logo
Denmark to increase military spending in Arctic by $2 billion - as Trump sets his sights on Greenland

Denmark to increase military spending in Arctic by $2 billion - as Trump sets his sights on Greenland

Yahoo28-01-2025

Denmark is set to increase military spending in its Arctic semiautonomous territory of Greenland by the equivalent of $2 billion following multiple aggressive statements by U.S. President Donald Trump about purchasing the territory.
Greenland, a massive island in the North Atlantic, has grown increasingly important in recent years as the Arctic ice melts, opening up new sea routes for commercial shipping.
Trump has called for U.S. control of Greenland since his first term in office. 'Ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity' for national security reasons, the president has said, and he has refused to rule out using military or economic force to gain control of the territory.
In a statement Monday announcing the boost in spending, Greenland government member Vivian Motzfeldt said the territory is 'facing a changing security landscape,' according to The New York Times.
Copenhagen is spending more on its North Atlantic territories of Greenland and the Faroe Islands as part of an agreement struck last year amid rising tensions in the Arctic between the U.S., Russia and China.
But the announcement of the growth in spending was likely pushed forward amid increased strains in the relationship between Copenhagen and Washington over control of Greenland, Niels Thulesen Dahl, a political analyst at Jyllands-Posten, a Danish daily, said, according to The Times.
The governments of Denmark, Greenland and the Faroe Islands will buy three Arctic naval vessels to patrol its waters according to the agreement. In addition, they will also obtain two long-range drones and satellites for increased surveillance in the area, the official statement said.
The Danish government added that the new increased budget will also include funding for training young people in Greenland 'to acquire important skills allowing them to take responsibility for preparedness.'
'We must face the fact that there are serious challenges regarding security and defense in the Arctic and North Atlantic,' Danish defense minister Troels Lund Poulsen said in the statement.
Just a day after the announcement was made, Danish Prime Minister Metter Frederiksen met with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, French President Emmanuel Macron and the NATO secretary general, former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte. The meetings with Western allies come after she spoke on the phone with Trump last week, with European officials describing the call as momentarily aggressive and antagonistic.
'The agreement has become slightly larger than it would otherwise have been,' Dahl added, according to The Times. He said that the announcement revealed that Greenland and Denmark have shared interests, rejecting the notion that the Greenlandic people would welcome American control of the territory.
'Much of the current discussion and tension feeds into a narrative that Denmark and Greenland have no shared interests and that Greenlanders simply want to move as quickly as possible away from Denmark and into the arms of the Americans,' Dahl added, noting that this is an inaccurate impression.
While Trump has repeatedly said the U.S. would like to buy Greenland, both the Danes and the local authorities in the Greenland capital of Nuuk have said that the territory is not for sale. Denmark ruled over it for more than 200 years and retains some control over its defense and foreign policy.
Earlier this month, before he was sworn in for his second term, Trump claimed, 'People don't even know if Denmark has any legal right to it. But if they do, they should give it up because we need it for national security.'
The idea of buying Greenland initially came to Trump from cosmetics billionaire Ronald Lauder, according to the 2022 book The Divider: Trump in the White House, 2017-2021 by Peter Baker of The New York Times and Susan Glasser of The New Yorker. Trump and Lauder have known each other since their college days.
The notion was subject to months of internal study and debate, much to the bemusement of cabinet secretaries and aides to the president.
'A friend of mine, a really, really experienced businessman, thinks we can get Greenland,' Trump told his National Security adviser, according to the book. 'What do you think?'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

3 Reasons GIS is Risky and 1 Stock to Buy Instead
3 Reasons GIS is Risky and 1 Stock to Buy Instead

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 Reasons GIS is Risky and 1 Stock to Buy Instead

Over the last six months, General Mills's shares have sunk to $54.81, producing a disappointing 17.1% loss while the S&P 500 was flat. This was partly due to its softer quarterly results and may have investors wondering how to approach the situation. Is now the time to buy General Mills, or should you be careful about including it in your portfolio? Get the full breakdown from our expert analysts, it's free. Even with the cheaper entry price, we're sitting this one out for now. Here are three reasons why there are better opportunities than GIS and a stock we'd rather own. Revenue growth can be broken down into changes in price and volume (the number of units sold). While both are important, volume is the lifeblood of a successful staples business as there's a ceiling to what consumers will pay for everyday goods; they can always trade down to non-branded products if the branded versions are too expensive. General Mills's average quarterly sales volumes have shrunk by 1.6% over the last two years. This decrease isn't ideal because the quantity demanded for consumer staples products is typically stable. When analyzing revenue growth, we care most about organic revenue growth. This metric captures a business's performance excluding one-time events such as mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures as well as foreign currency fluctuations. The demand for General Mills's products has barely risen over the last eight quarters. On average, the company's organic sales have been flat. Forecasted revenues by Wall Street analysts signal a company's potential. Predictions may not always be accurate, but accelerating growth typically boosts valuation multiples and stock prices while slowing growth does the opposite. Over the next 12 months, sell-side analysts expect General Mills's revenue to drop by 4.3%, a decrease from This projection is underwhelming and indicates its products will face some demand challenges. General Mills isn't a terrible business, but it isn't one of our picks. Following the recent decline, the stock trades at 12.9× forward P/E (or $54.81 per share). While this valuation is reasonable, we don't really see a big opportunity at the moment. We're fairly confident there are better stocks to buy right now. We'd suggest looking at one of our top software and edge computing picks. Market indices reached historic highs following Donald Trump's presidential victory in November 2024, but the outlook for 2025 is clouded by new trade policies that could impact business confidence and growth. While this has caused many investors to adopt a "fearful" wait-and-see approach, we're leaning into our best ideas that can grow regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate. Take advantage of Mr. Market by checking out our Top 9 Market-Beating Stocks. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-micro-cap company Tecnoglass (+1,754% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Where Could Air Canada Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Could Air Canada Stock Be in 5 Years?

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Where Could Air Canada Stock Be in 5 Years?

Written by Andrew Button at The Motley Fool Canada Air Canada (TSX:AC) stock has been taking a beating in recent years. In 2020, in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, the stock fell all the way from $54 to $12, as the travel restrictions in that period caused the company's revenue to decline 80%. The company's stock later rallied when the first COVID vaccine was announced, but subsequently gave up the gains for reasons that are less clear. Today, Air Canada is in a much better place than it was in 2020. It's profitable. It has repaid much of its debt. Its revenue has recovered to its pre-COVID level and then some. Nevertheless, at around $19, AC stock is still nowhere near its pre-COVID stock price. What's going on here? There are a few lingering issues for Air Canada that have investors worrying about the stock, even though the underlying company is in a much better place than it was before the crash. The question is, why the apparent discrepancy? In this article, I will explore the reasons why Air Canada stock is still at a relatively low level and why I think it will be at a higher one in five years' time. One reason why some investors are concerned about Air Canada is because of the large amounts of capital expenditures (CAPEX) the company is undertaking in the next three years. CAPEX refers to spending on fixed assets like property, plant and equipment. In the case of an airline, it mainly refers to spending on new aircraft. Air Canada expects $3.4 billion in CAPEX in 2025, $4.3 billion in 2026, and $4.9 billion in 2027. After 2027, the CAPEX spend is expected to decline. The amounts of CAPEX above are fairly large. Notably, they exceed the company's past amounts of free cash flow, seeming to imply that Air Canada will be cash flow negative in the years ahead. Is this CAPEX such a big risk for Air Canada? In my opinion, no. Airplanes tend to be in service for decades, meaning that a lot of CAPEX now does not mean a lot of CAPEX in the future. Also, Air Canada's revenue has far surpassed levels seen in past years, so unprecedented CAPEX does not necessarily mean chronic cash burn. Overall, I don't think Air Canada's CAPEX is going to ruin the company. Another reason why people are concerned about Air Canada is because of Donald Trump's trade wars. Earlier this year, Trump slapped a 25% tariff on Canada, ostensibly to counter the flow of fentanyl into the United States. In response, many Canadians pledged to cancel vacations to the United States. Later, data collection firms reported that Canada-U.S. air travel did decline — one story claimed by as much as 70%. Air Canada said that it saw an impact but denied that its U.S. travel hours went down by 70%. Again, this strikes me as not that big of a risk. Canadians are most likely replacing U.S. travel with inter-provincial travel and overseas travel. Air Canada's most recent earnings release confirms this: revenue was stable year-over-year, and free cash flow was positive. On the whole, Air Canada looks like a bargain at 8.8 times earnings and 1.6 times operating cash flow. I think it will be worth more in five years' time than it is today. The post Where Could Air Canada Stock Be in 5 Years? appeared first on The Motley Fool Canada. More reading Made in Canada: 5 Homegrown Stocks Ready for the 'Buy Local' Revolution [PREMIUM PICKS] Market Volatility Toolkit Best Canadian Stocks to Buy in 2025 Beginner Investors: 4 Top Canadian Stocks to Buy for 2025 5 Years From Now, You'll Probably Wish You Grabbed These Stocks Subscribe to Motley Fool Canada on YouTube Fool contributor Andrew Button has positions in Air Canada. The Motley Fool recommends Air Canada. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2025

Longtime Dividend Giant Announces Hike
Longtime Dividend Giant Announces Hike

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Longtime Dividend Giant Announces Hike

National Fuel Gas Company (NYSE:NFG) is one of the best stocks for a retirement stock portfolio. On June 12, the company declared a 3.9% hike in its quarterly dividend to $0.535 per share. Through this increase, the company stretched its dividend growth streak to 55 years. In addition to this strong dividend growth, National Fuel Gas Company (NYSE:NFG) has also paid regular dividends to shareholders for 123 years in a row. A large oil and gas production plant with pipelines leading to tanker truck and storage tanks. The company's steady dividend growth is largely due to its solid cash reserves. In the latest quarter, it generated $473.8 million in operating cash flow, while its levered free cash flow over the past twelve months totaled $50.3 million. National Fuel Gas Company (NYSE:NFG) offers a dividend yield of 2.54%, as of June 13, and it will trade ex-dividend on June 30. The stock has surged by over 37% since the start of 2025. National Fuel Gas Company (NYSE:NFG) is a diversified energy firm with a fully integrated portfolio of natural gas and oil operations. Its business is divided into four key segments: Exploration and Production, Pipeline and Storage, Gathering, and Utility. While we acknowledge the potential of NFG as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure. None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store