Is Wall Street still too bearish on the impact of tariffs?
Earnings estimates for the more trade-sensitive companies still haven't rebounded from the very serious hit they took after Apr 2. Maybe (just maybe) we'll start to see that happen as companies announce their quarterly results. Though tariffs are no joke for profit margins, many large companies are finding ways to mitigate the impact, and there's no clear sign that the levies will precipitate the economic downturn that many initially feared.
Consider consumer discretionary stocks. Excluding special cases Amazon.com and Tesla, sellside analysts are projecting a 6.2 per cent contraction in S&P 500 discretionary earnings this calendar year. The outlook collapsed after Liberation Day and has remained gloomy. The speed and scope of the downward earnings revisions for the sector since early April were the worst in 20 years outside of 2020 (the start of the Covid-19 pandemic) and 2008 (the onset of the financial crisis). Even if 2025 isn't all sunshine and roses for these companies, Wall Street may still be a bit too negative.
We can observe a similar collapse of earnings expectations across the entire S&P 500 if we carve out the so-called Magnificent 7 group of mega-capitalisation growth stocks. Analysts now project modest declines this year for consumer staples, and the rebound in industrial earnings is expected to be weaker than what was estimated early in 2025. Among the non-Magnificent-7 cohort, it's noteworthy that analysts soured not only on profit margins but also on revenues. The latter has room to recover even in an environment of enduring tariffs, as long as we assume that the US economy will skirt a downturn.
If analysts are so down on so many stocks, how has the index performed as well as it has? Basically, it's the same old story of Magnificent 7 exceptionalism, with a special emphasis on a few standouts among them. America's superstar mega-cap stocks are putting the market on their shoulders, driven by extraordinary underlying growth and optimism about artificial intelligence (AI).
The trade war briefly hit earnings expectations for the likes of Nvidia and Amazon, but they swiftly bounced back. More than just a retailer, Amazon has a massive cloud business that's relatively trade-proof, and Nvidia has benefited from positive reversals in policy since the trade war first broke loose (more on that later).
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Microsoft, Meta Platforms and Alphabet never lost their mojo in the eyes of analysts, a reflection of business models that weren't highly exposed to the changes that Trump introduced. Of the entire group, only Apple and Tesla have seen an enduring drop in earnings expectations after early April. For Tesla, trade is just one in a confluence of factors that includes Elon Musk's dramatic fallout with Trump and the pending loss of electric vehicle tax credits.
Investors are also learning that some of these stocks qualify for special treatment from the Trump administration. This week, the government reversed course on restricting shipments of key AI processors to China, unlocking billions in potential revenue for Nvidia and rival Advanced Micro Devices.
Whether this Magnificent 5 leadership is a blessing or a hazard is still mostly in the eye of the beholder. Certainly, the lofty expectations implicit in these companies' valuations come with risks of their own, but they're generally separate from the question of whether markets are appropriately pricing tariff policy. In the meantime, investors are benefiting handsomely.
Moreover, equity investors have other developments to cheer for. The Republican tax and spending package, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, enshrines tax benefits on domestic and international income that Morgan Stanley said could benefit companies across a range of industries, including tech and communication services. On the trade front, Bloomberg reported that President Trump had softened his tone with China to set the table for a summit with counterpart Xi Jinping.
Could the tariff story take another turn for the worse? Absolutely. Trump is still unveiling new threats, and ongoing trade investigations could push the effective rate closer to 20 per cent before the tariff drama is over. Most major trading partners have responded cautiously so far, but an all-out trade war with the likes of the European Union could change the calculus rather quickly. Despite the perception that Trump has backtracked, the average tariff rate still stands at about 13 per cent today, comparable to the 1940s, and it's possible that significant economic damage is already in train with a lag.
Yet, unlike small businesses, large-cap stocks have extraordinary negotiating power with their suppliers, and the dispirited forecasts in key sectors suggest that there could, optimistically speaking, be room for analysts to start revising earnings higher rather than lower this earnings season. If that happens, we may yet see some modest upside in the US market. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
15 minutes ago
- Business Times
Is today's AI boom bigger than the dotcom bubble?
WALL Street's concentration in the red-hot tech sector is, by some measures, greater than it has ever been, eclipsing levels hit during the 1990s dotcom bubble. But does this mean history is bound to repeat itself? The growing concentration in US equities instantly brings to mind the Internet and communications frenzy of the late 1990s. The tech-heavy Nasdaq peaked in March 2000 before cratering 65 per cent over the following 12 months. And it didn't revisit its previous high for 14 years. It seems unlikely that we'll see a repeat of this today, right? Maybe. The market's reaction function appears to be different from what it was during the dotcom boom and bust. Just look at the current rebound from its post-'Liberation Day' tariff slump in early April – one of the fastest on record – or its rally during the pandemic. But despite all of these differences, there are also some worrying parallels. Investors would do well to keep both in mind. Top 10 club The most obvious similarity between these two periods is the concentration of tech and related industries in US equity markets. The broad tech sector now accounts for 34 per cent of the S&P 500's market cap, according to some data, exceeding the previous record of 33 per cent set in March 2000. Of the top 10 companies by market capitalisation today, eight are tech or communications behemoths. They include the so-called 'Magnificent 7' – Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla – as well as Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan. By contrast, only five of the 10 biggest companies in 1999 were tech firms. The other five were General Electric, Citi, Exxon, Walmart and Home Depot. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up On top of that, the top 10 companies' footprint in the S&P 500 today is much larger than it was back then. The combined market cap of the top 10 today is almost US$22 trillion (S$28.1 trillion), or 40 per cent of the index's total, significantly higher than the 25 per cent in 1999. This all reflects the fact that technology plays a much bigger role in the US economy today than it did around the turn of the millennium. AI bubble? By some measures, the current tech boom, driven in part by enthusiasm for artificial intelligence, is more extreme than the IT bubble of the late 1990s. As Torsten Slok, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, points out, the 12-month forward earnings valuation of today's top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 is higher than it was 25 years ago. However, it's worth remembering that the dotcom bubble was characterised by a frenzy of public offerings and a raft of companies with shares valued at triple-digit multiples of future earnings. That's not the case today. While the S&P tech sector is trading at 29.5 times forward earnings today, which is high by historical standards, this is nowhere near the peak of almost 50 times recorded in 2000. Similarly, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq are currently trading around 22 and 28.5 times forward earnings, compared with the dotcom peaks of 24.5 and over 70 times, respectively. US$3 trillion investment hurdle With all that being said, a meaningful, prolonged market correction cannot be ruled out, especially if AI-driven growth isn't delivered as quickly as investors expect. AI, the new driver of technological development, will require vast capital outlays, especially on data centres, which may mean that earnings and share price growth in tech could slow in the short run. According to Morgan Stanley, the transformative potential of generative AI will require roughly US$2.9 trillion of global data centre spending through 2028, comprising US$1.6 trillion on hardware such as chips and servers and US$1.3 trillion on infrastructure. That means investment needs of over US$900 billion in 2028, the group reckons. For context, combined capital expenditure by all S&P 500 companies last year was around US$950 billion. Wall Street analysts are well aware of these figures, which suggests that at least some percentage of these huge sums should be factored into current share prices and expected earnings, but what if the benefits of AI take longer to deliver? Or what if an upstart (remember China's DeepSeek) dramatically shifts growth expectations for a major component of the index, such as US$4 trillion chipmaker Nvidia? Of course, technology is so fundamental to today's society and economy that it's difficult to imagine its market footprint shrinking too much, for too long, as this raises the inevitable question of where investor capital would go. It's therefore reasonable to question whether a tech crash today would take well over a decade to recover from. But, on the other hand, it's that type of thinking that has gotten investors into trouble before. REUTERS
Straits Times
15 minutes ago
- Straits Times
EU readies nearly $150 billion no deal plan to match US 30% tariff
Find out what's new on ST website and app. EU member states have hardened their positions in response to the US stiffening its negotiating stance. BRUSSELS – The European Union plans to quickly hit the US with 30 per cent tariffs on some €100 billion (S$149.78 billion) worth of goods in the event of no deal and if US President Donald Trump carries through with his threat to impose that rate on most of the bloc's exports after Aug 1. As a part of a first wave of countermeasures, the EU would combine an already approved list of tariffs on €21 billion of US goods and a previously proposed list on an additional €72 billion of American products into one package, an European Commission spokesman said on July 23. The US exports, which include industrial goods such as Boeing Co aircraft, US-made cars and bourbon whiskey, would face a levy that matches Mr Trump's 30 per cent threat, according to people familiar with the matter. The tariffs would be prepared to come into force in August but only if there is no deal and the US implements its levies after the August deadline, said the people who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations. The euro extended a fall after the report, down 0.3 per cent at US$1.1723, leading losses among major currencies. German bonds trimmed an earlier decline. The plans come as EU member states, including Germany, have hardened their positions in response to the US stiffening its negotiating stance. Berlin would be willing to even support the activation of the EU's anti-coercion instrument, or ACI, in a no-deal scenario, a government official said on condition of anonymity. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singapore's domestic recycling rate drops to all-time low of 11% Singapore Male victim of fatal Toa Payoh fire was known to keep many things, say residents Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kicks in Singapore 5 teens arrested for threatening boy with knife, 2 charged with causing hurt Singapore Money, housing and isolation the biggest struggles for youth leaving children's homes: Study Singapore Sota parent portal taken down for urgent patching following global cyberattack alerts Singapore COE prices for cars mostly unchanged; premium for commercial vehicles up 2.9% Singapore Cyclist charged after allegedly hitting elderly pedestrian, killing him This tool would come into play only if a deal fails to materialise. Mr Trump announced two tariff deals on July 22 – one with the Philippines and another with Japan, and both featured across-the-board duties on their imports that were lower than initially threatened. Also noteworthy was the 15 per cent US levy on Japanese autos that was lower than the current 25 per cent rate on major car exporters including the EU. European leaders are in Tokyo on July 23 and Beijing on July 24 for talks with some of the bloc's biggest trading partners in Asia. The ACI is the 27-nation EU's most potent trade tool and a growing number of member states is pushing for its use if a deal isn't reached. The instrument is primarily designed as a deterrent and is currently not on the table, with its activation requiring a qualified majority of member states to support the move. The ACI would enable the EU to launch a broad range of retaliatory actions, including new taxes on US tech giants, targeted curbs on US investments, and limiting access to the EU market. 'We are now approaching the decisive phase in the tariff dispute with the USA. We need a fair, reliable agreement with low tariffs,' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told reporters in Berlin on July 22 after a meeting with his Czech counterpart Petr Fiala. 'Without such an agreement, we risk economic uncertainty at a time when we actually need exactly the opposite.' The Commission, the EU's executive arm, is discussing the instrument with member states, the people said. While some capitals having been pushing to use the tool, most want to wait to see how the situation develops beyond Aug 1 before progressing discussions further to try to achieve the required majority, they added. The overwhelming preference is to keep negotiations with Washington on track in a bid for an outcome to the impasse ahead of August's deadline. EU and US negotiators are scheduled to continue talks on July 23. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
EU readies 100 billion euro no-deal plan to match US 30% tariff
[BRUSSELS] The European Union plans to quickly hit the US with 30 per cent tariffs on some 100 billion euro (S$150 billion) worth of goods in the event of no deal and if US President Donald Trump carries through with his threat to impose that rate on most of the bloc's exports after Aug 1. As a part of a first wave of countermeasures, the EU would combine an already approved list of tariffs on 21 billion euro of US goods and a previously proposed list on an additional 72 billion euro of American products into one package, an European Commission spokesman said on Wednesday (Jul 23). The US exports, which include industrial goods such as Boeing aircraft, US-made cars and bourbon whisky, would face a levy that matches Trump's 30 per cent threat, according to people familiar with the matter. The tariffs would be prepared to come into force next month but only if there is no deal and the US implements its levies after the August deadline, said the people who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations. The plans come as EU member states, including Germany, have hardened their positions in response to the US stiffening its negotiating stance. Berlin would be willing to even support the activation of the EU's anti-coercion instrument, or ACI, in a no-deal scenario, a government official said on condition of anonymity. This tool would come into play only if a deal fails to materialise. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The ACI is the bloc's most potent trade tool and a growing number of member states is pushing for its use if a deal is not reached. The instrument is primarily designed as a deterrent and is currently not on the table, with its activation requiring a qualified majority of member states to support the move. The ACI would enable the EU to launch a broad range of retaliatory actions, including new taxes on US tech giants, targeted curbs on US investments, and limiting access to the EU market. 'We are now approaching the decisive phase in the tariff dispute with the USA. We need a fair, reliable agreement with low tariffs,' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told reporters in Berlin on Tuesday after a meeting with his Czech counterpart Petr Fiala. 'Without such an agreement, we risk economic uncertainty at a time when we actually need exactly the opposite.' Still, the overwhelming preference is to keep negotiations with Washington on track in a bid for an outcome to the impasse ahead of next month's deadline. BLOOMBERG
