Anti-Emergency movement reaffirmed vitality of preserving India's democracy: PM
In a series of tweets on the occasion marking fifty years since the imposition of the Emergency, the Prime Minister paid tributes to those Indians who defended democracy during ''one of the darkest chapters in the nation's history.''
Recalling the grave assault on constitutional values, he said June 25 is observed as Samvidhan Hatya Diwas — a day when fundamental rights were suspended, press freedom was extinguished, and countless political leaders, social workers, students and ordinary citizens imprisoned.
'No Indian will ever forget the manner in which the spirit of our Constitution was violated, the voice of Parliament muzzled and attempts were made to control the courts. The 42nd Amendment is a prime example of their shenanigans. The poor, marginalised and downtrodden were particularly targeted, including their dignity insulted.''
He called upon all those who remember the days of the Emergency or those whose families suffered during that time to share their experiences on social media to create awareness among the youth of the shameful time from 1975 to 1977.
'Today marks fifty years since one of the darkest chapters in India's democratic history, the imposition of the Emergency. The people of India mark this day as Samvidhan Hatya Diwas. On this day, the values enshrined in the Indian Constitution were set aside, fundamental rights were suspended, press freedom was extinguished and several political leaders, social workers, students and ordinary citizens were jailed. It was as if the Congress Government in power at that time placed democracy under arrest! #SamvidhanHatyaDiwas'
'We salute every person who stood firm in the fight against the Emergency! These were the people from all over India, from all walks of life, from diverse ideologies who worked closely with each other with one aim: to protect India's democratic fabric and to preserve the ideals for which our freedom fighters devoted their lives. It was their collective struggle that ensured that the then Congress Government had to restore democracy and call for fresh elections, which they badly lost. #SamvidhanHatyaDiwas'
'We also reiterate our commitment to strengthening the principles in our Constitution and working together to realise our vision of a Viksit Bharat. May we scale new heights of progress and fulfil the dreams of the poor and downtrodden. #SamvidhanHatyaDiwas'
'When the Emergency was imposed, I was a young RSS Pracharak. The anti-Emergency movement was a learning experience for me. It reaffirmed the vitality of preserving our democratic framework. At the same time, I got to learn so much from people across the political spectrum. I am glad that BlueKraft Digital Foundation has compiled some of those experiences in the form of a book, whose foreword has been penned by HD Deve Gowda, himself a stalwart of the anti-Emergency movement.
''The Emergency Diaries' chronicles my journey during the Emergency years. It brought back many memories from that time.
I call upon all those who remember those dark days of the Emergency or those whose families suffered during that time to share their experiences on social media. It will create awareness among the youth of the shameful time from 1975 to 1977.
UNI RB GNK 1046
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Digambar Kamat and Ramesh Tawadkar — whose careers saw them in, out of, and back in BJP — sworn in as new Goa ministers
Former Goa chief minister Digambar Kamat and former Assembly Speaker Ramesh Tawadkar were sworn in Thursday as ministers in the Goa Cabinet. Governor Pusapati Ashok Gajapathi Raju administered the oath of office and secrecy to the BJP legislators at Raj Bhavan in the presence of Chief Minister Pramod Sawant. The Cabinet berth marks a political resurrection for Kamat, who was first elected as an MLA on a BJP ticket more than three decades ago in 1994. He later joined the Congress and was among the group of eight 'turncoat' MLAs who switched over to the BJP from the Congress in September 2022. He served as the chief minister of Goa from 2007 to 2012, the last Congress government in the state. Kamat said he got an opportunity to become a minister after a gap of 13 years. 'I am returning to the Cabinet after 13 years. I am happy that I will get the strength to work for the common man. This will allow me to work for the people and help strengthen the party. God, the central leadership, the chief minister and party colleagues…have given me this opportunity,' Kamat said. The seven-time MLA from Margao has oscillated between the Congress and the BJP in his political career. Kamat started his journey with the Congress. He joined the BJP in 1994 and won two elections as the party's candidate from the party and first became a minister in the Manohar Parrikar-led Cabinet in 2000. He returned to the Congress in 2005 and was instrumental in bringing down the Parrikar-led BJP government in 2005. In 2007, with opinion divided on whether to choose Ravi Naik or Pratapsingh Rane, the party finally named Kamat as the chief minister in the Congress-led coalition government. He remains the only chief minister in Goa to have completed a full five-year term. Along with then PWD minister Churchill Alemao, Kamat was booked under the Prevention of Corruption Act in a bribery case. Alemao was PWD minister from 2007 to 2012 when officials of the US-based company, Louis Berger, allegedly paid bribes to win a consultancy bid for water augmentation and a sewerage pipeline project in Goa under the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). Kamat, who served as mining minister of the state for 10 years, was indicted by a judicial commission in 2012 for reportedly allowing illegal mining in the state. The Centre-appointed Commission of Inquiry, headed by Justice M B Shah, had estimated a loss of Rs 35,000 crore to the state exchequer. A Sessions Court in Goa discharged him and 16 others in the case in February this year. Earlier on Thursday morning, Canacona MLA Ramesh Tawadkar resigned as the Speaker of Goa Legislative Assembly. 'From the day I took the responsibility, I tried to do justice to the post [of Speaker]. I treated both the ruling and Opposition legislators as colleagues. I earned the respect from the Opposition, just as I earned it from the ruling side. I have a slight regret that I was not able to complete the full five-year term as the Speaker. I have to take this decision with a heavy heart since the party has given me a different responsibility with a view on the 2017 assembly elections,' said Tawadkar. Tawadkar first became a minister in the Parrikar-led Cabinet in 2012 and held Sports, Youth Affairs and Tribal Welfare portfolios. He quit the BJP after he was denied a ticket in 2017 Assembly elections and contested as an Independent. He returned to the BJP in 2019 and was elected as an MLA in 2022, after which he became the Speaker. BJP state president Damu Naik told The Indian Express, 'Tawadkar comes from the ST community and has been associated with the party for a long time and has worked at the grassroot level. Kamat was the chief minister. So, both are quite experienced. The decision has been made in order to strengthen the party as the state goes to polls in 2027.' Three BJP legislators – Calangute MLA Michael Lobo, Siolim MLA Delilah Lobo and former Art and Culture Minister Govind Gaude – were absent from the swearing-in ceremony. Gaude, a tribal leader, was dropped from the Cabinet after he levelled corruption allegations in the department of Tribal Welfare – a portfolio held by CM Sawant. Naik dismissed any suggestions of internal dissent, saying, 'They may have prior engagements.'
Hans India
26 minutes ago
- Hans India
Presidential reference: 'Political solution' over rushing to SC, says Centre on Governor's delay
New Delhi: The Centre on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a "political solution" should be prioritised by the states over "rushing to the top court" when a Governor delays assent to Bills passed by the legislative Assembly. During the hearing on the Presidential reference made under Article 143 of the Constitution in the aftermath of the apex court verdict in the Tamil Nadu Bills case, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Union government, argued that not every problem needs to be resolved by the Supreme Court. "Suppose a particular Governor is sitting over bills, there are political solutions. And such solutions are taking place, but it is not everywhere. It is not everywhere the state government rushes to the Supreme Court. The Chief Minister goes and requests the Prime Minister. The Chief Minister goes and meets the President," SG Mehta, the second-highest law officer of the Centre, said. "There are delegations that go and say, 'These Bills are pending, please speak to the Governor and have him decide one way or the other'. The issue can even be sorted out over the telephone,' Mehta added, suggesting that joint meetings between the CM, the PM, and the Governor could resolve such impasses. He argued that in the absence of an explicit timeline under the Constitution, the question arises whether the Supreme Court can lay one down, even if there exists sufficient justification. "There may be justifications, but justification does not confer jurisdiction," said SG Mehta, emphasising that such issues have existed in every state for decades, but "political maturity" has usually led to "political solutions" through meetings among constitutional functionaries. To lay down timelines for Governors to act on Bills, in the absence of a constitutionally prescribed limit, he contended, would violate the principle of separation of powers and lead to constitutional chaos. Terming separation of powers "a two-way street", SG Mehta said the Supreme Court never issues directions to a co-ordinate constitutional functionary, calling it a matter of "constitutional comity". He added that the apex court cannot prescribe how a constitutional functionary should exercise power, since the court cannot legislate. After CJI B.R. Gavai remarked that withholding assent indefinitely would render the legislature defunct, SG Mehta said the solution lay in a constitutional amendment, but until then, the political process was the way out. The five-judge special Bench, headed by CJI Gavai and comprising Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, P.S. Narasimha, and Atul S. Chandurkar, is set to advise the President on whether the exercise of constitutional discretion by a Governor on Bills is justiciable when Article 361 of the Constitution bars judicial review of gubernatorial actions. On Wednesday, the Supreme Court remarked that allowing a Governor to withhold assent to Bills without returning them to the state Assembly would place the functioning of an elected government at the "whims and fancies" of an unelected Governor. When SG Mehta said that if a Governor withholds assent, there is no obligation to return the Bill to the state Assembly for reconsideration, CJI Gavai remarked: "Would we not be giving total powers to the Governor to sit in appeal? The government elected with a majority would be at the whims and fancies of the Governor." Mehta argued the Governor's power to withhold assent is meant to be exercised rarely and sparingly, only in extraordinary situations such as when a Bill is unconstitutional, repugnant, or violative of fundamental rights.
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Why high GST rate on insurance is a bad idea
It is an idea that was floated by a senior minister in the Narendra Modi government after the 2024 Lok Sabha results. And it's getting closer to reality. HT reported on Thursday that the Union government has sent a proposal to the group of ministers in the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council to do away with GST on insurance premiums for health and life insurance policies. From an 18% tax to no tax at all, this will provide significant relief to policyholders. The policy change, if implemented, will especially benefit taxpayers in the new tax regime. They are not entitled to any deductions in taxable income on account of expenses such as insurance premiums. Hopefully, this will free up some, even if little, disposable income for spending on other things and also help reduce the cost of insurance in the country. In fact, the government should make sure that insurance companies do not increase their premiums to neutralise the cost-saving effect of the possible abolition of GST on insurance premiums. The government should make sure that insurance companies do not increase their premiums to neutralise the cost-saving effect of the possible abolition of GST on insurance premiums. (@FinMinIndiaX via PTI) To be sure, it is eminently arguable that the move is aimed at affecting public perception rather than the macroeconomy at large. Insurance coverage, especially health insurance, is growing rapidly in India, especially among the middle classes. Taxing it at 18% was never a fair idea, given the fact that insurance is something one buys for a potential crisis. It is not a luxury or sin-spend. But should it have been made completely tax-free? There is a fine line between political populism and fiscal prudence, if not in tax collections, then in the idea of taxation itself. Creating tax-free goods and services categories can often erode the sanctity of the latter.
