ProKidney Reports Statistically and Clinically Significant Topline Results for the Phase 2 REGEN-007 Trial Evaluating Rilparencel in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
In Group 1 (n=24), kidney function stabilized in patients randomized to receive two rilparencel injections (one in each kidney). The annual decline in eGFR slope improved by 78% from -5.8 mL/min/1.73m2 in the pre-injection period to -1.3 mL/min/1.73m2 in the period following the last rilparencel injection. This 4.6 mL/min/1.73m2 per year difference was statistically significant (p<0.001) and clinically meaningful
In Group 2 (n=25), patients were randomized to receive a single rilparencel injection followed by a second injection only if kidney function worsened and a re-dosing trigger was met. The annual decline in eGFR slope improved by 50% from -3.4 mL/min/1.73m2 in the pre-injection period to -1.7 mL/min/1.73m2 in the period following the last rilparencel injection. This 1.7 mL/min/1.73m2 per year difference was not statistically significant (p=0.085) but suggests evidence of a dose response
No rilparencel-related serious adverse events were observed; the safety profile was consistent with previously reported study results and comparable to a kidney biopsy
FDA Type B meeting set for this summer to confirm ProKidney's approach to using eGFR slope as the surrogate endpoint in the ongoing Phase 3 PROACT 1 study for accelerated approval
WINSTON-SALEM, N.C., July 08, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- ProKidney Corp. (Nasdaq: PROK) ('ProKidney' or the 'Company"), a leading late clinical-stage cellular therapeutics company focused on chronic kidney disease (CKD), today reported statistically significant and clinically meaningful positive topline results from the full Group 1 modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population of the Phase 2 REGEN-007 trial evaluating rilparencel in patients with CKD and diabetes. Rilparencel is an autologous cellular therapy that has received Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation from the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and is currently being evaluated in the ongoing Phase 3 REGEN-006 (PROACT 1) trial to demonstrate the therapy's potential to preserve kidney function in patients with advanced CKD and type 2 diabetes.
'We are very encouraged by the REGEN-007 topline results that demonstrated a robust improvement in eGFR slope following treatment with rilparencel in Group 1 as well as evidence of a dose response in Group 2. These data bolster our confidence in the design of our ongoing Phase 3 PROACT 1 study given the similarity between the dosing regimen in REGEN-007 Group 1 and PROACT 1. It is also worth noting that 15 of the 24 patients in Group 1 (63%) met key Phase 3 PROACT 1 inclusion criteria, and similar efficacy results were observed in this subgroup compared to the full Group 1 results. We plan to submit the full results from REGEN-007 to ASN's 2025 Kidney Week as a late-breaking clinical trial and are excited to share more details at that time with investors and the medical community,' said Bruce Culleton, M.D., CEO of ProKidney. 'We also look forward to our upcoming FDA Type B meeting in the coming weeks to confirm our approach to eGFR slope as a surrogate endpoint for accelerated approval. This meeting represents an important step toward our goal of expediting rilparencel's potential path to market in the U.S. where there remains a significant unmet clinical need in patients with advanced CKD and diabetes.'
Phase 2 REGEN-007 Overview and Topline ResultsREGEN-007 is a multi-center Phase 2 open-label 1:1 randomized two-arm trial in patients with diabetes, CKD, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 20-50 mL/min/1.73m². At randomization, patients were assigned to one of two treatment groups using different dosing regimens. Group 1 replicated the dosing schedule of the ongoing Phase 3 PROACT 1 study in which patients received two scheduled rilparencel injections (one in each kidney), approximately three months apart. Group 2 tested an exploratory dosing regimen to investigate whether disease progression triggers, rather than a time-based trigger, could optimize multiple administrations of rilparencel. In Group 2, patients received a single rilparencel injection in one kidney and a second injection in the contralateral kidney only if triggered by a sustained eGFR decline from baseline of ≥ 20%, and/or an increase in the urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline of ≥ 30% and ≥ 30 mg/g.
The prespecified primary endpoint for REGEN-007 is the difference in annual eGFR slope (calculated using a linear mixed effects model) in the pre-injection period versus the period following the last rilparencel injection. The pre-injection period included all historical eGFR values collected up to 24 months before the screening visit as well as the on-study central laboratory eGFR results prior to first rilparencel injection. The period following the last injection included eGFR values from the last rilparencel injection to the end of study (EOS) visit. Median follow-up after the last injection was approximately 18 months in both Group 1 and Group 2.
Fifty-three patients were randomized in the study, of whom 49 patients (mITT population) received at least one rilparencel injection. Four patients did not receive any rilparencel injections. The majority of patients were male (69%), and the mean age was 60 years. At baseline, 38 of 49 patients (78%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus and 11 (22%) had type 1 diabetes. Thirty-nine (80%) patients were receiving an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), and 18 (37%) were receiving a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i). At baseline, the mean (SD) eGFR was 33±10 mL/min/1.73m2. Notably, the median UACR was higher in Group 1 (792 mg/g) compared to Group 2 (229 mg/g).
Annual eGFR Slope (mL/min/1.73m2)
Group
N (mITT)
Pre inj
Post last inj
Absolute benefit
Relative benefit
1
24
-5.8
-1.3
4.6
78%
2
25
-3.4
-1.7
1.7
50%
In Group 1 (n=24), kidney function stabilized after receiving rilparencel. The annual decline in eGFR slope improved by 78% from -5.8 mL/min/1.73m2 in the pre-injection period to -1.3 mL/min/1.73m2 in the period following the last rilparencel injection. This 4.6 mL/min/1.73m2 per year difference1 was statistically significant (p<0.001) and clinically meaningful. Of the 24 patients in Group 1, 15 (63%) met key Phase 3 PROACT 1 inclusion criteria, and similar efficacy results were observed in this subgroup compared to the full Group 1 results. As a reminder, the Phase 3 PROACT 1 protocol was amended in 1H 2024 after a similar eGFR efficacy signal was observed in the Phase 2 RMCL-002 study subgroup analysis (n=23) of high-UACR, Stage 4 CKD patients with type 2 diabetes.
In Group 2 (n=25), the annual change in kidney function as measured by eGFR slope was -3.4 mL/min/1.73m2 in the pre-injection period versus -1.7 mL/min/1.73m2 in the period following the last rilparencel injection, resulting in an improvement of 50%, or 1.7 mL/min/1.73m2 per year. This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.085) but suggests evidence of a dose response. Out of the 25 patients in Group 2, 15 (60%) met the re-dosing trigger and received a second rilparencel injection. The median time between the first and second injections in these 15 patients was approximately 11 months.
No rilparencel-related serious adverse events were observed across all patients in the study who received at least one rilparencel injection (n=49). The safety profile was consistent with previously reported study results and comparable to a kidney biopsy.
Full results from REGEN-007 are being held and will be submitted to the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) 2025 Kidney Week as a late-breaking clinical trial.
Phase 3 PROACT 1 Regulatory ProgressAs previously communicated, the FDA confirmed during a Type B meeting in Q4 2024 that the accelerated approval pathway is available for rilparencel if an acceptable surrogate endpoint, such as eGFR slope, is used. ProKidney has an upcoming FDA Type B meeting this summer to confirm the approach to using eGFR slope as the surrogate endpoint for accelerated approval. Additional details are expected in mid-2025.
About Chronic Kidney DiseaseCKD is a progressive condition characterized by the gradual decline of kidney function, which can ultimately lead to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) requiring dialysis or transplantation. An estimated 37 million adults in the U.S. have CKD, though many remain undiagnosed in the early stages. Diabetes is the leading cause of CKD, and individuals with both conditions face significantly elevated risks of cardiovascular events, hospitalization, and mortality. ProKidney is developing rilparencel for patients with Stage 3b/4 CKD and diabetes, a population that includes 1 to 2 million people in the U.S. While current treatment options aim to slow disease progression, there remains a substantial unmet need for therapies that can stabilize kidney function and delay or prevent the need for dialysis in patients with advanced CKD.
About the Phase 3 REGEN-006 (PROACT 1) Clinical TrialREGEN-006 is an ongoing Phase 3, randomized, blinded, sham controlled safety and efficacy study of rilparencel in subjects with advanced CKD and type 2 diabetes. The study protocol was amended in 1H 2024 to focus on a subset of patients with Stage 4 CKD (eGFR 20-30 mL/min/1.73m²) and late Stage 3b CKD (eGFR 30-35 mL/min/1.73m²) with accompanying albuminuria (UACR less than 5,000 mg/g for patients with eGFR 20-30 mL/min/1.73m² and 300-5,000 mg/g for patients with eGFR 30-35 mL/min/1.73m²). The total planned enrollment is approximately 685 subjects. Subjects are randomized (1:1) to the treatment group and the sham control group prior to kidney biopsy or a sham biopsy procedure, respectively. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of up to two rilparencel injections (one in each kidney) using a minimally invasive percutaneous approach. The primary composite endpoint is the time from first injection to the earliest of: at least 40% reduction in eGFR; eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73m², and/or chronic dialysis, and/or renal transplant; or renal or cardiovascular death.
About ProKidney Corp.ProKidney, a pioneer in the treatment of chronic kidney disease through innovations in cellular therapy, was founded in 2015 after a decade of research. ProKidney's lead product candidate, rilparencel (also known as REACT®), is a first-in-class, patented, proprietary autologous cellular therapy being evaluated for its potential to preserve kidney function in diabetic patients at high risk of kidney failure. Rilparencel has received RMAT designation from the FDA. For more information, please visit www.prokidney.com.
Forward-Looking StatementsThis press release includes 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of the 'safe harbor' provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. ProKidney's actual results may differ from its expectations, estimates and projections and consequently, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Words such as 'expect,' 'estimate,' 'project,' 'budget,' 'forecast,' 'anticipate,' 'intend,' 'plan,' 'may,' 'will,' 'could,' 'should,' 'believes,' 'predicts,' 'potential,' 'continue,' and similar expressions (or the negative versions of such words or expressions) are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the Company's beliefs that the FDA agrees that the Company's Phase 3 REGEN-006 (PROACT 1) trial could be sufficient to support a potential BLA submission and full regulatory approval and that the Company could consider using eGFR slope as a surrogate endpoint on an accelerated approval pathway for rilparencel, expectations with respect to financial results and expected cash runway, including the Company's expectation that current cash will support operating plans into 2027, future performance, development and commercialization of products, if approved, the potential benefits and impact of the Company's products, if approved, potential regulatory approvals, the size and potential growth of current or future markets for the Company's products, if approved, the advancement of the Company's development programs into and through the clinic and the expected timing for reporting data, the making of regulatory filings or achieving other milestones related to the Company's product candidates, and the advancement and funding of the Company's developmental programs, generally. Most of these factors are outside of the Company's control and are difficult to predict. Factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to: disruptions to our business or that may otherwise materially harm our results of operations or financial condition as a result of our recent domestication to the United States; the inability to maintain the listing of the Company's Class A common stock on Nasdaq; the inability of the Company's Class A common stock to remain included in various indices and the potential negative impact on the trading price of the Class A common stock if excluded from such indices; the inability to implement business plans, forecasts, and other expectations or identify and realize additional opportunities, which may be affected by, among other things, competition and the ability of the Company to grow and manage growth profitably and retain its key employees; the risk of downturns and a changing regulatory landscape in the highly competitive biotechnology industry; the risk that results of the Company's clinical trials may not support approval; the risk that the FDA could require additional studies before approving the Company's drug candidates; the inability of the Company to raise financing in the future; the inability of the Company to obtain and maintain regulatory clearance or approval for its products, and any related restrictions and limitations of any cleared or approved product; the inability of the Company to identify, in-license or acquire additional technology; the inability of Company to compete with other companies currently marketing or engaged in the biologics market and in the area of treatment of kidney diseases; the size and growth potential of the markets for the Company's products, if approved, and its ability to serve those markets, either alone or in partnership with others; the Company's estimates regarding expenses, future revenue, capital requirements and needs for additional financing; the Company's financial performance; the Company's intellectual property rights; uncertainties inherent in cell therapy research and development, including the actual time it takes to initiate and complete clinical studies and the timing and content of decisions made by regulatory authorities; the fact that interim results from our clinical programs may not be indicative of future results; the impact of geo-political conflict on the Company's business; and other risks and uncertainties included under the heading 'Risk Factors' in the Company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company cautions readers that the foregoing list of factors is not exclusive and cautions readers not to place undue reliance upon any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company does not undertake or accept any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect any change in its expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
Investor Contacts:
ProKidneyEthan HoldawayEthan.Holdaway@prokidney.comLifeSci Advisors, LLCDaniel Ferry Daniel@lifesciadvisors.com
1 Difference in values is due to rounding.Sign in to access your portfolio
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New study showcases where home prices dropping the most
The housing market has been in a serious crunch since the COVID-19 pandemic, with limited inventory, elevated home prices and mortgages in the 7% range, continuing to keep many would-be home buyers locked out. But even amid such tight constraints, modest declines in home prices can still be found in some regions of the country. Shop Top Mortgage Rates Personalized rates in minutes Your Path to Homeownership A quicker path to financial freedom That's according to a new report from which finds that median home prices across the 50 largest metro areas in the country have declined slightly in July 2025, compared with three years ago. Median home prices hit a peak of $443,000 in July 2022, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis. The extent to which home prices are declining varies from region to region according to the report, which is based on the brokerage platform's housing data. "The housing market has cooled modestly in 2025," Danielle Hale, chief economist at said in a statement on the report. "But the extent and persistence of rebalancing really varies across the country. And regionally, homebuyers and sellers are likely to experience a very different market." Behind those notable price differences is inventory. Right now, the housing market is essentially divided into two camps, with higher inventory in the South and West, where deeper price cuts can be found, and more limited inventory in the Midwest and Northeast, where price changes "remain relatively tight," according to the report. "It's a supply and demand story," Jake Krimmel, senior economist at and author of the July 2025 report, told CBS MoneyWatch. "When you have fewer homes for sale, and if there is still sufficient demand, that's going to maybe put upward pressure on prices or prevent them from falling." Cities where prices are falling The largest declines in median listing prices in 2025 tend to be concentrated in the South and West, where all 19 of the 50 largest U.S. metro areas with median housing prices below July 2022 levels are located. "After years of intense competition, it's starting to feel more balanced — especially in the South and West," Gary Ashton, founder of The Ashton Real Estate Group of RE/MAX Advantage said in a statement on the report. "It's not a buyer's market yet, but we're headed in that direction." The cities that saw the biggest declines in price were Austin, where median listing prices have fallen nearly 15% over the last three years; and Miami, where prices have dropped around 19%. According to Krimmel, inventory is rising in these markets due to the fact that homes are staying on the market longer, more home sellers are reducing prices and new listings are climbing. A boom in building also boosted housing supply in those regions during the COVID-19 pandemic, when demand for markets like Austin, Denver and Florida exploded, he added. Austin, Los Angeles and Miami saw the largest declines in median listing price over the past year, although prices in Los Angeles remain more than 18% above the median listing price in 2022. Cities where prices are rising Housing markets in cities in Northeast and Midwest remain squeezed, according to Krimmel, due to "sticky high" prices, and tight inventory, said Krimmel. Other contributing factors include stricter zoning and land use regulation laws that making building new houses more difficult, he said. In New York, for example, median listing prices have climbed roughly 16% since 2022, according to the report. Median listing prices in Milwaukee increased 26%. Furthermore, the number of active listings per month in the Northeast is still 50% below pre-pandemic levels, according to Krimmel. The number of active listings in the Midwest is down 40%, pointing to an inventory shortage in both regions, he said. While median listing prices have gone down over the last year in northeastern cities like Boston and Philadelphia, which saw 1.4% and 1.2% decreases, respectively, median prices remain at least 10% above those from 2022. "To the extent that there are falling prices in the Northeast and the Midwest, for the most part it's pretty modest numbers," said Krimmel. Quadruple murder suspect captured in Tennessee, officials confirm DOGE savings are a fraction of what the department claims, CBS News analysis finds Zelenskyy says he had a productive talk with Trump about war with Russia
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Michigan Gov. Whitmer makes another White House visit to meet with Trump
WASHINGTON (AP) — Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer met with President Donald Trump at the White House on Tuesday to discuss the toll tariffs are taking on the auto industry and the potential effects of his tax and spending bill on Medicaid. It's the latest in a string of meetings between the Democratic governor and the Republican president after the two frequently clashed during his first term. In his second term, Whitmer has adopted a more diplomatic approach, drawing some backlash from fellow Democrats. But it's also resulted in multiple wins for Whitmer's state, including Trump's approving $50 million in storm relief and awarding a new fighter jet mission for an Air National Guard base in the state. 'I've always said that I'll work with anyone to get things done for Michigan,' Whitmer, a potential 2028 presidential candidate, said in a statement Tuesday. 'That's why I've continued to go to Washington, D.C., to make sure that Michiganders are front and center when critical decisions are being made.' The private meeting between Whitmer and Trump — which a White House official would not confirm but did stress Trump's continued focus on Michigan — marks a rare instance of the president sitting with a leading Democratic figure. In recent weeks, Trump attacked Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer, telling him to 'go to hell," while also taking aim at other high-profile Democratic governors who have pushed back on some of his policies, including California's Gavin Newsom and Illinois' JB Pritzker, also considered possible 2028 candidates. Pritzker has aided Texas Democrats in leaving their state to stay in Illinois to block Republicans from their needed quorum to pass a new congressional map backed by Trump. Early Tuesday, Trump called Pritzker 'probably the dumbest of all governors' in a television interview. Whitmer has been more careful, criticizing some of Trump's policies rather than the president himself. She issued an executive directive last week to assess the impact of tariffs that she said have led to 'massive economic uncertainty' — without mentioning Trump's name once. Tuesday's appearance ended with far less controversy than her trip to the White House in April. Whitmer was unexpectedly ushered into the Oval Office during that visit, standing awkwardly nearby as the Republican president signed executive orders and assailed his political opponents during a photo opportunity. In their White House meeting Tuesday, Whitmer said that she told Trump and 'his team about the impact tariffs are having on Michigan's economy, especially our auto industry.' She also discussed 'changes in the Medicaid program, and ongoing recovery efforts following the ice storm in Northern Michigan this year." Whitmer also saw Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and chief of staff Susie Wiles while at the White House. Trump announced last month that he had spoken with Whitmer to inform her that he was appproving $50 million in federal funds for Michigan to support repairs and recovery from a March ice storm. In April, Trump traveled to Michigan to announce a new mission for Selfridge Air National Guard Base, which Whitmer has sought for years.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opendoor CEO Wants to Make The Most of Meme-Stock Moment
(Bloomberg) -- Opendoor Technologies Inc. was nursing years of losses and grappling with a potential delisting when it became a meme stock. Then, in a matter of days, the real estate company rallied 460%. PATH Train Service Resumes After Fire at Jersey City Station Mayor Asked to Explain $1.4 Billion of Wasted Johannesburg Funds All Hail the Humble Speed Hump Chief Executive Officer Carrie Wheeler sees a chance to use newfound interest to her advantage as she tries to reposition the company from one known for flipping suburban abodes to one that offers homeowners a variety of ways to sell. 'It probably wasn't on my bingo card for 2025,' Wheeler said in an interview. 'We want to make sure we harvest this moment.' Wheeler's remarks came as Opendoor reported second-quarter results, a period in which it made money by one measure for the first time in three years. The company posted adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of $23 million, beating the average analyst estimate of $17.5 million, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The company expects to generate revenue of as much as $875 million and report a loss of as much as $28 million in the third quarter, according to a company statement. The shares slid in postmarket trading, falling 19% to about $2 as of 4:45 p.m. in New York. Opendoor pioneered a software-driven approach to flipping homes known as iBuying, which caught on with consumers in the hot housing market that followed early Covid lockdowns. At its peak, the company was acquiring 5,000 homes a month and drawing copycat efforts from well known housing players like Zillow Group Inc., Redfin Corp. and others. The business has been complicated and risky at times, causing some iBuyers to shutter their operations. Rising interest rates also hit the industry hard, slowing the pace of US home sales significantly in the second half of 2022. That August, Opendoor lost money on 42% of its transactions and took a more cautious approach to buying homes in the months that followed. The company has since slimmed down considerably. Two years ago, Opendoor booked more than $3 billion of revenue in the first quarter. The figure was $1.6 billion in the most recent quarter. The stock, which peaked at $35.88 in early 2021, bottomed out this June at 51 cents and Nasdaq warned the company that it could be delisted for failing to maintain a share price of at least $1. Then Canadian hedge fund manager Eric Jackson at EMJ Capital made a series of posts online laying out a bull case for the stock, leading to the recent surge. Opendoor has the ability to sell as much as $200 million in shares 'at the market' — a tactic that meme-stock beneficiaries like GameStop Corp. and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. have used to capitalize on retail interest. Wheeler declined to say whether her firm had tapped its ability to raise money this way. Even before the recent rally, Wheeler was plotting a change in course. Opendoor has expanded efforts to bring real estate agents into its process from the beginning, allowing homeowners to weigh the benefits of a fast, cash sale against a traditional listing process. The company also introduced a product that it calls Cash Plus, in which Opendoor pays a lower price for the home and gives the seller some upside from the proceeds of the resale. 'We see a huge opportunity in front of us,' said Wheeler. 'No one else is trying to change home-selling.' (Adds third quarter guidance and shares in paragraph five.) Russia's Secret War and the Plot to Kill a German CEO AI Flight Pricing Can Push Travelers to the Limit of Their Ability to Pay Government Steps Up Campaign Against Business School Diversity What Happens to AI Startups When Their Founders Jump Ship for Big Tech How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data