
Are Vegetable and Seed Oils Bad for Your Health?
The consumption of vegetable oils has increased dramatically in the past century.
Most mainstream health professionals consider them healthy, but vegetable oils may cause health problems.
Their health effects vary depending on what fatty acids they contain, what plants they are extracted from, and how they are processed.
This article examines the evidence to determine whether vegetable and seed oils harm your health.
What are they and how are they made?
Edible oils extracted from plants are commonly known as vegetable oils.
In addition to their use in cooking and baking, they're found in processed foods, including salad dressings, margarine, mayonnaise, and cookies.
Common vegetable oils include safflower oil, soybean oil, and canola oil.
Refined vegetable oils were not available until the 20th century, when the technology to extract them became available.
These are extracted from plants using either a chemical solvent or an oil mill. Then they are often purified, refined, and sometimes chemically altered.
Health-conscious consumers prefer oils made by crushing or pressing plants or seeds rather than those produced using chemicals.
Consumption has increased drastically
In the past century, vegetable oil consumption has increased at the expense of other fats like butter.
They are often labeled 'heart-healthy' and recommended as an alternative to sources of saturated fat, such as butter, lard, and tallow.
Vegetable oils are considered heart-healthy because studies consistently link polyunsaturated fat to a reduced risk of heart problems compared with saturated fat.
Despite their potential health benefits, some scientists worry about how much of these oils people consume.
As explained in the next chapter, these concerns mainly apply to oils that contain a high amount of omega-6 fats.
What do we know about omega-6?
It's important to note that not all plant oils are bad for your health. For example, avocado oil and olive oil are both excellent choices.
Both omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids are essential fatty acids, meaning that you need some of them in your diet because your body can't produce them.
Throughout evolution, humans got omega-6 and omega-3 in a certain ratio. While this ratio differed between populations, it's estimated to have been about 1:1.
However, in the past century or so, this ratio in the Western diet has shifted dramatically and may be as high as 20:1.
Older research has hypothesized that too much omega-6 relative to omega-3 may contribute to chronic inflammation. On the other hand, a more recent study from 2025 did not show a connection between higher omega-6 consumption and inflammation.
Chronic inflammation is an underlying factor in some of the most common Western diseases, such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and arthritis.
Observational studies have also associated a high intake of omega-6 fat with an increased risk of heart disease.
However, these associations don't necessarily imply a causal relationship. In fact, the evidence for omega-6 being detrimental to human health is mixed.
Some studies investigating the effects of omega-6 fat consumption generally do not support the idea that these fats increase inflammation.
For instance, eating a lot of linoleic acid, which is the most common omega-6 fat, doesn't appear to affect blood levels of inflammatory markers.
Consider limiting plant oils high in omega-6, as well as processed foods that contain these plant oils, which include:
soybean oil
corn oil
cottonseed oil
sunflower oil
peanut oil
sesame oil
rice bran oil
Scientists do not fully understand the effects of omega-6 fats on the body, and more human studies are needed.
However, if you are concerned, it is more important to limit processed foods high in omega-6 fats, such as baked treats, chips, deep-fried fast foods, or takeout meals, as these have a more direct and proven effect on health.
Current studies remain inconclusive about the actual impact of avoiding vegetable oils when cooking at home on health.
These oils are easily oxidized
Saturated, monounsaturated, or polyunsaturated fats differ by the number of double bonds their chemical structures contain:
Saturated fats: no double bonds
Monounsaturated fats: one double bond
Polyunsaturated fats: two or more double bonds
The problem with polyunsaturated fats is that all these double bonds make them susceptible to oxidation. The fatty acids react with oxygen in the atmosphere and start deteriorating.
The fat you eat isn't only stored as fat tissue or burned for energy ; it is also incorporated into cell membranes.
If your body contains a lot of polyunsaturated fatty acids, your cell membranes are more sensitive to oxidation.
In short, you have a very high level of fragile fatty acids that can easily be degraded to form harmful compounds called free radicals, which can cause cell damage.
For this reason, it may be best to eat polyunsaturated fats in moderation. Vary your diet by eating a mix of healthy saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fats.
The USDA 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend aiming for 20-35% of total daily calories from fats, with no more than 10% of these calories coming from saturated fat.
They are sometimes high in trans fats
Commercial vegetable oils may also contain trans fats, which form when the oils are hydrogenated.
Food producers use hydrogenation to harden vegetable oils, making them solid like butter at room temperature.
Margarines are no longer full of trans fats since the FDA ban on trans fats in 2015, which went into effect in 2018, with an extended deadline of 2020 for some food manufacturers. However, some margarines may still contain a small amount of trans fat, so it's important to read the nutrition label.
However, non-hydrogenated vegetable oils may also contain some trans fats. However, it's important to note that naturally occurring trans fats found in non-hydrogenated oils are less detrimental to health than industrial trans fats.
Also, natural trans fats are found in very small amounts compared to hydrogenated oils. One 2015 study found extremely low amounts of trans fats (less than a quarter of 1%) in vegetable cooking oils.
A high intake of trans fats is associated with all sorts of chronic diseases, including heart disease, obesity, cancer, and diabetes.
If a product lists hydrogenated oil or partially hydrogenated oil as an ingredient, it likely contains trans fats. For optimal health, avoid these products, although with the trans fat ban, they are likely to be present only in very small amounts now.
Vegetable oils and heart disease
The reason is that vegetable oils are generally low in saturated fat and high in polyunsaturated fat.
The benefits of reduced saturated fat intake are controversial.
However, studies show that reducing saturated fat intake for at least 2 years reduces the risk of heart problems by 21%, but it has no significant effects on the risk of death from heart disease.
Furthermore, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids appear to have a greater benefit than omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids.
The omega-6 linoleic acid has been associated with a lower risk of heart disease. However, it is important to be vigilant about avoiding highly refined vegetable oils and processed foods that contain these oils.
Our food environment makes it very easy for us to get more than enough omega-6-rich vegetable oils. We can control how we prepare food at home, so in an effort to practice moderation, it may be a good idea to choose other oils that are lower in omega-6 content, like olive oil or avocado oil.
There is a lot of evidence on the benefits of olive oil on heart health.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Eating fries over boiled potatoes increases type 2 diabetes risk
People who eat three portions of French fries a week have a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes, a new study suggests. Those who consume similar amounts of boiled, baked or mash potatoes do not have an increased risk, researchers found. An international team of researchers, including an expert from the University of Cambridge, wanted to investigate any links between potato consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Academics analysed data on studies tracking the health of more than 205,000 health workers in the US. Repeated surveys about people's diets were performed over almost four decades. And during the study follow-up periods, some 22,000 cases of type 2 diabetes were documented. Overall the research team found that consumption of baked, boiled or mashed potatoes were not linked to an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). But people who had a higher consumption of French fries – at least three weekly servings – had a 20% increased risk. And those who eat fries five times a week appeared to have a 27% increased risk. 'The risks associated with potato intake varied by cooking method,' the authors wrote in The BMJ. 'The association between higher potato intake and increased T2D risk is primarily driven by intake of French fries. 'Higher intake of French fries, but not combined baked, boiled, or mashed potatoes, was associated with a higher risk of T2D.' The research team also found that replacing three servings of potatoes each week with whole grains was found to lower the risk of type 2 diabetes by 8%. 'Replacing any form of potatoes, particularly French fries, with whole grains is estimated to lower the risk of T2D, reinforcing the importance of promoting whole grains as an essential part of a healthy diet,' they wrote. But replacing potatoes with white rice was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, they found. The research team also performed a review of all of the other studies on the topic which had similar findings. In a linked editorial, also published in The BMJ, experts from the US and Denmark wrote: 'This finding also corresponds to the observed associations between high intake of ultra-processed foods and high risk of type 2 diabetes – French fries are often ultra-processed, whereas baked, boiled, or mashed potatoes are often minimally processed.' They added: 'With their relatively low environmental impact and their health impact, potatoes can be part of a healthy and sustainable diet, though whole grains should remain a priority.' Commenting on the study, Dr Faye Riley, research communications lead at Diabetes UK, said: 'This research shows that the link between potatoes and type 2 diabetes isn't as clear-cut as it might seem. 'Type 2 diabetes is a complex condition, with many factors influencing its development, including genetics, age and ethnicity. 'Diet is just one part of the picture, but this study suggests that how food is prepared can make a difference and reinforces the advice to prioritise whole grains and cut back on fried or heavily processed foods as a way to support a balanced diet and reduce your risk.'


Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
USAID And PEPFAR Cuts Could Lead To Massive Loss Of Life Overseas
A Lancet paper published in July evaluates data to illustrate the importance of roughly two decades of American humanitarian aid offered through the United States Agency for International Development and the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. The piece subsequently projects what the future could look like in light of the steep cuts imposed by President Trump to USAID and PEPFAR. Authors estimate that USAID-funded programs have helped prevent more than 91 million deaths globally in the past 20 years, including 30 million fatalities among children. Projections suggest that ongoing deep funding cuts—combined with the dismantling of the agency—could result in more than 14 million additional deaths by 2030. On inauguration day, President Trump ordered a sweeping 90-day spending freeze on virtually all U.S. foreign aid, including many forms of health and food assistance. An independent agency, USAID, was largely gutted. The USAID undertakes a wide range of activities, which include among other things food aid and distribution (often in conflict zones), clean water provision, maternal and infant health support, mass administration of rehydration salts for children suffering from diarrhea, malaria prevention and treatments and polio vaccinations in countries where the disease is still endemic. The agency was established under President John F. Kennedy in the early 1960s to administer humanitarian aid programs around the world. Congress appropriates funds for USAID's operations. The agency employed roughly 10,000 people, two-thirds of whom worked overseas. In fiscal year 2024, the agency received more than $44 billion in federal funding. Most of that money was spent in Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and Europe (primarily on humanitarian efforts in Ukraine). While a considerable sum, it merely accounts for 0.4% of the entire federal budget. The Trump administration has slashed 86% of USAID funding. Only a small fraction of aid programs remains in place. The employee head count is now under 500. As carried out by successive administrations since Bush, including the first Trump administration, PEPFAR represented the largest commitment in history by any nation to address a single disease, HIV/AIDS. But gradually the second Trump administration is unraveling this initiative, too. KFF reported that while PEPFAR received a limited waiver on Feb. 1, allowing it to continue certain 'life-saving HIV services,' the waiver doesn't include essential pre-exposure prophylaxis for anyone other than pregnant and breastfeeding women. The State Department has sought $2.9 billion in funding to continue HIV-AIDS programs in the next fiscal year—considerably lower than PEPFAR's current budget of $4.1 billion. Moreover, USAID was the main agency working on behalf of PEPFAR. Without USAID and its staff, PEPFAR's implementation capacity has been seriously affected. Going forward, the Trump administration intends to transform PEPFAR from an aid program to one that is aligned with its 'America First' priorities. The plan, as described by the New York Times, outlines the administration's intentions to 'transition' countries off of PEPFAR, in some cases within two years. The program would in essence no longer be involved in aid and saving lives overseas. Rather, it would focus on detecting outbreaks that could threaten the U.S. and at the same time create new markets for American drugs and technologies. On the ground, journalists are painting a grim picture of the implications of the drastic curtailment in U.S. aid. A story in America Magazine, for example, describes in detail the local impact in Eswatini, a country in Southern Africa, of the gutting of USAID and reductions in PEPFAR. Cuts have severely limited access to HIV treatments and testing in clinics. During the height of the HIV/AIDS pandemic, the population of Eswatini plummeted, and life expectancy dropped from 61 in 1988 to 44 by 2003. It reverted to 61 in 2023, thanks in large part to USAID and PEPFAR. But now the gains in health outcomes are in jeopardy. The ramifications of a greatly diminished U.S. presence in health aid, international development and disaster assistance could be profound, specifically around the global humanitarian programs which rely on USAID. In terms of international assistance, the U.S. was by far the world's largest donor. The U.S. spent $68 billion on international aid in 2023. And the Trump administration's actions are also affecting what is termed the President's Malaria Initiative, an organization also founded by former President Bush. Through the work of this entity, the U.S. had become the global leader in donating to anti-malaria programs and research. According to the New York Times, one of Trump's executive orders has led to two-thirds of the staff being let go from the Malaria Initiative. And by pulling out of the World Health Organization, Trump further diminishes the critical role the U.S. plays in combating neglected tropical diseases, such as leishmaniasis, river blindness, Dengue fever and trachoma. These preventable and mostly treatable infectious diseases affect millions of people in tropical regions of the world, causing severe health problems, including anemia, blindness, chronic pain, infertility and bodily disfigurement. Historically, despite the large burden imposed by neglected tropical diseases on many people, they've received a relatively small portion of resources for drug development and treatment distribution. U.S. aid agencies had been filling some of the void. Until now.

Wall Street Journal
6 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Affordable Pet Insurance Options: Balancing Cost and Coverage
What do most basic coverage plans include? Most pet insurance companies offer plans that cover treatment for illnesses and accidents, as long as the condition isn't pre-existing and occurs after the waiting period. Some breed-specific and hereditary conditions have special waiting periods, but pet insurers might cover them. While not all of the best pet insurance companies offer the same benefits in their plans, many of those we evaluated include: Access to 24/7 vet telehealth Behavioral and alternative therapies Dental illnesses and emergencies Some end-of-life expenses Vet exam fees for illnesses and accidents What features do most basic coverage plans exclude? Pet insurance plans don't cover pre-existing conditions, which can include illnesses and accidents that happen within the waiting period when you purchase coverage. Additionally, most insurers won't cover routine wellness visits for annual checkups and vaccines. You normally need to purchase a wellness add-on to access benefits like blood and fecal testing, dental cleaning, grooming and preventive medications for flea, tick and heartworm. Some of the best pet insurers include microchipping and prescription food and supplements in their base plans, but most require a wellness add-on for those benefits. Additionally, end-of-life expenses benefits often vary from insurers that only cover euthanasia for specific conditions to those that cover all end-of-life expenses, including cremation or burial. What factors increase the cost of pet insurance? Various factors influence pet insurance costs. Most pet insurance plans have base plans that cover both accidents and illnesses, and offer wellness add-ons for other treatments and preventive care. Some insurers also offer accident-only plans, which are much cheaper than more comprehensive coverage but won't help if your pet needs emergency surgery for an illness. Benefits of the base plan don't increase with premiums. Instead, premiums for pet insurance are usually influenced by the following factors: Coverage, deductible and reimbursement amounts ZIP code Type of pet Pet's age Pet's traits such as breed, gender and health Coverage, deductible and reimbursement choices When choosing your pet insurance plan, your monthly premium is heavily influenced by how much you pay out of pocket. The main considerations include: Annual coverage limits: Most pet insurance plans have annual coverage limits. One of the most common levels is $5,000. Once the pet insurer has paid $5,000 in a year, you're responsible for the remainder. You might be able to choose unlimited annual coverage, but that will cost more. For example, the average monthly difference between Pets Best's $5,000 limit and unlimited coverage for dogs is $40 vs. $49. Spot insurance has a bigger gap, however: $44 vs. $91. Most pet insurance plans have annual coverage limits. One of the most common levels is $5,000. Once the pet insurer has paid $5,000 in a year, you're responsible for the remainder. You might be able to choose unlimited annual coverage, but that will cost more. For example, the average monthly difference between Pets Best's $5,000 limit and unlimited coverage for dogs is $40 vs. $49. Spot insurance has a bigger gap, however: $44 vs. $91. Deductible: This is how much you pay before the insurer begins paying claims. Many insurers offer deductibles between $100 and $500, although you can find some companies that allow you to pay as little as $50 a year or as much as $1,000 before they begin paying claims. The higher your deductible, the more you can save on your monthly premiums. This is how much you pay before the insurer begins paying claims. Many insurers offer deductibles between $100 and $500, although you can find some companies that allow you to pay as little as $50 a year or as much as $1,000 before they begin paying claims. The higher your deductible, the more you can save on your monthly premiums. Reimbursement rate: Even after you meet your deductible, few pet insurance companies reimburse you for 100% of your covered costs. Instead, you typically choose a reimbursement rate of 70%, 80% or 90%. After you meet your deductible, the pet insurer will cover that percentage of the claim. When providing averages for base plans, we reference a $5,000 annual coverage limit, with an 80% reimbursement rate and $500 deductible. With these coverage options, if your pet had a procedure that cost $2,000, you would first meet your $500 deductible. Then, the pet insurance company would cover 80% of the remaining $1,500 bill, or $1,200. In this scenario, you pay $800. However, if your pet has an illness later in the year, resulting in another $1,000 invoice, you've already met the deductible, so you only pay $200 and your pet insurer covers the remaining 80%. Now, though, the pet insurer has paid a total of $2,000 ($1,200 + $800), and it will only pay up to $3,000 for the rest of the year. ZIP code Where you live affects the price of pet insurance. It might also influence the benefits covered by your base plan or your wellness add-on. For example, you have a 2-year-old, medium-sized, mixed breed dog that you want to insure through Pets Best, our cheapest pet insurer. If you live in California and choose $5,000 annual coverage with an 80% reimbursement rate and $500 deductible, your average monthly cost might be $35. In Texas, though, that coverage for the same pet costs an average of $23 per month. Someone in Texas might save more than $130 a year due to their ZIP code. Type of pet Whether you have a cat or a dog affects the cost of your pet insurance. Our top-rated insurer, Spot, charges an average of $44 per month to cover a dog, while the average monthly cost to cover a cat is $17. Some pet insurers also cover other pets, like hamsters, birds and horses. All of these types of pets have their own rates, depending on how much veterinary care they need on average and how much that care typically costs. Age As your pet ages, the cost of insuring it increases. Pets Best offers the lowest average cost to insure an 8-year-old dog, at $61 per month. Compare that to the average cost of insuring a 4-month-old dog at $30. Some pet insurers stop insuring pets over a certain age, or may only offer your senior pet a less comprehensive accident-only plan. Breed, gender and health Your pet's characteristics also play a role in pet insurance premiums. Some breeds cost more to insure, like Persian cats which are at a higher risk of polycystic kidney disease. Dachshunds and other dog breeds with short legs are more likely to be diagnosed with intervertebral disc disease. When providing a pet insurance quote, the pet insurer will consider gender and health, as well as the likelihood that breed-specific conditions might manifest later. Tips for reducing pet insurance premiums You're likely to save more money on pet insurance premiums if you take the following steps: Increase your deductible: What you're willing to pay out of pocket before your insurance pays claims can reduce your monthly cost. If you can choose a $750 or $1,000 deductible instead of a $250 or $500 deductible, your monthly premium will be lower. What you're willing to pay out of pocket before your insurance pays claims can reduce your monthly cost. If you can choose a $750 or $1,000 deductible instead of a $250 or $500 deductible, your monthly premium will be lower. Reduce your reimbursement rate: While an 80% reimbursement rate is standard for many pet parents, you can save money by choosing a lower rate. Some insurers allow you to choose a reimbursement rate as low as 50%, although you're more likely to find the lowest level at 70%. While an 80% reimbursement rate is standard for many pet parents, you can save money by choosing a lower rate. Some insurers allow you to choose a reimbursement rate as low as 50%, although you're more likely to find the lowest level at 70%. Choose a lower annual coverage limit: Instead of selecting unlimited coverage, stick with the $5,000 annual coverage limit to save on your pet insurance premium. Some companies, like MetLife and Embrace, allow you to choose an annual coverage limit as low as $2,000. You pay more out of pocket during an expensive emergency, but your monthly cost is lower. Instead of selecting unlimited coverage, stick with the $5,000 annual coverage limit to save on your pet insurance premium. Some companies, like MetLife and Embrace, allow you to choose an annual coverage limit as low as $2,000. You pay more out of pocket during an expensive emergency, but your monthly cost is lower. Get an accident-only plan: If the pet insurer offers an accident-only plan, you can save a significant amount of money on premiums. You enjoy peace of mind knowing that an unexpected injury or accident is covered and you won't have a large out-of-pocket cost. However, your benefits won't include illness coverage for chronic conditions like diabetes or cancer treatments. If the pet insurer offers an accident-only plan, you can save a significant amount of money on premiums. You enjoy peace of mind knowing that an unexpected injury or accident is covered and you won't have a large out-of-pocket cost. However, your benefits won't include illness coverage for chronic conditions like diabetes or cancer treatments. Plan to cover wellness and preventive care on your own: Instead of adding a wellness plan to your pet insurance policy, which comes with an extra monthly cost, plan to pay for preventive and routine care on your own. This includes dental cleanings, vaccinations, special food, routine checkups and heartworm medications. When taking steps to reduce your monthly pet insurance premiums, consider creating a special emergency fund or sinking fund for pet care to handle the potentially higher out-of-pocket costs when your pet experiences an emergency or expensive illness. Cheapest dog insurance The cheapest average dog insurance is Pets Best at $40 per month and that's based on a $5,000 annual cover, with a $500 deductible and 80% reimbursement rate. However, Pets Best doesn't offer a lower minimum annual coverage. If you were willing to lower your reimbursement rate to 70% and pay a $1,000 annual deductible, you might find a lower dog insurance premium with Embrace, which offers a $2,000 annual coverage. Cheapest cat insurance The least expensive cat insurance is Spot, at an average of $17 per month. Pumpkin and Figo offer plans for around $18 per month, as does MetLife. MetLife doesn't offer unlimited coverage, maxing out at $10,000 a year. If you get the maximum coverage, MetLife costs $26 a month, while the plan with a $5,000 limit costs $18 per month. Spot, on the other hand, costs an average of $35 a month for unlimited annual coverage, compared to Pumpkin and Figo, which cost $34 and $27 a month, respectively. The cheapest unlimited coverage option is from Pets Best, at an average cost of $24 a month. FAQ Does a lower premium mean less coverage? A lower premium with one pet insurer doesn't necessarily mean a significant difference in benefits from another insurer, but it can mean lower annual coverage limits or a lower reimbursement rate. It's a good idea to compare several pet insurance quotes and the coverage similar plans provide before making a decision. What kind of discounts are available that could help save money? Many pet insurance companies offer multi-pet discounts, and some offer military service discounts. There are also discounts for veterinarian employees and store memberships, depending on the pet insurer. You can typically see the discounts available when requesting a quote from the company. How does the deductible affect my premium? The more you're willing to pay upfront before the insurance company starts paying claims, the lower your monthly premium. If you have a higher deductible, you normally pay a lower pet insurance premium. Can I switch pet insurance providers if I find a cheaper option? Yes, if you find a cheaper pet insurance plan, you can switch providers. Compare benefits and find out if the new insurer covers the same conditions. Also, be aware that if your pet is being treated for certain conditions now, the new insurer might not cover them since they can be considered pre-existing. Methodology We evaluated 15 pet insurance policies, focusing on key coverage areas, such as cost, access to vet telehealth, microchipping, direct vet payments and therapies that pet owners might prefer to be included in coverage. Advertisers and partners don't influence our ratings, as our research and editorial team maintains independence in using data-driven methodologies. For the cheapest pet insurance companies, we featured the insurers that receive at least 4 out of 5 stars in our ranking system and ordered them from cheapest to most expensive. We based our rating on the average monthly price to insure a medium-sized mixed breed dog. Our methodology is based on the following weighted factors, including rates based on medium, mixed breed dogs. We only selected companies with annual coverage limits of at least $5,000.