logo
How different constitutional drafts imagined India

How different constitutional drafts imagined India

The Hindu18 hours ago
India's path to becoming a republic was paved with a range of constitutional visions articulated by diverse political thinkers and movements before the adoption of the 1950 Constitution. Between 1895 and 1948, various drafts were proposed reflecting contrasting ideologies — from early liberalism to Gandhian decentralism to radical socialism. These five key constitutional drafts that preceded the final Constitution offer insights into differing interpretations of sovereignty, governance, economic justice, and cultural identity.
Early constitutional visions
The Constitution of India Bill, 1895, attributed anonymously but often linked to early nationalists like Bal Gangadhar Tilak, was one of the earliest efforts to frame a constitution for self-rule within the British Empire. Containing 110 articles, this draft proposed representative government, individual rights, legal equality, and a clear separation of powers. It emphasised civil liberties such as freedom of speech, the right to property, and equality before the law, setting forth a legalistic and liberal vision inspired by British constitutional models. It was more an aspiration for dominion status than a call for complete independence.
In contrast, M.N. Roy's Constitution of Free India: A Draft (1944), created under the Radical Democratic Party, was grounded in the philosophy of radical humanism and advocated a participatory form of democracy. Roy envisioned a federal India composed of linguistically organised provinces and promoted popular sovereignty as the bedrock of governance. His draft introduced the right to revolt as a safeguard against tyranny and featured a robust Bill of Rights encompassing civil and socio-economic guarantees. Citizens' committees were proposed to ensure grassroots participation, making Roy's vision strikingly ahead of its time in its emphasis on decentralisation, transparency, and social accountability. This document went well beyond traditional liberalism, promoting direct democratic control and economic equity.
A distinctive feature of Roy's draft was its rejection of parliamentary sovereignty in favour of a constitutionally entrenched republic where citizens, not legislators, were the ultimate locus of power. Roy's insistence on institutionalising political education, through mechanisms such as citizens' committees, highlighted his commitment to transforming subjects into active citizens. The draft was also unique in its clarity and precision: the Preamble defined the republic as a 'free, secular, federal, and democratic' polity, and the structure of government envisioned checks against bureaucratic centralism through provincial autonomy and public participation. Importantly, Roy's draft placed economic and social rights on equal footing with civil liberties — anticipating the eventual Fundamental Rights–Directive Principles split in the 1950 Constitution. Yet unlike the non-justiciable nature of the Directive Principles, Roy's socio-economic rights were enforceable and binding.
Homogenous yet secular
The Constitution of the Hindusthan Free State Act (1944), associated with nationalist right-wing circles such as the Hindu Mahasabha, presented a sharply contrasting perspective. It proposed a unitary state structure and declared India a sovereign 'Hindusthan Free State,' emphasising cultural unification through one language, one law, and one national culture. Yet, contrary to prevailing assumptions, the draft did explicitly guarantee religious freedom and equal treatment across castes and creeds. It affirmed freedom of conscience and the right to profess, practise, and propagate religion subject to public order and morality. It barred the State from endowing any religion or discriminating based on religious belief. The draft also explicitly rejected any state religion for the Hindusthan Free State or its provinces and prohibited the use of public funds for sectarian purposes. These provisions underscore a commitment to formal secularism and non-discrimination in public employment and education, despite the document's culturally homogenising tone and emphasis on national unity. The juxtaposition of these liberal guarantees with an overarching nationalist framework reflects the tensions within the ideological thrust of the draft.
In addition, the 1944 draft was one of the few to contain an explicit reference to the right of secession, stating that provinces could opt out of the Union under certain conditions — an unusual feature given its otherwise unitary orientation. It also mandated the state to promote 'moral and spiritual values,' thus embedding a civilisational mission into its constitutional logic. Its provisions for emergency powers and the duties of citizens echoed a strong state-centric ethos, while still including democratic processes such as direct election to the legislature and regular judicial review.
Decentralism to socialist democracy
On a very different note, the Gandhian Constitution for Free India, drafted in 1946 by Shriman Narayan Agarwal with a foreword by Mahatma Gandhi, sought to ground India's constitutional framework in indigenous traditions and moral values. This draft was built upon Gandhi's principles of non-violence, trusteeship, and rural self-sufficiency. It proposed a confederation of self-sustaining village republics (gram swaraj) as the basic unit of governance. Rejecting both industrial capitalism and Western legalism, the Gandhian model envisioned decentralised, minimalist governance led by ethical self-regulation rather than law enforcement. With its strong focus on khadi, agriculture, and cottage industries, it aimed to create a self-reliant, spiritually grounded republic, though critics found it impractical for governing a complex modern state.
Strikingly, however, the draft included a provision for the right to bear arms — a somewhat ironic inclusion in a constitution guided by Gandhian non-violence. Article 6 of the draft proclaimed that 'every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in accordance with such regulations as may be made by the Legislature,' revealing a pragmatic concession to the need for self-defence or resistance, even within a pacifist framework. This dissonance between the ideal of ahimsa and the constitutional recognition of arms underscores the tensions inherent in attempting to reconcile ethical philosophy with the imperatives of statecraft.
By 1948, the Socialist Party, under the leadership of Jayaprakash Narayan, offered its Draft Constitution of the Republic of India as a counter-proposal to the official draft prepared by the Constituent Assembly. This document was firmly rooted in Marxist and democratic socialist thought, advocating the nationalisation of all major industries, banks, and key services. It called for the abolition of private ownership of the means of production and proposed land reforms and workers' control over factories. This socialist draft envisioned a unicameral legislature composed of representatives from key social groups —workers, peasants, and intellectuals — thus rejecting the traditional liberal representative model in favour of a class-based system. It went further to assert that all land and natural resources were national property, and that planning would be conducted by a Central Planning Commission accountable to the legislature. Strikingly, the draft also offered an early commitment to gender equality and prohibited caste discrimination in any form. Civil liberties were acknowledged, but the document prioritised economic democracy, with socio-economic rights taking precedence over procedural safeguards. While it was bold in its redistributive commitments, the draft was less detailed in its administrative and judicial architecture, assuming that radical economic transformation would organically support political democracy.
Comparative analysis
When viewed comparatively, these drafts reflect divergent paths for India's future republic. The 1895 Bill and Roy's draft both championed democracy, but Roy's version expanded it through mechanisms like the right to revolt and participatory governance, departing significantly from the legalistic, elite-centred liberalism of the earlier proposal. Centralisation versus decentralisation is another crucial axis of comparison. While the Hindusthan Free State Act and the Socialist Party draft leaned towards a strong centralised authority to preserve national unity or effect economic restructuring, Roy's and the Gandhian drafts were deeply committed to decentralised governance, albeit in different ways — Roy through institutional federalism and democratic oversight, and Gandhi through autonomous village self-rule grounded in moral authority.
Economically, the spectrum ranged from the minimalist and agrarian Gandhian model, to Roy's emphasis on democratic economic planning, to the Socialist Party's full-fledged state socialism. The Hindusthan Free State draft, while largely silent on economic redistribution, offered a more complex picture than often presumed — it prioritised national cohesion but enshrined specific liberal protections around religious freedom and equality. Meanwhile, the 1895 Bill reflected an absence of economic radicalism, concerned primarily with civil liberties and political representation. Cultural and identity politics also played out markedly differently. The Hindusthan Free State draft projected a homogenised, majoritarian cultural identity, in contrast to the pluralistic and secular ethos implicit in Roy's draft and the Socialist Party's vision. The Gandhian model, while rooted in Indian traditions, emphasised unity through moral and communal harmony rather than cultural uniformity.
On civil liberties, the 1895 Bill and Roy's draft were strongest, both incorporating detailed rights frameworks. The Socialist Party draft prioritised economic rights over political ones, whereas the Gandhian draft focused more on duties and community values than on formal rights. The Hindusthan Free State draft, while ideologically nationalist, nevertheless provided robust constitutional guarantees for religious freedom and non-discrimination, challenging the assumption that it was devoid of liberal principles. In all, these constitutional drafts capture a vibrant pre-independence debate on the nature of the Indian state, reflecting ideological diversity and differing assumptions about governance, society, and citizenship. Though none of these drafts were adopted wholesale, elements from each filtered into the 1950 Constitution. Roy's ideas on decentralisation and rights, the Gandhian notion of panchayati raj, the Socialist commitment to economic justice, and even the legalistic structure of the 1895 Bill all left their mark. Their greatest contribution, however, may lie in showcasing the democratic imagination at play even before the republic was born — a testament to India's rich constitutional legacy and the multitude of futures it once contemplated.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PM Modi Lands In UK, Long-Awaited Free Trade Deal Expected Today: 10 Points
PM Modi Lands In UK, Long-Awaited Free Trade Deal Expected Today: 10 Points

NDTV

time8 minutes ago

  • NDTV

PM Modi Lands In UK, Long-Awaited Free Trade Deal Expected Today: 10 Points

The free trade agreement is India's first major bilateral trade agreement with a developed economy in over a decade. A 10-point cheat sheet on the free trade agreement to be signed by India and the UK The free trade agreement between India and the UK will be signed during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to London on July 24. Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal will accompany the prime minister. The two countries announced the conclusion of the negotiations for the trade agreement on May 6, after three years of negotiations. The trade agreement proposes to remove taxes on the export of labour-intensive products such as leather, footwear and clothing, while making imports of whisky and cars from Britain cheaper, in an effort to double trade between the two economies to USD 120 billion by 2030. After the free trade agreement is signed by the commerce ministers from both countries, it will require approval from the British Parliament before coming into effect, as the Indian cabinet has already given its consent to the deal. Britain is the sixth-largest investor in India with investments of around $36 billion. There are 1,000 Indian companies in the country, with 1,00,000 employees, with a total of $2 billion investment. 99% of Indian products will receive duty-free access to the UK market, covering nearly all of India's current trade value. Apart from the free trade agreement, the biggest the UK has done since leaving the European Union, the two sides also sealed a double contribution convention. It provides for exemption for employers of Indian workers from paying social security contributions in the UK. India's exports to the U.K. rose by 12.6% to $14.5 billion, while imports grew by 2.3% to $8.6 billion in 2024-25. The bilateral trade between India and the U.K. increased to $21.34 billion in 2023-24 from $20.36 billion in 2022-23. From London, PM Modi will travel to the Maldives at the invitation of President Mohamed Muizzu in what is being seen as a breakthrough in the ties between the two countries following a spell of frostiness under Mr Muizzu.

Who is Candace Owens? Right-wing commentator sued by French President Macron for defamation
Who is Candace Owens? Right-wing commentator sued by French President Macron for defamation

Hindustan Times

time37 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Who is Candace Owens? Right-wing commentator sued by French President Macron for defamation

French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron, have filed a defamation case against American hard-right podcaster Candace Owens. The couple, as per a filing in the Delaware state court, alleged that Owens had profited off spreading rumors that the French First Lady was born a biological male, Politico reported. Conservative influencer Candace Owens has been accused of defamation by French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte.(AP) The suit also claimed that Candace Owens had used the rumor to 'promote her independent platform, gain notoriety, and make money.' She also launched an eight-part podcast, Becoming Brigitte, focusing on various conspiracy theories about the Macrons and their relationship. According to the Financial Times, the Macrons are ready to appear for a trial in Delaware. As the controversy rages on, here is a look at who Candace Owens is. Also read: French president Macron sues influencer for claims that first lady was born male Who is Candace Owens? She is a right-wing influencer who often supported Donald Trump in his first presidential term. She has taken a critical tone over the past few months, particularly on matters like the president's links with deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, The Hill reported. Owens has worked for conservative organizations such as media outlet Daily Wire and the student group Turning Point. She launched her own podcast in 2024, the BBC reported. The influencer spent many of her early years in low-income housing in Connecticut's Stamford, a period she described as 'dysfunctional' to the New Yorker in 2023. Her family moved in with her grandparents when she was nine. Owens' grandfather, Robert, became a powerful influence in her life. Candace Owens is married to British-American entrepreneur George Farmer, who is the son of Baron Michael Farmer. The duo met while Owens was serving as the communications director of Turning Point in the US, while Faermer was working for the group's UK branch. They have three kids together, as per a People report. Baron Michael Farmer, a former Conservative Party treasurer and House of Lords peer, has distanced himself from some of Owens' views, the BBC said. Owens' political views have often thrust her into the limelight. She has promoted conspiracy theories regarding COVID-19 vaccines, the moon landings, and even the Holocaust. The 36-year-old influencer remains popular on social media, with over 6 million followers on Instagram and 4.47 million subscribers on YouTube. She had recently made headlines for calling President Donald Trump's comments on the Epstein files 'outright embarrassing.' Also read: Which MAGA figures are criticizing Trump's handling of Epstein files? Full list Candace Owens and the Marcons Owens, in 2024, had doubled down on her claims regarding Brigitte Macron. She said that she would 'stake [her] entire professional reputation on the fact that Brigitte Macron is in fact a man,' the Guardian reported. Since then, she has continued to make controversial claims about the French First Lady. The lawsuit filed against her by the Macrons has asked for unspecified damages. It has also named her Delaware-headquartered companies in the matter. Under US law, the Macrons will need to prove 'actual malice' for defamation, meaning that the defendant knew the information was false, but broadcast or published it regardless. FAQs: 1. Who is Candace Owens? She is a right-wing influencer who is at the center of a lawsuit filed by the Macrons. 2. What has Candace Owens said about Brigitte Macron? She has claimed that the French First Lady was born as a biological male. 3. Where have the Macrons filed a lawsuit against Candace Owens? The lawsuit was filed in a Delaware court.

PM Modi arrives in London for 2-day UK visit, trade deal key focus
PM Modi arrives in London for 2-day UK visit, trade deal key focus

India Today

time38 minutes ago

  • India Today

PM Modi arrives in London for 2-day UK visit, trade deal key focus

Prime Minister Narendra Modi landed in London on Wednesday evening for a two-day official visit to the United Kingdom from July 23 to Prime Minister was received at the airport by UK Foreign Office Minister in charge of the Indo-Pacific Catherine West, along with Indian High Commissioner to the UK Vikram Dorsaiswami and British High Commissioner to New Delhi Lindy visit, described as 'historic' by Indian diaspora groups, marks the first leg of his two-nation tour and is expected to significantly boost bilateral ties between India and the arrival, PM Modi was welcomed by enthusiastic groups of community leaders, students, and parliamentarians gathered on the outskirts of London.'It's a great achievement for both the governments, and especially for the Indian diaspora, which is really excited to see the Prime Minister here after so many years. He's again here for a very short visit, but at least we get a chance to greet him,' said Kuldeep Shekhawat, President of the Overseas Friends of BJP (OFBJP) diaspora group to the news agency his visit, he is scheduled to hold wide-ranging discussions with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and meet King Charles III. Starmer will host him at Chequers, the British prime minister's official country residence near centrepiece of the visit is expected to be the signing of a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and a renewed push to enhance the India-UK Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (CSP).'Our collaboration spans a wide range of sectors, including trade, investment, technology, innovation, defence, education, research, sustainability, health and people-to-people ties,' said PM Modi in his departure Minister Piyush Goyal is likely to sign the free trade agreement alongside his UK counterpart Jonathan Reynolds and the two prime ministers, capping three years of hard bargaining. Britain sees the deal as its biggest trade win since Brexit and hopes it will inject fresh momentum into defence, research and tech partnerships with leaders are likely to focus on enhancing economic ties, with an emphasis on prosperity, growth, and job creation in both countries. PM Modi's visit underscores efforts to eliminate or reduce tariffs on imports and exports between the two nations under the proposed trade deal, which aims to make products from both countries more competitive. Both sides are targeting a bilateral trade volume of USD 120 billion by 2023–24, bilateral trade between the two countries crossed USD 55 billion. The UK is India's sixth-largest investor with USD 36 billion invested so far, while nearly 1,000 Indian companies in Britain employ around 1,00,000 people. Indian investments in the UK stand at close to USD 20 visit marks PM Modi's fourth to the United Kingdom since assuming office. He had previously visited in 2015, 2018, and in 2021 for the COP26 summit in Glasgow. Over the past year, Modi and Starmer have met twice—first at the G20 summit in Rio de Janeiro and more recently at the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada, in June.- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Narendra Modi

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store