Teenager Charged With Killing Mother and Stepfather in a Plan to Assassinate Trump
The teenager, Nikita Casap, 17, was arrested last month in the deaths of his mother, Tatiana Casap, 35, and stepfather, Donald Mayer, 51, according to the Waukesha County Sheriff's Department.
Sheriff's deputies found the bodies at the family's home in Waukesha, about 17 miles southwest of Milwaukee, after receiving a call on Feb. 28 requesting a welfare check, the department said.
According to federal documents unsealed on Friday, the fatal shootings were part of a plan by Mr. Casap, who identified with a right-wing terrorist network known as the Order of Nine Angels, to assassinate President Trump in what he believed would 'foment a political revolution in the United States,' federal investigators said.
Mr. Casap also paid, at least in part, for a drone and explosives that he planned to use in an attack, according to the documents, which were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
Mr. Casap's lawyers could not be immediately reached on Sunday for comment.
A self-described 'manifesto,' found on Mr. Casap's phone and detailed in the federal documents, contained images and praise of Adolf Hitler, as well as instructions to others to make bombs.
'By getting rid of the president and perhaps the vice president, that is guaranteed to bring in some chaos,' Mr. Casap wrote.
According to the federal documents, sheriff's deputies found the body of Ms. Casap covered in blankets on Feb. 28 while responding to a call from Mr. Mayer's mother, who said that she had been unable to contact the family, and that Mr. Casap had not been at school in two weeks.
During a secondary search of the residence, deputies found Mr. Mayer's body also covered in blankets, according to the documents. They also located a receipt for a .357 Magnum handgun, which was not in the home.
Based on cellphone records, security footage and witness statements, the authorities determined that Mr. Mayer was killed on Feb. 11 at about 6:30 p.m., and that Ms. Casap was killed about two hours later, according to the documents.
Security camera footage taken on Feb. 12 showed Mr. Casap, who was traveling with the family dog, at a truck stop in Walcott, Iowa, in Mr. Mayer's car, according to the documents.
On Feb. 28, Mr. Mayer's car was listed as stolen. That day, officers with the WaKeeney, Kan., Police Department stopped Mr. Casap and saw a .357 Magnum handgun on the front passenger floorboard, according to the documents.
Officers also found ammunition, the wallets and phones of both his mother and stepfather and 'large amounts' of cash in dollars and euros.
Mr. Casap was charged with theft and possession of a firearm. He was later charged with several other felonies, including two counts of first-degree homicide and two counts of hiding a corpse, according to the Waukesha County Sheriff's Department. He is scheduled to be arraigned on May 7.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Epping man pleads guilty to purchasing live-streamed child sexual abuse from Philippines
CONCORD — An Epping man admitted in federal court Aug. 19 to paying child sex traffickers in the Philippines to live-stream the sexual abuse of children for his viewing online. David Mendum, 46, pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court to one count of coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in criminal sexual activity as part of a negotiated plea deal. He is scheduled to be sentenced on Nov. 25, 2025. Mendum was arrested Nov. 7, 2024, as part of a Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) probe into individuals who have engaged in the sexual exploitation of children through internet-based videoconferencing and chat applications. According to court documents, HSI identified individuals operating child sex trafficking networks from the Philippines who were collecting viewership fees from vetted customers to show the sexual abuse of minors in real time during private webcam interactions on a variety of streaming video services and applications. Mendum, according to court documents, used a Skype account starting in 2020 to communicate with one of the traffickers. According to court records, the two exchanged 5,022 messages, one media file and 18 connected calls. Summonses issued to money services businesses revealed 500 money transfers sent by Mendum to recipients in the Philippines, totaling more than $39,000 between Jan. 8, 2018, to Sept. 25, 2024. Federal agents executed a search warrant at Mendum's home on Nov. 7, 2024, seizing multiple electronic devices, including three laptops and a cellphone. During an interview, Mendum initially denied using online platforms to access child sexual abuse material but later admitted to it when confronted with chat records, according to an agent's affidavit. "Mendum acknowledged a sexual interest in children and admitted that he had engaged in the above communication and other similar communications for the purpose of obtaining sexually explicit content depicting minors," the affidavit states. Mendum was initially charged with sexual exploitation of children, as well as coercion and enticement of a minor. Under the terms of a negotiated plea agreement, federal prosecutors agreed to dismiss the exploitation charge. He now faces a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years in prison, with a maximum possible term of life. Prosecutors are recommending a sentence ranging from 20 to 27 years. The Department of Homeland Security led the investigation. The New Hampshire Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force and Epping Police Department provided assistance. Assistant U.S Attorney Anna Z. Krasinski is prosecuting the case. The case is brought as part of Project Safe Childhood. In 2006, the Department of Justice created Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative designed to protect children from exploitation and abuse. Led by the U.S. Attorneys' Offices and the DOJ's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who exploit children, as well as identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit This article originally appeared on Portsmouth Herald: Epping man pleads guilty to purchasing live-streamed child sex abuse
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former California mayor indicted in PPP loan fraud, faces 30-year sentence
A former California mayor with a history of scandals, including pleading guilty to providing alcohol to minors and embezzlement, faces new federal fraud charges that could send him to prison for three decades. Anthony Silva, once the mayor of Stockton, is facing federal charges of bank fraud and aggravated identity theft. Prosecutors allege Silva lied to obtain and later forgive a pandemic-era $17,000 Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan for his now-defunct business, Indoor Adventures LLC. According to the indictment filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, Silva used another person's name to hide his majority ownership in the business—an apparent attempt to bypass federal rules that bar applicants with recent felony convictions. The loan was approved in April 2020 and later forgiven, wiping out the debt. The alleged scheme ran through September 2021. If convicted, Silva could face up to 30 years in prison, a $1 million fine for bank fraud, a mandatory two-year sentence, and a $250,000 fine for identity theft. Silva's attorney, Kresta Daly, could not immediately be reached for comment. Here's what to know about Silva and the controversies he's faced over the years. What was the PPP loan scandal, and what is Silva accused of doing? The PPP loan program, created under the 2020 CARES Act, was designed to help small businesses retain employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. The U.S. Small Business Administration fully guaranteed loans and could be forgiven if spent on payroll, rent, or other eligible expenses Silva's application reportedly misrepresented ownership and business operations to qualify for the loan, and by using another person's identity and submitting fraudulent documentation, he circumvented rules that would have disqualified him due to his prior felony conviction, prosecutors allege. Once the loan was approved, Silva applied for forgiveness under the SBA's Form 3508 process, which allowed borrowers to eliminate their debt if they met specific spending criteria. The Department of Justice has since launched a nationwide crackdown on COVID-19 relief fraud, forming a task force in 2021 that has brought thousands of cases against business owners, public officials, and organized rings. A history of scandal: Strip poker, embezzlement, and alcohol to minors Silva's legal troubles are not new. His single term as Stockton mayor from 2013 to 2017 was controversial. In 2016, he was accused of hosting a strip poker game involving underage participants at a summer camp he ran. That same year, he faced allegations of providing alcohol to minors and embezzling funds from the Stockton Kids Club, a youth organization under his leadership. He eventually pleaded no contest to giving alcohol to a minor and was ordered to perform 40 hours of community service. In 2019, Silva pleaded no contest to a felony conflict-of-interest charge stemming from financial misconduct during his time in office. The case centered on Silva's alleged misuse of public funds and his involvement in redirecting money from a city-supported nonprofit, the Stockton Kids Club, which he oversaw. Prosecutors accused Silva of re-directing $5,000 in public funds to benefit the organization while simultaneously serving as its CEO—violating California's conflict-of-interest laws. The conviction was later reduced to a misdemeanor and expunged in 2022. Failed comebacks and continued political aspirations Despite his checkered past, Silva has repeatedly tried to re-enter public office. Most recently, he ran for Stockton City Council District 2 in 2024 but failed to advance past the March primary, losing to Mariela Ponce and Waqar Rizvi. Just days before the latest charges were filed, Silva appeared at a city council meeting to support Mayor Christina Fugazi and former Interim City Manager Steve Colangelo's reappointment. His presence raised eyebrows, given his legal and ethical controversies' history. This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: Anthony Silva indicted in PPP loan fraud, faces 30-year sentence Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mississippi DEI ban blocked by federal judge. Will IHL walk back its new campus policies?
U.S. District Court Judge Henry Wingate on Monday, Aug. 18, indefinitely blocked Mississippi's new law banning diversity, equity and inclusion, also known as DEI initiatives, in public education, calling the measure likely unconstitutional and overly vague. The ruling, issued Monday, stops the state from enforcing House Bill 1193 while the case plays out in court — raising questions about whether Mississippi's public universities will move forward with new policies meant to comply with the now-paused law. Wingate initially issued a temporary restraining order for the new law in July, and after an August hearing, he upgraded that to a preliminary injunction — blocking enforcement of key parts of the law while the lawsuit plays out. HB 1193 bans public schools from running DEI offices, requiring DEI training, or asking for 'diversity statements' in hiring. It also outlaws programs deemed 'divisive concepts,' allows formal complaints and lets the state cut funding for repeat violations. The bill passed the Mississippi Legislature this past session and was signed into law by Republican Gov. Tate Reeves in April. What IHL did in response to the law In July, Mississippi's Institutions of Higher Learning adopted one policy and introduced another in a closed, behind-doors session, both aimed at complying with House Bill 1193. Those two policies are: The 'Academic Responsibility' policy, which is currently in effect, prohibits public universities from requiring ideological or political statements in hiring, promotion or admissions processes. It affirms academic freedom while emphasizing that universities must remain ideologically neutral in their official operations. According to the policy, faculty and students are free to explore ideas, but instructors 'should be careful not to introduce into their teaching controversial matters or divisive concepts which have no relation to their subject.' The policy also states that IHL institutions must provide learning environments free from requirements to conform to specific political or ideological beliefs — including those related to DEI. Universities are expected to maintain rigorous and relevant curricula, while faculty are encouraged to clarify when they speak as individuals, not as representatives of their institution. The 'Non-Discrimination' policy, still in draft form, goes further. It would bar universities from operating DEI offices, requiring DEI training or asking job applicants to submit diversity statements. It also prohibits giving preferential treatment in hiring or contracting based on race, sex or national origin, and protects individuals who disagree with DEI-related initiatives from being penalized. The policy remains under review and must complete the Administrative Procedures Act process before it can be finalized. How IHL is responding to the court's ruling In a statement Wednesday, IHL spokesperson John Sewell clarified the status of the two policies. 'The non-discrimination policy considered by the IHL Board of Trustees on July 18 remains in draft form and has not received final consideration by the Board,' Sewell said. 'The academic responsibility policy is in effect and provides guidance to universities in a way that does not conflict with the federal court's preliminary injunction.' Sewell also confirmed that Wingate's ruling does not jeopardize any other policies the board may be planning to implement in response to HB 1193. Why Wingate blocked HB 1193 In his 22-page ruling, Wingate said HB 1193 is likely unconstitutional, noting that it imposes vague and viewpoint-specific restrictions that could discourage free speech on college campuses. Wingate also criticized the statute for being poorly defined and prone to selective enforcement. "It (HB 1193) is unconstitutionally vague, fails to treat speech in a viewpoint-neutral manner, and carries with it serious risks of terrible consequences with respect to the chilling of expression and academic freedom," Wingate wrote. Who sued over the DEI law? The plaintiffs in the case are a coalition of civil rights groups and educators. That includes the Mississippi Center for Justice, the American Civil Liberties Union of Mississippi and Legal Defense Fund attorneys, among others. They filed the lawsuit on behalf of several professors and students at public universities in Mississippi, arguing that House Bill 1193 violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments by restricting academic freedom and free speech. In a press release Tuesday, the groups applauded Wingate's ruling, calling it a win for public education: "We are please that this law is preliminarily enjoined," said Joshua Tom, legal director at the ACLU of Mississippi. "The State's attempt to impose its preferred views — and ban opposing views — on Mississippi's public education system is not only bad policy, it's illegal, as the Court has preliminarily found today.' Additionally, Rob McDuff, attorney and director of the Mississippi Center for Justice George Riley Impact Litigation Campaign, said Wingate's ruling offers a reprieve for Mississippi's teachers and students, who were left wondering how to keep teaching subjects like history and biology without running afoul of the law 'Thankfully, this puts to rest for now the concerns springing up among administrators, teachers, and students around the state, wondering how they could suddenly stop teaching and learning about issues that have long been essential to a complete education in courses like history, biology, literature, and many others,' McDuff said. Contact Charlie Drape at cdrape@ This article originally appeared on Mississippi Clarion Ledger: Mississippi's anti-DEI law blocked. What IHL plans to do next Solve the daily Crossword
