
HRF condemns Andhra govt's move to extend workday from 8 to 10 hrs
VISAKHAPATNAM: The Human Rights Forum (HRF) has opposed the AP Cabinet's recent approval of the AP Factories Amendment Bill, 2025, which proposes to extend the workday to 10 hours.
Terming the move as a serious threat to labour rights, HRF State General Secretary Y Rajesh and HRF member of the AP & Telangana Coordination Committee VS Krishna demanded the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of the proposed amendment. The amendment, which seeks to modify provisions under the Factories Act, 1948, has been described by the government as a reform aimed at improving business efficiency. However, HRF argued that the change undermines the progress made over decades through labour struggles for fair and humane working conditions.
'The eight-hour workday has long been a cornerstone of labour rights, not a gift from employers but the outcome of generations of working-class resistance,' the Forum stated. It recalled the role played by BR Ambedkar in shaping and institutionalising this right in the 1940s, and criticised the amendment as a rollback of this significant achievement.
According to HRF, the language of 'ease of doing business' is increasingly being used to justify policies that erode labour protections.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump Brings Mar-a-Lago to D.C. — Rose Garden lawn torn up for new patio and towering Presidential flagpole
Donald Trump is making a new mark on the White House lawn, and it's raising questions. The president has begun tearing down the historic Rose Garden to create a more "functional" space that echoes the aesthetic of his private Florida resort, Mar-a-Lago. President Donald Trump is transforming the iconic White House Rose Garden into a Mar-a-Lago-style patio with two towering flagpoles. Critics argue that the historic lawn is being erased in favor of Trump's personal style and agenda. According to a report by the Daily Beast, bulldozers have begun tearing up the grass and laying the groundwork for a new flagpole, fulfilling President Donald Trump's intention to install a patio in the Mar-a-Lago style. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Schlechter Stuhlgang? Diese Methode funktioniert wie "auf Knopfdruck" Darmschutz Ratgeber Undo Why is Donald Trump tearing up the Rose Garden lawn? According to the AP, Trump approached reporters to check the work and informed them that he was erecting two "beautiful" flagpoles that he had "paid for" because the grounds "needed flagpoles for 200 years." The American flag and the POW/MIA flag are already flown daily from the White House's roof. Live Events The president had already declared in mid-February that he would remove the Rose Garden lawn, which frequently serves as the location for press conferences, award presentations, bill-signing ceremonies, and formal dinners. Later, he clarified that it was because women found it difficult to walk in high heels on the wet grass. During a March White House tour, he told Fox News that the grass just doesn't work when they use it for press conferences; people fall into the wet grass. ALSO READ: Pope Leo to speak virtually in Chicago — and it will happen right when Trump military parade rolls out Are Donald Trump's renovations erasing history? There are two rose gardens at the White House, the Jacqueline Kennedy Garden , which is south of the East Terrace Colonnade, and the Rose Garden, which is situated along the West Wing. Former First Lady Edith Roosevelt redesigned both flagpoles for the Kennedys in the early 1960s, following their original design in 1903. According to Rose Garden designer Rachel Lambert Mellon, President John F. Kennedy had the idea to revitalize the Rose Garden and turn the lawn that Trump is razing into a venue for formal events. What changes are being made to the White House grounds? Trump has promised to construct a $100 million ballroom that is comparable to the Grand Ballroom at Mar-a-Lago, the president's private club in Palm Beach, Florida, besides renovating the garden. To honor John F. Kennedy Jr., a big magnolia tree was chopped down and replaced with a smaller one outside the Oval Office window last month. The renovation project was started on Monday by staff from the National Park Service, which looks after the White House grounds. According to the Associated Press, they anticipate wrapping up sometime in the first half of August. FAQs Why is President Trump rebuilding the Rose Garden? Donald Trump claims wet grass made it difficult for women wearing heels and wants a more usable, Mar-a-Lago-inspired space. What else is changing? Along with a new patio and flagpoles, Donald Trump intends to construct a $100 million ballroom and has already replaced a historic magnolia tree .


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Siddaramaiah urges Chandrababu Naidu to lift ban on Karnataka's totapuri mangoes in Chittoor, hints retaliatory action
Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has written to his Andhra Pradesh counterpart N Chandrababu Naidu urging him to lift the ban on the entry of totapuri mangoes from the neighbouring states into Chittoor district. The adjoining Kolar district in Karnataka is a large grower of totapuri variety of mangoes, and large quantities food processing units in Chittoor district buy large quantities of them. With Chittoor district reporting a bumper totapuri production leading to a price crash and leaving growers in distress, the AP government has imposed curbs on imports of totapuri from other states into the district. The AP government has also deployed officials at inter-state check-posts to prevent entry of totapuri into the state. 'This abrupt and unilateral move has caused considerable hardship to mango growers in Karnataka, particularly those in the border regions who cultivate totapuri mangoes in substantial quantities. These farmers have long relied on the robust linkages with Chittoor-based processing and pulp extraction units for marketing their produce. The current restriction has disrupted this well-established supply chain and threatens significant post-harvest losses, directly impacting the livelihoods of thousands of farmers,' Siddaramaiah said in his letter. Actions of this type taken without prior consultation run contrary to the spirit of cooperative federalism. 'I am also concerned that this may lead to avoidable tension and retaliatory measures, with stakeholders already expressing discontent that could potentially disrupt the inter-state movement of vegetables and other agricultural commodities,' the CM said. Live Events The Chittoor administration has introduced a token-based purchase of only local mangoes by the food processing units. The administration has also asked the units to buy in a phased manner to prevent distress sales and ensure growers get a fair price. The Congress regime in Karnataka has come under pressure from mango growers in Kolar to declare a support price for their produce with Chittoor shutting its doors for the produce. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Why the US faces legal battles over Ten Commandments display in schools
A 6-foot-tall privately funded Ten Commandments monument is seen on the Arkansas Capitol grounds, in Little Rock. (AP File Photo) A wave of legal challenges is emerging across the US over laws that mandate the display of the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms. At the center of these disputes is a growing tension between religious symbolism and constitutional protections of religious freedom. Most recently, a group of seven families in the state of Arkansas has filed a federal lawsuit, arguing that a new law requiring the posting of the Ten Commandments in all public school classrooms infringes on their constitutional rights. As reported by the Associated Press, the law is set to take effect in August and was signed earlier this year by Republican Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders. Families say law promotes religious coercion The families, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, and the Freedom from Religion Foundation, argue that the law violates the First Amendment. Their complaint states that forcing religious texts into public education "unconstitutionally pressures students into religious observance, veneration, and adoption of the state's favored religious scripture," as quoted by the Associated Press. The lawsuit specifically challenges the permanent and prominent placement of the Ten Commandments in classrooms and libraries, which the plaintiffs say creates an environment of religious coercion. The families involved in the case include those who identify as Jewish, Unitarian Universalist, or nonreligious. They plan to request a preliminary injunction to prevent the law from being enforced when schools reopen. Legal precedent and national implications According to attorneys for the plaintiffs, the Arkansas law defies long-standing US Supreme Court rulings on the separation of church and state. They argue it contradicts established precedent that prohibits government-endorsed religious displays in public education. Samantha Stinson, one of the plaintiffs, said the law would "create an unwelcoming and religiously coercive school environment" and "infringe on our rights as parents," as reported by the Associated Press. Though Arkansas is currently under legal scrutiny, it is not alone. Louisiana passed a similar law, but its enforcement was blocked by a federal judge before it was set to take effect. As noted by the Associated Press, no school in Louisiana has posted the Ten Commandments yet, as litigation is ongoing. Texas is also expected to adopt a comparable law, with the governor expressing support. Officials respond cautiously amid legal review The lawsuit names four school districts—Fayetteville, Bentonville, Siloam Springs, and Springdale—as defendants. A spokesperson for Fayetteville schools told the Associated Press the district would not comment on pending litigation, while the other three districts have not responded. Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin said his office is reviewing the lawsuit and considering its legal options, according to the Associated Press. As debates over religious freedom and public education escalate, the outcome of these cases could shape how religion is treated in classrooms across the US. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.