
News in Easy English: Tokyo man speaks out daily for Gaza in busy streets
The man's name is Yusuke Furusawa. He is 49 years old. He works building sets for TV shows. After work, he goes alone to places like Shinjuku and Shibuya stations to speak about Gaza. Gaza is a place where many Palestinian people live. Recently, there has been fighting there. Many people in Gaza have died.
Furusawa started this activity in October 2023, after getting sick with COVID-19. As he recovered, he watched videos online about the difficult situation in Gaza. He felt he needed to speak up about it.
At first, some people were unkind to him in the street. Because of this, he started taking videos of himself and posting them online. Many people around the world saw these videos. Now, he has about 170,000 followers on Instagram. Foreign visitors to Japan sometimes come just to meet him. They say, "Where are you today?" and thank him for speaking up.
He often wears a special scarf and uses a bag with the Palestinian flag on it. Followers from social media gave these to him as presents. One time, an Israeli woman met him and said she agreed the fighting needed to stop. Furusawa explained, "I am speaking about the governments, not about normal people."
But not everyone is happy with his actions. Sometimes, people tell him, "You are noisy," or "This has no meaning."
Furusawa knows some people dislike what he does, but he keeps standing there. He says, "In Japan, people have the right to live safely and speak freely. If someone loses these rights somewhere in the world, I believe we need to speak up. Is meaning important? I think it is just the right thing to do."
(Japanese original by Kohei Chiwaki, Digital News Group)
Vocabulary
genocide: trying to kill many people from a group or country
set: background used on TV programs or movies
recover: to get better after you have been sick
social media: websites or apps like Instagram or Facebook, where people share information and videos online
follower: someone who regularly looks at another person's social media posts
government: the group of people who make decisions for a country
right: something everyone should be allowed to have or do (for example, the right to speak freely and safely)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Today
20 hours ago
- Japan Today
Israel in talks to resettle Gaza Palestinians in South Sudan, sources say
FILE PHOTO: Palestinians carry aid supplies they collected from trucks that entered Gaza through Israel, in Beit Lahia, in the northern Gaza Strip August 10, 2025. REUTERS/Dawoud Abu Alkas/File Photo South Sudan and Israel are discussing a deal to resettle Palestinians from war-torn Gaza in the troubled African nation, three sources told Reuters - a plan quickly dismissed as unacceptable by Palestinian leaders. The sources, who have knowledge of the matter but spoke on condition of anonymity, said no agreement had been reached but talks between South Sudan and Israel were ongoing. The plan, if carried further, would envisage people moving from an enclave shattered by almost two years of war with Israel to a nation in the heart of Africa riven by years of political and ethnically-driven violence. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office and Israel's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the information from the three sources. A spokesperson for the U.S. State Department said, "we do not speak to private diplomatic conversations," when asked about the plan and if the United States supported the idea. Netanyahu said this month he intends to extend military control in Gaza, and this week repeated suggestions that Palestinians should leave the territory voluntarily. Arab and world leaders have rejected the idea of moving Gaza's population to any country. Palestinians say that would be like another "Nakba" (catastrophe) when hundreds of thousands fled or were forced out during the Arab-Israeli war of 1948. The three sources said the prospect of resettling Palestinians in South Sudan was raised during meetings between Israeli officials and South Sudanese Foreign Minister Monday Semaya Kumba when he visited the country last month. Their account appeared to contradict South Sudan's foreign ministry which on Wednesday dismissed earlier reports on the plan as "baseless". The ministry was not immediately available to respond to the sources' assertions on Friday. News of the discussions was first reported by the Associated Press on Tuesday, citing six people with knowledge of the matter. Wasel Abu Youssef, a member of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization, said the Palestinian leadership and people "reject any plan or idea to displace any of our people to South Sudan or to any other place". His statement echoed a statement from the office of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Thursday. Hamas, which is fighting Israel in Gaza, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel, who visited the South Sudanese capital Juba this week, told reporters that those discussions had not focussed on relocation. "This is not what the discussions were about," she said when asked if any such plan had been discussed. "The discussions were about foreign policy, about multilateral organizations, about the humanitarian crisis, the real humanitarian crisis happening in South Sudan, and about the war," she said, referring to her talks with Juba officials. Netanyahu, who met Kumba last month, has said Israel is in touch with a few countries to find a destination for Palestinians who want to leave Gaza. He has consistently declined to provide further details. © Thomson Reuters 2025.


The Diplomat
a day ago
- The Diplomat
Philippines Opens Campaign Period in Landmark Bangsamoro Regional Elections
The Commission on Elections has introduced a gun ban in the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao, in the run-up to its first parliamentary election in October. The Philippines yesterday announced the opening of the two-month election campaign period in the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM), including a ban on firearms that will run until after the election. BARMM, an autonomous region in the far south of the Philippines that was created by a Bangsamoro autonomy plebiscite in 2019, will hold its first regular parliamentary elections on October 13, after two postponements. Speaking to the press yesterday, George Erwin Garcia, the chairperson of the Commission on Elections (Comelec), announced that a gun ban would be in place until October 28, in order to prevent election-related violence in the run-up to the historic election. As Rappler explained, 'Unlicensed weapons have fueled clan feuds, insurgent attacks and political killings, with police and military records showing hundreds of shooting incidents in recent years.' Under the ban, Garcia said, the carrying of firearms and deadly weapons in all public places in the BARMM will be prohibited, even if the holder is authorized to possess or carry firearms, Minda News reported. 'Individuals are also barred from employing the services of security personnel or bodyguards, and the transport and delivery of firearms, ammunition and explosives, and/or their components,' it added. Those violating the ban will face prison terms of one to six years, the loss of voting rights, and disqualification from public office in the case of officials and politicians. Any foreigners found breaching the prohibition will be deported after serving their sentence. The BARMM elections will mark an endpoint to the political transition that is currently underway in the Muslim-majority region, following decades of war between the Philippine government and Moro separatist rebels. In 2014, the government reached an agreement with the main rebel group, the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), providing for the establishment of an autonomous authority in the Bangsamoro region, which was set up after the 2019 plebiscite. The election was initially set to take place in 2022, but was delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic and the absence of an electoral authority for the region. The elections were then rescheduled to May of this year, when they were to be held simultaneously with the nationwide mid-term polls. However, the government was forced to delay the election by another five months after the Supreme Court ruled in September of last year that Sulu province would be excluded from BARMM. The court ruled that its inclusion in the BARMM was unconstitutional as most of its residents voted against joining the region in the plebiscite. This then necessitated 'adjustments in the region's parliamentary structure,' as PhilStar Global reported in February. As a result, only 73 of the 80 parliamentary seats will be up for election in October. According to Comelec, around 100 individual candidates and seven regional parliamentary political parties have registered to participate in the election. Assuming that there are no further delays, the BARMM elections 'shall be held and synchronized with the 2028 national elections and every three years thereafter.' The parliamentary election will be an important test of the political accord, and will likely set the tone for whatever parliament emerges from the election. In a report last year, the International Crisis Group lauded the 2014 accord between Manila and MILF as 'one of the few examples of a negotiated peace anywhere in the world over the last ten years.' Nonetheless, the situation remained fragile across much of the state, where 'conflict is surging, in the form of feuds among clans and political rivals, but also rebel infighting, particularly in central Mindanao.' It added, 'Although confined to pockets of the island, the recurrent skirmishes cast a shadow over the delicate transition.'


The Mainichi
a day ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: 80 years after World War II, now is the time for Japan to act for global peace
Eighty years have passed since the end of a war that brought Japan to the brink of destruction and claimed countless lives in the Asian countries it invaded. It is time to reaffirm the weight of the peace built on such immense sacrifices. The journey of postwar Japan, marked by reconstruction and economic growth while upholding a vow to never wage war again, is something to be proud of. This was made possible by the postwar international order, underpinned by the rule of law and free trade. However, this foundation is on the verge of collapse. The international community has failed to stop the two wars continuing in Europe and the Middle East, while the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is disrupting the global economy with coercive high tariffs. The risk of nuclear weapons being used is increasing, and natural disasters caused by climate change are unending. The "Doomsday Clock," which warns of how close humanity is to its final hour, is set at its shortest time ever at 89 seconds to midnight. The logic of the powerful prevails In these turbulent times, the arrogance of powerful nations is rampant. The Israeli military is destroying the Gaza Strip in the Palestinian territories, while Russia is pressuring Ukraine, once referred to as "Little Russia," to surrender. This is a structure where the weak are suppressed. Nazi Germany incited hostility toward Jews and drove its people into World War II. As the number of people who experienced the war dwindles and the preservation of their memories becomes challenging, there is concern about the rise of distorted nationalism and exclusionism. Japan is no exception. Politicians have made remarks denying the historical facts about the Battle of Okinawa and the Nanjing Massacre. During the recent House of Councillors election, false rumors such as "foreigners are being given preferential treatment" and "crime rates are high" were rampant. "It is tough for us, though we're the ones supporting Japan's convenient lifestyle." This was a comment received by Jiho Yoshimizu, the representative director of the nonprofit Nichietsu Tomoiki Shienkai (the Japan Vietnam Mutual Support Association), which supports Vietnamese residents in Japan. Intolerance that excludes minorities is continuous with the logic of "survival of the fittest." We must not allow the clock to be turned back to an era of war. Postwar Japan has maintained war-renouncing Article 9 of its Constitution and bases its security on the Japan-U.S. alliance to avoid direct involvement in armed conflict. By relying on the U.S. military for security, rapid economic growth was also possible. However, there is no denying that postwar Japan's societal trend was strongly influenced by the idea of "one-country pacifism," or a desire never to be caught up in war again, as noted by University of Tokyo professor Tadashi Karube. Now that the Trump administration has turned its back on global stability, Japan's ability to devise and create peace on its own initiative based on its postwar experience is put to the test. The most urgent task is to rebuild order. Japan must listen to the voices of the Global South and help create fair international rules. Instead of lamenting its declining national power, Japan should work to strengthen the function of the United Nations as "a forum where middle powers can join hands with small countries to exert their presence," as stated by U.N. Under-Secretary-General Izumi Nakamitsu. The free trade system must be protected. Deepening dialogue with Southeast Asian countries and the European Union, and expanding the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), is a logical step. The creation of an environment that brings stability to East Asia is also urgent. Japan is in a position to propose the establishment of a regional framework for dialogue aimed at building trust. It is crucial not to impose "Japan-centric Asianism" as seen before the war, but to work as equal partners. Breaking away from 'own country first' policy According to a public awareness survey by the Japanese Red Cross Society, more than half of respondents believe "Japan is peaceful," while less than 20% feel "the world is peaceful." How can this gap be bridged? Professor Toshikazu Inoue of Gakushuin University, an expert on Showa-era (1926-1989) history, pointed out, "Japan must fulfill its fair share of responsibility in building world peace." There are notable citizen efforts. The Kyoto-based nonprofit Terra Renaissance sends staff to countries including Uganda in East Africa to help children, who were abducted by anti-government forces and forced to become soldiers, return home and reintegrate into society. Founder Masaya Onimaru explained, "We want to reclaim child soldiers and dismantle armed rebel groups. What is needed is to end conflicts through means other than violence." Now is the moment for Japan's political leadership to reflect on history and present a vision for a "world without war." It is perplexing that Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba chose not to issue a statement to mark the anniversary of the end of WWII. Diplomatic critic Kiyoshi Kiyosawa, who was slammed as a "pacifist" during wartime, lamented the narrow, self-centered nationalism in his "A Diary of Darkness," writing, "Japan sees only its own position." His words still strike at the heart of the issue, even 80 years later. We must not shut ourselves off from the world and be bystanders to others' plights. At this 80-year postwar milestone, what is required of Japan is action that spreads the practice of peace across the globe.