Mehdi Hasan on Trump's first 100 days
'So many things have shocked me about the past 100 days,' says the Guardian US columnist and author of Win Every Argument, Mehdi Hasan.
'Even for me, even the person who was saying it's going to be so bad, it's much worse than even I thought.'
What's been shocking to Hasan about Donald Trump's second term so far is not the policies – they were laid out on the campaign trail – but the lack of resistance.
'I didn't realise how quickly mainstream US media organisations would roll over,' he tells Michael Safi. 'Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, Sundar Pichai of Google all lined up at the inauguration. No, I didn't see that coming. I didn't see universities and big law firms bending the knee so quickly.'
Hasan discusses the impact of Trump's first 100 days on people in the US and around the world, his plan to run for a third term, how the Democrats are performing and why public movements are the only way to resist the dismantling of democratic norms.
'My greatest hope is that the American people – not all of them, I think 30 to 40% are unreachable – but the vast majority of them recognise the peril that American democracy is in, the peril that the American economy is in, and the peril that the globe is in, and actually do take to the streets, do take to town halls, and do take to the ballot box, eventually, when we get there in '26, to say this was a huge mistake that we did twice.'
Support the Guardian today: theguardian.com/todayinfocuspod
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
'Biggest scandal in American history' or a 'distraction': A look at Trump's autopen claims
President Donald Trump has ordered an investigation into the Biden administration's use of an automatic signature pen, alleging that Joe Biden wasn't aware of many of his presidential orders and appointments. "This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history," Trump said in a memorandum Wednesday directing the probe. Biden denied the allegations, calling them "ridiculous and false." 'This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations,' Biden said in a statement Wednesday, referring to a massive GOP bill to advance Trump's agenda. Here's a look at what's known — and what isn't — about the allegations Trump has referred to on social media as "the biggest scandal in American history," how they started and what might come next. What is an autopen? An autopen is a device that replicates a person's signature or writings. Variations of it have been around for centuries — Thomas Jefferson got one in 1803 that he used to make copies of his correspondence. They're often used for mass reproductions of signatures on items like diplomas, and there are now digital versions in use. Can presidents use autopens for official actions? They can, according to 2005 guidance from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel. 'The President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to become law,' the guidance said. 'Rather, the President may sign a bill . . . by directing a subordinate to affix the President's signature to such a bill, for example by autopen.' Have presidents used autopens for official acts? They have. President George W. Bush — who had requested the guidance from the Justice Department — did not wind up using an autopen for official actions, but both Biden and President Barack Obama did while traveling. USA Today reported in 2017 that Obama used an autopen to issue dozens of pardons the previous year while he was on vacation in Hawaii. Biden, meanwhile, signed a funding extension for federal aviation programs via autopen while he traveling to San Francisco in 2024, CNN reported at the time. How often did Biden use an autopen? That's unclear. There is no official record of Biden's use of an autopen for official government business. Trump's memorandum says, 'The vast majority of Biden's executive actions were signed using a mechanical signature pen, often called an autopen, as opposed to Biden's own hand.' Trump has offered no evidence in support of those claims. Has Trump used an autopen? He has, but maintains it wasn't for anything important. Speaking to reporters on Air Force One in March, Trump at first said, 'I never use' an autopen before acknowledging that he had. On Thursday, he said, "I think it's very disrespectful to people when they get an autopen signature," but that he does use one to respond to letters. "I'd like to do it myself," he said, but added that he gets thousands of letters a week and it's "not possible to do." What did Trump order with his new memo? Trump's memo directs"The Counsel to the President, in consultation with the Attorney General and the head of any other relevant executive department or agency (agency), shall investigate, to the extent permitted by law, whether certain individuals conspired to deceive the public about Biden's mental state and unconstitutionally exercise the authorities and responsibilities of the President." It also orders a probe into "the circumstances surrounding Biden's supposed execution of numerous executive actions during his final years in office," including "policy documents for which the autopen was used." Asked by NBC News whether he has any evidence that anything specific was signed without Biden's knowledge or that someone in the former president's administration acting illegally, Trump said, 'No, but I've uncovered, you know, the human mind.' 'I was in a debate with the human mind, and I don't think he knew what the hell he was doing,' he said Thursday, referring to his debate with Biden last year. Did Trump request a criminal probe? The Justice Department declined to comment when asked whether the investigation into the autopen issue is a criminal one, but the White House counsel's office does not conduct criminal probes. Republican allegations about Biden's use of the autopen is also being investigated by the House Oversight Committee. 'Who was making the decisions? Who was authorizing his signature? Was it him?' committee chair James Comer, R-Ky., asked last month. Have the courts weighed in on autopens? The Justice Department guidance from 2005 has not been directly challenged in court, but a ruling last year involving presidential pardon powers lent some weight to the finding. A unanimous decision by a three-judge panel on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said presidents don't have to issue written or signed pardons for them to be implemented. 'The plain language of the Constitution imposes no such limit, broadly providing that the President 'shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.' The constitutional text is thus silent as to any particular form the President's clemency act must take to be effective,' the ruling said. What is the source of the allegations against Biden? While it's unclear how Trump came to seize on the allegations, right wing media has focused on the claim for months, fueled in large part by a study from the conservative Heritage Foundation that accused the Biden administration of extensive autopen use, largely based on the timing of when Biden signed documents compared to when he was traveling. Some of the findings also came from an analysis of the signatures in the Federal Register. A National Archives spokesperson told the fact-checking website Snopes in March that: 'At the beginning of each administration, the White House sends a sample of the President's signature to the Federal Register, which uses it to create the graphic image for all Presidential Documents published in the Federal Register.' What is the objective of Trump's order? Trump's memorandum does not give any indication of what might result from the investigation. The president has already revoked scores of Biden's executive actions — including about 80 on his first day in office — but he's suggested before that the use of an autopen could be used to challenge some of the pardons issued by Biden. 'The 'Pardons' that Sleepy Joe Biden gave to the Unselect Committee of Political Thugs, and many others, are hereby declared VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT, because of the fact that they were done by Autopen,' Trump wrote on Truth Social, referring to the pardons Biden gave to members of the House committee that investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. There's no evidence that Biden was not aware of those pardons — he'd discussed the possibility he would sign off on them in a Jan. 8 interview with USA Today and later issued a lengthy statement explaining why he'd signed them. Can a president rescind a prior president's pardon? While the Constitution gives the president unique powers to issue pardons, it makes no provision for subsequent presidents to rescind them. Jeffrey Crouch, a politics professor at American University and author of the book 'The Presidential Pardon Power,' told NBC News in March that 'Biden's pardons are highly unlikely to be revoked somehow because of the apparent use of an autopen.' What does Biden say about Trump's allegations? In his statement Wednesday, the former president said, 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false." Trump told reporters Thursday, "I don't think Biden would know" if he signed something.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
El Chapo's sons 'will never be seen again' as bombshell US deal edges closer
Ovidio and Joaquín Guzmán López are both expected to iron out plea deals with Donald Trump's US Attorney's Office, that could mean they are never seen again in the same context El Chapo's two sons may never be seen again thanks to a potential plea deal being pursued by the drug traffickers and the Trump administration. Ovidio and Joaquín Guzmán López - known as the " Chapitos" alongside their brothers - have been subject to US indictments, Ovidio on drug trafficking charges and Joaquín on drug trafficking and money laundering. The duo were arrested and extradited to the US after having assumed leadership of the Sinaloa Cartel, their father's powerful and notoriously violent drug trafficking organisation. Now, the two appear set to make a plea deal with American officials, and Mexicans are expected to "never see them again". READ MORE: Bodies of five Mexican musicians found near Texas border after vanishing during car journey The brothers - both of whom are due to appear before an Illinois judge on July 9 and 15 - have reportedly held talks about plea and cooperation agreements with the US Attorney's Office. Six sealed files and a resolution have been delivered to Judge Coleman, which eagle-eyed watchers of the case believe indicate an impending plea deal. Speaking to Aristegui Noticias, journalist Jesús Esquivel said the deliveries are a "very clear indication that everything is already arranged for an agreement". In May, Jeffrey Lichtman, the lawyer representing Ovidio, said that, while a final plea deal hadn't been reached at the time, they hoped to hammer one out over the next few months. He said at the time: "We have no completed agreement yet but hope to in the future." Ovidio's July 9 court appearance is expected to be a change of plea hearing, court documents have shown. One document stated the government would need to provide the court with a "courtesy copy" of a prospective plea agreement. The document stated: "Government shall provide the court with a courtesy copy of the plea agreement at least 3 days prior to the plea." Mr Esquivel added that, should this be the case, the Chapitos will soon be exiting court, and that they may never be seen again publicly in the same circumstances. He added: "It seems to me that the presence of these two sons of El Chapo Guzmán in the courts is coming to an end, because once the commitment is formalized before the judge in the Chicago court in Illinois, we will never see them again, at least not publicly, as accused drug traffickers." Ovidio is best known for sparking a gruesome battle between Sinaloa gunmen and soldiers in the Mexican military in October 2019, when officials descended on the Sinaloan stronghold of Culiacán. He was captured in the exchange, but cartel operatives humiliatingly forced the Mexican government to release him. The druglord was arrested again nearly four years later in January 2023, and was extradited to the US. He, Joaquín, their half-brothers Iván Archivaldo Guzmán Salazar and Jesús Alfredo Guzmán Salazar, and former El Chapo business partner Ismael Zambada García were named in the ensuing indictment.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Newark mayor & N.J. gubernatorial candidate: Democrats cannot support their own 'self-destruction'
Newark Mayor Ras Baraka joins Meet the Press NOW to discuss his gubernatorial bid in New Jersey and the Democrats' "inability" to inspire 5, 2025
