'Scores better' – Former NFL legend LeSean McCoy gives explosive remark on Jalen Brunson and Stephen Curry debate
LeSean McCoy (Photo by Gary Wiepert/AP) and Jalen Brunson (Photo by Mary Altaffer/AP)
Former
NFL
legend
LeSean McCoy
exclusively admitted in a recent talk that the New York Knicks point guard
Jalen Brunson
is a better player than the Golden State Warriors point guard
Stephen Curry.
Even though the New York Knicks got eliminated by the Indiana Pacers in the Conference Finals, Brunson put up an impressive performance throughout the season. The player's score went as high as 43 and 36 points in Games 1 and 2 of the conference finals; however, they fell short in the overall score against the team.
Despite an early end to the season run, Stephen Curry managed to rack up an average of 24.5 points
Golden State Warriors point guard Stephen Curry had to end his season run early during the conference semifinals owing to a hamstring injury.
The team lost the semifinals eventually to the Minnesota Timberwolves in the Western Conference. Despite the loss, Curry's average for the 2024-25 season stands at 24.5 points, 4.4 rebounds and 6 assists. Jalen Brunson, on the other hand, with whom LeSean McCoy draws a comparison alongside Curry, has an overall stat of 26 points, 2.9 rebounds and 7.3 assists.
While the average competition is quite neck-to-neck between the two players, NFL star McCoy, in his recent statement, revealed his opinion favoring Brunson over Curry.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
News For Jack Nicholson, 87, He Has Been Confirmed To Be...
Reportingly
Undo
'This might not be popular because I'm a Steph Curry fan, but I would say 1 on 1, I think Jalen Brunson scores better than Steph 1 on 1.' The two-time Super Bowl champion believes that the right team would pay off for Brunson to let his skills out completely on the court, 'But what I'm saying is, when you got the right team, the structure, now Steph can be Steph.
'
Curry, despite his age of 37 and Brunson remained as the best point guards for the entire season.
The Warriors point guard, even if he has received several accolades and prestiges throughout his career, Brunson still manages to surpass him, according to the analysts and experts, in one-on-one games.
Also read:
Will Stephan Curry eye an NBA TV broadcasting role post-retirement? Golden State Warriors veteran explains his future goals
LeSean's comment has been met with support from the NBA fans who also believe that Brunson would triumph over Curry in a one-on-one face-off. Curry, however, remains a better all-time player and shooter than the Knicks point guard.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Adrianne Curry shows tough reality behind her America's Next Top model victory; all you need to know
, America's Next Top Model's very first winner, is giving us the tea on the reality of her legendary win—and it's far cry from the glittering fantasy that people thought. On the June 3 episode of Just B with Bethenny Frankel, the 42-year-old model-turned-recluse spoke candidly about the failed promises, financial non-reward, and her lengthy path to finally moving on. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "My season of Top Model, I was the lone winner who won no money. Zero dollars," Curry revealed to Frankel, who was shocked by the admission. Curry achieved stardom in 2003 as the winner of Cycle 1 of ' model competition show, which enthralled millions with hopes of transforming normal young women into supermodels. However, according to Curry, things were far from how they were presented on TV. "There was no money in my win. I won a title," she went on, explaining that although the show promoted a Revlon campaign as part of the grand prize during production, that segment was eliminated from the final product broadcast on TV. Although Curry did ultimately make $15,000 from Revlon, she maintains the experience made her feel cheated. She also got a contract with Wilhelmina Models but asserted in a 2017 blog entry that the agency released her once the show changed to IMG Models for its second season. Wilhelmina refuted Curry's allegations in 2023 through a statement by VP Ray Lata: Two decades ago, Wilhelmina had various owners and employees. Wilhelmina is today a publicly owned company. It does not appear there would be enough incentive to injure Tyra and not seek to optimize a model's earning potential." Nevertheless, Curry asserts that the real prize she emerged with wasn't a lucrative modeling career—but merely a title. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "Tyra [Banks] was saying we're gonna be this giant Revlon-type superstar. Because I don't think any of us would have struggled as hard as we did for what the award actually was—which is the title," Curry said. "So I always tease because people are like, 'You still refer to yourself as America's Next Top Model?' I'm like, it's the only f—— thing I won. I'm gonna put it on my tombstone." When 54-year-old Bethenny Frankel inquired whether Curry had felt a need to join in on the online criticism of Tyra Banks amidst the 2020 "reality reckoning" tide—when videos from ANTM re-emerged featuring contentious challenges such as "race-swapping" photo shoots—Curry replied that she deliberately avoided it. What's actually funny is everybody needed me to dog pile on Tyra Banks when 2020 was going on and everybody was getting angry," she remembers. "And I'm like, no, because if anybody has a right to be angry with her, it's me. And I'm done. I don't care anymore. What she taught me was the reality of entertainment. Curry long ago parted ways with the fashion and public eye. But through this honest interview, she paints a grim portrait of the unseen realities reality television stars endure—even the winners. Her account joins the list of voices calling for greater reality TV transparency, accountability, and equity.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Can we beat plastic pollution?
Unless we as individuals change our mindset and behaviour towards single-use plastic, neither a global treaty nor national legislation will end plastic pollution read more (File) A man collects plastic and other recyclable material from the shores of the Arabian Sea, littered with plastic bags and other garbage, in Mumbai. AP Plastic, the necessary evil, has become entangled in our web of life, spanning both tradition and modernity, from plumbing to healthcare, from home to Parliament. Invented in 1860, and the first synthetic plastic, Bakelite, was produced in 1907, the suitability, affordability and availability of the plastic have generated a colossal quantity of plastic waste that is choking the very survival of the living Planet. The plastic pollution is so alarming that the UN has called on a second time in two years (last in 2023) on World Environment Day to end the plastic pollution. Strategically, the World Environment Day's repeat theme of 'beat the plastic pollution' is to ignite the countries to agree on plastic pollution during the forthcoming UN Ocean Conference (June 9-13, 2025) and second part of fifth Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic in Geneva (August 5-15, 2025). Similarly, India steps up its campaign for 'one nation, one mission- End Plastic Pollution'. Can we overcome the intricate dependence on single-use plastic (SUP) or end plastic pollution? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While plastic has been increasingly and immeasurably integrated in our daily lives for the last several decades, littering of SUP items in our ecosphere has severe adverse and hostile effects on terrestrial, aquatic and marine ecosystems. Plastic has become so intertwined that our ecosphere has evolved into a 'plastisphere' – an ecosystem consisting of human-made plastics. The use, abuse and misuse of plastic has become the single most significant and dominant contribution of humankind that transforms the geological era, which is famously termed as Anthropocene- the age of humans. Meanwhile, the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) estimates that the world produces approximately 413.8 million tonnes of plastic annually (in 2023). Two-thirds of which (more than 280 million tonnes) are short-lived plastic products that quickly become waste, filling the ocean and, often, finding their way into our food chain. Of the more than 8 billion tonnes of plastic waste generated globally to date, less than 10 per cent has been recycled at a snail's pace. About 22 per cent of plastic waste worldwide is neither collected nor properly disposed of, or ends up as litter. However, recycling plastic is not without its risks. One of the recently released studies, Forever Toxic: The science of health threats from plastic recycling, found that this process not only increases the toxicity of plastics but also poses a threat to the health of consumers, frontline communities, and workers in the recycling sector. Is the hype surrounding plastic recycling veering towards myth? Whereas global plastic waste generation has increased more than sevenfold in the past four decades to 360 million metric tonnes per year, projections indicate that waste generation by 2040 will be double the current quantity and may exceed 615 million metric tonnes. Many of us use plastic products every day without even considering where they end up. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Are we truly aware that one million plastic bottles are purchased every minute worldwide, while up to five trillion plastic bags are used globally each year? In total, half of all plastic produced is designed for single-use purposes — used just once and then discarded. We are so addicted to single-use plastic that it seems unthinkable to eliminate it immediately. According to the UNEP, plastics contain over 13,000 chemicals, with more than 3,200 of them known to be hazardous to human health, while the safety of the remainder has not yet been assessed. More intriguing is how 75 to 199 million tonnes of plastic end up in the oceans to date. Every year, two million metric tonnes of plastic enter the ocean. The sorry state of plastic pollution can be assessed with the most intriguing photo by photographer and naturalist Justin Hofman depicting a seahorse in the ocean near Sumbawa Island, Indonesia, clinging to a bright pink plastic cotton swab. It is projected that if we don't change our behaviour towards the use of plastic, we may seriously intervene with our aquatic ecosystems, with a projected 23-27 million tonnes per year of plastic waste by 2040. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India's one nation, one mission to end plastic pollution Plastic is ubiquitous in India. India has become the world's largest contributor to plastic pollution, accounting for nearly 20 percent of the total global plastic waste. With 9.3 million tonnes of plastic waste generated annually in India, a staggering 3.5 million tonnes of plastic waste are mismanaged. Among the States and Union Territories, Tamil Nadu has produced the largest plastic waste, while Sikkim generated the lowest in 2023. India's per capita plastic consumption has grown to approximately 11 kg per year and is expected to rise significantly with the increasing consumerism. However, India has been specifically addressing the plastic menace through various policy initiatives domestically and globally by engaging in two important treaty negotiations- a global plastic treaty and the Open Seas Biodiversity treaty. Unilateral 'casual' measures date back to the early 2000s when states had imposed a ban on plastic bags. Those state-wide initiatives failed due to a lack of awareness and unpopularity, and non-enforceability. However, the Plastic Waste Management Rules (PWMR), 2016, provide the statutory framework for plastic waste management in the country. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, India has banned 19 identified single-use plastic items, which have low utility and high littering potential, since 1st July 2022 through the Plastic Waste Management Amendment Rules, 2021. India also prohibits the manufacture, import, stocking, distribution, sale and use of plastic carry bags having a thickness less than seventy-five microns from September 2021, and having a thickness less than one hundred and twenty microns from December 2022. The Guidelines on the Extended Producer Responsibility for plastic packaging instruct mandatory targets on recycling of plastic packaging waste, reuse of rigid plastic packaging and use of recycled plastic content. Even so, we keep on using and abusing our surroundings and asking vendors to provide the banned products. Simple awareness programs are not yet effective. Therefore, who will oversee the enforcement of the implementation of the ban on identified single-use plastic items and on plastic carry bags? We must not expect the special task forces of states and Union Territories and the National Level Taskforce to monitor and implement successfully a complete ban on single-use plastic. When estimated against a business-as-usual scenario by one billion Indians in 2022-23 to 2027-28, the impact of LiFE (Lifestyle for Environment) actions can be significant in ending 375 million plastic waste if using a cloth bag instead of plastic. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What is India's position on the global plastic treaty? In the meantime, India's official position from the beginning of the intergovernmental negotiating committee (INC), the group established to negotiate an international agreement on plastic pollution, has been to ensure the 'fairness, equity, shared responsibility, collective commitments and consensus-based actions' rather than majority-based decision making. India argues, as a common strategy in all multilateral environmental negotiations, that it must be acknowledged that countries have different levels of development, unique circumstances and differential contribution to plastic pollution as we are witnessing now. Therefore, India prefers a mix of both global mandates and largely voluntary approaches to tackle the plastic menace. Many external stakeholders have commented that India, with other countries, has become obstructionist to a global legally binding plastic treaty. After US President Donald Trump reversing the federal push away from plastic straws in February this year, all eyes will be on India during the UN Ocean Conference and final meeting on plastic in Geneva for a successful global plastic treaty. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In the meantime, a multi-prong strategy both within and beyond can be justified to end plastic pollution. Ultimately, it has been reflected in various goals under SDGs- responsible consumption and production (Goal 12), climate action (Goal 13), life below water (Goal 14), life on land (Goal 15), to end the plastic pollution. Meanwhile, the UN Human Rights Council has adopted a resolution, in its 58th session (April 4, 2025), recognising, for the first time, the critical connection between plastic pollution, ocean protection and the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. To reach a successful global treaty, countries must thrash out principles of reuse, reorient, regulate and diversify the dependence on plastic. The ambitious treaty, expected to progress during the final meeting in Geneva in August, may anchor on provisions for re-designing and rethinking the way we package, affordable and accessible alternatives to plastics, improving the waste management infrastructure, the principle of polluters pay, a predictable financial mechanism and access to technology and so on. Likewise, it is time to change how we produce, consume and dispose of the plastic we use. This is possible when we change our mindsets and behaviours. Let's start with reducing our dependence on single-use plastic from this World Environment Day onwards. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Dr Avilash Roul, International Advisor on Transboundary Water and Climate Change Risk, is a Senior Fellow at the Society for the Study of Peace and Conflict (SSPC), a Delhi-based think tank. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
World Boxing issues Imane Khelif apology after naming Olympic gold medallist in sex testing policy
World Boxing president Boris van der Vorst has apologised after Olympic champion Imane Khelif was signed out in an announcement made by the governing body to make sex testing mandatory. The decision comes after Khelif's gold medal at the Paris Olympics last year, where there was controversy over her eligibility. Khelif's case was specifically mentioned when World Boxing released the policy. According to AP, the body's president wrote to Algerian Boxing Federation, 'I am writing to you all personally to offer a formal and sincere apology for this and acknowledge that her privacy should have been protected.' He added, 'reaching out to you personally we show our true respect to you and your athletes.' Recently a chromosome test allegedly administered to the Olympian in 2023 by Dr Lal Path Labs has once again triggered a controversy around her biological sex. The report has allegedly been leaked. 3 Wire Sports reported, 'In chromosome tests given amid the International Boxing Association's 2022 and 2023 world championships, the boxer's DNA showed XY markers with 'male' karyotype.' Karyotype is the complete set of chromosomes in a person's cells. Humans usually have 46 chromosomes, arranged in 23 pairs. The sex chromosomes determine biological sex - XX is female, while XY is male. Meanwhile, in its statement, World Boxing had said, 'The introduction of mandatory testing will be part of a new policy on 'sex, age and weight' to ensure the safety of all participants and deliver a competitive level playing field for men and women.' 'The policy is in the final stages of development and has been crafted by a specially convened working group of the World Boxing medical and anti-doping committee, which has examined data and medical evidence from an extensive range of sources and consulted widely with other sports and experts across the world.'
