logo
Three Thai soldiers injured by landmine on Cambodian border – DW – 08/09/2025

Three Thai soldiers injured by landmine on Cambodian border – DW – 08/09/2025

DWa day ago
The incident occured only days after an agreement to extend a ceasefire that ended the recent deadly conflict between the Southeast Asian neighbors.
Three Thai soldiers have been wounded after one stepped on a landmine in territory along the border with Cambodia, the Thai army announced on Saturday.
The incident comes just days after the two countries agreed to extend the ceasefire that ended a brief armed conflict, which were their deadliest clashes in decades.
One soldier suffered a severe leg injury, another was wounded in the back and arm, and the third experienced extreme pressure damage to the ear during the incident in northeastern Thailand's Sisaket province.
"It clearly demonstrates to both domestic and international society that the use of concealed weapons in border areas continues to exist, constituting a clear violation of the Ottawa Convention by the Cambodian side," the army's statement said.
After Saturday's blast, the Thai army statement, citing its spokesperson Maj. Gen. Winthai Suvaree, said that Saturday's mine explosion constituted "a significant obstacle to the implementation of ceasefire measures and peaceful resolution of problems."
The Cambodian Mine Action and Victim Assistance Authority, a government body, issued a statement denying that any new mines had been laid.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
"We have not, and will not, plant new land mines," said the statement, noting that Cambodia is a party to the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Treaty Convention, "and has an internationally recognized record of removing, not deploying, these indiscriminate weapons."
It noted that Cambodia has cleared more than 1 million mines and nearly 3 million other pieces of unexploded ordnance left over from more than three decades of war and civil unrest that began in 1970.
A five-day conflict between Thailand and Cambodia killed at least 43 people in a flare-up of a long-running dispute over ancient border temples.
The clashes, involving jets, artillery, rockets and infantry battles, ended on July 29 with a ceasefire, after cajoling by US President Donald Trump.
A meeting of defense officials in Kuala Lumpur finished on Thursday with a deal to extend the ceasefire.
Tensions had simmered since May this year when a Cambodian soldier was shot dead by Thai troops in a brief fracas in another contested border area.
The escalating dispute was marked by border crossing restrictions and cross-border boycotts along with bans of goods and services before fighting broke out.
The Ottawa Convention, also called the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Treaty, is an international agreement banning the weapons' use, and both Thailand and Cambodia have committed to it.
A statement from Thailand's foreign ministry said the incident confirmed the Thai army's findings "that new land mines are being laid in blatant violation of international law." It also noted this was the third such incident in less than a month.
Cambodia had suggested that two earlier explosions last month wounding Thai soldiers might be land mines from past conflicts.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Germany's Merz defends partial weapons halt to Israel – DW – 08/10/2025
Germany's Merz defends partial weapons halt to Israel – DW – 08/10/2025

DW

time5 hours ago

  • DW

Germany's Merz defends partial weapons halt to Israel – DW – 08/10/2025

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that despite the decision, Berlin's approach toward Israel has not changed. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he hopes Merz will reconsider. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Germany's stance on the conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza remains unchanged despite his government's order to suspend arms to Israel which could be used in Gaza. "We will continue to help this country to defend itself," Merz told German public broadcaster ARD on Sunday, adding that despite this stance, the German government could not supply weapons to a conflict where hundreds to thousands of civilians could be killed. The move to partially halt German arms exports to Israel comes after Israel's Security Cabinet announced Israel would take over Gaza City. That plan has been condemned by UN chief Antonio Guterres and numerous countries such as the UK, France and Canada, who believe it will exacerbate Gaza's ongoing humanitarian crisis. "Solidarity with Israel does not mean we consider every single decision by the Israeli government to be good, or that we support it, even to the extent of providing military support in the form of weapons," Merz said, also emphasizing his responsibility for the new policy. "I did not make this decision alone, but at the end of the day, I'm fully responsible for it," the chancellor said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Merz's decision to halt the export of offensive arms which could be used in Israel's war in Gaza has been met with criticism within the chancellor's own conservative party (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party (CSU). CDU Bundestag lawmaker Carsten Müller condemned the decision "in the strongest of terms," while adding that it ignores the importance of the security cooperation with Israel for the German army and NATO. Members of Bavaria's CSU party, too, condemned the arms export halt. The CSU parliamentary group leader in the Bundestag, Alexander Hoffmann, on Saturday told German paper that his party was not involved in Merz's decision and "we consider it questionable." CDU lawmaker and foreign policy expert Norbert Röttgen, however, supported Merz's decision. Röttgen told the newspaper on Saturday that he supported the export halt: "This reaction is correct and has unfortunately become inevitable due to the latest decisions by the Israeli government." The conservative bloc's coalition partners, the center-left Social Democrats (SPD), largely support the decision. In a press conference to foreign media on Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Merz "buckled under" the pressure of news reports which the Israeli leader labeled as false. Netanyahu said he hopes German chancellor would change his decision. Germany is one of Israel's staunchest supporters, with former Chancellor Angela Merkel saying Israel's security is Germany's Staatsräson (reason of state). Germany feels a special responsibility for Israel due to the Holocaust, where 6 million Jews were killed from 1933 to 1945 by the German Nazi regime. Germany has stood by Israel and supported Israel's ongoing military operation in Gaza after Hamas carried out its October 7, 2023 terror attacks on Israel. Merz's decision to now halt certain exports to Israel is a significant course change by Germany, as Israel finds itself increasingly estranged from its partners in Europe. In recent weeks, France and the UK said they would formally recognize Palestinian statehood, drawing criticism from Netanyahu.

After busy first 100 days, Germany's Merz faces discord at home
After busy first 100 days, Germany's Merz faces discord at home

Local Germany

time16 hours ago

  • Local Germany

After busy first 100 days, Germany's Merz faces discord at home

On election night in February, a jubilant Merz promised to bring a bit of "rambo zambo" to the post -- using a colloquialism that can evoke a wild and joyous ride, or chaos and mayhem. Having achieved his life's ambition at age 69 to run Europe's top economy, Merz lost no time to push change, mostly in response to transatlantic turbulence sparked by US President Donald Trump. "Germany is back," Merz said, vowing to revive the economy, the military and Berlin's international standing after what he labelled three lacklustre years under his centre-left predecessor Olaf Scholz. Even before taking office, Merz's Christian Democrats (CDU/CSU) and their governing partners from Scholz's Social Democratic party (SPD) loosened debt rules and unlocked hundreds of billions of euros for Germany's armed forces and its crumbling infrastructure. Merz vowed to build "Europe's largest conventional army" in the face of a hostile Russia and keep up strong support for Ukraine in lockstep with Paris and London. A promise to ramp up NATO spending endeared Merz to Trump, who greeted him warmly at a White House meeting in June, only weeks after a jarring Oval Office showdown with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. When Israel bombed Iranian targets, Merz, with a penchant for strong and often controversial one-liners, praised it for doing the "dirty work" -- but last Friday he took the bold step of freezing arms exports to Israel over its Gaza campaign. Advertisement Migration crackdown On the home front, Merz has pressed a crackdown on irregular migration, a sharp departure from the centrist course of his long-time party rival Angela Merkel. He has said he must address voter concerns about immigration to stem the rise of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which won a record 20 percent in February's election. Merz's heavy focus on global events has earned him the moniker of "foreign chancellor" -- but trouble looms at home, where his SPD allies have often felt overshadowed or sidelined. To many of them, Merz's right-wing positions have been hard to swallow in the marriage of convenience they entered following the SPD's dismal election outcome of 16 percent. German voters have not yet fallen in love with Merz either. His personal approval rating slipped 10 points to just 32 percent in the latest poll by public broadcaster ARD. Advertisement Judge row In an early sign of trouble, Merz's inauguration on May 6 turned into a white-knuckle ride when rebel MPs opposed him in the first round of the secret ballot. He was confirmed in the second round, but the debacle pointed to simmering resentment in the left-right coalition. Many have chafed at his hard line on immigration, his vow to slash social welfare and his limited enthusiasm for climate protection. Merz also sparked controversy when he dismissed plans to hoist an LGBTQ rainbow flag on the parliament building by saying the Reichstag was "not a circus tent". The biggest coalition crisis came last month, sparked by what should have been routine parliamentary business -- the nomination of three new judges to Germany's highest court. Right-wing online media had strongly campaigned against one of them, SPD nominee Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, calling her a left-wing activist on abortion and other issues. The CDU/CSU withdrew support for her and postponed the vote, sparking SPD fury. The issue looked set to fester until Brosius-Gersdorf withdrew her candidature on Thursday. 'Too many arguments' Other trouble came when the CDU's Bavarian sister party demanded sharp cuts to social benefits for Ukrainian refugees, a position the SPD opposes. Vice Chancellor Lars Klingbeil of the SPD warned the conservatives to refrain from further provocations, telling Welt TV that "we already have far too many arguments in this government". Both coalition partners know that open squabbling will turn off voters after discord brought down Scholz's three-party coalition, and play into the hands of the AfD, their common foe. For now Merz and most other politicians are on summer holidays, leaving unresolved issues lingering. Merz will need to pay attention, said Wolfgang Schroeder of Kassel University. "The chancellor's attitude is: I think big-picture and long term, I'm not interested in the small print," he said. But Schroeder added that all the coalition's big troubles so far -- from the judge row to Ukrainians refugees -- "have been about the small print".

Armenians Caught Between Hope And Distrust After Accord With Azerbaijan
Armenians Caught Between Hope And Distrust After Accord With Azerbaijan

Int'l Business Times

time20 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Armenians Caught Between Hope And Distrust After Accord With Azerbaijan

The streets were almost deserted in Yerevan Saturday because of the summer heat, but at shaded parks and fountains, Armenians struggled to make sense of what the accord signed a day earlier in Washington means for them. The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, two Caucasian countries embroiled in a territorial conflict since the fall of the USSR, met Friday and signed a peace treaty under the watch of US President Donald Trump. In Yerevan, however, few of the people asked by AFP were enthusiastic. "It's a good thing that this document was signed because Armenia has no other choice," said Asatur Srapyan, an 81-year-old retiree. He believes Armenia hasn't achieved much with this draft agreement, but it's a step in the right direction. "We are very few in number, we don't have a powerful army, we don't have a powerful ally behind us, unlike Azerbaijan," he said. "This accord is a good opportunity for peace." Maro Huneyan, a 31-year-old aspiring diplomat, also considers the pact "acceptable", provided it does not contradict her country's constitution. "If Azerbaijan respects all the agreements, it's very important for us. But I'm not sure it will keep its promises and respect the points of the agreement," she added. But Anahit Eylasyan, 69, opposes the agreement and, more specifically, the plan to create a transit zone crossing Armenia to connect the Nakhchivan region to the rest of Azerbaijan. "We are effectively losing control of our territory. It's as if, in my own apartment, I had to ask a stranger if I could go from one room to another," she explains. She also hopes not to see Russia, an ally of Armenia despite recent tensions, expelled from the region." Anahit also criticizes Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan for "making decisions for everyone" and for his "endless concessions to Azerbaijan". "We got nothing in exchange, not our prisoners, nor our occupied lands, nothing. It's just a piece of paper to us," she fumes. Shavarsh Hovhannisyan, a 68-year-old construction engineer, agrees, saying the agreement "is just an administrative formality that brings nothing to Armenia." "We can't trust Azerbaijan," Hovhannisyan asserted, while accusing Pashinyan of having "turned his back" on Russia and Iran. "It's more of a surrender document than a peace treaty, while Trump only thinks about his image, the Nobel Prize." According to President Trump, Armenia and Azerbaijan have committed "to stop all fighting forever; open up commerce, travel and diplomatic relations; and respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity." For Olesya Vartanyan, an independent researcher specializing in the Caucasus, the Washington agreement "certainly brings greater stability and more guarantees for the months, if not years, to come." But given the long-lasting tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan, "I fear that we will have to plan only for the very short term," she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store