Eutelsat replaces CEO with Orange executive in surprise move
PARIS : Franco-British satellite operator Eutelsat will replace its CEO with Orange executive Jean-Francois Fallacher, it said on Monday, in a surprise move by a company in the spotlight for its role in European defence communications.
Fallacher, currently CEO of Orange France, will take over on June 1, at a time when Eutelsat has said it needs more financing. He will succeed Eva Berneke, who has led the company since 2022.
The Frenchman takes over as Europe is looking for home-grown commercial and defence satellite communication options to reduce its reliance on Elon Musk's Starlink.
Fallacher, 58, is a telecoms sector veteran, having led Orange's branches in Romania, Poland, Spain and France over the last 15 years.
"It is a continuity appointment, not a rupture with the strategy, as the path is clearly traced and the new CEO is committed to build," a Eutelsat spokesperson said.
Shares in the company, up 90 per cent this year, rose 8 per cent by 1148 GMT. Only 20.9 per cent of the shares listed in Paris and London are publicly traded, making it prone to sharp price swings.
A COSTLY MERGER
Berneke led Eutelsat through its merger with Britain's OneWeb in 2023 and a rapid revival of interest in the role of satellite connectivity in Europe.
Eutelsat's OneWeb acquisition gave the group control over the only other constellation of low Earth orbit satellites in the world at the time besides Starlink.
Suggestions the company could replace Starlink in providing internet access to war-torn Ukraine fuelled the biggest weekly gains ever in Eutelsat stock in early March.
Berneke told Reuters last month the company has provided its high-speed satellite internet service to Ukraine for about a year via a German distributor.
"Eutelsat is set for a full alignment with a world where Europe is a strong sovereign space player and strongly aligned with the telecom connectivity ecosystem," Berneke wrote in a post on LinkedIn regarding her departure.
She added that the company was looking to "adjust our governance and shareholder structure", which had paved the way for the CEO change. She did not give further details.
A person familiar with the situation said Eutelsat was facing significant investment demands that would require fresh capital, with a potential share sale a logical avenue.
Eutelsat had said its OneWeb tie-up would lift the group's annual sales to $2 billion by 2027, with OneWeb's second generation of LEO satellites expected to be launched by the end of the decade.
However, Eutelsat now says it needs more than three times the satellites than previously thought, requiring up to 2.2 billion euros ($2.5 billion) in financing.
($1 = 0.8822 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Musk is the US$350 billion Rocket Man who fell to Earth
THE popcorn emoji is out in force as the world's richest person feuds with its most powerful leader. Even Thierry Breton, the European regulator who was a frequent target of Elon Musk's ire, is at it. Still, as entertaining as the billionaire's spat with Donald Trump may be, it also carries costly lessons for a US$630 billion space economy dominated by Musk's Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX – such is the danger of co-dependence between de facto monopolies and increasingly protectionist states. This danger wasn't high on the agenda at the peak of Trump's 'bromance' with Musk, when the then-president-elect described SpaceX's reusable rocket revolution in the way a Renaissance monarch might have praised a successful colonial expedition – with a mix of national pride, geopolitical influence and financial potential: 'I called Elon. I said, 'Elon, was that (landing manoeuvre) you?' He said, 'Yes, it was.' I said, '...Can Russia do it?' 'No.' 'Can China do it?' 'No.' 'Can the United States do it, other than you?' 'No, nobody can do that.' 'That's why I love you, Elon.'' Since then, the love has turned to stardust as the contradictions inherent in Musk's US$350 billion space empire spill over. The hypocrisy of a billionaire pitching himself as 'dark Maga' – 'Make America Great Again' – and taking a chainsaw to government spending while SpaceX (and Tesla) benefits from US$22 billion worth of government contracts is exacerbating the clash of egos, with Trump threatening to withdraw taxpayer support. Meanwhile, Musk's casual threat – quickly withdrawn – to halt the Dragon capsule upon which the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Nasa) relies to ferry astronauts echoed the geopolitical blackmail exerted on the battlefield in Ukraine, where the billionaire has in the past halted attacks against Russia via SpaceX unit Starlink. These are high-stakes threats with huge societal costs. We are no longer in the realm of enterprising conquistadors but conflicted taxpayer-backed trade empires. Even if Musk deserves credit for his part in SpaceX's domination in both rocket launches and satellite communications, with 80 per cent market share in the former and more than 8,000 Starlink satellites in orbit, the feud's weaponisation of space suggests innovation has taken a backseat to favouritism. SpaceX's successes this year have not been on the launchpad but rather inside the corridors of power, where its market share looks like a lever for rent extraction instead of exploration. Rule changes to high-speed Internet subsidies have opened the door to Starlink awards, as has the prospect of a defence 'Golden Dome'. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Trump's tariff bullying of other countries has been reportedly accompanied by a push for regulatory approvals for Starlink. And putting a Musk ally atop Nasa appears to have been a last straw for the Maga movement. While Nasa and the Pentagon remain heavily reliant on SpaceX, the silver lining to all this is that Musk's competitors must get the message and step up their game. US commercial space companies including Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin have been contacted by government officials about rocket readiness, according to the Washington Post (owned by Bezos). Over in the European Union, which is desperately trying to not miss another technological revolution, governments are getting serious about reenergising legacy players such as Eutelsat Communications, which is in talks to raise 1.5 billion euros (S$2.2 billion) that would double the French state's stake to 30 per cent. The continent is also eyeing its first 'hop' test of a reusable booster project called Themis, which I glimpsed while on a recent tour of Airbus and Safran's Arianespace manufacturing facility near Paris. But one gloomy possibility is that a prolonged Maga-Musk war makes space a chillier place for everyone. Nasa is already facing hefty budget cuts; snapbacks and U-turns driven by personal rivalries won't inspire confidence. (Let's not forget Amazon once blamed Trump's personal dislike of Bezos for the loss of a US$10 billion Pentagon contract.) And Europeans have a huge gap to close: A report by think tank Institut Montaigne notes that its military space spending is one-fifteenth the US', while Bloomberg Intelligence's John Davies estimates Eutelsat's OneWeb network requires an extra four billion euros or more of capital spending by 2030. More mergers and more state meddling are likely in a de-Musking world – though hopefully with some lessons learnt ahead of time. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
France's Mistral launches Europe's first AI reasoning model
[PARIS] Mistral on Tuesday launched Europe's first AI reasoning model, which uses logical thinking to create a response, as it tries to keep pace with American and Chinese rivals at the forefront of AI development. The French startup has attempted to differentiate itself by championing its European roots, winning the support of French President Emmanuel Macron, as well as making some of its models open source in contrast to the proprietary offerings of OpenAI or Alphabet's Google. Mistral is considered Europe's best shot at having a home-grown AI competitor, but has lagged behind in terms of market share and revenue. Reasoning models use chain-of-thought techniques - a process that generates answers with intermediate reasoning abilities when solving complex problems. They could also be a promising path forward in advancing AI's capabilities as the traditional approach of building ever-bigger large language models by adding more data and computing power begins to hit limitations. For Mistral, which was valued by venture capitalists at US$6.2 billion, an industry shift away from 'scaling up' could give it a window to catch up against better capitalisdaed rivals. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up China's DeepSeek broke through as a viable competitor in January through its low-cost, open-sourced AI models, including one for reasoning. OpenAI was the first to launch its reasoning models last year, followed by Google a few months later. Meta, which also offers its models open-sourced, has not yet released a standalone reasoning model, though it said its latest top-shelf model has reasoning capabilities. Mistral is launching an open-sourced Magistral Small model and a more powerful version called Magistral Medium for business customers. 'The best human thinking isn't linear - it weaves through logic, insight, uncertainty, and discovery. Reasoning language models have enabled us to augment and delegate complex thinking and deep understanding to AI,' Mistral said. American companies have mostly kept their most advanced models proprietary, though a handful, such as Meta, has released open-source models. In contrast, Chinese firms ranging from DeepSeek to Alibaba have taken the open-source path to demonstrate their technological capabilities. Mistral Small is available for download on Hugging Face's platform and can reason in languages including English, French, Spanish, Arabic and simplified Chinese. REUTERS
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
UK's Reeves to make £2 trillion bet on ‘Britain's renewal'
[LONDON] British finance minister Rachel Reeves will divide up more than £2 trillion of public spending on Wednesday in a speech she hopes will foster a sense of national renewal and make clear the year-old Labour government's political priorities. In an address to parliament due after 1130 GMT, Reeves will set out day-to-day budgets for government departments from 2026 to 2029 and investment plans out to 2030. Reeves set the overall total for spending in an October budget, financing her plan with the biggest tax rise in a generation and looser fiscal rules that make it easier for her to borrow to cover long-term investment. The choices she announces on Wednesday must start paying off quickly if Labour is to achieve its goals of boosting Britain's growth rate and improving the quality of overstretched public services. 'This government is renewing Britain. But I know too many people in too many parts of the country are yet to feel it,' Reeves is expected to tell parliament, according to speech extracts released by the finance ministry. Reeves said the government would 'invest in our country's security, health and economy so working people all over our country are better off.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Among the projects announced on Wednesday was likely to be a £39 billion 10-year programme to build lower-cost housing - almost doubling the annual amount spent on this compared with existing support, the finance ministry said. Since its sweeping election victory last July, Labour has seen its popularity slide. The right-wing Reform Party led by former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage is now ahead of it in the polls and outperformed it in English local elections last month. While Britain's economy recorded the fastest growth of the Group of Seven advanced economies in the first quarter of this year, the International Monetary Fund has forecast that in coming years it will lag behind the United States and Canada and barely outperform the euro zone. Official data on Tuesday showed the jobless rate had hit its highest in nearly four years - which the opposition Conservatives blamed on Reeves' October decision to place the main burden of tax rises on employers and boost workers' rights. Spending battle Discussions between Reeves and government ministers have continued into this week over how big a slice their departments will receive of a pie whose size was set last year. Plans announced so far include £86 billion on research and development, £16 billion on public transport, £4 billion on a new nuclear power station, £6 billion on nuclear submarines and £4 billion on prisons. The final spending increases are unlikely to be shared out equally. Capital-intensive plans to raise defence spending to 2.5 per cent of gross domestic product, announced by Starmer in February, mean other departments will see no real-terms increase in the pace of investment after this year, the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank estimates. Day-to-day spending on public services is due to rise by an average of 1.2 per cent a year on top of inflation between 2026-27 and 2028-29, while capital budgets will increase by an average of 1.3 per cent in real terms through to 2029-30, according to the IFS. Both rates of growth are much slower than in the current financial year, when investment spending is set to jump by 11.6 per cent and current spending rises by 2.5 per cent. For day-to-day spending, increasing the health budget by 2 percentage points more than the average - as was typical when Labour was last in power before 2010 - would mean real-terms cuts of 1 per cent a year for other departments, the IFS said. Chris Jeffery, head of macro strategy at Legal & General, Britain's largest asset manager, said the fact that the overall spending total was known limited the impact for investors. Instead, financial markets would be most focused on whether any proposed cuts looked realistic for the departments affected. 'If they're imposing really large real-terms cuts in spending, then I think the market will come to the conclusion that these are less likely to be delivered than if they are less aggressive,' he said. REUTERS
