After U.S. labels The Resistance Front as global terror outfit, China calls for stronger regional anti-terror cooperation
'China firmly opposes all forms of terrorism and strongly condemns the terrorist attack that occurred on April 22,' Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian told a media briefing here on Friday (July 18, 2025) when asked about the U.S. State Department's statement designating TRF as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation.
'China calls on regional countries to enhance counterterrorism cooperation and jointly maintain regional security and stability,' he said.
In a statement, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio earlier said the Department of State is designating the TRF as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT).
The U.S. designation of TRF was expected to have its echo in the U.N. Security Council, especially the 1267 Committee of the UNSC, an important counter terrorism mechanism that designates terrorists and their organisations.
Several Pakistani terrorist groups and individuals are listed under the UN Security Council's 1267 sanctions regime, which imposes asset freezes, travel bans, and arms embargoes. These include LeT, Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM), and Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD), along with key figures like Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar.
Highlighting the importance of the U.S. designation of TRF as a terrorist group, Pakistan's daily Dawn said in its report that Thursday's statement from the State Department seemed to echo India's viewpoint, which has claimed that the little-known newly-formed group was actually a 'front and proxy' of the banned LeT.
Twenty-six people were killed in the April 22 attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir. The TRF claimed responsibility for the attack, but later backtracked as tensions soared between India and Pakistan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
24 minutes ago
- First Post
How state plunder and CPEC have made Balochistan Pakistan's Achilles' heel
Pakistan's focus on external threats over internal reconciliation highlights its failure to assert sovereignty through governance, leaving Balochistan a battleground for both local aspirations and global ambitions read more In the past week, the BLA has launched a deadly assault on Pakistani security forces, killing 29 people in Quetta and Kalat. The attack targeted a bus reportedly carrying over 48 passengers, including Pakistani soldiers. Image: AFP The Balochistan Liberation Army's (BLA) relentless campaign against Pakistani forces has thrust Pakistan's largest yet most marginalised province into the spotlight of a deepening crisis. In the first half of 2025 alone, the BLA claimed responsibility for 286 attacks, resulting in over 697 Pakistani military personnel killed and significant territorial gains, including the seizure of 45 strategic locations. In the past week, the BLA has launched a deadly assault on Pakistani security forces, killing 29 people in Quetta and Kalat. The attack targeted a bus reportedly carrying over 48 passengers, including Pakistani soldiers. This incident marks one of the deadliest strikes in recent months, pushing the military's casualty count to its highest in the past six months. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD These audacious operations, marked by sophisticated tactics and coordinated assaults on military infrastructure, signal a reinvigorated insurgency that challenges Pakistan's sovereignty over its resource-rich western frontier. The BLA's actions, including high-profile attacks like the Jaffar Express hijacking in March 2025, underscore a growing defiance rooted in decades of grievances—political exclusion, economic exploitation, and systemic human rights abuses. Balochistan, despite its vast reserves of gas, gold, and copper, remains Pakistan's poorest region, with 70 per cent of its population living in multidimensional poverty. The province's strategic significance, amplified by the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), has only intensified tensions, as Baloch nationalists view such projects as tools of external exploitation rather than local development. Pakistan's heavy-handed military response, characterised by enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings, has further alienated the Baloch, swelling the ranks of insurgent groups with educated youth and even women. This escalating conflict exposes not only Pakistan's failure to integrate Balochistan but also its inability to reconcile with a population demanding autonomy or independence. The BLA's growing sophistication and public support signal a broader rejection of Islamabad's authority, raising questions about the state's capacity to maintain control over a region integral to its geopolitical ambitions. As the violence intensifies, the roots of this conflict—historical neglect, resource disputes, militarisation, and external influences—demand closer examination to understand why Pakistan's grip on Balochistan is slipping. Historical Neglect and Broken Promises The roots of the Pakistan-BLA conflict trace back to the forced annexation of Balochistan in 1948, when the princely state of Kalat was coerced into joining Pakistan despite its brief declaration of independence. This historical grievance set the stage for recurring rebellions, with five major uprisings since 1947, each driven by the Baloch people's sense of betrayal. The Pakistani state's early policies, such as the One-Unit scheme of 1955, which merged Balochistan into West Pakistan, stripped the region of its distinct identity and political agency. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD These actions sowed seeds of distrust that have persisted for decades. Baloch nationalists argue that Islamabad's promises of autonomy and development have consistently been broken, leaving the province politically marginalised. Despite constituting 44 per cent of Pakistan's landmass, Balochistan holds only 5 per cent of its population and lacks proportional representation in federal institutions, with Punjabi elites dominating the bureaucracy. The dismissal of Balochistan's provincial government in 1973, followed by a brutal four-year insurgency, further deepened this alienation. Successive governments have failed to address these grievances, opting instead for cosmetic reforms or outright repression. The Baloch see their region's strategic importance—bordering Iran and Afghanistan, with a coastline along the Arabian Sea—as a curse, exploited by the central government for geopolitical gain without reciprocal investment in local welfare. This historical neglect has created a fertile ground for the BLA's narrative of resistance, framing their fight as a legitimate struggle against a state that has consistently failed to honour Balochistan's sovereignty or aspirations for self-determination. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Economic Exploitation and the CPEC Balochistan's vast natural resources—gas, coal, gold, and copper—should have made it a cornerstone of Pakistan's economic growth, yet the province remains mired in poverty. The central government's exploitation of these resources, often without equitable benefit to the local population, has been a key driver of the BLA's insurgency. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a $62 billion infrastructure project linking China's western region to Gwadar's deep-sea port, has become a lightning rod for Baloch grievances. While CPEC is touted as a game-changer for Pakistan, Baloch nationalists view it as a symbol of external exploitation, with Chinese investments prioritising federal and foreign interests over local needs. Militarised Repression Deepens Alienation Pakistan's response to Baloch dissent has relied heavily on militarisation, exacerbating the conflict and undermining its sovereignty over Balochistan. The Pakistani military's 'kill-and-dump' policy, involving enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings, has targeted thousands of Baloch activists, students, and intellectuals since the early 2000s. Estimates suggest over 20,000 Baloch have gone missing, with bodies often found bearing torture marks, fuelling public outrage. Operations like the 2025 counterinsurgency campaign, involving drone strikes and mass arrests in Quetta and Mastung, have failed to quell the BLA's momentum, instead radicalising more civilians. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The military's heavy presence—over 50,000 troops stationed in Balochistan—creates a siege-like atmosphere, with checkpoints and raids disrupting daily life. This approach has alienated even moderate Baloch, who view it as collective punishment. The BLA's recruitment of educated youth, including women, reflects this growing resentment, with groups like the BLA's Majeed Brigade conducting suicide attacks against military targets in 2025. Pakistan's refusal to pursue political solutions, coupled with its reliance on force, has strengthened the BLA's narrative of state oppression, eroding trust in federal authority. By prioritising security over dialogue, Pakistan has failed to address the root causes of unrest, allowing the BLA to gain legitimacy as defenders of Baloch rights. This militarised approach not only escalates the conflict but also exposes Pakistan's inability to govern Balochistan effectively, weakening its claim to sovereignty. External Influences and Geopolitical Stakes Balochistan's strategic location and resources have drawn external actors, complicating the Pakistan-BLA conflict and exposing vulnerabilities in Pakistan's sovereignty. Bordering Iran and Afghanistan, with access to the Arabian Sea, Balochistan is a geopolitical hotspot. The CPEC has elevated its importance, with China investing heavily in Gwadar and energy projects. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, Iran's concerns about Baloch militancy spilling across its border have led to joint military operations with Pakistan, further complicating the regional dynamic. The BLA's reported ties to sanctuaries in Afghanistan, where porous borders allow training and arms flows, have emboldened its 2025 offensive, with 45 strategic locations seized. These external factors expose Pakistan's failure to secure Balochistan's borders, undermining its territorial control. The involvement of global powers in CPEC amplifies local grievances, as Baloch nationalists frame their struggle as resistance to foreign-backed exploitation. Pakistan's reliance on Chinese investment to stabilise its economy ties its hands, limiting its ability to address Baloch demands for fear of jeopardising CPEC. This geopolitical entanglement, coupled with Pakistan's inability to counter external influences or secure regional cooperation, has allowed the BLA to exploit fault lines, intensifying the conflict. The state's focus on external threats over internal reconciliation highlights its failure to assert sovereignty through governance, leaving Balochistan a battleground for both local aspirations and global ambitions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The author, a columnist and research scholar, teaches journalism at St. Xavier's College (autonomous), Kolkata. His handle on X is @sayantan_gh. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Operation Sindoor aftermath: BSF ups drone shield along Pakistan border; first UAV squadron being raised to counter threat
This is an AI-generated image, used for representational purposes only. NEW DELHI: In a major move to strengthen border defences, the Border Security Force (BSF) is raising its first drone squadron to counter increasing aerial threats from Pakistan, especially in the wake of lethal drone attacks witnessed during Operation Sindoor . The unit will be deployed at select Border Outposts (BoPs) along the India-Pakistan frontier and will include reconnaissance, surveillance and attack drones operated by specially trained personnel, official sources said, as quoted by news agency PTI. This specialised drone squadron, to be monitored by a control room based at the BSF's western command in Chandigarh, is a direct response to recent security challenges, including Pakistan's use of drone swarms targeting Indian military and civilian areas. During Operation Sindoor, a retaliatory strike launched by India on May 7 following the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam that killed 26 people, Pakistan responded by sending thousands of drones across the border. One such deadly attack occurred on May 10, when a bomb-laden Pakistani drone dropped explosives on BSF's Kharkola post in the RS Pura sector of Jammu. The attack killed two BSF personnel and one Army jawan, critically injuring four others. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like AirSense 11 – Smart tech for deep sleep ResMed Buy Now Undo One of the injured troops had to undergo leg amputation. As per PTI, the BSF has since begun fortifying its border infrastructure. Bunker walls and roofs are being reinforced with alloy sheets and additional protective measures are being implemented at vulnerable posts. A BSF officer said the force is also working with defence and intelligence agencies to install counter-drone technology at key locations to intercept and neutralise rogue UAVs. According to PTI, sources confirmed that the new drone squadron will be stationed at BoPs spanning the more than 2,000-km India-Pakistan border across Jammu, Punjab, Rajasthan, and Gujarat. Each drone team will consist of 2-3 trained personnel. Some equipment has already been procured, and training is underway in batches. Union home minister Amit Shah recently said the BSF 'destroyed more than 118 Pakistani posts and completely dismantled their surveillance system' during Operation Sindoor, underlining the force's aggressive role in recent border operations. Meanwhile, Pakistan-based smugglers have stepped up attempts to push narcotics and arms across the border using drones. The BSF recently recovered a DJI Matrice 300 RTK drone and a 3.7 kg heroin packet in Punjab's Tarn Taran, and earlier intercepted drones carrying drugs and weapon parts near Amritsar and Khemkaran. These frequent drone intrusions reflect the urgency behind the BSF's decision to launch a dedicated UAV combat unit.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Hasina Loyalists Sold UK Properties After Her Fall, Yunus Now Demands Probe: Report
Bangladesh is probing embezzlement tied to former regime families. The UK's NCA froze millions in assets, including those of Saifuzzaman Chowdhury and the Rahman family. Following the political change in Bangladesh, authorities have opened investigations into prominent business and political families linked to the former regime. The probes focus on allegations of embezzlement and money laundering, with claims that significant sums were invested in luxury UK properties. The National Crime Agency (NCA) in Britain has already acted against some high-profile individuals, according to a report by UK-based newspaper The Guardian, who first reported the development. London's property market is under increasing scrutiny from both UK and Bangladeshi investigators. The UK's National Crime Agency froze £90 million in assets connected to the Rahman family and over £170 million tied to former minister Saifuzzaman Chowdhury, the newspaper said in its report. Chowdhury allegedly amassed more than 300 UK properties during his tenure. These freezes are part of a broader crackdown on questionable foreign investments in London, with the NCA working closely with international partners. The report said that several individuals under investigation sought to liquidate, transfer or refinance their UK properties after the change in Bangladesh's political landscape. Transparency campaigners raised concerns that this could jeopardize recovery efforts. Bangladeshi authorities have requested their UK counterparts to tighten scrutiny and prevent the suspected movement of assets. Guardian said. They stressed that such actions would support due legal processes and help ensure any unlawfully acquired funds are repatriated. The powerful Sobhan family, behind the Bashundhara conglomerate, reportedly engaged in property transfers worth millions. One Knightsbridge townhouse changed hands twice in unclear transactions, prompting questions over financial dealings. Investigators in Dhaka are probing potential money laundering links, Bangladeshi news media outlets reported. The family has denied any wrongdoing and vowed to defend themselves. Properties associated with Saifuzzaman Chowdhury's relatives and business contacts have seen multiple recent transactions, including sales and refinancing moves. Chowdhury's brother, Anisuzzaman, sold a £10 million Regent's Park property, while further dealings are under review. Allegations have also emerged about his links with a London-based developer facing scrutiny. The NCA also froze assets tied to the Rahman family, which includes a £35 million apartment in Grosvenor Square, the report said. Members of the family are under investigation in Dhaka, and while the Rahmans reject allegations of misconduct, authorities are examining financial flows between Dhaka and London. The family has pledged to cooperate with any legal processes. Transparency International has questioned the role of UK law firms and advisers who facilitated property deals for individuals under investigation. Concerns include inadequate source-of-wealth checks and possible failures to report suspicious transactions. Calls have grown for stricter oversight to prevent illicit funds from vanishing through London's financial networks. The unrest in Bangladesh leading up to the regime change was marked by months of student-led protests, sparked by economic grievances and governance concerns. Clashes between protestors and security forces resulted in casualties, drawing global attention. While Sheikh Hasina's departure led to a new interim setup, political tensions remain high in Bangladesh. The anti-corruption drive is part of a broader reform agenda, but some critics see it as politically sensitive, motivated by revenge of the interim government and the rivals of the Hasina regime. view comments First Published: July 22, 2025, 17:39 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
