logo
Why part-time job may not be enough for university students to meet basic standard of living

Why part-time job may not be enough for university students to meet basic standard of living

Independent17 hours ago
University students in England must undertake more than 20 hours of paid work a week to meet the basic standard of living, a new report has suggested.
The pressures of part-time work are 'squeezing out' the other elements of a university experience such as studying, sports, societies and socialising, according to the Higher Education Policy Institute (Hepi) think tank.
University sector leaders have suggested that cost-of-living pressures are affecting young people's choices – with more opting to stay living at home for university and more taking on part-time work alongside their studies.
Hepi has called for maintenance support to be increased so that all students can reach a 'minimum socially acceptable standard of living'.
The findings come as students in England, Wales and Northern Ireland receive their A-level and Level 3 BTec results on Thursday, with many finding out if they have secured a university place.
A report from Hepi, TechnologyOne and the Centre for Research in Social Policy (CRSP) at Loughborough University has suggested how much first-year students need for a 'minimum socially acceptable standard of living' that covers the basics and full participation in university life.
It estimated a student in England will need around £61,000 over the course of a three-year degree, or around £77,000 if studying in London, to reach a minimum socially acceptable standard of living – all excluding tuition fees.
For students in England, the maximum annual maintenance loan (up to £10,544), which is available only to people from low-income households, covers just half the costs faced by first-year students, the report said.
It also found that even with the highest levels of maintenance support, students in England must work more than 20 hours per week to meet a basic standard of living.
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has said the government is 'looking at all of the options' for how to support university students facing costs.
When asked about the cost-of-living pressures facing university students, Ms Phillipson said the government recognises that there is 'still more to do' to tackle some of the disparities that young people experience.
She said: 'I do want all students to be able to get the full benefits of their time at university, to be able to take up internships, study trips (and) other work experience opportunities.
'I don't want students from less well-off backgrounds to be deterred from doing that because of having to take on more hours of paid work.'
Last year, the government announced that undergraduate tuition fees in England, which have been frozen at £9,250 since 2017, will rise to £9,535 for the 2025-26 academic year.
It also announced that maintenance loans will increase in line with inflation in the 2025-26 academic year to help students with their living costs.
The latest report from Hepi has suggested students might be expected to undertake some part-time work, such as 10 hours of paid employment a week, but the remainder should be covered by maintenance support.
It has also called for maintenance support to be 'pegged to inflation' and for the household income thresholds to be increased so parents do not need to contribute to their child's living costs until they have enough money to meet a basic standard of living for themselves.
Nick Hillman, director of Hepi, said: 'Maintenance support is currently woefully inadequate, leading students to live in substandard ways, to take on a dangerous number of hours of paid employment on top of their full-time studies or to take out commercial debts at high interest rates.
'We hope our results will lead to deeper conversations about the insufficiency of the current maintenance support packages, how much the imputed parental contribution should be and whether it is unreasonable to expect most full-time students to have to find lots of paid work even during term time.'
Josh Freeman, one of the authors of the report, said: 'These findings demonstrate three serious risks to UK higher education: access to higher education becomes more unequal, the quality of the student experience suffers and the sustainability of the sector is put at risk.
'The harm students currently face cannot be overstated.
'Too many students are struggling to cover their basic costs, let alone participate fully in higher education.
'It is not only good policy: there is a moral imperative to give students a fair chance of succeeding and thriving in higher education.'
A spokesperson for Universities UK said: 'Going to university is an investment in your future, and no-one should have their experience of higher education limited due to financial pressures.
'Universities already offer scholarships, bursaries and hardship support for students who are struggling, but this research shows that the maintenance package just doesn't go far enough.
'This is why we are calling on the government to increase maintenance support offered to students to better track inflation and living costs, so that everyone with the potential to succeed can do so, whatever their background.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sefton's children's services praised for 'significant turnaround'
Sefton's children's services praised for 'significant turnaround'

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Sefton's children's services praised for 'significant turnaround'

A council's children's services which last year was described as posing "significant harm", has shown improvement across the board, inspectors have services run by Sefton Council were rated "inadequate" by Ofsted back in early 2022, but the education watchdog's latest monitoring report gave it an overall rating of "good".Ofsted inspectors said "children are now a clear priority for the wider council", and that staff have reported "a positive shift" in the culture of the Council leader Marion Atkinson said securing the improved rating was "a proud moment", and that the services had "undergone a transformation". Atkinson said the council had "worked tirelessly to build a children's services in Sefton that our families, children and young people deserve".She said the Ofsted rating confirms that "our children are now safer, better supported and more empowered".Last year Ofsted carried out two monitoring visits which identified "widespread failures" in the described the inspection as "bleak" with highly vulnerable children being left at risk of serious harm."This report marks a significant turnaround from the previous rating," said the improvement, Ofsted highlighted the need for improvement in areas like the use of multi-agency information when responding to safeguarding concerns and the quality of record-keeping. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.

Building site in Cleckheaton to be tested after asbestos fears
Building site in Cleckheaton to be tested after asbestos fears

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Building site in Cleckheaton to be tested after asbestos fears

A council has promised to undertake extra air quality tests at a building site after residents raised concerns about asbestos dust found in their homes. Kirklees Council told residents there would be additional independent testing undertaken at the development off Westgate in Cleckheaton, starting this week, at a public meeting attended by council officials on 6 August. The developer, Strata Homes, said the work was being carried out safely and in line with the council assured residents it would also make more effort to ensure all the conditions to control dust and manage contaminated land were being followed. The site covers around 6.5 hectares and is due to deliver 180 new houses by previously contained industrial units, including works that involved asbestos. There are therefore strict rules about how the developer manages the site and any emissions their work residents are crowdfunding in order to pursue legal action and have called for the construction to stop until independent testing and a review of safety measures is undertaken. One resident said living nearby was "like living in a dystopian nightmare".A spokesperson for Kirklees Council said: "We understand how concerned residents are about asbestos at the site. Like many building sites in Kirklees, and across the country, there are hazardous chemicals in the ground that need to be managed carefully. "That's why we've ordered these extra tests to respond to what residents have seen and address their understandable worries."We will carry out this thorough testing as quickly as we can and report the results back to residents before deciding what, if any, further action is needed. In the meantime, we will continue to monitor the site closely."Since the start of the work, some residents have sent samples of the dust collecting in their homes to be analysed by asbestos specialist, Local Democracy Reporting Service said resulting documents from June and July of this year concerning five properties in the area confirmed there was amosite, known as brown asbestos, present in the dust in two samples, and chrysotile, known as white asbestos, in three of the samples were taken from gardens and one from an inside housing provider Thirteen Group, which has taken on the site, said work was being carried out in a "phased and controlled" manner and in "full compliance" with national regulations. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store