Solar panel, hybrid car tax rejected
Listen to article
A National Assembly panel on Tuesday unanimously rejected the 18% sales tax on solar panel imports, while the government announced it would withdraw another controversial proposal to increase in sales tax on hybrid vehicles, rolling back two controversial budget measures viewed as anti-environment.
The National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance also raised questions about the proposed Digital Presence Proceeds Act 2025 but did not issue a final decision. The meeting was chaired by Pakistan People's Party (PPP) MNA and former finance minister Syed Naveed Qamar.
"The committee unanimously rejects the 18% sales tax on import of solar panels and its parts," Qamar said after detailed discussion. Unlike the Senate, the National Assembly and its standing committee's decisions are binding in the case of the Finance Bill. This was the committee's first formal rejection since it began reviewing the Finance Bill.
The government had projected Rs20 billion in revenue from the 18% sales tax on the import and supply of photovoltaic cells, whether assembled or not. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) had not endorsed the tax, and its rejection by the committee will not affect the IMF programme.
FBR Chairman Rashid Langrial said a sales tax already applied to locally assembled solar panels, and exempting imports could hurt the domestic industry. However, he failed to provide reliable data on local production's share in total sales and admitted local supply was minimal.
"If the government doesn't accept our rejection, the National Assembly will veto it," said Qamar, urging alternative means to support local producers.
Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb said the era of subsidies had ended, to which Qamar responded that the government had just announced subsidies for electric vehicles in the same budget.
"It is a cross-subsidy on electric vehicles," said Aurangzeb. "It is still a subsidy funded by someone else," replied Qamar. The budget introduced a 1% to 3% engine levy to raise Rs10 billion for electric vehicle subsidies.
The government has long sought to reduce reliance on solar energy, which provides cheaper electricity than costly grid power. "No party in the National Assembly supports the 18% solar tax. The government must withdraw it," Qamar said. The finance minister acknowledged the feedback.
Hybrid tax withdrawn
The government also announced it would withdraw the proposed increase in sales tax on hybrid cars up to 1800cc, maintaining the current 12.5% rate. The reversal will cost an estimated Rs7 billion in potential revenue.
"The 12.5% sales tax on hybrid cars will remain," said the FBR chairman. He said that although the tax hike had been announced in the budget speech, it would not be increased.
This marks the second time in a year that the government proposed raising the tax on hybrid vehicles, only to backtrack before the budget's approval by the National Assembly. Under the current auto policy, the tax rate on hybrid cars cannot be increased before June 2026.
However, Langrial said the government would proceed with raising the sales tax on small cars up to 850cc, often purchased by middle-income buyers. The government has proposed a sales tax rate increase from 12.5% to 18%.
Langrial argued that buyers of Rs3 million cars could afford to pay 18% sales taxes.
"It seems small cars will become more expensive while luxury SUVs get cheaper," remarked Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) MNA Usama Mela.
FBR powers spark controversy
The committee also held a heated debate over proposals to expand the Federal Board of Revenue's policing powers, warning of potential abuse.
"The Finance Bill is like declaring martial law on businesses," said PPP MNA Nafisa Shah.
Langrial objected to the comparison. "Harsh words like martial law have been used, but I want to clarify that I work for a democratic government," he said before leaving the meeting room.
Committee members also opposed giving police the authority to trace and seize untaxed cigarettes under FBR directives. They warned the measure could open new avenues for bribery. "Poor people smoke to relieve stress, but the rich can afford diet coke," quipped MNA Sharmila Faruqi.
Digital tax plan questioned
The committee also questioned the Digital Presence Proceeds Act, a new bill aimed at taxing online payments to foreign digital companies like Netflix and Amazon. The bill proposes a 5% tax on the value of such payments.
FBR Member Dr Najeeb Memon said annual foreign payments exceeded Rs300 billion, with potential to raise Rs15 billion in tax revenue. He said credit card payments to Netflix and Amazon alone hit Rs300 billion this year, while Chinese e-commerce platform Temu made Rs4 billion in tax-free sales.
Committee members urged the government to introduce the digital tax measure as a separate law, not as part of the Finance Bill.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
20 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Bajaur pays the price again
EDITORIAL: Days after Minister of State for Interior Talal Chaudhary had declared on the floor of the National Assembly that no military operation would be launched in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), the authorities have done exactly that, proceeding with one in the province's Bajaur district. The operation, it must be noted, had initially begun last month but was paused amid hopes that talks between the Bajaur Amn Jirga and militant commanders may bear fruit, making armed action in the area avoidable. But with negotiations collapsing, August 11 saw security forces launch what is being termed a 'targeted' operation, striking militant hideouts in several tehsils of the district. Parts of Bajaur will now face a three-month curfew, signalling that the security situation may remain volatile for an extended period. As with operations past, this latest armed action will also likely displace the local population from their homes and upend their lives, with the authorities having already asked residents to move into relief camps. Such experiences have long fuelled opposition to military operations, which have repeatedly brought mass displacements, destruction of infrastructure and property, followed by entirely lacklustre rehabilitation efforts. Nevertheless, with the terror threat emanating from KP's erstwhile tribal districts mounting by the day – militants targeting civilians and security personnel alike, and terrorising the people of Bajaur – doing nothing was never going to solve matters either. The question does arise, however: why were such elements allowed to re-entrench themselves in parts of KP over a prolonged period, facing little meaningful resistance from the law enforcement and intelligence apparatus, while civilian authorities – both federal and provincial – were also caught napping? The hard-won gains of past operations, which had driven these groups out at great cost have been recklessly squandered, and now the hapless people of Bajaur will once again pay the price of this lax attitude to the terror menace. Their opposition to armed action must not be misconstrued as sympathy for militants; it is the natural response of communities that have spent decades as victims in a war that never seems to end. This latest operation must also serve as a sobering reminder that the fight against terror cannot be waged in silos. The threat is national, and so must be the resolve to confront it, with an unambiguous consensus on denying terror groups and extremist ideologies any physical or ideological space within society. History shows that while armed actions against these forces may become unavoidable after a certain point, they cannot be the sole answer. Without a united political front and sustained societal efforts to tackle the roots of radicalisation, Pakistan will remain trapped in a cycle of perpetual instability and violence. In this context, the prime minister's Independence Day call for national unity and invitation to all political parties to join the 'Misaq-i-Istehkam-i-Pakistan' – yet another bid to forge national solidarity in the face of domestic and external threats – may sound promising on paper. But too often such initiatives prove to be heavy on rhetoric, but devoid of follow-through. The government has repeatedly shown that it has little appetite for forging genuine unity, as demonstrated by its clampdown on political dissent, muzzling of the media and hounding of opponents. When political rivals are routinely convicted under anti-terror clauses, it cheapens the gravity of laws meant to protect the public from genuine threats, while also deepening societal fault lines, breeding resentment and diverting resources away from the task of tackling forces that pose existential dangers to the country. This erodes the collective resolve needed to confront terrorism in all its forms. Our rulers must realise that calls for national unity ring hollow when they prioritise their own political survival over the hard work required to build a united front against threats that endanger us all. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
20 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Biometric verification of registered persons: LTBA urges FBR, Nadra to bring in secure mobile app
ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) and the National Database and Registration Authority (Nadra) should jointly implement a secure mobile application for biometric verification of sales tax registered persons. According to a letter of the Lahore Tax Bar Association (LTBA) to the FBR Chairman, the association highlighted major challenges faced by certain sales taxpayers under the current biometric verification system and proposed a digital solution aligned with FBR's commitment to facilitation and innovation. Presently, biometric verification for sales tax registration and annually bio metric which required in terms of SRO 350(1)/2024 is conducted exclusively through Nadra's physical infrastructure. While this may suffice for most residents, it poses considerable challenges for the following categories of taxpayers: (I); Individuals temporarily residing or travelling abroad. (2); Taxpayers located in remote or underdeveloped areas. (3); Elderly or physically challenged individuals who cannot easily access the Nadra facilities. Due to the unavailability of a remote verification mechanism, these taxpayers are unable to complete their sales tax registration and annually biometric which required in tarns of SRO 350(1)/2024 dated 07.03.2025, despite their willingness to comply with legal requirements. This creates unnecessary delays, hampers business operations, filing of sales tax returns and discourages potential entrants into the tax system. Key challenges included no Remote Option for Overseas Taxpayers and delays in Registration Activation and filing of sales tax returns. He LTBA proposed the FBR should consider in coordination with Nadra, the development and deployment of a secure mobile application for biometric verification. This solution may include facial recognition or fingerprint scanning wing smartphone technology and secure integration between the FBR and the Nadra. The expected benefits included enhanced taxpayer's facilitation particularly for overseas Pakistanis and remote areas residents, improved compliance rate with quicker registration and fewer delays; expanded lax base and alignment with FBR's digital transformation and automation goals. The association is confident that this initiative would greatly enhance the accessibility, efficiency, compliance and Inclusivity of FBR's taxpayers' registration system and ease filing of sales tax returns and enhance the revenue collection, it added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Sewage Sans Frontières
Incorporated into the outer walls of houses, constructed with bricks, linked to drainage systems and covered with wooden seats. Such were the toilets of Mohenjo-Daro in the third millennium BC. In 2025, Pakistan barely treats 1% of its raw sewage, letting the remaining 99% pour into land, rivers, canals, lakes and sea. The file relating to SDG 6, which included our pledge for treating up to 50% of untreated sewage by 2030, was misplaced by the 'Naib Qasid' and has been missing since then. In 2024, we proudly led the world in polio cases — outpacing our closest competitor Afghanistan by a factor of three — and have maintained that dubious lead well into 2025. Since 2014, Pakistan happily swallowed $1.2 billion in polio aid, much to the delight of those who prefer 'polio drops' over addressing the root causes of disease. It is therefore surprising that Pakistan makes no attempt to understand or to disrupt the faecal-oral link between contaminated water and polio. Cynics often admire the masterstroke of our policymaking — that enables 150,000 elite club members to cruise in Toyota Fortuners, while the 250 million ordinary citizens soak in their own raw sewage. They describe with remarkable 'objectivity' that our national passion for sinking in sewage brings countless hidden benefits. Take, for instance, Karachi's very own water and sewage management organisation, the KWSC, for whom this visionary 'Sewage Sans Frontières' (SSF) policy is a blessing in disguise. The SSF policy provides a justification to KWSC to receive about Rs40 billion per year and maintain a large inventory of real and virtual employees. SSF helps the KWSC to successfully keep postponing the completion date (from 2007 to 2027) and increasing the bill (from Rs7 billion to Rs27 billion) for the Greater Karachi Sewerage Plan (S-III). Cynics claim that KWSC has no real intention to ever complete the project. Anyone who knows simple arithmetic can appreciate that KWSC is having a blast at the taxpayers' expense, by treating merely 30 MGD out of the 500 MGD of raw sewage generously donated by the citizens of Karachi every day. Of the 4 Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs), 3 add no value and one reluctantly operates at a third of its capacity. With overall 1% sewage treatment, it may be safe to conclude that the sewage treatment plants in Karachi, Islamabad, Lahore and Faisalabad oscillate between idleness, dysfunctionality, encroachments, stolen machinery, ghost staff, lack of maintenance and misgovernance. Why is Pakistan not interested in treating its sewage using low-cost, nature-based, indigenously "Constructed Wetlands" or CWs? Even developed cities like Oslo, Brisbane, New York, Singapore, Bangkok and Berlin treat a part of their sewage by using CWs. CWs are environment-friendly, simple to build, easy to maintain, involve little capital, few operators and use negligible energy. The treated water is not sent to water bodies but stored and reused for plantation, parks and industrial applications. A typical CW consists of a shallow basin or channel, filled with a substrate such as gravel, sand or stones, and planted with wetland vegetation like reeds and canna. A 2-stage sedimentation/pretreatment tank helps settling of heavier solids, before the water enters the main CW. Water flows slowly through the system allowing microbial activity, breaking down organic pollutants and filtration to remove contaminants such as suspended solids, organic matter, nutrients and pathogens. Malir and Lyari riverbeds are ideal to accommodate scores of CWs, each creating a lake for storage of treated water, recreational areas, opportunity for planting trees and suitable environment for birds, frogs, dragonflies, butterflies and bees. This entire transformation could be achieved at less than one-tenth of the current STPs' cost and replicated across every town and village in Pakistan. Within just 2-3 years, Pakistan not only could meet but surpass its 2030 SDG for sewage treatment. Additionally, if our "KWSCs" were to ensure a minimum 10-foot horizontal separation between water and sewer lines and where lines must cross, the water line is at least 1.5 feet above the sewer line, Pakistan could have licked its polio problem for good.
