
The $45,000 golden prescription to heal rural health
This is what the Mudgee community has prescribed to entice city doctors to the famed wine region in central western NSW in a bold bid to ease a dire shortage of GPs.
"We like to call it their prescription for a better work lifestyle in the vines," Doctors 4 Mudgee Region program co-ordinator Kate Day, who is also a winemaker, tells AAP.
The bucolic remedy has been enough to attract a new GP to the picturesque gold rush village of Gulgong, while a doctor from Queensland will return to work in Mudgee after training in the region.
The push to get more doctors, complete with financial incentives provided by three mining companies, began after Gulgong's only GP left in early 2024 and clinics in nearby Mudgee closed their books.
Locals began travelling to neighbouring towns - or even 260km to the city - to see a doctor, an experience familiar to many across rural Australia where there are only 78 full-time GPs per 100,000 population.
After securing two new GPs, the region has an ambitious plan to lure 10 more from urban centres over the next three years in a sophisticated campaign that could inspire other towns.
"What rural communities can take from this is locals, companies and businesses banding together, not sitting on their laurels and waiting for someone else to come in," Ms Day says.
"It is community-led change."
The Mudgee region's campaign, which also includes a "concierge" service linking doctors to childcare, schools, housing and even hairdressers, is one of many examples of country communities fighting for healthcare equity.
Half a million Australians live in "GP deserts", receiving 40 per cent fewer services per person than the national average, according to research by the Grattan Institute.
With poorer access to check-ups, screening and medication, the burden of chronic disease is higher in rural and remote areas and life expectancy is shorter.
Fed-up and frustrated, many rural communities have gone to extreme lengths to bridge the gap.
The WA Wheatbelt town of Quairading offered a $1 million salary package for a GP in 2023, while locals in Kerang, northern Victoria, parodied the Queen hit I Want To Break Free in a social media video called We Want a GP.
When two long-time western NSW Bogan Shire GPs approached retirement in 2015, the council began operating a medical centre at a cost to ratepayers of between $600,000 and $900,000 per year.
The Royal Flying Doctor Service has stepped in to run clinics in several rural towns, including Robinvale, in Victoria, where the only GP to 2500 people was under immense pressure.
While these grassroots efforts are admirable, rural communities should not have to do the work of federal and state governments, Council of Presidents of Medical Colleges chair Sanjay Jeganathan says.
"Australia is a wealthy nation and each and every Australian should receive the same kind of healthcare irrespective of their postcode," Associate Professor Jeganathan tells AAP.
As a radiologist in Perth, Dr Jeganathan regularly sees patients who have travelled thousands of kilometres from Broome or Karratha.
The council, which represents all 15 specialist medical colleges in Australia, believes a "grow your own" approach will boost the numbers of doctors in the bush.
It has introduced guidelines for colleges to prioritise rural candidates for specialist training, as junior doctors from the bush are more likely to stay in the regions, as are those who get exposure to country life during their studies.
"There is no point in training them in Sydney and Melbourne because the likelihood is they are going to stay in the big cities," Dr Jeganathan says.
"We should be really putting our efforts into developing rural and regional training hubs with a selection of appropriate trainees to work there."
The constant cry from the bush to train more doctors is slowly turning the tide.
Australia's two GP colleges are oversubscribed for the first time in many years and more trainees are expressing a desire to work outside the cities, Rural Doctors Association president RT Lewandowski says.
But once they arrive in the bush, a Medicare system designed for the city won't necessarily cover the cost of their work.
Rural GPs tend to see fewer patients with more complex health conditions in longer consultations, while also possibly working across clinics, hospital wards and emergency departments.
Those things partly contribute to an estimated $6.5 billion annual spending shortfall on rural health.
"There is a tremendous underspend ... on rural patients," Dr Lewandowski says.
"Our mortality is still determined by our postcode."
Dr Lewandowski was among of a group of doctors who visited Canberra in late June, imploring national leaders to help train more doctors and fix "piecemeal" rural health funding.
The message is being heard, with the federal government delivering more doctor training places as a start.
"I don't think the government is closing their eyes to the problem but it's going to be a hard change," Dr Lewandowski says.
"We should have an ample supply of GPs but I don't see that realistically coming super soon."
In Mudgee, the local campaign is proving successful if a little frustrating.
"You do look and think 'wow, this is a major problem, what is our state and federal government doing?'" Ms Day says.
"But it doesn't matter what problem you have in life, if you want to fix it, you've got to go out there and do it yourself.
"That's what country towns do so well, they just pull up their sleeves and get on with it."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
11 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Dramatic spike' in Aussies installing infrared saunas at home
A new wellness trend is sweeping Australia, with data showing a 'record number' of people installing an expensive item at home to avoid paying costly gym fees. Infrared saunas have been gaining popularity in recent years, largely due a stream of celebrity endorsements and potential health benefits such as improved muscle recovery, reduced pain, and enhanced relaxation. With gyms and health centres generally charging between $20 to $50 per session, it has sparked an uptick in Aussies installing the large device at home. Data shows demand for the hottest 'must-have' property feature has increased among those buying homes, with searches for the keyword up by more than a third on in the past year. It's a boom also being experienced on Airtasker, where there has been a 'dramatic spike' in the number of people seeking help installing saunas as the trend takes off. 'We're seeing a major spike in sauna-related tasks as Australians embrace the health and wellness trend in their own backyard,' Tim Fung, the job-posting platform's CEO, told The company's data showed that tasks for saunas have been consistently on the rise over the last 4 years, with 2025 seeing the most consistent demand at a very high volume. Tasks related to the sweat-boosting habit peaked during July, with the platform stating it had the most tasks involving a sauna shared in Airtasker history. 'What's really exciting is that saunas are no longer just a luxury as they are more accessible and easy to get installed,' Mr Fung added. 'It's wellness with a social twist, as people can invite a friend over for a sauna, just like people do for a swim in the pool.' Prices for one of these trendy new saunas, which use infrared lamps to heat the body directly, rather than the traditional sauna method of heating the air, can vary. Bunnings currently has one on sale for $2499, while some brands charge as much as $15,000 to take one home. Sydney woman, Layla Kalachm, 42, said it was a 'no-brainer' to splurge on the device, stating she was spending between $100 and $150 a week just using infrared saunas at local gyms and bathhouses. 'It really started to add up,' she told 'With winter setting in, having young kids, and a hectic schedule, it also just wasn't practical anymore. 'I needed something that fit into my life, and having a sauna at home means I can jump in whenever I have a spare moment, without having to book in advance or worry about running late. The flexibility and convenience is a game-changer.' In total, Ms Kalachm spent $8000 on a three-person sauna with a light therapy panel, and a further $400 for it to be installed in her backyard using Airtasker. Valentino Sia, 37, also spent a 'significant amount' setting up his infrared sauna inside his Sydney home – but said 'in the long run, around two to three years, it will definitely pay for itself'. 'Owning a sauna feels like a real luxury – it's almost like living the millionaire lifestyle,' he joked. 'It's fast become a core part of my relaxation routine as I find it helps manage my chronic lower back pain. The relief is temporary, but it really makes a difference.' For Mr Sia, he finds the ambient lighting 'very calming,' stating that he likes to sync music up to its Bluetooth speakers to get the full experience. 'It's like a mini meditation retreat right at home,' he explained. Sales of sauna and wellness products are rising by around 7 per cent annually, two per cent faster than the growth for the home improvement category, which is increasing by 5 per cent, according to Luxo Living. While scientific evidence around the health benefits of infrared saunas is still its infancy, it has shown promise in a number of different ways, including boosting heart health and reducing blood pressure, according to Cleveland Clinic. Researchers in a two-year study have also found that infrared sauna therapy 'may be a promising method for treatment of chronic pain'. It has also been linked to better sleep, with studies estimating that a 30-minute sauna session can burn approximately 100 to 300 calories, depending on factors like heat intensity and session duration.


Perth Now
15 hours ago
- Perth Now
Prize shines light on top Aussie women in STEM research
Women working in science, technology, engineering or mathematics sectors are being encouraged to apply for a world-first prize for emerging researchers. The inaugural Marie Krogh Young Women in Science prize, launched by healthcare company Novo Nordisk, will consist of a $50,000 cash prize as well as $5000 for seven finalists. It's named in honour of Danish physician Marie Krogh (1874-1943), who pioneered treatment for diabetes as one of the first women in Denmark to earn a doctorate in medicine. In Australia, women make up 37 per cent of university enrolments in STEM and hold just 15 per cent of jobs in those sectors. The prize aims to recognise mid-career women in STEM for their contributions to science and medicine and recognise future leaders, Murdoch Children's Research Institute director Kathryn North said. "Supporting the next generation of women in science and medicine isn't just about equity, it's about excellence," Professor North said. The judging panel is made up of several esteemed scientists and doctors, including Royal Children's Hospital centre for community child health director Sharon Goldfeld. It was exciting for an international company to recognise the contributions of Australian women in STEM, Professor Goldfeld told AAP. "Awards like this try to right some of the imbalance in the sector. It's not that there are no women in STEM, there are amazing women, but this is a leg up," she said. "We talk about the 'cliff' in research where often early career researchers are tracking along well but then can't quite make it to the next stage. A prize like this helps to fix that." Judges would be on the lookout for applicants who could communicate their research well, alongside excellent ideas. "I am blown away by the amazing women scientists of today and their ability to traverse all sorts of sciences and think cleverly about the way they communicate," Prof Goldfeld said. "We are looking for the STEM researcher who is not only excellent but also able to say why their research project is going to make a difference." Applications are now open, with finalists to be honoured at a Parliament House reception and awards dinner in Canberra in November 2025.

ABC News
17 hours ago
- ABC News
PFAS experts answer common questions about 'forever chemicals' and the risks to human health
PFAS, it seems, are everywhere. From farmers in Queensland managing contaminated land, to residents north of Perth fighting for tainted pipework to be replaced, Australians are grappling with how to live with so-called "forever chemicals". Last week, a New South Wales Health expert advisory panel delivered its report on the health impacts of PFAS, on the same day researchers confirmed 21 new PFAS chemicals had been detected in Sydney's tap water. With a Senate inquiry into the extent, regulation and management of PFAS looming, some academics are encouraging a rethink on the essential use of these substances. To better understand how "forever chemicals" work, what the risks are, and what's being done to address the problems, we sat down with three leading PFAS experts: These researchers, who have a combined six decades of experience in the fields of environmental science, engineering and molecular toxicology, are urging caution around what they've called a growing problem. Have you got a question about PFAS? Dr O'Carroll will join us live from 11am to answer the common questions about forever chemicals. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) refers to a group of over 14,000 synthetic chemicals used in all sorts of industrial and domestic products since the 1950s. They're often used in firefighting foams, pesticides, building materials and electronics, as well as household products such as stain-resistant upholstery, waterproof clothing, cleaning products, cosmetics, food packaging and non-stick cookware. Dr O'Carrol explains that the chemical properties of PFAS make them very effective at repelling water, oil and dirt. "It's a chemical that likes to be at interfaces … it doesn't let water through jackets, doesn't allow wine to stain our carpets," he says. Dr Clarke adds "anything that is advertised as oil- or water-repellent is likely to have a PFAS in it". "It has a carbon-fluorine bond, which is very strong, and it doesn't degrade easily in the environment … they get the term 'forever chemicals' because they don't really degrade," he says. The durability of PFAS means they can persist in the environment — and in the bodies of humans and animals — for a long time, and this presents significant concerns. According to the latest National Health Measures survey, most Australians have detectable levels of PFAS in our blood. The most common types detected are perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), and perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), found in more than 85 per cent of the population. The Australian government's PFAS taskforce notes these chemicals aren't directly manufactured in Australia, but we do know they are found in products we use and traces have been found in the environment. Dr DeWitt says most people are exposed to PFAS through ingestion — the water they drink or the food they eat. Pioneering research by Dr O'Carroll, in collaboration with international scientists, tested 45,000 soil and groundwater samples from around the world, and found "a substantial fraction" had PFAS levels exceeding safe drinking water guidelines. The highest PFAS levels tended to be around known exposure sites, including training areas where firefighting foam had been in high use, or around landfills. Levels of PFAS have also been detected in water filtration plants in Sydney, in compost being sold to the public in Western Australia, and in the nesting soils of little penguins around Tasmania. Last year, Australia updated its guidelines around safe drinking water to reduce the accepted levels of several PFAS chemicals. Dr DeWitt says less is known about other routes of exposure, such as skin absorption or inhalation. "But we know that when PFAS are [ingested in food or drink] the bulk of what you take into the body can get absorbed across your intestines and get into your blood," she says. Dr DeWitt says once PFAS are distributed throughout the body, they can cross cell membranes and interact with proteins that affect various bodily functions. "Some of these proteins can affect vitally important processes in our bodies, such as the production and action of hormones, the production of cholesterol. So they can interact with these physiological proteins in the body to produce toxicity," she says. Researchers say one of the biggest concerns with PFAS is their persistence — that is, how long they hang around in our bodies. "Many PFAS get excreted in the urine, so they travel from the blood to the kidneys, where they can get pushed out of the body whenever somebody urinates," Dr DeWitt says. But this can take a long time. For some PFAS, the half-life — that is, the time it takes for half of the amount ingested to be excreted — is a matter of hours or days, but for most, it's years. "The problem is, even if you have low levels of exposure, you can still build up amounts in your body if what you rake in is greater than what you put out," Dr DeWitt says. The science on PFAS and the potential impact on human health has been the subject of much public debate in the past few years. Not all of these 14,000 chemicals have been closely studied. Most research has focused on the effects of well-known PFAS, often in populations who have been exposed to high doses. From that research, PFAS exposure has been associated with increased levels of cholesterol and uric acid in the blood, reduced kidney function, altered immune function and levels of thyroid hormones, delayed menstruation, earlier menopause and lower birth weight. The Australian Health Department's PFAS guidelines note these differences have generally been small and unlikely to cause significant negative health outcomes. And less is known about the toxicity of these chemicals at low doses over time. However, Dr DeWitt notes several large-scale epidemiological studies of people who have been highly exposed to PFAS have led to some concerning findings. "Right now, PFOA has the strongest evidence of links to cancer, followed by PFOS. For the others, there haven't been enough studies to understand if they are linked to cancer," Dr DeWitt says. "But we also have evidence from experimental studies with animals like mice and rats to support what we observe in exposed people, which gives biological plausibility or credibility to those findings in people." The NSW Health advisory panel's report on PFAS, published last week, concluded that "health effects of PFAS appear to be small", and cautioned authorities to "avoid using currently available epidemiological studies to derive threshold levels due to the higher risk of bias". Dr Clarke warns that while more research is needed, there are potential risks we should be mindful of. "We know that there's a lot of harm from particular types of pollutants, so I'm talking about cancers, reproductive health problems, impaired immune systems, and neurological damage. "We've seen a 50 per cent decline in male fertility over the last century, which many researchers believe is associated with exposure to chemicals." In a group of more than 14,000 chemicals, not all PFAS are the same. Researchers use several criteria to evaluate the harm of different PFAS chemicals, including how persistent they are in the environment, whether they accumulate in the bodies of humans or animals, and whether they produce toxicity. The bulk of the research to this point has focused on the impact of what are known as longer-chain PFAS, including PFOA, PFOS and PFHxS. The structure of these long-chain PFAS is understood to play a significant role in toxicity, and they are generally highly mobile in water, which means they can travel long distances in the environment. Certain long-chain PFAS, such as those used in firefighting foams, have been phased out around the world and Australia introduced a ban on PFOA, PFHxS and PFOS in July. But Dr DeWitt warns that PFAS with shorter carbon chains may still be harmful. "A short-chain PFAS is as equally persistent in the environment as a longer-chain PFAS. So whether a PFAS has eight carbons or four carbons, it doesn't break down," she says. "The difference is that the shorter-chain PFAS tend to get excreted more rapidly from the bodies of living organisms … that does mean that they have a lesser opportunity to interact with molecules in our bodies to produce toxicity, but they can still produce toxicity." Dr Clarke says there's still a lot we don't know about newer PFAS, including their effects on our bodies or the environment. "But we can reasonably predict that they will be persistent [in the environment] because of that perfluoro–carbon bond, which is very strong," he says. "So [while] we don't have full scientific evidence to demonstrate that it causes an environmental harm, we can reasonably predict that it will, because it has similar properties to things that we've already banned or phased out." Dr DeWitt wants the conversation to focus on what we really need PFAS for, and to consider limiting our use to chemicals that are "essential for the health, safety and functioning of society, and for which there are no alternatives". "So, do you have to have a sofa in your house that has a stain-resistant coating? Is it really that difficult to remove stains with soap and water?" she says. "Do you have to have PFAS in your dental floss so that it glides perfectly between your teeth? "I think we need to think about the essentiality of chemicals before we put them in products." The experts say, while products like non-stick cookware and cosmetics are not thought to be a major pathway for PFAS to get into the body, there are still choices you can make to reduce exposure. "The teflon pan isn't really thought to be an exposure source to people … be mindful about how you use it, though. If you're burning it, and you see smoke coming off it, that's a sign that you shouldn't be using it at that temperature," Dr Clarke says. As for cosmetics and personal care products, if you want to avoid PFAS, check ingredients lists for any chemical with "perfluoro" in the name.