Share tip-offs on drug peddlers: Cops to locals
Panaji:
Goa police said on Sunday that there is an increase in illicit
drug trafficking
and use of drugs in the state, especially among the younger generation. Police urged the public to share information about drug traffickers and peddlers for action.
'Say no to drugs,' said SP, anti-narcotics cell, Sunita Sawant. 'Drug use is destroying our families, societies, and is a threat to the nation. It has to be curbed.'
Sawant also sought the help of the public to nab the menace. 'We have a toll-free number and helpline, 1933. Your identity will be kept secret, and nobody will reveal your information if you provide information to curb drug trafficking,' she said.
She also said that Goa police are developing intelligence and conducting raids.
In the first four months of this year, Goa police seized more drugs than they did over the past four years. They seized drugs worth Rs 68 crore from Jan to April, a 300% increase over the value of drugs seized in the past four years. From 2021 to 2024, drugs worth Rs 21 crore were seized.
Since 2021, around 1,000kg of different types of drugs have been seized in the state, worth around Rs 90 crore. In 2025, Goa police have so far arrested 60 persons, including 18 Goans, 32 non-Goans, and six foreigners.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Install the Perfect Pool at Home – Start Here
Backyard Pool | Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
Since 2021, Goa police have arrested 691 persons, including 195 Goans, 401 non-Goans, and 93 foreigners.
In one of the biggest-ever single-day drug seizures by Goa police, 4.3 kg of cocaine worth over Rs 43 crore was seized at Chicolna, Mormugao, in April. Three individuals, including a woman, were arrested, and police suspect the drugs were brought to Goa from Thailand to be sold in the local market.
A week later, Goa police arrested 29-year-old resident of Palakkad, Kerala, Mohammad Sameer, for being in alleged possession of over 110g of high micro-LSD liquid worth Rs 11 crore.
Sameer, a BBA graduate who was living in Goa for the past five years, was running a three-room guesthouse at Baga and arranged for taxis for his guests.
Earlier, in March, Goa police seized drugs worth Rs 11.6 crore and arrested a 23-year-old Bengaluru resident for allegedly illegally possessing over 11kg of hydroponic weed (ganja). Police said the man brought drugs from Nepal to India and that the crime branch busted an international drug racket.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Owner's risk no excuse: Punjab and Haryana high court holds railways liable for pilferage losses
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana high court has held the railway department liable for compensating losses due to pilferage of iron consignments even when goods were booked at "owner's risk", clarifying that this classification does not absolve railways of liability if negligence is evident. Citing sections 79, 93, and 94 of the Railways Act, the court has emphasised the duty of the railways to account for consignments once they assume control, even if loaded at private sidings. "The refusal to allow re-weighment, a right under Section 79, was deemed a serious lapse," the court has held. Justice Pankaj Jain passed the order while deciding a 34-year-old matter in the appeals filed by the Steel Authority of India Limited and Indian Iron and Steel Company Limited, challenging the dismissal of their claim petitions by the Railway claims tribunal. The case dates back to the early 1990s, when the steel companies booked consignments of pig iron from Vishakhapatnam to Goraya, Jalandhar. Though the journey was expected to take 6–8 days, the wagons remained in transit for nearly a month. Suspecting pilferage, the consignees requested re-weighment of the goods. However, the request was repeatedly denied by the railway authorities. The companies engaged an independent surveyor, who confirmed significant shortages in the delivered material. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 임플란트, 지금 시작하세요 [자세히 보기] 임플란트 더 알아보기 Undo However, the railway tribunal previously rejected their claims on technical grounds, including lack of proper authorisation to file claims and failure to establish service of statutory notices under section 106 of the Railways Act. In its detailed order released last week, Justice Jain held that the railway tribunal erred. The judge held that the regional manager legal, who filed the claim, was duly authorised under a valid board resolution. Further, the court observed that statutory notice was served and backed by affidavit, and no evidence was produced by the railways to refute it. The single bench was also of the view that the denial of re-weighment and failure to counter the surveyor's findings pointed to such negligence. Finally, the court ordered compensation for the claimants for the full extent of the losses suffered, with 7% interest per annum from the date of filing until actual payment. The cause of action arose in the early 1990s, with the case pending before the high court since 1993. MSID:: 121975080 413 |
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
2 coaches get jail terms for sexual assault on judo players
1 2 Meerut/Bareilly: Courts in Meerut and Moradabad sentenced two judo coaches to prison for sexually assaulting minor trainees, including a national-level judoka, in separate incidents that took place in 2017 and 2023. Manish alias Max, 26, received a life sentence for raping a 10-year-old national judo player in Meerut, special public prosecutor Kuldeep Mohan said. Additional district judge Sangeeta also imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on him. Special public prosecutor Avkash Jain told TOI, "The convict violated the girl in the guard room while her brother and fellow players were asked to practise. After the crime, the minor bled profusely, and Max, in a cynical attempt to conceal his crime, staged a drama; he told the minor's parents that she sustained a severe injury during practice." Jain added, "Believing the convict's theory, the minor was rushed to a medical facility and underwent treatment in three different hospitals, and after eight days, she secretly wrote her ordeal on a paper, which somehow reached her father." In a separate case, special Pocso judge Ghanendra Kumar sentenced Mohd Qasim Ali, 46, to 15 years of rigorous imprisonment for sexually assaulting a 12-year-old boy in Moradabad. The convict was also fined Rs 60,000 and taken into judicial custody immediately after the court order. Additional district govt counsel Manoj Gupta said, "The incident occurred on Sept 9, 2017, when the boy was in his school where the convict was appointed as judo coach. Mohd Qasim took the boy to the forest on the pretext of judo training, where he forcefully sodomised him. The boy narrated his ordeal to his family upon returning home." Gupta added, "The submitted medical examination report to the court confirmed the assault. Additionally, the statement of the survivor and the circumstantial evidence helped in nailing the accused." The chargesheet was submitted in court, and the judge expedited the trial.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Interest on refund is like compensation in consumer disputes'
New Delhi: The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), while holding builders liable for deficiency in service, observed that in consumer cases, awarding interest along with a refund serves as a form of compensation. The commission's bench of Justice Sudip Ahluwalia and Sadhna Shanker was hearing an appeal filed by a builder against the orders of a state commission. The state commission had found the builder's service deficient and directed a refund of Rs 34,27,747 with 12% interest, Rs 1 lakh as compensation, and Rs 11,000 as litigation costs to the complainant. On June 16, NCDRC modified the state commission's order based on legal precedents. It set aside the Rs 1 lakh compensation but increased the litigation costs from Rs 11,000 to Rs 40,000. In 2011, the complainants booked a flat in a project by Barnala Builders on the Chandigarh-Ambala Highway after seeing advertisements that claimed it was fully developed and clear of legal issues. They paid a large portion of the price, but the builder did not provide the buyer's agreement at first. Later, the builder gave them an agreement with many unexpected and unfair terms. The complainants also received several arbitrary service tax demands without a proper explanation. Despite paying over Rs 34 lakh, they were only given a paper possession letter, while actual development, utility connections, and statutory certificates were still missing. They asked for a refund, but the builder only threatened forfeiture. They filed a complaint before the state commission of Punjab in 2014. The commission in 2016 held that the builder had been deficient in service and ordered a refund of Rs 34,27,747 with 12% interest, Rs 1 lakh compensation, and Rs 11,000 as litigation costs. Aggrieved, the builder filed an appeal before the National Commission. The national commission reaffirmed that in consumer cases, giving interest and a refund is a kind of compensation.
