Creeslough: Victims' families launch civil case
Darragh Mackin of Phoenix Law, which represents 11 people in the civil proceedings, said "many unanswered questions" remain around the tragedy. "Given the delay in the state initiating an independent inquiry along the lines the families have asked, our clients have no alternative but to pursue all available legal remedies to access the truth and the answers they so deserve," he said. "Akin to the planning permission challenge, it is abhorrent that these families are forced to, yet again, take the legal process into their own hands to get justice for their loved ones."Another firm, Damien Tansey Solicitors LLP, representing other families and survivors has ben approached for comment.Defendants listed include; Applegreen Ltd, Donegal County Council, Vivo Shell Ltd, the Commission for the Regulation of Utilities, and Duntally Woods Apartment Owners Management Company.
Creeslough explosion
Creeslough is a small village in the north west of the island of Ireland, about 15 miles (24km) from Letterkenny and 30 miles (48km) from the border with Northern Ireland.It has a population of about 400 people.The blast resulted in the highest number of civilian casualties in a single incident in the county in decades.Those who died were Robert Garwe and his five-year-old daughter Shauna Flanagan-Garwe; Catherine O'Donnell and her 13-year-old son James Monaghan; Jessica Gallagher; Martin McGill; James O'Flaherty; Martina Martin; Hugh Kelly; and 14-year-old Leona Harper.In November 2024, Donegal County Council passed a motion calling on the next Irish government to establish a public inquiry into the Creeslough explosion.In February, Donegal County Council granted planning permission to Vivo Shell Ltd to redevelop the existing building at the site by building a new petrol station and shop.However, family members appealed the decision and in June planning permission was refused.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
17 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Acquitted law professor Diarmuid Phelan in legal fight with State over 'enormous' trial costs
The State appears to have suggested that even people of means should make legal aid applications, which a barrister for law professor Diarmuid Phelan, who was acquitted by a Central Criminal Court jury of murdering a trespasser on his farm, has argued is "entirely contrary" to spirit of the scheme. A judge will give her ruling in September as to whether the State should pay the "enormous" legal costs for Mr Phelan following a trial that ended last January. Advertisement The costs issue was raised this evening on the last day of the Trinity term before Ms Justice Siobhan Lankford, who presided over the 10-week murder trial that ended on January 3rd last. Law lecturer Mr Phelan, who has assets valued in the millions, instructed two senior and two junior counsel at his trial and did not receive legal aid. He also called expert witnesses who gave evidence following the close of the prosecution case. Mr Phelan maintained from the outset that he had no intention of shooting the deceased Keith Conlon and had acted in self-defence when he fired three warning shots. The jurors unanimously agreed with the defence case following the trial that Mr Phelan was entitled to defend himself when he came under threat on his own land. Mr Phelan (56) went on trial in October 2024 after he pleaded not guilty to murdering father-of-four Keith 'Bono' Conlon (36) at Hazelgrove Farm, Kiltalown Lane, Tallaght, Dublin 24 on February 24, 2022. Advertisement Mr Conlon from Kiltalown Park in Tallaght, was seriously injured in the shooting incident on February 22 and died at Tallaght University Hospital two days later. The defendant is a barrister, law lecturer and farmer who owns Hazelgrove, formerly a golf course in Tallaght. It was the defence case that this was an unintended killing and what Mr Phelan had been trying to achieve in discharging the shots was not to strike Mr Conlon. Opening the application on Thursday evening, Sean Guerin SC, who was one of two senior counsel representing Mr Phelan at his trial, told Ms Justice Lankford that the starting point - and also expressly the most important consideration - in awarding costs was the verdict. Advertisement Counsel submitted that Mr Phelan was entitled to his costs and the onus was really on the prosecution to show why he shouldn't succeed in the application. He said there was no substantive reason as to why costs should not be awarded. Mr Guerin said one of the prosecution's submissions, which had previously been handed into the court, was that Mr Phelan had the option of applying for legal aid but had chosen not to do so. The lawyer said legal aid had been put in place because of the desperate injustice done to people who couldn't secure the means to defend themselves and to protect those of limited resources. The barrister said the State appeared to be suggesting that even people of resources or means should make a legal aid application, which he suggested was a complete misunderstanding of what the legal aid scheme was. "There is no suggestion of that in the authorities and is entirely contrary to the word and spirit of the statutory scheme of legal aid," he added. Mr Guerin went on to say that the personal financial consequences was that Mr Phelan had to bear "the enormous costs" of being on trial in the Central Criminal Court for nearly three months. "The court doesn't need to be told what those financial consequences are and how they weigh on anyone who has to meet their defence". Advertisement Opposing the application, John Byrne SC, for the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), argued there was no presumption in favour of costs and one cannot simply say they had been acquitted so were entitled to their costs. He said a more complex and nuanced enquiry was required by the trial judge. The barrister said an award of costs is a discretionary order and it was "too simplistic" to say an acquittal gives rise to a presumption in favour of costs being awarded. Ms Justice Lankford said she had not finalised her view in relation to awarding costs but asked both parties to articulate their views if she decided to award Mr Phelan his costs but confined it to legal aid costs. She noted there was quite a wide discretion in case law, where 50 per cent of costs had been awarded to applicants. Mr Guerin told the judge there was no warrant for doing so as those weren't the costs his client had incurred. He said legal aid was not a guide or a measure as to what are the appropriate costs in a case. "If the court concluded Mr Phelan is entitled to his costs, then the appropriate order is for the adjudication of those costs in the usual way". Advertisement Whereas, Mr Byrne said the discretion seemed to be very wide and awarding legal aid costs was not something the court couldn't do, provided it set out the basis for it. Ms Justice Lankford said she hoped to deliver the court's judgement as to whether Mr Phelan can recoup his legal costs from the State in the first week of September. Ireland Young man jailed for raping teenage girl and engag... Read More Mr Phelan's trial heard that Keith Conlon and others were trespassing on Mr Phelan's land at Hazelgrove Farm, Kiltalown Lane in Tallaght on February 24, 2022. Mr Phelan shot a dog belonging to one of the trespassers due to concerns the dog might go after his sheep. An angry confrontation followed in which Mr Phelan produced a handgun and fired three shots, the third of which struck Mr Conlon in the head and caused his death. Mr Phelan said he acted in self-defence and that the fatal shooting was accidental. The jury had rejected the State's case that when the third shot was fired by Mr Phelan, the gun was pointed in the direction of Mr Conlon, who was shot in the back of the head when it was argued he had turned away to leave. It was in those circumstances, the prosecution said, that Mr Phelan intended to either kill or cause serious injury to Mr Conlon. Instead, the jurors accepted Mr Phelan's position that he was acting in self-defence after two trespassers were "coming to fulfil the threats they had made" and that he was fearful and facing an "imminent attack" as the men closed in on him.
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Extreme online pornography is ‘radicalising' young men, Garda Commissioner says
Extreme online pornography is 'radicalising' some young men into normalising violence against women, Garda Commissioner Drew Harris has said. Mr Harris said in some cases gardaí have had to explain to perpetrators of violent sexual assaults why what they did was wrong. Advertisement Mr Harris will step down as Commissioner in September after seven years in the post. On Thursday, he addressed his final meeting of the Policing Authority. Speaking to the media afterwards he explained his concerns about the prevalence of online pornography. He said: 'I think the use of the expression hard-core is no longer relevant. Advertisement 'The pornography which is readily accessible on the internet is extreme in the violence that it perpetrates, mostly against women. 'What happens then is that young men see this and this is a major influence on them in terms of what they think a sexual relationship is. 'We see this manifest in serious sexual assaults where, literally, it has to be explained to them what they did was wrong. 'Because seeing this violent behaviour has become so normalised.' Advertisement He added: 'There is a trend in the violent behaviour of the offending which you can relate back to the imagery which is in pornography, which is so prevalent on the internet. 'That has been also observed by the various studies, Women's Aid recently released a report and that was their conclusion as well. 'My analysis of this is probably more anecdotal. 'As I look at the incidents and what is described, but also what the responses of the various assailants, perpetrators are, one can see that they have become normalised to the violence that they are seeing online.' Advertisement Mr Harris said some men's view of a normal sexual relationship had become 'completely distorted'. He added: 'You can say almost that they have been radicalised. 'I do think there is an education piece for this. We have heard a lot over the last few weeks about limiting the access of children to all sorts of violent imagery, I think that's a good thing. Ireland 'Shocking' report reveals some gardaí are 'openly... Read More 'It has to be faced up as well that there is a multibillion industry behind this that we are not going to defeat by attacking it, what we have to do is make sure people are educated and understand what a proper relationship is.' Advertisement The Commissioner said: 'What I am saying is one can see the trend, it is backed up by academic research. 'We can see the trend ourselves and it is evident then when we consider some of the crimes that come through our courts in recent years.'
BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Teenager (17) produced two knives and told victim he was going to kill him and slice him
A teenager has been given two years detention for the false imprisonment of another young man. Dublin Circuit Criminal Court heard that the 17-year-old, who cannot be named for legal reasons, pleaded guilty to false imprisonment with other counts to be taken into consideration at a location in Dublin on June 15th, 2023. Advertisement He was aged 15 at the time of the offending and had ten previous convictions from the Children's Court, including seven convictions for theft, one for attempted robbery, one for assault causing harm and one for production of a knife. He was also on bail at the time of this offending. Detective Garda John Hayes from Blanchardstown Garda Station told Stephen Montgomery BL, prosecuting, that a young man then aged 19 was travelling on a bus in the Clonsilla area of Dublin in May 2023. Neither the accused or the victim were known to the other. The detective told the court that the accused was larger in stature than the injured party. When the victim got off the bus, he was followed by the teenager, who started a conversation with him and broke his glasses. The accused then ordered the injured party to walk to a nearby shop and instructed him to withdraw €50 from an ATM. Advertisement The teenager then threatened the victim to keep this a 'secret'. The court heard that a week later, the victim was on the bus again, and the teenager sat behind him and put his hands around his neck and told him to be quiet. They got off the bus together, and the teenager took the victim's iPhone 13, worth €1,300. The teenager then added the victim as a friend on Snapchat. Det Gda Hayes told the court that the victim received a message on June 15th, 2023, from the teenager, who told him to meet him with his bank card, which he did. Advertisement The teenager brought the victim to an apartment where he produced two knives and told the victim he was going to kill him and slice him. He also instructed the victim to remove his clothing, as he would have to burn it. The injured party did not take his clothes off, but his backpack was searched, and his driver's licence with his address on it was taken. The court heard that the victim was then brought to his own home by the teenager, who disposed of one of the knives en-route. While in the injured party's house, the teenager threatened to harm the family dog if he didn't 'put it out of the way'. The teenager searched the victim's bedroom and took a Nike tracksuit, an Under Armour top, Nike runners, a PlayStation, and a camel jacket, all with a total value of € 1,751. Advertisement The teenager then made the victim transfer €500 from his Revolut account to one of the injured party's friends' accounts, as he did not have a Revolut bank card. He told his friend to meet him in a local shopping centre, and the defendant, the victim and the victim's friend went to multiple ATM's while withdrawing €460 in total. The teenager then left with the cash and the items taken earlier from the victim's house. Later that evening, the victim told his mother and showed her the knife left behind by the teenager. They went to the gardaí, and the victim showed them the apartment he had been taken to. Advertisement CCTV footage from the shopping centre and footage from the Ring doorbell of the victim's home were obtained, and the defendant was identified. He was interviewed on two occasions. None of the money or belongings were recovered. A victim impact statement was submitted to the court and read by the prosecuting counsel. It outlined how the victim quit his job in case the teenager came back. He was also afraid that the defendant would come back to his home and described that he was in 'fear for his parents'. He said he was always 'looking over his shoulder' and said he 'can never relax on public transport'. He still has trouble sleeping. Padraig Dwyer SC, defending, said his client was forthright with the Probation Services and is apologetic, showing empathy towards the victim in his case. He stated that his client has taken responsibility for his actions and told the probation officer that he deserves a prison sentence. Counsel said his client was 15 at the time of the offending. He said that his client's parents do not condone this behaviour and are very pro-social people. He said his client 'self-reports that he has used cannabis but is now self-reporting that he is clear at present. He said his client is expressing regret for his actions. On Thursday Judge Martina Baxter noted the defendant had two knives with him and the 'brazenness' of going to the victim's home. 'It wasn't as if it was a once-off situation, the judge said. It was clear that the 'fear and threat' was 'pervasive and real,' said the judge. Judge Baxter said she had have regard for his previous convictions. She said the victim was bullied and traumatised 'while going about his business'. Ireland Man (46) jailed for taking photographs of his teen... Read More She said a significant factor was that the accused was 15 at the time but noted he was 'back in adverse company'. 'Clearly there has to be an intervention,' said Judge Baxter. She said the aggravating factors were the effects on the victim who is 'constantly in fear', the threats and the menace. In mitigation she took account of his age and that the Children's Act states detention is 'the last resort'. Judge Baxter imposed two years detention on him.
