logo
Texas Democrat remains locked in House chamber after refusing GOP law enforcement escort

Texas Democrat remains locked in House chamber after refusing GOP law enforcement escort

Independent2 days ago
Texas Democratic State Rep. Nicole Collier spent Monday night locked in the state House of Representatives in Austin after refusing to sign a pledge to return for a vote on Republican redistricting proposals.
Collier's protest came after 51 of the state's opposition lawmakers fled for Illinois, New York and Massachusetts two weeks ago to deny the GOP majority a quorum in the House, preventing it from holding a ballot on plans to create five new red seats ahead of next year's midterms that would almost certainly have passed had the Democrats participated.
After a fortnight of Republican fury in which House Speaker Dustin Burrows issued civil arrest warrants, the runaways finally returned to their posts, only to find that Burrows expected them to sign a statement committing themselves to returning for the scheduled vote at 10 am on Wednesday – and be accompanied by individual law enforcement escorts in the interim.
The speaker's ultimatum meant the rebel Democrats would not be able to leave the chamber without risking arrest unless they put pen to paper.
Collier, who represents Fort Worth, flatly refused to comply with what her side mockingly characterized as a 'permission slip' or 'hall pass' system that effectively rendered their liberty conditional.
'I refuse to sign,' she told Fox News's Austin affiliate. 'I will not agree to be in [Department of Public Safety] custody. I'm not a criminal. I am exercising my right to resist and oppose the decisions of our government. So this is my form of protest.'
In a subsequent statement, she elaborated: 'My constituents sent me to Austin to protect their voices and rights. I refuse to sign away my dignity as a duly elected representative just so Republicans can control my movements and monitor me with police escorts.
'My community is majority-minority, and they expect me to stand up for their representation. When I press that button to vote, I know these maps will harm my constituents – I won't just go along quietly with their intimidation or their discrimination.'
The Independent has contacted Collier's office for further comment.
Refusing to play ball but still bound by the speaker's conditions, Collier instead spent the night among the otherwise empty chairs of the legislative chamber, offering a livestream of her quiet protest on her X account.
Texas House Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu and fellow representative Vince Perez stayed with her on the House floor in a show of solidarity, with Wu posting a picture of the snacks he was bringing with him, including dried peaches and grapes and instant ramen noodles.
Collier also received a message of support from former Democratic presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke, who said: 'A true hero, refusing to submit, fighting these fascists by herself if she has to. We are with you Nicole!'
The drama began on August 3 when the Democrats went into exile in the three northern blue states rather than enable a gerrymandering push that would, in all likelihood, have ended with their Republican counterparts redrawing the electoral map to their advantage with one eye on the November 2026 midterm elections, creating five extra seats in right-leaning areas.
That would enable the Lone Star State to send five more Republicans to Washington, D.C., to help force through President Donald Trump 's legislative agenda on Capitol Hill, a great help to the president when the congressional GOP's majority is currently so slender.
By fleeing, the Democrats denied the GOP the two-thirds majority attendance it required in the 150-seat state House to go ahead with its vote on the proposals.
The lawmakers won the support of the Democratic National Committee, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, and influential blue state governors like Gavin Newsom and JB Pritzker. Still, they risked arrest and $500 per day fines for their actions.
After Newsom vowed to fight fire with fire in California and redraw his map to favor Democrats as a means of remedying the measures being undertaken by the Texas Republicans, the southerners were finally able to make their way home.
'Now that we have California backing us up, we try to get back here as fast as possible,' Wu said. 'With that margin of the safety, we can come back here and say, let's stick this thing to court.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jussie Smollett opens up about alleged hate crime: ‘I felt like I had died'
Jussie Smollett opens up about alleged hate crime: ‘I felt like I had died'

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Jussie Smollett opens up about alleged hate crime: ‘I felt like I had died'

Jussie Smollett has discussed his initial reaction to the alleged 2019 hate crime, which he was later accused of staging, in the new Netflix documentary The Truth About Jussie Smollett?. In the documentary, Smollett describes feeling 'eulogized' and 'emasculated' by the rapid circulation of reports about the alleged attack. The actor, who starred in Empire, claimed two men assaulted him in Chicago, but brothers Abimbola and Olabinjo Osundairo later alleged Smollett paid them $3,500 to stage the incident. Prosecutors claimed Smollett orchestrated the attack due to dissatisfaction with the studio's response to hate mail while on Empire. Smollett was convicted of five counts of disorderly conduct in 2021, receiving a 150-day jail sentence, but his conviction was overturned by the Illinois Supreme Court in 2024 due to a non-prosecution agreement.

Voting machine company linked to Trump conspiracy used LA funds to create slush fund for bribing officials: prosecutors
Voting machine company linked to Trump conspiracy used LA funds to create slush fund for bribing officials: prosecutors

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Voting machine company linked to Trump conspiracy used LA funds to create slush fund for bribing officials: prosecutors

Employees of Smartmatic, the U.K.-headquartered election technology company, face accusations from federal prosecutors of systematically overbilling Los Angeles County for voting machines used in the 2020 election. The company allegedly used the surplus funds to create a 'slush fund' for bribing government officials, according to a criminal case against three company executives. Smartmatic is involved in a multibillion-dollar defamation lawsuit against Fox News after the network claimed it was involved in conspiracy theories to steal the 2020 election from Donald Trump. Joe Biden defeated the incumbent president in both the popular vote and the Electoral College. Prosecutors in a Florida federal corruption case against Smartmatic co-founder Roger Alejandro Piñate Martinez and two other company officials allege that bribery was part of the company's business model. While the recipients of the alleged misuse of county taxpayer money have not been identified, Dean Logan, the county's top voting official, has reported having regular meetings with Piñate, The Los Angeles Times reports. The allegations also extend internationally with prosecutors claiming similar schemes occurred in the Philippines and Venezuela. Last year, Piñate was charged with bribery and money laundering in the Philippines, where executives are accused of inflating voting machine prices to secure $182 million (£135 million) in contracts for its 2016 election to bribe a top election official. In Venezuela, Smartmatic employees are said to have used a similar fund to buy a home with a pool for a long-time elections official in 2019. This detail surfaced in an August 1 court filing in the Philippines corruption case. In Los Angeles County, where Smartmatic won a $209 million contract for the 2020 election — considered the largest election technology deal in U.S. history — the company allegedly used county money to create a similar type of slush fund. Prosecutors plan to present financial and business records, witness testimony, and electronic communications to strengthen their case, which they claim reveals a broader pattern of bribery. According to the August 1 filing, the company is accused of regularly adding a surplus fee of $10 to $50 per machine sent to the three jurisdictions, with these funds designated for bribes. Federal prosecutors declined to comment on the ongoing criminal case when contacted by the LA Times. Logan, the county's registrar-recorder, stated: 'The county has no knowledge or visibility into how Smartmatic USA used proceeds from that contract. The contract between Los Angeles County and Smartmatic USA was competitively bid, evaluated, and awarded in compliance with the county's open competitive public procurement processes.' A spokesperson for the registrar-recorder's office added that no evidence was found of the surplus charges alleged by federal prosecutors and that the price of machines always remained the same. No federal prosecutors have contacted the department. Smartmatic spokesperson Samira Saba accused the Department of Justice of filing the motion with misrepresentations that were 'untethered from reality.' In a statement, the company asserted: 'Let us be clear: Smartmatic wins business because we're the best at what we do. We operate ethically and abide by all laws always, both in Los Angeles County and every jurisdiction where we operate.' As the federal corruption case against the Smartmatic employees gets underway, L.A. County's Logan faces separate civil allegations that he benefited from a close relationship with company management. This included upscale dinners, a trip to Taiwan and the Maldives, as well as other outings, according to reported county emails and text messages. Logan later stated in a civil case deposition that these were exempt from disclosure because he attended in a 'personal capacity.' The emails and depositions emerged in an unusual 1,000-page public records lawsuit filed this month by Fox News, whose representatives say they need county records to defend themselves against the multibillion-dollar defamation lawsuit brought by Smartmatic. Smartmatic gained widespread recognition in 2020 after Fox News falsely reported that the company, along with Dominion Voting Systems, helped rig the 2020 election against President Trump. This conspiracy was widely pushed by Trump surrogates both on-air and in legal filings that ultimately failed. At the time, Dominion voting machines were used in about two dozen states, while Smartmatic was only used in L.A. County — it's first business in North America. Dominion filed a defamation suit against Fox which was settled for $787.5 million. Smartmatic filed a similar lawsuit in 2021 seeking $2.7 billion. Smartmatic also launched defamation lawsuits against some of its accusers. In addition to Fox News, the company sued Mike Lindell, Newsmax, One America News Network, Sidney Powell, and Rudy Giuliani. As part of its defense, Fox News lawyers have focused on the relationship between Logan and Smartmatic, arguing that the county is withholding crucial records. The network declined to elaborate on the allegations made in the lawsuit when contacted by the LA Times. Logan said in a statement that the county is being used as a pawn in both the civil lawsuit and federal corruption case and said the 'voluminous records' the county released 'refute the salacious allegations.' The federal criminal case against Smartmatic executives started during the Biden administration with charges filed in August 2024. The Trump administration paused most foreign bribery cases after he took office for a second term, but allowed the charges against Smartmatic executives to proceed. Records released to Fox News by L.A. County, which the media company included as exhibits in the civil public records lawsuit, show no evidence of the voter fraud espoused on air by the network's guests in 2020 that led to the whirlwind of conspiracy theories and the subsequent defamation case.

Trump administration to vet immigration applications for 'anti-Americanism'
Trump administration to vet immigration applications for 'anti-Americanism'

Reuters

time13 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump administration to vet immigration applications for 'anti-Americanism'

WASHINGTON, Aug 20 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's administration has said it will assess applicants for U.S. work, study and immigration visas for "anti-Americanism" and count any such finding against them, sparking concern about implications for free speech. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said in a "policy alert, opens new tab" dated Tuesday that it gave immigration officers new guidance on how to exercise discretion in cases where foreign applicants "support or promote anti-American ideologies or activities" as well as "antisemitic terrorism." Trump has labeled a range of voices as anti-American, including historians and museums documenting U.S. slavery and pro-Palestinian protesters opposing U.S. ally Israel's military assault on Gaza. "Anti-American activity will be an overwhelmingly negative factor in any discretionary analysis," USCIS said. "America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies." The announcement did not define anti-Americanism. But the policy manual refers to a section of federal law about prohibiting naturalization of people "opposed to government or law, or who favor totalitarian forms of government." The full text mentions supporters of communism or totalitarian regimes and people who advocate overthrow of the U.S. government and violence against government officers, among other factors. USCIS said it expanded the types of applications that have social media vetting, and reviews for "anti-American activity" will be added to that vetting. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, said the step hearkened to the 1950s when Senator Joseph McCarthy hunted alleged communists in a campaign that became synonymous with political persecution. "McCarthyism returns to immigration law," he said. Anti-Americanism "has no prior precedent in immigration law and its definition is entirely up to the Trump admin." In April, the U.S. government said it would begin screening the social media of immigrants and visa applicants for what it called antisemitic activity. Rights advocates raised free speech and surveillance concerns. (This story has been refiled to fix a typo in the headline)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store