logo
Government pressure on independent media fatal for democracy: Congress on action against Gujarat Samachar

Government pressure on independent media fatal for democracy: Congress on action against Gujarat Samachar

The Hindu16-05-2025
The Congress on Friday (May 16, 2025) flayed the Enforcement Directorate (ED) action against Gujarat Samachar founder, saying anyone raising their voice against the government or not compromising with the BJP will have to go to jail.
Bahubali Shah, one of the owners of the leading Gujarati newspaper Gujarat Samachar, was detained by the ED following a raid on their premises.
In a post on X, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge alleged that the government is putting pressure on independent media which is fatal for democracy.
मोदी जी ने हाल ही में एक इंटरव्यू में कहा था — "Criticism is the soul of Democracy"
गुजरात समाचार एक 93 वर्ष पुरानी संस्था है, जिसके वरिष्ठ संस्थापक, श्री बाहुबली भाई शाह जी को ED से गिरफ़्तार करवाकर मोदी जी ने सिद्ध किया है — Arresting critics is the first sign of a scared… — Mallikarjun Kharge (@kharge) May 16, 2025
Citing Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent interview in which he had said, 'Criticism is the soul of Democracy', Mr. Kharge said by getting the founder of Gujarat Samachar arrested by ED, "Modi ji has proved that arresting critics is the first sign of a scared dictator."
"Whoever raises voice against this government and who does not compromise with the BJP, will have to go to jail. The government putting pressure on independent media and using it to its own advantage is fatal for democracy," Mr. Kharge charged.
Congress' head of media department Pawan Khera said, 'Late last night the ED arrested Bahubali Bhai Shah of Gujarat Samachar. The 93-year-old newspaper has been a bold anti-establishment voice. This is the fate of those who have the guts to openly say that the emperor is naked.' Congress leader and former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Digvijaya Singh also said in a post on X, 'We admire the Guts 'Gujarat Samachaar' have always shown over the years. At least there are some people left in Media who have the courage to stand up and do impartial reporting. I am sure it is just 'witch hunting' to harass the owners, ultimately they would come out Clean. We all stand by them,' he also said.
We admire the Guts "Gujarat Samachaar" have always shown over the years. At least there are some people left in Media who have the courage to stand up and do impartial reporting.
I am sure it is just "Witch Hunting" to harass the owners, ultimately they would come out Clean.… https://t.co/Lqe7KsY8eF — Digvijaya Singh (@digvijaya_28) May 16, 2025
Criticising the government's action, Gujarat Congress chief Shaktisinh Gohil charged, 'In the Modi government, severe punishment is given for writing and speaking the truth — the latest case is from Gujarat.' He said ED raids were conducted on Gujarat Samachar and GSTV.
"Bahubalibhai Shah, 73-year-old director of 'Gujarat Samachar' has been arrested. His only crime was that he was continuously asking questions to the government and fixing their responsibility. But...The BJP government is not used to answers and accountability, so by sending ED, they trampled the rights of the fourth pillar of democracy," he said. Before this, the X handle of 'Gujarat Samachar' was also blocked in India, Mr. Gohil said.
"This dictatorial and arbitrary attitude of the Modi government is extremely dangerous for the country, against which we all have to raise our voice unitedly," the Gujarat Congress leader charged in his post.
Bahubali Shah is one of the directors of Lok Prakashan Limited, which owns the Gujarat Samachar. His elder brother, Shreyansh Shah, is the managing editor of the daily.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Seek nod to conduct Partition Day events, Kerala University colleges told
Seek nod to conduct Partition Day events, Kerala University colleges told

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Seek nod to conduct Partition Day events, Kerala University colleges told

Thiruvananthapuram: Close on the heels of widespread protests against governor-chancellor Rajendra Arlekar 's directive to observe 'Partition Horrors Remembrance Day' in higher education institutions on Aug 14, Kerala University college development committee director in-charge sent a circular to affiliated colleges against organising programmes without the consent of 'appropriate authorities'. Committee director in-charge Biju V had on Monday shared with affiliated colleges a communication he received from the office of vice-chancellor regarding chancellor's directive to observe Aug 14 as Partition Horrors Remembrance Day. In the new communique to affiliated colleges on Tuesday, reportedly at govt's behest, Biju pointed out that chief minister openly declared Kerala govt's policy regarding the commemoration of Partition Horrors Day. "In this context, steps in this regard may be taken with the consent of appropriate authorities," Biju said. Later, the committee director expressed his wish to relinquish his charge and informed VC in-charge Mohanan Kunnummal about it. CPM and Congress functionaries came out against governor's efforts to observe Partition Horrors Day, an idea first mooted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi a few years ago. Student organisations and youth organisations of both CPM and Congress registered strong protests against the proposal and said they wouldn't let such observance be forced upon students on campuses. According to sources, Raj Bhavan sent a letter to all universities a month ago regarding the Aug 14 programme. However, universities acted upon the same only after Raj Bhavan reminded them. The college development committee director in-charge's decision to send a circular nullifying the directive he shared with affiliated colleges, on VC's instructions, underscores the depth of the anarchy prevailing in the university. While Kerala, Kannur and KTU vice-chancellors asked officials concerned to share the chancellor's directive with principals of affiliated colleges, other ad hoc VCs instructed registrars concerned to take further steps. Cusat VC issued a directive to organise a seminar on the subject. The chancellor asked VCs to organise seminars or theatre performances to observe Partition Horrors Remembrance Day. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.

Ludhiana: Councillor alleges irregularities in vending zone relocation
Ludhiana: Councillor alleges irregularities in vending zone relocation

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Ludhiana: Councillor alleges irregularities in vending zone relocation

Congress councillor from Ward 94, Bhupinder Kaur, has written to the ministry of housing and urban affairs, accusing the Ludhiana Municipal Corporation (MC) of misusing public funds in shifting a vending zone project from the West constituency to the North constituency. In her complaint, Kaur alleged that a ₹ 1.2-crore Smart City project sanctioned for Zone D was moved to Zone A without due approval. (HT Photo) In her complaint, Kaur alleged that a ₹1.2-crore Smart City project sanctioned for Zone D was moved to Zone A without due approval. She said work orders for the vending zone were issued on September 21, 2022, but the location was later changed in violation of rules. According to Kaur, the new site is unnecessary as a vegetable market already exists nearby. She claimed the relocation was done to benefit an acquaintance allegedly planning to set up an illegal slaughterhouse, and that the project is being built on a prohibited green belt. 'This is a clear misuse of Smart City funds. Public money is being spent on an unnecessary project at an unsuitable location, all for personal gain,' she stated, urging the ministry to stop construction and order an impartial inquiry. MC officials rejected the allegations, saying the project was relocated to provide more space for vendors and reduce congestion. 'The change was made in the interest of public convenience, and there is nothing unlawful about it,' said Shamlal Gupta, superintending engineer of the MC.

CJI not superior to other SC judges, has same judicial powers: Justice Gavai
CJI not superior to other SC judges, has same judicial powers: Justice Gavai

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

CJI not superior to other SC judges, has same judicial powers: Justice Gavai

The Chief Justice of India is not superior to other judges of the Supreme Court and exercises the same judicial powers as the rest, Chief Justice B R Gavai said on Tuesday. The CJI made the observation as a three-judge bench, presided by him and comprising Justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria, took up an application by the Enforcement Directorate for recall of the court's April 26, 2023 judgment in Ritu Chhabaria vs. Union of India & Ors case. A two-judge bench of Justices (retired) Krishna Murari and C T Ravikumar it its 2023 judgment deprecated the 'practice' of investigating agencies filing chargesheet in court even before completion of probe so as to deny default bail to accused, and said that even in such cases the right of the accused to default bail will not be extinguished. As per the law, the chargesheet has to be filed within 60 days from the date of arrest of the accused in cases triable by lower courts and 90 days in cases triable by a sessions court. Failure to file the chargesheet within this period entitles an accused to default bail. Days after the April 26 ruling, the ED approached the SC and told a bench presided by then CJI D Y Chandrachud that the Delhi High Court had granted bail to the accused in a case probed by it based on the SC judgment in the Ritu Chhabaria case. The agency pointed out that the decision will have nationwide repercussions. By order dated May 12, 2023, the SC suspended the operation of the April 26 judgment. On Tuesday, CJI Gavai expressed his displeasure over the one-judge bench, even if that be the CJI-headed bench, hearing appeals against judgements of any other bench of the SC. 'When a bench of two learned judges of this court grants any relief, can another bench, merely because it sits in court number 1, of the same strength, sit in appeal over that judgment,' asked CJI Gavai. He said, 'We believe in adherence to the judicial propriety, judicial discipline. If we go on permitting this, then one bench merely because it does not like an order, will go on interfering with the orders of the other bench.' 'The Chief Justice of India is not superior to the other judges. He is the first among the others. The CJI exercises the same judicial powers as all other judges of this court,' the CJI said. Appearing for ED, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the three-judge bench that the petitioner in the matter in which the April 26 judgment was delivered had 'misused' the court's jurisdiction. He said initially, a person filed a petition saying her husband was in jail and sought permission to allow her to send him home-cooked food. 'Thereafter the petitioner (in the April 26 matter) filed a similar petition that 'my husband is also in jail, so permit me to serve him home-cooked food'. The petitioner further pointed out that a similar petition (the first petition) is pending before a particular bench… Both matters are listed together. Then first (petition) pales into insignificance. Subsequently, an Interlocutory Application (IA) is filed…in the second petition where the main prayer is home-cooked food. It says the chargesheet is filed with Section 173(8) CrPC, which says that further investigation is going on…' 'The SC (two-judge) bench takes the view that once you file a chargesheet with 173(8), you will get default bail because it is an incomplete chargesheet,' the SG said, adding that this was contrary to multiple larger-bench judgements. 'Thereafter all-across India, people started filing default bail applications once chargesheet was filed (with section 173(8)).' The counsel for the respondents sought to clarify that in the writ petition for allowing home-cooked food, the IA for default bail was filed before the first hearing of the case. On the first hearing, IA was allowed, and notice was issued in the writ petition. The SG said if the court did not want to look at the recall request, it can still consider the ED's SLP filed against the Delhi High Court order and settle the law. The court finally agreed to list it before a three-judge bench.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store