 'hoax'. 'They haven't learned their lesson, and probably never will, even after being conned by the Lunatic Left for eight long years,' said Mr Trump. 'I have had more success in six months than perhaps any President in our Country's history, and all these people want to talk about, with strong prodding by the Fake News and the success starved Dems, is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax. 'Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work, don't even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don't want their support anymore!' July 17 'Ridiculous amount of publicity.' After The Wall Street Journal revealed a note Mr Trump wrote Epstein to mark his 50th birthday in 2003, the President instructed the Justice Department to move to unseal the grand jury transcripts from the government's prosecution of both Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. 'Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney-General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval,' he wrote on social media. 'This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!' He claimed not to have written the note to Epstein: a naked woman's body, drawn in marker pen, with Mr Trump's name signed in an imitation of her pubic hair. The strange note ended with the line: 'May every day be another beautiful secret.' Mr Trump also announced his intention to sue the newspaper for its reporting. July 23
7NEWS
2 hours ago
- 7NEWS
US Prime Minister Keir Starmer expected to push US President Donald Trump on Gaza ceasefire during upcoming talks
US President Donald Trump will host British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at his golf resort in Scotland for talks expected to range from their recent bilateral trade deal to the worsening hunger crisis in Gaza. Trump, riding high after announcing a huge trade agreement with the European Union late on Sunday, said he expected Starmer would also be pleased. 'The prime minister of the UK, while he's not involved in this, will be very happy because you know, there's a certain unity that's been brought there, too,' Trump said. 'He's going to be very happy to see what we did.' Starmer had hoped to negotiate a drop in US steel and aluminium tariffs as part of the discussions, but Trump on Sunday ruled out any changes in the 50 per cent duties for the EU and has said the trade deal with Britain has been 'concluded'. The two men are expected to travel from Trump's luxury golf resort in Turnberry, on Scotland's west coast, on Monday to a second sprawling estate owned by Trump in the east, near Aberdeen. Starmer was heading to Scotland from Switzerland, where England on Sunday won the Women's European Championship final. Casting a shadow over their visit has been the deepening crisis in the war-torn Gaza enclave, where images of starving Palestinians have alarmed the world. Starmer has recalled his ministers from their summer recess for a cabinet meeting, a government source said on Sunday, most likely to discuss the situation in Gaza as pressure grows at home and abroad to recognise a Palestinian state. The British leader on Friday said his country would recognise a Palestinian state only as part of a negotiated peace deal, disappointing many in his Labour Party who want him to follow France in taking swifter action. Trump on Friday dismissed French President Emmanuel Macron's plan to recognise a Palestinian state, an intention that also drew strong condemnation from Israel, after similar moves from Spain, Norway and Ireland in 2024. Trump said he understood Starmer wanted to discuss Israel, adding that while the US would increase its aid to Gaza, it wanted others to join the effort. Ukraine will also be on the agenda. Dozens of Gazans have died of malnutrition in recent weeks, according to the Gaza health ministry in the Hamas-run enclave, with aid groups warning of mass hunger among Gaza's 2.2 million people.
