Senate Republicans Eye Medicare Changes To Help Pay For Tax Cuts
WASHINGTON ― Republicans are so strapped for budget savings to offset their multi-trillion dollar tax cuts they're looking in a forbidden and politically explosive place: Medicare.
The $5 trillion tax-and-spending package that the House passed includes cuts of nearly $900 billion to Medicaid, which serves over 70 million low-income Americans. Now, some Senate Republicans are pushing to broaden spending reductions by looking for supposed inefficiencies in the Medicare program that serves America's seniors.
'The president indicated waste, fraud and abuse is a permissible target,' Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) told HuffPost after a meeting with President Donald Trump on Wednesday. 'Part of the issue has to do with abuse in Medicare Advantage.'
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said Republicans were looking at 'upcoding,' or the practice of health care providers using inaccurate diagnosis codes in order to wring more money from Medicare Advantage, the Medicare program run by private insurers. Grassley said the topic had come up at Monday meetings, but he wasn't sure if the president was on board.
Other Republicans stressed the idea of major changes to Medicare isn't a serious one.
'There's been some discussion. I think the general consensus is it's off the table,' Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said.
Fiddling with Medicare — even at the edges, without touching people's benefits — is extremely risky and would fly in the face of Trump's earlier pledges not to go after the program. Democrats have already attacked the GOP bill over estimates that it would kick millions of people off their health care. Putting Medicare into the mix could give them even more ammo to wallop Republicans ahead of next year's midterm elections.
'For Republicans to even suggest Medicare be cut to bankroll billionaire tax breaks is frightening and revolting,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said in a speech on the Senate floor on Thursday.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) said Republicans should go after Medicare if they 'never want to win another election again.'
'After George W. Bush tried to privatize Social Security in 2004, Republicans didn't win the popular vote for 20 years. Let that sink in,' he added.
Democrats have previously suggested that Republicans consider going after upcoding as a way of saving money in their legislation instead of cutting Medicaid.
'This practice by private, for-profit insurance companies leads to wasteful spending in Medicare, picking the pockets of seniors and taxpayers while adding tens of billions in costs to the federal government,' a group of more than 40 Democrats said in a May letter to Republican leaders.
Senate Republicans are under internal and external pressure to include more spending cuts in their version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which they are hoping to send to Trump's desk by the July 5 holiday. The House draft would reduce spending by $1.7 trillion, but a group of Senate conservatives is pushing for the Senate to cut even deeper to address the nation's debt.
Billionaire Elon Musk, meanwhile, has been on an extraordinary rampage on his social media platform X, calling the bill an 'abomination' because of its negative impact on the deficit, and urging Trump and Republicans to scrap it and start all over.
'The Big Ugly Bill will INCREASE the deficit to $2.5 trillion!' he wrote in a social media post.
The math problem is compounded for Senate Republicans by the fact that a number of their members are pushing to scale back provisions in the House bill that, if altered, would increase the total cost of the package. These include its repeal of Inflation Reduction Act renewable energy tax credits, a freeze on the Medicaid 'provider tax,' and its cuts to federal food aid.
Moreover, key Senate Republicans have expressed a desire to make permanent a whole host of business tax cuts that, under the House bill, would expire in five years. That, too, would balloon the cost of the bill.
For now, at least, GOP senators are expressing confidence about finding a path forward.
'We just started our conversation yesterday, we're just diving into it,' Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) said when asked about potential additional spending cuts. 'Everything's on the table. We're going to use the structure the House sent over, but we may repaint the walls and redecorate some of the interior rooms.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
23 minutes ago
- Politico
Supreme Court limits outside access to DOGE records
The Supreme Court has reined in a lower-court order that allowed a watchdog group wide-ranging access to records of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency. The high court's majority said a judge's directive allowing Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington to examine DOGE's recommendations for cost savings at executive branch agencies was 'not appropriately tailored.' In a two-page order Friday, the Supreme Court said such access was not a proper way to resolve an ongoing dispute about whether DOGE is a federal agency subject to the Freedom of Information Act or operates as a presidential advisory body that does not have to share its records with the public. 'Separation of powers concerns counsel judicial deference and restraint in the context of discovery regarding internal Executive Branch communications,' the court's majority wrote. All three of the court's liberal justices indicated they disagreed with the decision, but none provided an explanation of her views.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Over the finish line': Tuberville says passing spending bill bolster economic growth
ALABAMA (WHNT) — As the Big Beautiful Bill is under consideration in the Senate, an Alabama Senator says his top priority is to get the spending bill passed. U.S. Sen. Tommy Tuberville said Thursday the legislation is likely to undergo some significant changes while in the Senate, but he said his ultimate goal was to get the bill over the finish line. Alabama Agriculture Commissioner Rick Pate to run for lieutenant governor 'The number one priority in this bill is getting the jobs and tax cuts done,' Tuberville said. The spending bill has received criticism from conservatives over the past few days, including the former head of the Department of Governmental Efficiency. Elon Musk has called the bill an 'abomination,' posting on social media platform X about how the spending bill will significantly increase the national debt. 'The problem that Elon Musk looks at, I look at it different,' Tuberville told members of the press on Thursday. 'Number one, the way to grow this country is to get the tax cuts done and that tax cuts are in this bill and we need to make them permanent.' Tuberville said he and his colleagues have complained that Democrats spend too much money. He said he wants to cut back on how much can be cut from this bill. 'There's a lot of things the federal government, in this bill, is trying to send down to the states,' Tuberville said. 'We can't afford it in Alabama. We can't afford to pick up the tab for a federal government agency that was started years ago by the federal government. We don't need it in the state.' Tuberville said he is looking to the future to make changes. 'Remember, we will do another reconciliation after this,' Tuberville said. 'We have two more in the next year and a half, so whatever we don't get done in this bill, hopefully we can get done in the next.' The president has given Republicans in the Senate a tight deadline to pass the spending bill, asking them to have it on his desk by July 4th. The Tax Foundation estimates the bill passed by the House of Representatives will add more than $2 trillion to the national deficit over the next 10 years. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration to pay nearly $5M in wrongful death lawsuit of Jan. 6 rioter shot by police
The Trump administration will pay a $4.975 million settlement in the lawsuit over the wrongful death of Ashli Babbitt, who was killed by a U.S. Capitol Police officer after storming the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Babbitt — a 35-year-old from California and veteran of the Air Force who went to Washington for President Donald Trump's rally — was among an early group of rioters that reached the doors of the Speaker's Lobby, adjacent to the House chamber, while lawmakers were still evacuating. Details of the settlement were released by Judicial Watch, a pro-Trump advocacy group that represented her estate and family members in the lawsuit. The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to request to comment. The settlement is likely to inflame tensions on Capitol Hill over the riot. Outgoing Capitol Police chief Thomas Manger blasted the reported settlement last month, saying it 'sends a chilling message to law enforcement nationwide, especially to those with a protective mission like ours.' As members of the mob standing near Babbitt pounded on the doors and cracked glass window panes, outnumbered police officers stepped aside and ceded the hallway to the rioters. Moments later, Babbitt is seen on video attempting to enter the lobby through a shattered window. That's when Capitol Police officer Michael Byrd fired the fatal shot. Byrd was investigated and cleared by local and federal authorities. Babbitt was the only rioter killed by police, but several others died either during or in the hours immediately after the protest. Over 100 Capitol Police officers were injured during the protest. The lawsuit was filed in California by Babbitt's family in 2024, claiming wrongful death, assault and battery, as well as negligence claims. The lawsuit was set to go to trial in 2026, but both parties agreed to the settlement. A joint filing Friday from government attorneys and Babbitt's acknowledged that a settlement was reached, but did not disclose details. 'This fair settlement is a historic and necessary step for justice for Ashli Babbitt's family. Ashli should never have been killed, and this settlement destroys the evil, partisan narrative that justified her outrageous killing and protected her killer,' said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a press release on the settlement. Trump has repeatedly praised Babbitt, portraying her as an innocent patriot and decrying her death at the hands of Capitol police. It's part of the Trump administration's efforts to repaint the protest on Jan. 6 as a day of patriotism and freedom of expression, rather than an unprecedented insurrection widely denounced in 2021 by Republicans and Democrats. Trump issued sweeping pardons for nearly all of those charged or under investigation for their actions on Jan. 6, including over 300 charged with assaulting the police. Numerous Jan. 6 rioters have been arrested on unrelated charges since. Kyle Cheney contributed to this report.