Tariff-tinged US inflation boosts dollar, set to weigh on rupee
The 1-month non-deliverable forward indicated an open in the 85.96-85.98 range versus 85.81 on Tuesday. The rupee has repeatedly avoided breaching the 86 level the last three sessions.
The question is whether the USD/INR can finally break through the 86–86.10 zone and push higher, said a currency trader at a Mumbai-based bank.
"There's little doubt that stop losses - both corporate and interbank - will be triggered if we see a decisive break past 86."
The dollar index rose 0.5% to its highest in three weeks on Tuesday, while the 30-year Treasury yield inched past 5% after U.S. inflation data indicated evidence of tariff impacts.
Prices increases across an array of goods drove inflation higher in June in what economists see as evidence of the Trump administration's increasing import taxes passing through to consumers.
U.S. consumer prices rose 0.3% in June, a roughly 3.5% annual rate, after a 0.1% increase in May.
In its daily market update, Morgan Stanley said that U.S. inflation is beginning "to show signs of tariff pressure".
Markets have digested tariff inflation effects and appear to "seemingly brace for the Fed to remain on hold for longer", it added.
Odds of a Fed rate cut in September fell after the data, with markets now pricing in 44 basis points of cuts this year, down from more than 50 bps before the data. Expectations of a July cut, already minimal, declined further.
"The increased uncertainty about tariffs and the extension of the trade talks deadline to 1 August suggest the Fed will need a few more months of data before cutting the policy rate," ANZ Bank said.
KEY INDICATORS:
** One-month non-deliverable rupee forward at 86.08; onshore one-month forward premium at 10 paise
** Dollar index up at 98.60
** Brent crude futures up 0.3% to $68.9 per barrel
** Ten-year U.S. note yield at 4.48%
** As per NSDL data, foreign investors sold a net $91.8 million worth of Indian shares on July 14
** NSDL data shows foreign investors sold a net $30.7 million worth of Indian bonds on July 14
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Donald Trump's latest Liberation Day means another dark day for America
Precisely what poor, benighted Syria and prosperous, neutral Switzerland have done to deserve US tariffs of 41 per cent and 39 per cent respectively is hard to discern. Neither is the kind of industrial superpower that represents a threat to America's economic hegemony, and both would, in their different ways, prefer to stay on reasonably good terms with the Trump White House. It is, sadly, easier to see why Canada got whacked with a 35 per cent levy on some of its exports – and Donald Trump's tariff tactics do have a hint of the mob about them. Mr Trump suggested that Canada's decision to recognise the state of Palestine as a sovereign nation would make it harder to achieve a trade deal, and he also mentioned the scourge of fentanyl. But then again, Mexico, which has also recognised Palestine and is by far the more important source of the drug, has been granted a 90-day tariff reprieve. Ever since the opening salvo in the Trump tariff war on 2 April – so-called Liberation Day – the shifting schedules and random pauses have lacked both rhyme and reason. Even at the time, their supposed 'reciprocity' was ridiculed. They have generated huge uncertainty, and, for a time, did so much damage to the dollar and US Treasuries on the capital markets that even Mr Trump had to make a tactical retreat. In fact, the US president's observed tendency to cave in whenever a trading 'partner' showed any sign of resistance led to the unwelcome 'Taco' sobriquet – 'Trump Always Chickens Out'. Some countries, such as the UK, Japan and the EU member states, have breathed a sigh of relief that they have escaped the worst, while others – often impoverished ones with no diplomatic leverage, such as Bangladesh and Lesotho – will find it difficult to cope with tariffs that are now considered moderate, but would have seemed shocking even a few years ago. Yet the game, even now, is not over. China – the second-largest economy in the world, and America's most formidable rival – has been left out of this supposedly final list of tariff increases. The trade talks between the two economic giants in Stockholm are dragging on, the prohibitive mutual tariffs having been abandoned, and they may well be extended past the next deadline of 12 August. President Trump met his match in Xi Jinping, and will not be imposing any further punitive trade sanctions on China for fear of another tit-for-tat escalation. Thus far, the markets have received the latest news of tariffs with some equanimity, but a collapse in trade between the world's two greatest economies would generate the kind of turmoil Mr Trump doesn't need right now. Even assuming that the eventual trade truce with China avoids disaster, these US tariffs are, in broad terms, the highest since 1934 and the era of the notorious Smoot-Hawley Act, which helped to strangle world trade and exacerbated the Great Depression. The Trump tariffs are no less damaging to world trade, and thus to economic growth, including that of the United States. But these restrictions on trade are what Mr Trump's Maga 'base' voted for, the folk memory of the previous disastrous experiment with tariffs having faded. The president's winning slogan was 'America First', epitomising a zero-sum, nationalistic view of the world, and unfortunately, he has proved as good as his word on inauguration day: 'Instead of taxing our citizens to enrich other countries, we will tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens.' Words that were both misguided and economically illiterate, naturally – but a promise kept. Many of the worst fears of America's friends and allies are coming true in these early months of Mr Trump's second term. With far more preparation than took place prior to his first term (which followed an election that, reputedly, he never expected to win), the US president has pressed on with his protectionist, isolationist, natalist agenda with speed and determination, surrounded by mostly underqualified, grotesquely sycophantic cronies. The judiciary is increasingly cowed, and Congress is listless in defending the constitution. The tendency to Caesarism is apparent in everything from the theatrical executive orders to the grandiose golden remodelling of the White House, and the contempt for the chair of the US Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell – a 'moron', apparently. Mr Trump thinks he can, with a stroke of a Sharpie, abolish the birthright to citizenship enshrined in the 14th amendment, passed in 1868. His conception of 'America First' is more America Alone, yet everything he does weakens American power and prosperity. It is an inward-looking, selfish, exclusionary approach. Undoubtedly it enjoys a political constituency, but ultimately it will prove self-defeating.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Figma IPO sketches case for direct listings
NEW YORK, Aug 1 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Precious few of Silicon Valley's self-professed renegades are ready to rebel against Wall Street. The madcap market debut of design-software developer Figma (FIG.N), opens new tab makes a case they should. An abundance of capital is already keeping companies private for longer, changing the rationale for going public. Doing so with the direct listing method, rather than a traditional initial public offering, would be more suitable. Figma sparked a frenzy by selling, opens new tab shares for $33 apiece on Wednesday after twice increasing its planned price range. By Thursday's end, they were trading for $115, giving the company a $56 billion valuation, nearly triple what rival Adobe was willing to pay for it in 2022. On Friday morning, the price hit $125. This mania does little for Figma beyond raising its profile. Having generated, opens new tab more than $200 million of adjusted free cash in the year through March, the 13-year-old firm led by Dylan Field wasn't seeking to raise much money and only sold about a third of the 37 million shares on offer. The rest came from earlier backers such as Index Ventures and Kleiner Perkins. Less than 8% of Figma's stock was available to investors who are, as ever, motivated by the fear of missing out on a fast-growing company. They ascribed a nonsensical valuation of 75 times last year's revenue. The biggest beneficiaries: financial advisers, including Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, that were paid generous fees to sell the shares, and their clients who received early allocations and an immediate return. Direct listings are better tailored for situations like Figma's. Used previously by Spotify Technology (SPOT.N), opens new tab and Palantir Technologies (PLTR.O), opens new tab, the process enables existing owners to sell straight onto an exchange with fewer restrictions. Market forces also determine the price instead of closed-door roadshows that cede such power to big fund managers and investment banks, whose incentives differ. Although traditional IPOs make sense for many companies, well-capitalized brand-name ventures like financial plumbing provider Stripe are a growing breed. There are more than 1,200 firms worldwide with private valuations of at least $1 billion, according to research outfit CB Insights. Such unicorns, opens new tab increasingly go public so investors can cash out rather than to fund growth. And although the sample size is small, a dozen direct listings have generated, opens new tab a 42% five-year return on average compared to just 9% from thousands of IPOs spanning 1999 to 2021, per University of Florida finance professor Jay Ritter. Figma's buzz will inspire other founders to go public, but they would do well to be more creative. Follow Jeffrey Goldfarb on X, opens new tab and Linkedin, opens new tab.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Deal or no deal?: world leaders walk tightrope in tariff negotiations with Trump
It was grip-and-grin time for Ursula von der Leyen as she sat across from Donald Trump in Scotland last week, with the two announcing a deal for 15% tariffs on European imports that would avert a transatlantic trade war – but came at a stiff price for the 27-country bloc. After committing to a unilateral US raise on tariffs that came on the heels of a Nato commitment to increase defense spending to 5% of national GDPs, von der Leyen then thanked Trump 'for his personal commitment and his leadership to achieve this breakthrough'. 'He is a tough negotiator, but he is also a dealmaker,' she said, as the US president beamed. The EU was one of just a number of parties to strike a deal with Trump before his temporary pause on new tariffs came to an end this week. And like many others, the guiding principle for the EU appeared to be: it can always get worse. 'This is clearly the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances,' Maroš Šefčovič, the EU trade chief, said. Others had a far bleaker interpretation of the dynamics, as Trump has wielded the threat of sky-high tariffs to cudgel his trading partners into submission. 'It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission,' wrote the French prime minister, François Bayrou. Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orbán put it another way: 'It was Donald Trump eating Ursula von der Leyen for breakfast,' he said on his podcast. Later, he called her a 'featherweight'. World leaders have been forced to adopt a position of appeasement and pragmatism as they've approached the Trump administration, which has swung between imposing staggering tariffs on imports and then announcing last minute pauses and exclusions that suggest there is little rhyme or reason to the White House's tariff strategy. But the key factor for Trump appears to be taking whatever he can get. Countries across Asia exporting to the US were quickest to begin negotiating new trade deals with the White House. Vietnam was desperate to cut a 46% tariff imposed on the country, and Trump early last month announced that he had negotiated a 20% rate with Vietnamese negotiators. Except, it turned out, they believed that they had negotiated an 11% rate, Politico reported. And treasury secretary Scott Bessent this week admitted that he had never seen the deal, which the Vietnamese authorities have never confirmed. Trump reportedly used the trade threats along with other incentives in order to broker a recent peace between Thailand and Cambodia after fighting broke out along the border between the two countries. He soon announced a 19% rate – a significant cut from 49% for Cambodia and 36% for Thailand – which appeared more motivated by international politics than trade considerations. But while many countries in the region will breathe a sigh of relief as they avert sky-high tariffs, some see a new danger in the arbitrary redrawing of the US's trade relationship with the world. 'What we felt during this negotiation is that the US trade environment is fundamentally changing,' South Korean trade minister Yeo Han-koo said shortly after a deal was made to tariff imports at 15%, down from a threatened 25%. The two sides had made a verbally agreement but had not made a formal draft, he said, because the deal had to be struck so quickly. 'I think we are entering a new normal era,' he said. 'So, although we have overcome this crisis, we cannot be relieved, because we do not know when we will face pressure from tariffs or non-tariff measures again.' Leaders who have stood up to Trump are having the hardest time. Among others, Trump has focused his ire on Canada, which he has blamed for the fentanyl crisis in the US, a charge that Canada's prime minister Mark Carney has rejected. Trump on Friday announced that he would raise tariffs on Canada, a top trading partner, to 35%, as tough negotiations between the two sides continued. Carney, who had coined the elections slogan 'Elbows up, Canada' as a signal of defiance against Trump's tariff and annexation threats, said he was 'disappointed'. 'While we will continue to negotiate with the United States on our trading relationship, the Canadian government is laser focused on what we can control: building Canada strong,' Carney said.
