
DOGE Seeks to Investigate Another Government Budget Watchdog
Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency is now seeking to investigate a federal agency with a mission similar to its own: the Government Accountability Office, which has been hunting for waste and inefficiency in government since the 1920s.
The Government Accountability Office said in a statement on Friday that it had rejected a request from Mr. Musk's group to 'assign a team' to the century-old budget agency.
'As a legislative branch agency, G.A.O. is not subject to executive orders and has therefore declined any requests to have a DOGE team assigned,' the agency said in its statement.
A spokeswoman for the Government Accountability Office declined to say when the agency was first contacted by Mr. Musk's group. A spokesman for Mr. Musk's group did not immediately reply to a request for comment. The confrontation between the two watchdog groups was first reported by Wired.
Mr. Musk's group has audited agencies across government, and claims to have found $170 billion in savings, although that figure is inflated by errors, guesswork and zombie contracts that were killed but later reinstated.
On the surface, the Government Accountability Office would seem less like a target and more like an ally of Mr. Musk's group. The office audits federal programs for waste, fraud and mismanagement. Its budget is about $900 million, but the agency says it saves $76 for every dollar invested in its work.
But now the accountability office could become a roadblock for President Trump, who set Mr. Musk's group in motion.
The older watchdog agency, led by Comptroller General Gene L. Dodaro, finds itself at the center of a brewing battle over a power known as impoundment, the ability of the president to halt the delivery of funds that have been appropriated by Congress.
In his sweeping reconfiguration of American government, Mr. Trump has claimed he has vast powers to direct the course of the nation's spending. He and his leading budget adviser, Russell T. Vought, maintain that a 1970s law restricting impoundment is unconstitutional, setting up a potential legal clash around the power over the nation's purse.
Still, the statute empowers the Government Accountability Office to investigate potential violations, and in late April, Mr. Dodaro acknowledged his team had opened more than three dozen probes into reports that the Trump administration illegally withheld congressionally authorized funds.
'We're trying to get information from the agencies about what their legal position is for not expending the money,' Mr. Dodaro told the Senate at a hearing, as he acknowledged some agencies had been 'unresponsive' to the inquiries.
Mr. Dodaro did not signal how his office might proceed, but it has the power under law to sue the administration for violations.
A similar showdown arose at the end of Mr. Trump's first term, as Democrats moved to impeach him. The Government Accountability Office found that the administration had violated the law by illegally withholding roughly $400 million in aid to Ukraine in defiance of Congress, though the administration claimed it had acted lawfully.
Senator Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, said in a statement that Mr. Musk's group has no power over the older watchdog group.
'The law is crystal clear: G.A.O. is a legislative branch agency not subject to DOGE or the president's whims,' Ms. Murray said in a statement. 'It is an indispensable, impartial government watchdog, and its independence must remain. My message to Elon and DOGE: get lost.'
Mr. Trump has already faced pushback from legislators of both parties over his effort to take over another congressional institution: the Library of Congress. Mr. Trump recently fired the librarian of Congress before the end of her term, and sought to replace her with his former personal lawyer, now a top official at the Department of Justice.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
18 minutes ago
- Forbes
Could Trump–Musk Tensions Jeopardize SpaceX's Valuation?
SpaceX, Elon Musk's flagship aerospace company, is now valued at a staggering $350 billion following an internal employee share buyback in December 2024 — making it the most valuable private company in the U.S. and arguably one of the most strategically important. But that massive valuation now faces an unexpected source of risk: political tensions between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. While SpaceX remains technically dominant and commercially indispensable, rising political hostility could have real implications for federal contracts and regulatory approvals — both of which underpin a large portion of the company's future cash flow expectations. SpaceX's rise to a $350 billion valuation is grounded in two core pillars: But valuation is not just about technology — it's also about contracted revenue and political alignment. SpaceX's most critical customers remain NASA, the Department of Defense, and the U.S. Space Force, with long-term contracts that support everything from lunar missions to national security payloads. Those relationships are deeply strategic — and politically sensitive. Recently, tensions between Elon Musk and Donald Trump have become unusually public. Their disagreement — reportedly over political influence, media ownership, and policy alignment — has escalated to the point where Trump has hinted at a possible "review" of government contracts involving Musk-linked companies if he returns to office. While this could be political bluster, the risk is not theoretical. Federal procurement decisions, particularly in defense and aerospace, can be influenced by the political environment. A freeze or slowdown in contract flow, more stringent regulatory reviews, or even unofficial blacklisting from future missions could materially affect the assumptions underlying SpaceX's valuation. Moreover, Starlink, while more commercially independent, relies on spectrum allocation, regulatory clearance, and foreign licensing — all of which could be indirectly affected by U.S. political posturing. At $350 billion, SpaceX is being valued at levels normally reserved for profitable, publicly listed tech giants. Much of that valuation assumes: But if even partial disruption hits SpaceX's government revenue pipeline, or if regulatory friction slows Starlink expansion, the company's growth story would lose key drivers. And because the $350 billion valuation came from an internal buyback — not an open market raise — it may not fully reflect the pricing discipline of institutional capital. While SpaceX is not in immediate danger, the political noise introduces a new kind of valuation overhang. Pre-IPO investors, secondary market participants, and regulators will all be watching to see: Until recently, SpaceX's risks were mostly technical — around rocket performance, satellite economics, or project execution. Now, for the first time, politics may be its biggest threat. SpaceX at $350 billion reflects world-class engineering, unmatched market position, and transformative long-term potential. But that valuation also depends on a stable political and regulatory environment — especially when so much of its revenue is tied to U.S. government partnerships. If the feud between Trump and Musk intensifies, it could lead to subtle but meaningful shifts in contract behavior, regulation, and investor sentiment. That wouldn't bring SpaceX crashing down — but it could force a re-rating of expectations in both private and future public markets. As such, the Trump–Musk dynamic may represent the most unexpected threat yet to SpaceX's soaring valuation. Investing in a single stock/asset can be risky. Conversely, the Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, which comprises 30 stocks, has a history of comfortably outperforming the S&P 500 over the past four years. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks delivered superior returns with lower risk compared to the benchmark index, creating less of a turbulent experience as reflected in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump and Musk's followers must choose their sides
The toxic bromance of President Donald Trump and Elon Musk was always going to end ugly. These are not guys who take two deep breaths — or even one — before they post or care whether a scorched-earth insult also makes them look bad. Another thing they have in common: They are both worshipped as demigods (or something even greater) by millions of people. And while an eventual reconciliation between the two highly transactional and unstable men can't be ruled out, the alliance between their respective tribes will be fractured. Sides will be chosen. Musk was the president's top 2024 election donor — and he also spent prodigiously on other Republicans' campaigns. Musk's cash bought him his own fake agency, the Department of Government Efficiency. His largesse also helped give Trump small, beautiful majorities in both houses of Congress, thus preventing any investigations into his administration's rampant lawbreaking, including DOGE's rampage of arbitrary firings and fund-slashing through nearly every government agency. But the richest man in the world broke with the most powerful man in the world over the massive spending increases in the latter's 'big, beautiful bill.' And in just a few easy steps, Musk went from politely leaving the White House to giving self-pitying interviews about how hard he tried to save America to publicly blasting the bill to declaring Trump 'is in the [Jeffrey] Epstein files. That is why they have not been made public,' and calling for his impeachment. Musk, who just a few months ago wielded his bags of cash in a failed attempt to get a GOP candidate elected in Wisconsin, even mused about forming a new political party. What a year this week has been. Musk and Trump are bound by many traits, but of great relevance today is the fact that each is surrounded by a slavish cult of personality. And the whole point of a cult of personality is that there can be only one true master. This isn't to say that all Trump voters worship the president as a kind of deity, nor does it apply to every admirer of Musk's technological successes. But there can be no doubt that both men have millions of followers — particularly among very online males — who revere one of them as something greater than men. Trump and many of his MAGA devotees have come to think of him as touched by God, particularly after he survived two assassination attempts last year. And there's no way he could have sold his 'big lie' about the 2020 election without having a ready-made audience of millions who would continue to believe such a thoroughly debunked falsehood. Musk and his flock, meanwhile, revere him as a visionary on a heroic mission to save humanity and colonize Mars. And when Musk endorses a German political party so extreme that Europe's other far-right parties didn't want to be seen with it and Vice President JD Vance appears to follow his lead, Musk's followers laud his almost supernatural ability to move the political Overton Window in ways previously thought impossible. But lines are already being drawn. On one side you have the old-school MAGAs: the pizzagaters, QAnoners, Jan. 6ers and Trump 1.0 all-stars like Laura Loomer and Steve Bannon. Included among Elon's team are the Silicon Valley tech utopians, various fascist-adjacent online influencers, heterodox pick-me podcasters whose work he has promoted ... and the antisemitic white nationalist Nick Fuentes (who infamously dined with Trump in 2022 at Mar-a-Lago). Dinesh D'Souza wishcasted that the whole spat could just be a brilliant psyop by Trump and Musk, 'a perverse scheme to force the release of the Epstein files,' as he put it. And then there's disgraced Nazi rapper Kanye West, who wishes everybody could just get along. (I'm willing to bet Musk gets Joe Rogan in the divorce, while Trump keeps the Proud Boys.) Musk, in November 2023, posted on X: 'There is a large graveyard filled with my enemies. I do not wish to add to it, but will if given no choice. Those who pick fights with me do so at their own peril, but maybe this is their lucky day …' Trump spent the early months of his successful 2024 re-election campaign telling crowds, 'I am your retribution.' The bark is often worse than the bite with these two thin-skinned bullies. They've both been known to retreat when it gets too hot in the kitchen. But we've also seen how pitiless they can be to their perceived enemies. Their followers will, by definition, follow their leads on whether this was just an ugly Thursday online — or the long-anticipated civil culture war between the ultranationalist base and the Silicon Valley techno-monarchists who've become Trump's biggest financial boosters and who've tried to provide an intellectual sheen to MAGA's racism and xenophobia. What happens now will likely alter the trajectory of Trump's second term and the culture of the larger MAGA movement. This breakup is going to be incredibly ugly and dumb — even if it was tremendously entertaining on its first day. This article was originally published on

Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
In Our View: Trump v. Musk
It seems it was bound to happen. The White House is nowhere big enough to accommodate the egos of President Trump and Elon Musk. Their fallout happened this week over "The Big Beautiful Bill." Elon Musk headed up an effort called DOGE, Department of Government Efficiency. He suggested cuts in areas he deemed to be waste, fraud and abuse. Everybody is against government waste, fraud and abuse. Every government dollar spent has a constituency. Any cuts in Amtrak would bring out the rail fans, and any cuts in preserving national parks would bring out politicians who represent the area where the park is located. You get the idea. In many ways, neither man understands how Washington works — although Trump knows more from his previous term as President. Musk is the richest person in the world. He runs car maker Tesla and X, formerly known as Twitter. After their spat became public, Musk took to X, which he owns, to openly complain about Trump and Trump took to Truth Social, which he owns, to complain about Musk. Seemingly lost in the debate are those 340 million Americans who don't own their social media platform. To some degree, social media has replaced stray painting bridges and public property. The "Big Beautiful Bill" passed the House by a narrow margin. Now, the Senate will take up the matter in the days ahead. No Democrats will vote for the bill. That leaves Senate President John Thune with a razor-thin margin for passage. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul said he's unlikely to vote yes. Congressman Thomas Massie was one of a very few Republicans to vote no on the bill. Both men believe it will increase the $37 trillion debt. This newspaper hasn't always agreed with them, but we admire them for standing for their principles of lowering debt. Musk told Republicans "you know you're increasing the debt" and further told GOP members to side with him rather than Trump as Trump will die first. Musk is 53 and Trump is 78. Musk went on a Twitter rage Thursday saying Trump should be impeached and the president's name appears in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. Musk contends President Trump wouldn't be president without his millions in donations. Trump countered in an Oval Office press conference that he would've won without Musk. Republican senators must decide what to do. Do they offend their powerful party leader President Trump, or do they risk a primary opponent well funded by the richest man in the world? Politics makes strange bedfellows.