Dire predictions about renewable energy were all wrong
Image: Matt McClain/The Washington Post
David Von Drehle
Twenty years ago, former vice president Al Gore was traveling the world narrating a slideshow about the perils of greenhouse gas emissions and climate change; in 2006, the presentation reached far more people through the documentary 'An Inconvenient Truth.'
Audiences would have been hard-pressed to imagine headlines from two decades later. Such as this one proclaiming, 'Solar is EU's biggest power source.' For the first time, in June, the European Union - one of the world's largest economies - produced more electricity from solar power than from any other source. Three-quarters of E.U. electricity in June came from nonfossil fuel sources.
According to energy think tank Ember, solar power accounted for 22 percent of the European Union's electricity output for the month, barely more than Europe's nuclear plants. Natural gas and coal combined did not match either of these. More electricity was generated by wind and water combined than by fossil fuels.
Or this headline stating, 'Clean energy just put China's CO2 emissions into reverse.' During the first quarter of this year compared with the year before, again for the first time, total carbon emissions from the industrializing giant fell not because of an economic recession but thanks to rapid advances in renewable technology, especially solar.
Analyst Lauri Myllyvirta, a senior fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute, published the findings in Carbon Brief: 'The reduction in China's first-quarter CO2 emissions in 2025 was due to a 5.8 percent% drop in the power sector. … Increases in solar, wind and nuclear power generation, driven by investments in new generating capacity, more than covered the growth in demand.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
Headlines are not as sunny for the United States, where government enthusiasm for tackling the greenhouse problem is less consistent than in much of Europe. But even here, progress in recent years is striking. Consider: In March 2005, 27 percent of U.S. electricity consumption was supplied by nonfossil fuel sources.
Fast-forward to March of this year: 42 percent of U.S. consumption was supplied by nonfossil fuel sources. Solar power, a negligible resource 20 years ago, has surpassed hydroelectric, while wind turbines supply more than twice the power of dams. And the Trump administration's hostility to some renewables is partly offset by its supportive attitude toward next-generation nuclear power plants, without which the world has little hope of getting its arms around the emissions problem.
Total consumption of electricity in the U.S. was more than 15 percent lower this March than in the same month of 2005, yet during the past two decades the size of the U.S. economy more than doubled. That's another first: The timeless link between rising wealth and rising energy consumption has been broken; we've proved economies can grow robustly without using more power.
I am not suggesting that these headlines add up to Mission Accomplished on the climate. Far from it. Humans continue to create far more carbon and methane emissions through our agriculture, industries, transportation and homes than the atmosphere can store without trapping additional heat. The resulting rise in atmospheric greenhouse gases will have predictable and unpredictable consequences that will challenge humanity for generations.
What the headlines clearly show is that progress is not only possible - it is happening. Dire predictions that changes to the global energy supply would destroy economies and plunge civilizations into reverse have been proved wrong. Europe is three-quarters of the way to a green electrical grid. China is, quite possibly, coming down from peak carbon. In neither place have these achievements noticeably disrupted modern life.
We're making progress through countless innovations: cheaper solar panels; safer nuclear generators; better batteries; more fuel-efficient cars, trucks and airplanes; smarter appliances; more productive farming; reforestation; and other modes of carbon capture and storage.
And we have good ideas for further innovations - the best of which is a tax on emissions to make the hidden costs of greenhouse pollution plainly visible to the marketplace, thus stirring further innovations.
Impossible? It seems so now. But so much seemed impossible in 2005 that now has come to pass. A carbon tax has strong bipartisan support because it is a far more efficient way to encourage the next burst of progress, compared with doling out government subsidies and incentives. Greenhouse gas pollution is not free. It comes at a price. Make that price plain to the irresistible engine of American capitalism and watch what the market can do. The heartening progress of the past 20 years will be just a prelude to an explosion of invention and discovery.
This is no time to be discouraged.
David Von Drehle is a deputy opinion editor for The Post and writes a weekly column. He was previously an editor-at-large for Time Magazine, and is the author of four books, including 'Rise to Greatness: Abraham Lincoln and America's Most Perilous Year' and 'Triangle: The Fire That Changed America.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Trump orders tariffs on dozens of countries in push to reshape global trade
Trump's tariffs have raised fears of inflation and other economic fallout in the US. President Donald Trump ordered the reimposition of tariffs on dozens of trading partners Thursday – his cornerstone strategy for reshaping global trade to benefit the US economy. However, in a minor reprieve that opens the door to further negotiations, the White House said these measures will take effect in a week, not Friday as previously expected. The tariffs are a demonstration of raw economic power that Trump sees putting US exporters in a stronger position while encouraging domestic manufacturing by keeping out foreign imports. ALSO READ: Tau launches urgent support measures for exporters affected by US tariffs But the muscular approach has raised fears of inflation and other economic fallout in the world's biggest economy. And with questions hanging over the effectiveness of bilateral trade deals already struck – including with the European Union and Japan – the outcome of Trump's plan remained uncertain. Trump's new tariffs Trump's new measures in an executive order raises duties on nearly 70 economies, from a current 10% level imposed in April when he unleashed 'reciprocal' tariffs citing unfair trade practices. The steeper levels, varying by trading partner, go as high as 41%. Trump also adjusted some tariff levels threatened in April, with Switzerland now facing a higher 39% duty and Thailand a lower 19% rate. The tariff on Taiwanese products was revised down to 20%, but its President Lai Ching-te vowed to seek an even lower level. Trump separately hiked tariffs on Canadian goods to 35%, though indicating in an NBC interview he was open to further talks. Canada and Mexico face a separate tariff regime. But exemptions remain for imports entering the United States under a North American trade pact. 'No doubt about it – the executive order and related agreements concluded over the past few months tears up the trade rule book that has governed international trade since World War II,' said Wendy Cutler, senior vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute. 'Whether our partners can preserve it without the United states is an open question,' she added. Frantic negotiations The elevated duties come after Washington twice postponed their implementation amid a frantic series of negotiations, alongside announcements of new duties and deals with partners. Just Thursday, Trump announced he was delaying a tariff hike on Mexican products, keeping levels at 25% with existing exemptions. The 90-day postponement followed talks with his counterpart Claudia Sheinbaum. ALSO READ: Economists question if SA has a plan for US tariffs The 79-year-old Republican has made tariffs core to his protectionist brand of hard-right politics. On Thursday, he claimed that the US economy had 'no chance of survival or success' without tariffs. But the latest salvo came amid legal challenges against Trump's use of emergency economic powers. After a lower court said the president exceeded his authority, the US Court of Appeals heard arguments Thursday in cases against Trump's blanket tariffs targeting different countries. While Trump has touted a surge in customs revenues this year, economists warn the duties could fuel inflation. Proponents of his policy argue their impact will be one-off, but analysts are awaiting further data to gauge for more persistent effects. China question mark Those who managed to strike deals with Washington to avert steeper threatened levies were Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea and the EU. Britain also reached a pact with the United States, although it was not originally targeted by higher 'reciprocal' tariffs. ALSO READ: Where Trump's tariffs will hurt most For Canada, transshipped goods to evade its 35% duty would face even higher levels, said a White House fact sheet. Its trade ties with Washington faced renewed threat after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced plans to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. Trump's latest order however appeared to raise tariffs on several countries not initially targeted in April – to 15% – including Ecuador, Ghana and Iceland. Notably excluded from the drama was China, which faces an August 12 deadline instead, when duties could bounce back to higher levels. Washington and Beijing at one point brought tit-for-tat tariffs to triple-digit levels, but both countries have agreed to temporarily lower these duties and are working to extend their truce.
TimesLIVE
4 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Ferrari shares slump 12% in biggest drop since 2016 listing
Ferrari shares fell more than 12% on Thursday, setting the stock for its biggest one-day drop since its listing nine years ago even as the luxury sports car maker maintained its guidance, though it said it would cut back prices in the US. Citi analysts said though Ferrari continued to deliver solid results, the focus had shifted to whether the Milan- and New York-listed group can sustain its high profitability amid slowing growth in sales volumes and pricing. "The focus shifts to how far the EBIT margin can go in H2, with shipments and average selling prices slowing," wrote Harald Hendrikse at Citi. Ferrari said it will reduce the price compensation it introduced in April on some cars sold in the US once tariffs on EU-made products effectively move to 15% from 27.5%.
eNCA
4 hours ago
- eNCA
Trump orders tariffs on dozens of countries in push to reshape global trade
US - President Donald Trump ordered the reimposition of tariffs on dozens of trading partners Thursday - his cornerstone strategy for reshaping global trade to benefit the US economy. However, in a minor reprieve that opens the door to further negotiations, the White House said these measures will take effect in a week, not Friday as previously expected. The tariffs are a demonstration of raw economic power that Trump sees putting US exporters in a stronger position while encouraging domestic manufacturing by keeping out foreign imports. But the muscular approach has raised fears of inflation and other economic fallout in the world's biggest economy. And with questions hanging over the effectiveness of bilateral trade deals already struck - including with the European Union and Japan - the outcome of Trump's plan remained uncertain. Trump's new measures in an executive order raises duties on nearly 70 economies, from a current 10 percent level imposed in April when he unleashed "reciprocal" tariffs citing unfair trade practices. The steeper levels, varying by trading partner, go as high as 41 percent. Trump also adjusted some tariff levels threatened in April, with Switzerland now facing a higher 39 percent duty and Thailand a lower 19 percent rate. The tariff on Taiwanese products was revised down to 20 percent, but its President Lai Ching-te vowed to seek an even lower level. Trump separately hiked tariffs on Canadian goods to 35 percent, though indicating in an NBC interview he was open to further talks. Canada and Mexico face a separate tariff regime. But exemptions remain for imports entering the United States under a North American trade pact. "No doubt about it -- the executive order and related agreements concluded over the past few months tears up the trade rule book that has governed international trade since World War II," said Wendy Cutler, senior vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute. "Whether our partners can preserve it without the United states is an open question," she added. AFP | Patrick T. Fallon The elevated duties come after Washington twice postponed their implementation amid a frantic series of negotiations, alongside announcements of new duties and deals with partners. Just Thursday, Trump announced he was delaying a tariff hike on Mexican products, keeping levels at 25 percent with existing exemptions. The 90-day postponement followed talks with his counterpart Claudia Sheinbaum. The 79-year-old Republican has made tariffs core to his protectionist brand of hard-right politics. On Thursday, he claimed that the US economy had "no chance of survival or success" without tariffs. But the latest salvo came amid legal challenges against Trump's use of emergency economic powers. After a lower court said the president exceeded his authority, the US Court of Appeals heard arguments Thursday in cases against Trump's blanket tariffs targeting different countries. While Trump has touted a surge in customs revenues this year, economists warn the duties could fuel inflation. Proponents of his policy argue their impact will be one-off, but analysts are awaiting further data to gauge for more persistent effects. - China question mark - Those who managed to strike deals with Washington to avert steeper threatened levies were Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea and the EU. Britain also reached a pact with the United States, although it was not originally targeted by higher "reciprocal" tariffs. For Canada, transshipped goods to evade its 35 percent duty would face even higher levels, said a White House fact sheet. Its trade ties with Washington faced renewed threat after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced plans to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. Trump's latest order however appeared to raise tariffs on several countries not initially targeted in April - to 15 percent - including Ecuador, Ghana and Iceland. Notably excluded from the drama was China, which faces an August 12 deadline instead, when duties could bounce back to higher levels. AFP | RONALDO SCHEMIDT Washington and Beijing at one point brought tit-for-tat tariffs to triple-digit levels, but both countries have agreed to temporarily lower these duties and are working to extend their truce. By Beiyi Seow
