Tariffs likely to drive up U.S. prices even with Trump trade deals, experts say
Speaking at an AI summit on Wednesday, Mr. Trump said "we'll have a straight, simple tariff of anywhere between 15% and 50%," conditioning the lower rate on countries opening their economies to the U.S.
The White House has said sharply higher tariffs could take effect on dozens of countries as soon as Aug. 1 unless they ink new trade deals. The Trump administration has a separate negotiating timeline with China, which faces an Aug. 12 deadline for an agreement.
As these new rules of international commerce take shape, companies across a range of industries are emphasizing that higher tariffs translate into higher operational costs — and higher prices for consumers.
For example, Nestlé on Thursday said it was considering hiking prices for candy bars and other products as tariffs threaten to eat into the food company's profit margins. The same day, Italian fashion brand Moncler said it has already hiked prices for its apparel to offset additional tariff-related costs. And General Electric said this week that proposed U.S. tariffs, should they take effect, would cost the company around $500 million in 2025, noting that it would move to offset those taxes through "cost controls and pricing actions."
Orange juice importer Johanna Foods has gone a step further, this week filing a lawsuit against the Trump administration over its proposed 50% tariff on Brazil, which the New Jersey company said would seriously hurt its business and force it to hike product prices by up to 25%.
The White House disputes that higher U.S. tariffs will drive up costs for businesses and consumers.
"The administration has consistently maintained that the cost of tariffs will be borne by foreign exporters who rely on access to the American economy, the world's biggest and best consumer market," White House spokesman Kush Desai told CBS MoneyWatch in a statement.
Desai also pointed to a recent analysis by the White House's Council of Economic Advisers that he said shows import prices falling this year.
Economists warn that consumers should brace for higher prices on a range of goods, from leather products and clothing to electronics and automobiles, later this year.
"Up to now there has been only limited passthrough from tariffs into final consumer prices, but we still expect the impact to gradually mount in the second half of this year," Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist with Capital Economics, told investors in a research note. "Now that the Trump administration is concluding deals that would see the tariff rate facing most trading partners settling at between 15% and 20%, with even higher rates levied on Chinese imports, we suspect retailers will be forced to finally raise the prices paid by consumers."
Inflation in the early part of 2025 remained fairly contained. That's because many companies and consumers accelerated their purchases of imported goods to avoid the risk of paying more if, or when, steep new tariffs take effect.
Meanwhile, in the short-term, sharply higher prices are unlikely across the board, according to trade experts.
"When you open up the hood of that, it's not going to be even across all categories of spending," Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale, told CBS MoneyWatch. "It's categories of spending where we import more that are going to be more sensitive to tariffs."
But over the longer term, an increased baseline tariff, coupled wtih higher levies on individual countries, is projected to drive up U.S. prices by 2% over the next two years, according to an analysis from the Yale Budget Lab.
"This isn't an instantaneous, 'We wake up the next morning and the world is different,'" Tedeschi added.
But as the new U.S. tariff regime becomes embedded in global supply chains, some import-heavy product categories could see especially sharp price increases, he said. Specifically, foreign-made leather shoes and handbags, along with apparel, could see prices spike by at least 40%, while the cost of electronics could jump more than 20%, according to the Yale Budget Lab.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Confirms Emil Bove, Trump's ‘Enforcer,' To A Lifetime Federal Judgeship
WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans on Tuesday confirmed Emil Bove to a lifetime federal judgeship, choosing to ignore credible allegations that Bove had told Justice Department attorneys to defy court orders and say 'fuck you' to judges who ruled against them. Bove was confirmed, 50-49. Every Democrat opposed him, along with two Republicans: Sens. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Susan Collins (Maine). Bove, 44, will now serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, which has jurisdiction over cases in Pennsylvania, Delaware, New Jersey and the Virgin Islands. Given his age, he will potentially sit on this court for decades. Bove is easily President Donald Trump's most alarming court pick in his second term. He was previously Trump's personal criminal defense attorney and, until now, has been Trump's so-called 'enforcer' at the Justice Department, where he's spent months carrying out an apparent campaign of retribution against Trump's perceived political enemies. As a senior DOJ official, Bove ordered the firings of federal prosecutors who worked on criminal cases stemming from the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection. He ordered career prosecutors to dismiss corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams in a clear quid pro quo deal. He also called for the firings of senior FBI officials who were involved in the Jan. 6 probes. Bove has faced damning allegations from former senior DOJ attorney Erez Reuveni, who claimed in a whistleblower disclosure that Bove had told DOJ attorneys to ignore court orders, mislead judges and tell them 'fuck you' if they ruled against the department in a case involving the removal of hundreds of immigrants to a prison in El Salvador. Asked about this in his Senate nomination hearing, Bove said he couldn't recall saying those things and denied he'd told people to defy court orders. A second whistleblower later came forward with documents corroborating Reuveni's allegations, and a third whistleblower emerged Monday with documentation suggesting Bove misled senators during his hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. And in a stunning rebuke, more than 900 former Justice Department attorneys signed onto a letter condemning Bove's 'assault' on DOJ employees and urged senators to 'rigorously examine' his record before considering voting for him. But none of this swayed Republicans to oppose Bove, whose confirmation was clearly a high priority for Trump. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, held firm in pushing Bove forward amid all the allegations against him. He compared Democrats' attacks on Bove to the way they attacked now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who faced fresh and credible accusations of sexual assault just before Republicans confirmed him to his post. 'Eleventh-hour media smears by my colleagues based on information that was hidden from the Committee are unacceptable, and I won't stand for it as a delay and obstruction tactic,' Grassley said Tuesday on the Senate floor. 'This tactic didn't work against Justice Kavanaugh, and it won't work against Mr. Bove,' he said. Democrats were scrambling up until the end to stop Bove's nomination. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the top Democrat on the judiciary panel, released a batch of text messages, email exchanges and other documents corroborating Reuveni's allegations. After the third whistleblower came forward, Sens. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Cory Booker (D-N.J.) wrote to DOJ's acting inspector general on Tuesday with questions about whether Bove is or has been investigated by the department for wrongdoing. In a final appeal to his GOP colleagues ahead of the vote, Durbin warned that Trump isn't even trying to hide his belief that Bove's loyalty lies with him. He cited a message Trump posted on social media last month about Bove. 'President Trump himself has made it clear that Mr. Bove was selected for this position not because of his legal accomplishments, or his dedication to a conservative method of constitutional interpretation,' Durbin said on the Senate floor. 'As the president put it, Mr. Bove will 'do anything … that is necessary to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.'' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) took a harsher tack, condemning Republicans for voting to put a 'January 6th sympathizer' onto the federal bench. 'To my Republican colleagues who were here on January 6 and who are now putting him on the bench: shame on you,' Schumer said on the Senate floor. 'To confirm Mr. Bove is a sacrilegious act against our democracy, and a deep violation against the spirit of our oaths of office.' Related... More Than 900 Former DOJ Attorneys Offer Stunning Rebuke Of Trump's Court Pick DOJ Lawyer Emil Bove Refuses To Rule Out 3rd Trump Term Trump Court Pick For Lifetime Seat Refuses To Say If Biden Won 2020 Election
Boston Globe
19 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Senate confirms Trump lawyer Emil Bove, pushing past whistleblower claims
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Bove has accused FBI officials of 'insubordination' for refusing to hand over the names of agents who investigated the attack and ordered the firing of a group of prosecutors involved in those Jan. 6 criminal cases. Advertisement Democrats have also cited evidence from two whistleblowers, a fired department lawyer who said earlier this month that Bove had suggested the Trump administration may need to ignore judicial commands — Advertisement The audio is from a private video conference call at the Department of Justice in February in which Bove, a top official at the department, discussed his handling of the dismissed case against Adams, according to transcribed quotes from the audio reviewed by The Associated Press. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity because the whistleblower has not made the recording public. The whistleblower's claims were first reported by the Washington Post. None of that evidence has so far been enough to sway Senate Republicans — all but two of them voted to confirm Bove as GOP senators have deferred to Trump on virtually all of his picks. At his confirmation hearing earlier this month, Bove addressed criticism of his tenure head-on, telling lawmakers he understands some of his decisions 'have generated controversy.' But Bove said he has been inaccurately portrayed as Trump's 'henchman' and 'enforcer' at the department. Senators at the Judiciary Committee hearing asked Bove about the February 14 call with lawyers in the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section, which had received significant public attention because of his unusual directive that the attorneys had an hour to decide among themselves who would agree to file on the department's behalf the motion to dismiss the case against Adams. The call was convened amid significant upheaval in the department as prosecutors in New York who'd handled the matter, as well as some in Washington, resigned rather than agree to dispense with the case. According to the transcript of the February call, Bove remarked near the outset that interim Manhattan U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon 'resigned about ten minutes before we were going to put her on leave pending an investigation.' But when asked at the hearing whether he had opened the meeting by emphasizing that Sassoon and another prosecutor had refused to follow orders and that Sassoon was going to be reassigned before she resigned, Bove answered with a simple, 'No.' Advertisement At another moment, Bove said he did not recall saying words that the transcript of the call reflects him as having said — that whoever signed the motion to dismiss the Adams case would emerge as leaders of the section. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said Tuesday that he believes Bove will be a 'diligent, capable and fair jurist.' He said his staff had tried to investigate the claims but that lawyers for the whistleblowers would not give them all of the materials they had asked for. The 'vicious rhetoric, unfair accusations and abuse directed at Mr. Bove' have 'crossed the line,' Grassley said. The first whistleblower complaint against Bove came from a former Justice Department lawyer who was fired in April after conceding in court that Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man who had been living in Maryland, was mistakenly deported to an El Salvador prison. That lawyer, Erez Reuveni, described efforts by top Justice Department officials in the weeks before his firing to stonewall and mislead judges to carry out deportations championed by the White House. Reuveni described a Justice Department meeting in March concerning Trump's plans to invoke the Alien Enemies Act over what the president claimed was an invasion by the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. Reuveni said Bove raised the possibility that a court might block the deportations before they could happen. Reuveni claims Bove used a profanity in saying the department would need to consider telling the courts what to do and 'ignore any such order,' Reuveni's lawyers said in the filing. Advertisement Bove said he has 'no recollection of saying anything of that kind.'
San Francisco Chronicle
19 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Senate confirms Trump lawyer Emil Bove, pushing past whistleblower claims
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate confirmed former Trump lawyer Emil Bove 50-49 for a lifetime appointment as a federal appeals court judge Tuesday as Republicans dismissed whistleblower complaints about his conduct at the Justice Department. A former federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York, Bove was on Trump's legal team during his New York hush money trial and defended Trump in the two federal criminal cases. He will serve on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which hears cases from Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Democrats have vehemently opposed Bove's nomination, citing his current position as a top Justice Department official and his role in the dismissal of the corruption case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. They have also criticized his efforts to investigate department officials who were involved in the prosecutions of hundreds of Trump supporters who were involved in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Bove has accused FBI officials of 'insubordination' for refusing to hand over the names of agents who investigated the attack and ordered the firing of a group of prosecutors involved in those Jan. 6 criminal cases. Democrats have also cited evidence from two whistleblowers, a fired department lawyer who said earlier this month that Bove had suggested the Trump administration may need to ignore judicial commands — a claim that Bove denies — and new evidence from a whistleblower who did not go public. That whistleblower recently provided an audio recording of Bove that runs contrary to some of his testimony at his confirmation hearing last month, according to two people familiar with the recording. The audio is from a private video conference call at the Department of Justice in February in which Bove, a top official at the department, discussed his handling of the dismissed case against Adams, according to transcribed quotes from the audio reviewed by The Associated Press. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity because the whistleblower has not made the recording public. The whistleblower's claims were first reported by the Washington Post. None of that evidence has so far been enough to sway Senate Republicans — all but two of them voted to confirm Bove as GOP senators have deferred to Trump on virtually all of his picks. At his confirmation hearing earlier this month, Bove addressed criticism of his tenure head-on, telling lawmakers he understands some of his decisions 'have generated controversy.' But Bove said he has been inaccurately portrayed as Trump's 'henchman' and 'enforcer' at the department. Senators at the Judiciary Committee hearing asked Bove about the February 14 call with lawyers in the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section, which had received significant public attention because of his unusual directive that the attorneys had an hour to decide among themselves who would agree to file on the department's behalf the motion to dismiss the case against Adams. The call was convened amid significant upheaval in the department as prosecutors in New York who'd handled the matter, as well as some in Washington, resigned rather than agree to dispense with the case. According to the transcript of the February call, Bove remarked near the outset that interim Manhattan U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon 'resigned about ten minutes before we were going to put her on leave pending an investigation.' But when asked at the hearing whether he had opened the meeting by emphasizing that Sassoon and another prosecutor had refused to follow orders and that Sassoon was going to be reassigned before she resigned, Bove answered with a simple, 'No.' At another moment, Bove said he did not recall saying words that the transcript of the call reflects him as having said — that whoever signed the motion to dismiss the Adams case would emerge as leaders of the section. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said Tuesday that he believes Bove will be a 'diligent, capable and fair jurist.' He said his staff had tried to investigate the claims but that lawyers for the whistleblowers would not give them all of the materials they had asked for. The 'vicious rhetoric, unfair accusations and abuse directed at Mr. Bove' have 'crossed the line,' Grassley said. The first whistleblower complaint against Bove came from a former Justice Department lawyer who was fired in April after conceding in court that Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man who had been living in Maryland, was mistakenly deported to an El Salvador prison. That lawyer, Erez Reuveni, described efforts by top Justice Department officials in the weeks before his firing to stonewall and mislead judges to carry out deportations championed by the White House. Reuveni described a Justice Department meeting in March concerning Trump's plans to invoke the Alien Enemies Act over what the president claimed was an invasion by the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. Reuveni said Bove raised the possibility that a court might block the deportations before they could happen. Reuveni claims Bove used a profanity in saying the department would need to consider telling the courts what to do and 'ignore any such order,' Reuveni's lawyers said in the filing.
