Oil prices inch down on expected minimal sanctions impact
Brent crude futures dropped 20 cents, or 0.3 per cent, to $69.08 a barrel by 1100 GMT after settling 0.35 per cent down on Friday. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude eased by 6 cents, or 0.1 per cent, to $67.28 after a 0.3 per cent decline in the previous session.
The European Union on Friday approved the 18th package of sanctions against Russia over the war in Ukraine, which also targeted India's Nayara Energy, an exporter of oil products refined from Russian crude.
"The latest round of EU sanctions aren't necessarily going to change the oil balance. That's why the market is not reacting much," said Harry Tchiliguirian at Onyx Capital Group. "Russians have been very good at circumventing these kinds of sanctions."
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on Friday that Russia had built up a certain immunity to Western sanctions.
The EU sanctions followed U.S. President Donald Trump's threats last week to impose sanctions on buyers of Russian exports unless Russia agrees to a peace deal within 50 days.
ING analysts said the part of the package likely to have an impact is the EU import ban on refined oil products processed from Russian oil in third countries, though it said it could prove difficult to monitor and enforce.
Iran, another sanctioned oil producer, is due to hold nuclear talks with Britain, France and Germany in Istanbul on Friday, an Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson said on Monday. That follows warnings by the three European countries that a failure to resume negotiations would lead to international sanctions being reimposed on Iran.
In the U.S., the number of operating oil rigs fell by two to 422 last week, the lowest total since September 2021, Baker Hughes said on Friday.
U.S. tariffs on European Union imports are set to kick in on August 1, though U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Sunday that he was confident the United States could secure a trade deal with the bloc.
"Tariff concerns will continue to weigh in the lead up to the August 1 deadline, while some support may come from oil inventory data if it shows tight supply," said IG market analyst Tony Sycamore.
"It feels very much like a $64-$70 range in play for the week ahead."
Brent crude futures have traded between a low of $66.34 a barrel and a high of $71.53 after a ceasefire deal on June 24 halted the 12-day Israel-Iran war.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
21 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Takeaways of US-Japan deal include potential gains for Trump, Ishiba and EU
An emerging U.S.-Japanese trade deal could unlock major investment, avert a potential shock to the global economy and may deliver political wins for both U.S. President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, though many specifics of the agreement remain unclear. Here's a closer look at the early takeaways: * The deal stabilizes the global trade outlook by imposing a 15% tariff on Japanese goods — down from a threatened 25% — while Japan commits to investing $550 billion in the U.S. economy, a boost to U.S. jobs. It almost certainly averts a worst-case scenario for the Japanese economy. Moreover, if it signals that the balance of U.S. tariff rates are likely to settle in that range, Jefferies Chief Economist and Strategist for Europe Mohit Kumar said: "the world can live with 15% or so tariffs." * Trump gains some political capital ahead of November 2026 midterm elections by reinforcing his 'America First' trade stance and potentially bolstering his influence with industrial and agricultural constituencies while avoiding the market instability that loomed under earlier tariff threats. Still, not every U.S. constituency was happy with the announcement. The decision has angered the Detroit Three automakers, who still face a 25% levy on significant segments of their non-U.S. produced vehicles. * For Ishiba, the deal is a diplomatic and economic win amid domestic political turbulence. Just days earlier, Japan's ruling coalition lost its majority in upper house elections. * Analysts say the deal could serve as a benchmark for other economies negotiating with Washington, including the EU and China, both facing August tariff deadlines. * American exporters could gain broader access to Japan's markets, especially in autos and agriculture — sectors vital to U.S. economic growth. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Judge asks prosecution for more information on Kpods in first case involving etomidate-laced vapes World In landmark opinion, World Court says countries must address climate change threat Singapore 5 teens arrested for threatening boy with knife, 2 charged with causing hurt Singapore Male victim of fatal Toa Payoh fire was known to keep many things, say residents Sport Bukayo Saka the difference as Arsenal beat AC Milan at National Stadium Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kicks in Singapore Over 1.15 million Singaporeans aged 21 to 59 have claimed SG60 vouchers Singapore Cyclist charged after allegedly hitting elderly pedestrian, killing him * Global financial markets are rallying led by automakers. Stocks of major Japanese firms surged following the announcement, and capital inflows are expected to continue as investors seek exposure to Japan's innovation-led growth. * Despite the investment commitments, the deal may not significantly reduce the U.S. trade deficit with Japan in the short term. Critics argue that without stronger enforcement mechanisms or structural reforms, the imbalance could persist. * A 15% tariff, though lower than the threatened 25%, still represents a significantly higher import tax for consumer goods, especially for cars and electronics, which are heavily imported to the U.S. from Japan. Yale Budget Lab last week estimated the overall average U.S. tariff rate under Trump's policy shifts has climbed to around 20% from between 2% and 3% prior to his return to the White House in January. REUTERS
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
House Democrats raise concerns about T-Mobile role in 'Trump Mobile' service
WASHINGTON :Three Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee raised serious concerns about T-Mobile's involvement in the Trump Organization's self-branded mobile service and a $499 smartphone dubbed Trump Mobile. Representative Frank Pallone, the ranking member of the committee and two other committee members, asked T-Mobile CEO Mike Sievert to answer questions about the company's dealings with the Trump organization. "We are specifically concerned that T-Mobile's business relationship with the Trump Organization — while Donald Trump is serving as President of the United States — presents a conflict of interest that will harm the American people," they wrote in a letter Wednesday.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
WTO reform prospects clouded by investment deal block, sources say
GENEVA :The World Trade Organisation suffered a setback at its General Council meeting in Geneva on Wednesday after a small group of countries again blocked an initiative designed to boost foreign investment, two sources told Reuters. The Investment Facilitation for Development, which aims to reduce bureaucratic hurdles to encourage foreign direct investment, particularly in developing and least-developed countries, was blocked by India, South Africa and Turkey, they said, asking to remain anonymous due to the sensitivity of the matter. The WTO requires full consensus from all 166 members for a measure to be included in its formal rulebook. The measure has been formally backed by 127 members. Trade sources described the latest block as a "disturbing" signal, as WTO members weigh sweeping reforms to revitalise the global trade body, which has been challenged by a wave of tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. Proponents of reforms are pushing for changes to the consensus-based decision-making process in particular to stop countries from blocking measures and bogging down initiatives. India, South Africa and Turkey were not immediately available for comment. "The integration of the IFD into the WTO framework is a litmus test for members' willingness to turn reform discussions into practical action," a trade delegate told Reuters, describing it as disappointing. The EU delegation told members that the IFD did not hurt anyone's interest and that blocking it would "endanger" the multilateral trade system, according to a statement seen by Reuters. India and South Africa previously opposed the inclusion of the measure at high-level meetings, including the 2025 ministerial meeting in Abu Dhabi, where it failed to gain consensus. Keith Rockwell, a trade analyst at the Hinrich Foundation and former WTO communications director, told Reuters that India's continued obstruction of the IFD agreement is partly a tactic to gain leverage on food security negotiations.
