Awami League rejects its ban by Bangladesh interim govt, vows to continue operations
Bangladesh's deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina-led Awami League on Sunday rejected 'with disgust' the interim government's decision to ban the party and vowed to continue its operations despite the restriction.
The Muhammad Yunus-led interim government's Council of Advisers or the Cabinet on Saturday night slapped a ban on 'all activities of Awami League', including in cyberspace, under an anti-terrorism law.
Reacting to the move, in a strongly worded statement posted on X, the Awami League said, 'We are rejecting and protesting the fascist autocrat Yunus government's decision with disgust…Awami League will carry on its activities in an appropriate course, defying the decision of the fascist Yunus government.' The party regretted that 'today's independent Bangladesh' had to witness the ban on Awami League activities by an 'undemocratic fascist' government that now runs the country 'without people's mandate', while the country 'earned independence and sovereignty under its (Awami League's) leadership'.
Formed in 1949, the Awami League led the movement for the autonomy of Bengalis in the then East Pakistan for decades and eventually led the Liberation War in 1971.
The statement said the ban is meant to 'exile the spirit, ideals, and core values of the Liberation War and to empower the vulgar resurgence of anti-independence elements' and 'only an anti-state and anti-independence evil force alone'.
'We strongly believe that the people of Bangladesh will deliver a resounding response to this reckless decision by the fascist Yunus regime. We call upon all leaders and activists of Awami League to stand shoulder to shoulder with the people and build a total resistance against this incoherent and anti-people decision,' it said.
Awami League also called upon all democratic states, institutions, and leaders around the world to denounce the decision taken by the Yunus government.
Earlier in the day, Yunus's press secretary Shafiqul Alam in a media briefing said the democratic world was unlikely to oppose the interim government's decision to ban 'this shameless, killer, anti-democracy, and corrupt party'.
He said there are instances of the Western world banning political parties for their activities against the national interest and for committing crimes against humanity, like the Nazi and Fascist parties of Germany and Italy.
'So we don't expect any negative international reaction over the ban on Awami League activities,' Alam said.
The Election Commission (EC) has said it is awaiting a formal government notification to decide on scrapping the registration of the Awami League.
According to Bangladesh law, if the Awami League's registration with the EC is cancelled, it will be disqualified from contesting the general election, which could be held between December 2025 and June 2026.
'We will have to decide going with the spirit of the present Bangladesh,' Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) AMM Nasir Uddin told reporters here.
Hasina's 16-year-long Awami League regime was toppled on August 5 last year in a student-led violent mass uprising, prompting the 77-year-old former prime minister to flee to India.
Three days after her ouster, Yunus took charge as the chief adviser of the interim government.
Hasina and many of her party leaders have been facing hundreds of cases, including those of mass murder and corruption, since then. Most of her party leaders and ministers in her government have either been arrested or fled abroad.
The announcement to ban Hasina's Awami League came after the student-led newly-floated National Citizen Party (NCP) activists rallied since Thursday and carried out blockades across Dhaka demanding the ban.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Taiwan thinks the unthinkable: resisting China without America
IF TAIWAN CAN resist Chinese invasion forces for a month, then Communist Party leaders in Beijing can be deterred. That calculation has long guided war planners and politicians in Taiwan. The democratically ruled island would need to survive weeks of bombardment, blockade or even amphibious landings by the People's Liberation Army, to give America time to turn up and save the day. Alas, Taiwanese confidence that America will arrive at all is growing weaker by the day. That is reshaping the plans that the island's sitting government, which is determined to resist Chinese aggression, must make for its defence. For years, the island has had to live with a degree of doubt. When President Donald Trump declines to say whether he would risk war with China to save Taiwan, he is following the precedent set by most modern presidents, who used 'strategic ambiguity' to deter rash moves by either side to change the status quo. Under the terms of that uneasy stand-off, China calls Taiwan a province that must one day return to the motherland. The island's leaders deny being part of the People's Republic of China, but stop short of declaring Taiwan a separate country. American ambiguity leaves China's supreme leader, Xi Jinping, wrestling with uncertainties. If Mr Xi wants to avoid conflict with America, he needs to be sure of a quick victory, or must stay his hand. As for leading Taiwanese opposition politicians, they have long seized on that same ambiguity to portray America as an unreliable friend, and counselled accommodation of China to buy peace. What is new is the alarm engendered in Taiwan by Mr Trump's treatment of Ukraine. When Mr Trump scorns Ukraine as a small country that foolishly imagines it can defy a larger neighbour, Taiwanese hear echoes of their own plight. It does not help that Mr Trump has long scoffed at Taiwan's prospects in a fight with China. And if America stays aloof, no other power will take up arms in Taiwan's defence. True, Chinese hopes of a quick victory were shaken by the failure of Russia's own attempt at a lightning conquest of Ukraine in February 2022: a debacle that China has studied minutely. But now Ukraine's long war is forcing Taiwan and friendly governments, including in Europe, to make unprecedented public efforts to prepare the island's 23m people for a crisis lasting far longer than a month, such as a naval blockade. In June The Telegram travelled to Berlin for the Taiwan Trilateral Forum, a meeting of diplomats and analysts from America, Europe and Taiwan. Asked for lessons from Ukraine, a Taiwanese participant replied that his island needs 'to prove to the rest of the world that Taiwan is able to fight for an extended period'. This is as much a political as a military imperative. Taiwan's plan is 'to hold on as long as possible, while China's legitimacy is challenged and the international community has time to help', he added. Speakers described a flurry of studies and war-games in Western capitals, weighing Taiwan's vulnerabilities. Taiwanese firms, notably TSMC, make more than 90% of the world's cutting-edge semiconductors. Even if TSMC foundries are not blown up, the forum heard, a blockade could stop just-in-time imports of specialist gases and chemicals needed to make chips. The meeting, organised by the German Marshall Fund, a Washington-based think-tank, heard of growing seriousness in Taiwan, too. Green groups that clamoured for ageing nuclear power plants to be shut down are more open to arguments about national security and the risks of Taiwan's heavy reliance on imported fossil fuels. Trump administration views were parsed like scripture. There were accounts of reassuring meetings with the defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, and the secretary of state, Marco Rubio. Against that, there were dismaying reports of Britain and Germany being chided by other American officials for sending warships through the Taiwan Strait to uphold the freedom of navigation. Europeans should be focusing on Europe's security, was the message. The new German government risked China's wrath by allowing Jaushieh Joseph Wu, the head of Taiwan's national security council and a former foreign minister, to address the forum in Berlin. Praising Germany's 'courage', Mr Wu pledged that Taiwan will spend more on defence but will 'not be a provocateur', in remarks that German officials allowed to be made public. Speaking a stone's throw from Friedrichstrasse station, a cold war crossing point between East and West Germany, Mr Wu hailed West Berlin's survival as an island of freedom. He described Taiwan's improving civilian resilience, including the stockpiling of food, water, medicines and energy, and 'whole of society' training drills. Taiwan contemplates a harsher, lonelier world Under Tsai Ing-wen, Taiwan's president from 2016-24, such planning was kept secret to avoid alarming the public and foreign investors. The current president, Lai Ching-te, has chaired meetings about resilience and live-streamed them. His hope is to educate a society riven by partisan divisions. Promoting civilian resilience is a diplomatic play, too, allowing friendly powers to help Taiwan without arms sales that would enrage China. Israel and Finland, two countries with advanced civil-defence systems, have both welcomed Taiwanese fact-finding missions. Other Western countries want to learn from Taiwan's expertise in fighting off Chinese cyber-attacks and disinformation campaigns. One step is almost unsayable aloud. Should Taiwan rehearse how to resist occupation by China, striving to be ungovernable after a defeat? Several Taiwanese experts are sceptical. They call such planning defeatist, divisive and panic-inducing. Besides, fears of post-war unrest and resistance on Taiwan will not deter Mr Xi, sceptics argue. Other Taiwanese see no choice. They point to Ukraine's starkest lesson: survival is a long game. Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
2034 earliest for simultaneous polls under existing Bills
New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led Centre's ambitious 'One Nation, One Election' initiative, which seeks to synchronise elections for the Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha, is unlikely to be implemented before 2034, according to BJP MP PP Chaudhary, who is chairing the Joint Parliamentary Committee on the proposed Bill. Chaudhary said the simultaneous elections could be held under the existing Bills only in 2034, and the committee may go beyond the draft law to suggest ways to keep polls aligned, including recommending a provision for a constructive or positive vote of no-confidence. The 129th Constitutional Amendment Bill, approved by the Union Cabinet in December 2024, outlined a framework for simultaneous national and state-level elections. The Bill was tabled in the Lok Sabha in December 2024, and just a few days later, it was referred to the Joint Parliamentary Committee. The One Nation, One Election draws from the recommendations of the High-level Committee on Simultaneous Elections, chaired by former President Ram Nath Kovind. He submitted a 18,626-page report to President Droupadi Murmu in March 2024. But despite the Centre's legislative push, India is unlikely to see simultaneous polls before 2034, as the timeline depends on complex logistical, legal, and political preparations, a point recently reiterated by the JPC Chairperson. In a recent interview, when asked about the timeline for the first simultaneous elections, Chaudhary said: "The committee will deliberate; Parliament will decide. We can't say when, but the Bill says the first session of Parliament. If it happens with the appointed date, then it would be from 2034". The primary reason the One Nation, One Election plan can't be enforced before 2034 is because of how the Bill is structured. The Bill proposes adding a new Article 82A to the Constitution. This article would let the President announce an "appointed date" during the first sitting of a newly-elected Lok Sabha. But since the first sitting of the current (18th) Lok Sabha commenced in 2024, it could be done next in 2029. Following the President's notification of the appointed date, the terms of state legislative assemblies elected thereafter will be curtailed to synchronise with the five-year term of the Lok Sabha commencing in 2029. This means that any state assembly elected after the appointed date -- whether its term begins in 2031 or 2033 -- will have to end by 2034, so that its next election can align with the Lok Sabha cycle starting that year. So, the next opportunity for the President to notify would come only after the 2029 Lok Sabha elections. If the Bill passes by then, the next Lok Sabha will run until 2034, and that's when simultaneous elections could begin. Apart from this, there are other significant challenges as well. For the One Nation, One Election Bill to become law, it must be passed by a two-thirds majority by both houses of Parliament. After enactment, it would also have to be ratified by at least 50% of state legislatures, which looks like a challenging task given the National Democratic Alliance's numbers in Parliament. While the NDA holds a little over 290 seats in the Lok Sabha and 129 in the Rajya Sabha, it falls short of the two-thirds majority required -- 364 in the Lok Sabha and 164 in the Rajya Sabha -- to pass the Bill. Therefore, the Narendra Modi-led Centre will need support from parties outside its coalition, a point emphasised by Chaudhary, who said, "parties who think of the national interest would support the Bills". From the perspective of ratification by state and Union Territory Assemblies, as of June 2025, the NDA holds power in 20 of India's 30 legislative assemblies, while the INDIA bloc governs 10, a number that works in the NDA's favour.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Not dope test, carry out ED's income test on Punjab politicians to unravel money trail with drug sellers, says BJP state chief Sunil Jakhar
Chandigarh: Punjab BJP chief Sunil Jakhar on Tuesday said to catch drug-sellers, there should be an "income test" of Punjab politicians, starting from party presidents as he challenged chief minister Bhagwant Mann and finance minister Harpal Singh Cheema to send a request to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to investigate the money trail of politicians. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now While replying to a question at a press conference about the political slugfest between Punjab Congress president Amrinder Singh Raja Warring and Cheema over conducting dope tests on politicians, Jakhar said first it was important get an income test of political leaders done by the ED. "I challenge Mann and Cheema to send a request to ED to investigate the money trail of political leaders, beginning with party presidents, from the date they entered politics," Jakhar said. He emphasised that following the money trail would help catch the sellers of drugs and not merely drug users, who he said were being put in jails. "Sunil Jakhar is saying this because Sunil Jakhar did not take money from drug sellers as an election fund," said the Punjab BJP chief. He added investigations should focus on leaders' finances over the past five-10 years. "All should be probed from the day they entered politics. Someone is buying property in the name of their wife, another in the name of their son. Someone is buying property in Goa. Previously, they did not even have a place to stay," Jakhar said. Without naming anyone, he mentioned that while others had expensive cars, he travelled in a Toyota Innova. Referring to former chief minister and BJP leader Capt Amarinder Singh's property near Chandigarh and suggesting that it was moderate in scale, Jakhar said while Amarinder's farmhouse was on less than four acres of land, others had properties spread over 9-10 acres in the same area with high concrete walls. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Jakhar questioned Punjab's AAP-led govt on its war against drugs, saying the deadline given by the govt ended on May 31, and it was ten days past the deadline. "Has this war ended?" he said. Alliance talk: 'SAD must stand on its feet' Responding to a question regarding his recent call for the unity of Akali Dal factions and any likely alliance with SAD again in the 2027 Punjab elections, Jakhar said he made the remarks in an individual capacity as a Punjabi to caution the Akali Dal to preserve its "golden legacy" before someone else occupies it. He said as Punjab BJP chief, his stance was clear that re-stitching an alliance with SAD could only be a possibility if SAD was "on its feet". "There is a saying in English, what do you have to offer? The dialogue on any alliance will be only on the principle of what you bring to the table," he added. Hails PM on 11 years in power Jakhar, while addressing a press conference to list the 11-year achievements of the BJP-led govt at the Centre under Prime Minister Modi, said, "India has become the 4th largest economy in the world." Lauding the 6.5% growth rate of the country and pointing out that India surpassed Japan to emerge as the fourth largest economy, Jakhar said, "This is no coincidence but absolute commitment to work on policies, principles, and priorities to ensure that decisions which usher in change for the country were taken in the last 11 years. " Ends MSID:: 121757099 413 |
