Congress challenges Centre to present development record on global indices
Speaking at a press conference in Nagpur, Mr. Sapkal criticised the recent publicity campaign launched by the Union government highlighting its achievements and urged that any such account be evaluated through international metrics such as the Human Development Index, the Happiness Index, and the Global Hunger Index, as compiled by institutions like UNICEF, the World Bank, and the World Health Organization.
'The Modi government must answer why it failed to deliver on key promises - including two crore jobs annually, doubling farmers' income, implementing the Swaminathan Commission report, and developing smart cities,' Mr. Sapkal said.
Alleging that India's developmental momentum had slowed under the Bharatiya Janata Party-led regime, the Congress leader said, 'Under former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, the country was on a growth trajectory. But in the last 11 years, we have regressed on multiple fronts.'
Responding to questions on the possibility of reunification among factions of the Nationalist Congress Party, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena, and the Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray), Mr. Sapkal said such decisions rested with the respective parties.
'As the Maha Vikas Aghadi, we contested the last two elections together. Similarly, the INDIA bloc stands united against forces undermining democracy and the Constitution. Our alliances will strengthen with those committed to safeguarding these values,' he said.
Mr. Sapkal added that alliance-related decisions for the upcoming municipal elections would be taken at the local level in consultation with other coalition partners.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Minutes from now, Delhi's hottest contest – between two BJP leaders
A stone's throw from Parliament, Delhi's Constitution Club was unusually crowded on Tuesday, as MPs and ex-MPs queued up to cast their vote for what has become the hottest contest this season in the steaming Capital. Generally considered a routine affair, the polls to the administration of the club are the cynosure of all eyes this time, away from the brouhaha over the Election Commission — the reason being the two leaders, both belonging to the BJP, at the heart of it. Former Union ministers Rajiv Pratap Singh Rudy and Sanjeev Balyan are fighting it out for the post of Secretary (Administration), considered the club's most powerful post. Rudy has been holding the post for over two decades now, which makes him both entrenched and vulnerable. Officially, the BJP has kept out of the election, but there is buzz among MPs across parties that challenger Balyan has the tacit blessings of the party's top leaders. Those supporting Rudy cite the vast improvements at the club, saying the sea change from how it was run earlier has happened under the Bihar leader. However, there are many MPs and ex-MPs who feel that the long time Rudy has occupied the post is precisely the reason that change is due. The electorate that lined up to vote Tuesday, numbering about 1,200, included Union Home Minister Amit Shah, BJP president and Union minister J P Nadda, Union minister Piyush Goyal, Congress leader Sonia Gandhi and Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge. Speaking to reporters, Balyan said that whatever the result, the dignity of the club must remain intact and that, as a platform for MPs and ex-MPs from across party lines to engage with one another, it was a good thing the club was in the news again. One common complaint of those backing Balyan is that MPs no longer get the same importance as they once did. BJP Lok Sabha MP from Jharkhand Nishikant Dubey told reporters Tuesday: 'Dr Balyan will win because this club has gone into the hands of IAS, IPS, IFS and pilots. It has to be retrieved for the MPs and should be back in the hands of MPs and ex-MPs. That is why we will make Dr Balyan win.' Rudy is no longer an MP. Some other MPs and ex-MPs also talk of officials 'frequenting the place' and non-MPs being found using the gym and other facilities. 'Will IAS officers or defence officers allow MPs in their clubs? If not, why is it that officials are seen to be controlling the Constitution Club?' a former Congress MP said. 'Wives of MPs have also complained. There are also complaints that the prices are too high.' A former BJP MP claimed that many MPs and former parliamentarians may rally against Balyan, given the charges against him in the 2013 Muzaffarnagar riots. 'Rudy may also get significant support from MPs who are fellow Thakurs like him,' said a former BJP MP. Therefore, many believe that Congress MPs would play a major role in determining the outcome. A former Congress MP, however, said the votes of the party members could go both ways, with Rudy seen as favourite of the Lutyens Delhi crowd. A former BJP MP agreed with Balyan that the best part of the election was that a largely 'passive' club had come alive – and that many parliamentarians have woken up to its importance. Elections are typically held for Secretary (Administration), Secretary (Sports), Secretary (Culture) and Treasurer and 11 posts of Executive Members in the club. Congress MP Rajiv Shukla earlier won the post of Secretary (Sports) uncontested after BJP Rajya Sabha MP Pradip Kumar Varma withdrew his candidature. Similarly, DMK MP Tiruchi Siva won the Secretary (Culture) post after former BJP MP Pradeep Gandhi withdrew his candidature. The post of the treasurer, too, saw no contest after former Bharat Rashtra Samithi MP AP Jithender Reddy withdrew his candidature, with DMK MP P Wilson winning. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla is the outgoing treasurer. Standing for elections for the 11 executive member posts are 14 MPs, including former BJP Rajya Sabha MP Naresh Agarwal, former BJP Lok Sabha MP Pradeep Gandhi, former Congress Lok Sabha MP Jasbir Singh Gill, BJP Lok Sabha MP Naveen Jindal, former Congress MP Aslam Sher Khan, TDP Lok Sabha MP Krishna Prasad Tenetti, BJP Rajya Sabha MP Pradip Kumar Varma, Samajwadi Party Lok Sabha MP Akshay Yadav, TMC Lok Sabha MP Prasun Banerjee, former Shiv Sena Lok Sabha MP Shrirang Appa Barne, former BJD Lok Sabha MP Kalikesh Singh Deo, the RSP's N K Premachandran as and former MP Anoop Singh. Formed in the 1940s for parliamentarians, the club has conference rooms, coffee clubs and an outdoor cafe. Along with lounges for MPs, there is also a billiards room, a gym, a unisex salon, and a swimming pool.
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘BrahMos chalega': Mithun Chakraborty's fiery retort to Pakistan's Bilawal Bhutto's ‘threat of war' amid tensions around Indus Waters Treaty
In a sharp reaction to Pakistan's Bilawal Bhutto Zardari's reported comments on the Indus Waters Treaty, BJP leader and veteran actor Mithun Chakraborty issued a fiery warning. The actor-turned-politician's remarks came after Bhutto reportedly stated, 'If Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announces an attack on the Indus River, he will be attacking our history, culture and civilization… The people of Pakistan have the strength to confront Modi in case of war.' Bhutto also reportedly warned that in the event of another war, Pakistan would 'restore all its six rivers'. Zardari was formerly Pakistan's 37th Minister of Foreign Affairs from 2022 to 2023. Chakraborty responded by saying: 'Agar aisi baatein karte rahenge aur hamari khopdi sanak gayi toh phir ek ke baad ek BrahMos chalega (If you keep talking like this and we lose our minds, then one BrahMos after the other will be launched)… After that, we will open the dam, and a tsunami will occur. I have nothing against the people of Pakistan. I have said all of this to (Bhutto).' He had started his comment in a soft tone: 'I don't want to say anything against the country of Pakistan. People of Pakistan are good, they also don't want war.' #WATCH | Kolkata, WB: On Bilawal Bhutto's reported statement on Indus Waters Treaty, BJP leader Mithun Chakraborty says, '…Agar aisi baatein karte rahenge aur hamari khopdi sanak gayi toh phir ek ke baad ek BrahMos chalega… We have also thought of building a dam where 140… — ANI (@ANI) August 12, 2025 Chakraborty's comments come amid renewed tensions over the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty. India had previously suspended the treaty following a terrorist attack in Pahalgam that killed 26 people on April 22. Union Home Minister Amit Shah recently announced that India would not be reactivating the historic agreement, stating that the treaty was for 'peace and progress,' which Pakistan had violated. This is not the first time Chakraborty has been at the centre of controversy for his inflammatory statements. In 2024, he faced a police complaint for a speech where he allegedly said, 'We will chop them (up) and bury them in the ground.' He has also been a vocal critic of the West Bengal government, calling for the imposition of President's Rule in the state following alleged incidents of political violence.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Aadhaar not sole proof of citizenship in voter rolls, must be verified: SC
The Supreme Court today agreed with the Election Commission of India (ECI) that the Aadhaar card cannot be treated as final proof of citizenship and must be independently verified. A Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi made this observation while hearing petitions against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. 'The Election Commission is correct in saying that Aadhaar can't be accepted as conclusive proof of citizenship; it has to be verified. See Section 9 of the Aadhaar Act,' Justice Kant told senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who appeared for the petitioners, as reported by Bar and Bench. The judge also said, 'Are petitioners saying that an Aadhaar card is proof of citizenship? They are not saying that it is not a measure… the Aadhaar Act says so.' The court is examining whether the ECI has the legal power to carry out this verification exercise. Justice Kant remarked, 'If they don't have the power, everything ends. But if they have the power, there can't be a problem.' The petitions challenge the ECI's June 24 order to conduct the SIR in Bihar. Petitioners fear mass deletions Speaking for the petitioners, Sibal argued that the ECI's process could lead to large-scale voter exclusions, especially for those unable to submit the required forms. He argued, even voters from the 2003 rolls had to fill fresh forms, and failure to do so would lead to deletion, even without a change in residence, the news report said. Sibal pointed to ECI data showing 72.4 million forms submitted, but about 6.5 million names were excluded without proper checks on deaths or migration. 'They admit in their affidavit that they did not conduct any survey,' he told the court. The Bench asked how the 6.5 million figure was calculated and whether this fear was based on facts or just an assumption. It noted that those who submitted forms were already in the draft rolls. Missing voter data allegations Sibal mentioned that there were 79 million voters in the 2025 list, with 49 million from the 2003 list, and that 2.2 million were recorded as dead. Advocate Prashant Bhushan, also appearing for the petitioners, alleged the ECI had not made public the list of voters removed due to death or change of residence. 'They say they have given some information to booth-level agents, but claim they are not obliged to give it to anyone else,' he told the SC Bench. The court said that if a voter provides an Aadhaar and a ration card, the ECI must verify the details. ECI's defence on SIR The ECI has defended the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), citing its powers under Article 324 of the Constitution and Section 21(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950. It said the revision was essential due to urban migration, demographic changes, and outdated rolls that had not been intensively revised for nearly 20 years. The commission maintained that the SIR would ensure only eligible citizens were on the rolls before the Bihar Assembly elections. On July 10, the court had asked the ECI to consider Aadhaar, ration card, and EPIC card for verification. Later, the ECI filed an affidavit stating neither Aadhaar nor a ration card could prove eligibility to vote. The petitioners have called this 'absurd'.
