logo
Best S&P 500 ETFs: 10 top funds for 2025

Best S&P 500 ETFs: 10 top funds for 2025

Yahooa day ago
The Standard & Poor's 500 – the S&P 500 – is the benchmark stock index in the United States, and it's come to symbolize the stock market as a whole. The S&P 500 has a strong record of returns, averaging about 10 percent per year over long periods, and it's easy for investors to buy the index through an exchange-traded fund (ETF), getting immediate exposure to all its stocks.
Here are the best S&P 500 ETFs as well as some alternative funds based on the S&P 500 for investors to consider.
Best S&P 500 ETFs
The funds below invest in the S&P 500 in the same weighting as the official index. Because the S&P 500 is weighted by market capitalization, larger companies have a larger weighting in the index. The funds here try to closely mirror the performance of the official S&P 500. These funds tend to have low expense ratios, which is the fee you'll pay to the fund management company.
The funds below are all index funds since they track a specific index and invest passively with the fund's management reflecting only official changes in the index. You can also explore the best Nasdaq funds if you're looking to invest in tech stocks.
(Fund data as of July 31, 2025)
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)
This Vanguard fund tracks the S&P 500 and is one of the company's most popular funds.
5-year annualized return: 16.1 percent
Expense ratio: 0.03 percent
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV)
The iShares S&P 500 fund is another popular way to invest in the benchmark index.
5-year annualized return: 16.1 percent
Expense ratio: 0.03 percent
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY)
This State Street fund is the granddaddy of ETFs in the U.S. and tracks the S&P 500 index but at a somewhat higher cost than rival funds.
5-year annualized return: 16 percent
Expense ratio: 0.095 percent
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPLG)
This State Street fund functions exactly the same as its sister fund above, but it comes with the most competitive expense ratio here.
5-year annualized return: 16.1 percent
Expense ratio: 0.02 percent
MORE: Bankrate's list of the best ETFs
Other funds to invest in the S&P 500 with a twist
The funds above track the regular S&P 500 index, so their performance closely follows that index. But the funds below slice and dice the index for a different set of returns than the official S&P 500 index. Some funds include all the stocks in the index but weigh them differently, while other funds carve out a section of growth or value stocks and base their fund on those.
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP)
This Invesco fund weights the hundreds of stocks in the S&P 500 equally (not by market cap), so each stock has about a 0.2 percent share of the fund. This fund will do better than a regular S&P 500 fund when smaller stocks are outperforming and larger stocks are lagging.
5-year annualized return: 13.5 percent
Expense ratio: 0.20 percent
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW)
This iShares fund tracks a subset of the S&P 500 that includes the fastest-growing stocks, as measured by factors such as three-year sales-per-share growth and the stock's momentum.
5-year annualized return: 16.7 percent
Expense ratio: 0.18 percent
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE)
This iShares fund tracks a subset of the S&P 500 that includes the value-priced stocks, as measured by factors such as a stock's low price-to-earnings ratio and price-to-sales ratio.
5-year annualized return: 14.3 percent
Expense ratio: 0.18 percent
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG)
This State Street fund owns stocks among a subset of the fastest-growing S&P 500 stocks, as determined by the stock's momentum, sales growth and earnings growth compared to price change.
5-year annualized return: 16.8 percent
Expense ratio: 0.04 percent
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV)
This State Street fund owns stocks among a subset of the value-priced S&P 500 stocks, as determined by the stock's price-earnings ratio, price-to-sales ratio and price-to-book ratio.
5-year annualized return: 14.4 percent
Expense ratio: 0.04 percent
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG)
This Vanguard fund tracks a subset of the S&P 500 that includes the value-priced stocks, as determined by factors such as a stock's low price-earnings ratio and price-to-sales ratio.
5-year annualized return: 16.7 percent
Expense ratio: 0.07 percent
Learn more: Stocks vs. ETFs: Which should you invest in?
Risks of S&P 500 ETFs
While ETFs can be a great way to invest in the market, they still have some downsides:
Volatility: An ETF can be highly volatile, although it tends to be less volatile than individual stocks. In the short term, an ETF can move up or down, and you'll need to commit to holding on for years to enjoy the fund's strong long-term returns.
Tracking risk: An ETF tracking a specific index may not perfectly mirror the returns of the index, and it's called tracking risk. In the case of these S&P 500 funds, it's not a huge risk, but other types of index funds may vary widely, especially if they're investing in less liquid stocks.
Structural costs: ETFs that use leverage to multiply your returns or that try to profit on stocks falling have extra costs that can make them more costly. These extra costs can drag on their returns over time and their ability to track their target index. That's not an issue for the S&P 500 funds above, but it's something to watch if you're investing in leveraged ETFs.
Bottom line
An S&P 500 index fund can be a great way to invest in the market, and you won't need a lot of investing expertise to do so. In fact, legendary investor Warren Buffett has long advised most investors to simply buy the index rather than invest in individual stocks. It's incredibly easy to buy an S&P 500 fund, and you can do so at any of the best brokers for stock trading.
Calculator: Are you on track to reach your investment goals?
擷取數據時發生錯誤
登入存取你的投資組合
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump officials scramble to justify firing of economic statistician – as critics say ‘scary' move is a sign of ‘authoritiarianism'
Trump officials scramble to justify firing of economic statistician – as critics say ‘scary' move is a sign of ‘authoritiarianism'

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump officials scramble to justify firing of economic statistician – as critics say ‘scary' move is a sign of ‘authoritiarianism'

Members of Donald Trump's team scrambled to provide coherent explanations for the sudden firing of a top official at the Bureau of Labor Statistics on Sunday as Friday's firing resonated throughout Washington and left the White House open to criticism of Trump's 'authoritarian' leanings. The US president directed the firing of Erika McEntarfer on Friday after a jobs report showed private companies adding just 73,000 positions in July, a drop from projections and a further sign that the Trump economy is stalling in the face of growing uncertainty around the president's tariff agenda. McEntarfer's firing was immediately denounced by her Trump-appointed predecessor and numerous others in Washington. Republicans on the Hill struggled to defend it, while members of Donald Trump's team insisted in interviews that the president and the nation needed what he called 'reliable' numbers. Trump accused McEntarfer of cooking the numbers on Kamala Harris's behalf during the 2024 election, and now working to make him look bad, a notion even the president's own advisers wouldn't echo directly. Kevin Hassett, director of the White House economic council, led the efforts to defend the president's decision-making on Sunday. He was joined by Jamieson Greer, the US trade representative. Hassett directly contradicted the president during his interview on Fox News Sunday with Shannon Bream; he argued that it was the formula by which the BLS determined job market gains — not malicious activity by McEntarfer — which needed to be addressed. Pointing to a letter from McEntarfer's predecessors, Bream asked Hassett: 'They're saying it's not good to cast aspersions on what's being done because it's a formula. It's used the same way every single time. So are you saying maybe the formulas, the calculations need to change?' 'That's right. They really need to get back to ground zero and find out why these numbers are so unreliable,' said Hassett.' "The data can't be propaganda. The data has to be something you can trust, because decision-makers throughout the economy trust that these are the data that they can build a factory because they believe, or cut interest rates because they believe. And if the data aren't that good, then it's a real problem for the US,' Hassett continued. He and others pointed to the agency revising totals for May and June as evidence that the BLS required changes: 'We expect more big revisions for the jobs data in September, for example ... we want to know why, we want people to explain it to us.' Greer, during a pre-taped interview with CBS's Face the Nation, backed up Hassett's claims that sharp revisions dating back to 2024 were evidence of the numbers produced by the agency being unreliable. "You want to be able to have somewhat reliable numbers,' he said. 'There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways.' But there's still nothing linking McEntarfer to the kind of nefarious activity which Trump alleged she was up to in a Truth Social post. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump wrote on Friday. He added: 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad — Just like when they had three great days around the 2024 Presidential Election, and then, those numbers were 'taken away' on November 15, 2024, right after the Election.' No one on the president's team has attempted to present any evidence backing up Trump's claims. A number of McEntarfer's predecessors and other top officialst at the BLS fired back in a statement from a group called the 'Friends of the BLS': 'The President seeks to blame someone for unwelcome economic news.' The president's critics said that the firing and unsupported explanation meant that future figures released by the agency would be thrown into question and was an example of Trump desiring ability to dictate the creation of phony statistics. 'This is the stuff of democracies giving way to authoritarianism,' warned Larry Summers, former director of the White House economic council under Biden (and Hassett's predecessor), on ABC's This Week. 'This is really scary stuff, and it can hardly be surprising that when the rule of law is in a bit question that there's a big uncertainty premium in the markets.' He went on to argue that Trump's battering of Fed Chair Jerome Powell followed in a similar vein, and was behind much of the uncertainty curbing U.S. investments on Wall Street. Friday marked the resumption of Trump's reciprocal tariffs; enforcement of rates as high as 50% on some U.S. trading partners will resume this week. Economists largely agree that those tariffs are driving up consumer prices and stifling U.S. investment rather than encouraging the return of manufacturing plants to America as companies continue to evaluate new costs stemming from Trump's import duties. The job numbers put out by the BLS on a monthly basis are some of the most important statistics gathered by the U.S. government in terms of their ability to move financial markets around the world. Experts say the sharp revisions are a result of more accurate data collection efforts.

Apple CEO drops bombshell about its future
Apple CEO drops bombshell about its future

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Apple CEO drops bombshell about its future

Apple CEO drops bombshell about its future originally appeared on TheStreet. Apple is notoriously close-to-the-vest when it comes to making announcements, preferring to keep loyal fans and die-hard investors in the dark until the timing is right. The company's "one more thing" mentality, reflected by founder Steve Jobs's surprising product reveals at Apple keynote conferences, appears shared by current CEO Tim Cook. In contrast to other big tech leaders, including Elon Musk, Cook often lets Apple's products do the talking. As a result, investors often look closely at Cook's comments during conference calls, looking for clues to what he may have planned for the company next. During Apple's second-quarter earnings conference call, Cook may have dropped his guard a little when he offered an interesting response about Apple's massive cash stockpile and artificial intelligence ambitions. CEO Tim Cook says Apple is open for business Apple reported a solid June quarter that outpaced analysts' expectations. Revenue was a whopping $94 billion, up 10% year over year, and almost $5 billion better than Wall Street expected. Net income was over $23 billion, resulting in earnings per share, or EPS, of $1.57, up 12% from one year ago, and 14 cents ahead of company's massive profit lifted its cash hoard to about $36 billion from roughly $30 billion last year, giving it plenty of financial firepower to invest in its products and software. And that's precisely what investors want to see happen. While competitors like Google have gone all in on artificial intelligence, developing the AI chatbot Gemini, Apple's AI strategy has been criticized as too little, too late. The company's arguably slow development of AI solutions relative to peers has left many investors wondering if Tim Cook's number-crunching mindset sets Apple on a course of missing out on the most significant opportunity since the dawn of the Internet. However, during Apple's earnings conference call, Cook acknowledged that he'd consider accelerating Apple's AI efforts by using its massive cash war chest. When Citi analyst Atif Malik asked about the prospects of 'big M&A," Cook responded bluntly. 'We've acquired around seven companies this year,' said Cook on the call. 'We're very open to M&A that accelerates our road map… We are not stuck on a certain size company.' Cook said he didn't have anything to announce currently, but his willingness to consider a big deal could mean that reports of interest in Perplexity, a major AI player, may have merit. Buying Perplexity could make sense for Apple Cook aims to accelerate Apple's development timeline, ostensibly via internal research and development and smaller bolt-on deals. However, if he really wanted to, he could do a deal to acquire Perplexity that could, as he put it, 'help us accelerate a road map.'Perplexity provides an AI chatbot similar to Google and OpenAI's ChatGPT, but there are key differences. It has its own in-house model, Sonar, that's built on Meta Platforms' Llama open source code. It's also leaned on rival chatbots, including DeepSeek's R1. Subscribers to its Pro tier can also toggle between other large language models, including OpenAI, Gemini, Anthropic's Claude, and Elon Musk's Grok. Acquiring Perplexity would instantly give Apple an established model for monetizing AI. Perplexity operates on a freemium model, with a no-cost introductory subscription and paid service. Perplexity prioritizes real-time insight with direct responses — a design that arguably matches Apple's deep focus on user experience. In short, Perplexity's desire for a better chatbot user experience aligns nicely with Apple's approach, historically. Perplexity would cost Apple a pretty penny Cook says Apple has acquired seven companies this year, about one 'every several weeks.' Those deals, however, are small and haven't cost the company much of its war chest. Buying Perplexity would be a different story. Perplexity, which launched in 2022 around the same time as ChatGPT, has over 22 million monthly active users. Its annualized revenue could hit $150 million this summer, according to About Chromebooks data, up from an ARR of $63 million exiting last year. The company's rapid user growth translated into Perplexity answering 780 million queries in May, according to which was up from 230 million in August 2024. Also in May, its website recorded 153 million visits, about triple the number from March. Perplexity isn't publicly traded, is currently reportedly valued at $18 billion, and its AI search market share is about 6%.Apple CEO drops bombshell about its future first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 3, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 3, 2025, where it first appeared.

The ABC News host took the administration to task for the president's firing of his stats boss.
The ABC News host took the administration to task for the president's firing of his stats boss.

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The ABC News host took the administration to task for the president's firing of his stats boss.

ABC News host George Stephanopoulos says President Donald Trump's administration resembles the authoritarian regimes in Venezuela and Turkey after the president fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. On Friday, the president fired BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer after the agency released its July jobs report showing that the economy added a mere 73,000 jobs last month—far fewer than the 109,000 jobs the White House forecasted. Trump claimed BLS had 'RIGGED' the numbers 'to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' 'Suppressing statisticians is a time-honored tool for leaders trying to solidify their power and stifle dissent,' Stephanopoulos said on Sunday's edition of This Week. 'It's happened throughout history. Most recently in Venezuela and Turkey, where presidents punished officials and economists who do not tow the party line.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store