Termination of Tomato Trade Agreement Disrupts U.S. Supply Chain, Raises Supply Availability and Food Security Concerns
'This isn't just about trade. It's about food security, safety, and affordability for millions of Americans.' -- NatureSweet
Nearly 70% of the fresh tomatoes consumed in the U.S. are imported from Mexico, especially during the winter months when domestic production is limited. The sudden imposition of duties will create serious disruptions in supply, particularly for key varieties like grape and cherry tomatoes, which are largely grown in Mexico. This decision will mean fewer options, less availability, and higher prices in the produce aisle for both consumers and retailers.
'As a vertically integrated greenhouse grower, NatureSweet manages every step of the process—from growing and harvesting to packaging and distribution—which gives us the ability to absorb some of the cost shocks and all of the additional administrative burden,' says Rodolfo Spielmann, President and CEO of NatureSweet. 'But we operate in a thin-margin industry in which our model is unique, and most growers and distributors are separate. Many smaller growers might not have this flexibility, and this new burden will push some to the brink.'
The ripple effects of these pressures are more than just economics. Food safety and product quality are also at risk as reduced supply may force less-resourced growers to cut corners or leave the market entirely. Increased reliance on open-field operations, which are harder to monitor and more vulnerable to contamination could further elevate food safety risks.
For nearly 30 years, the TSA has provided a framework that protects Florida growers while supporting a diverse and resilient tomato market across North America. NatureSweet urges all stakeholders to return to the table and negotiate a new agreement that preserves consumer access to safe, high-quality, and affordable tomatoes.
'Our tomatoes are grown year-round in greenhouses and ripened naturally on the vine—unlike many field-grown Florida tomatoes, which are picked green and artificially ripened with gas,' said Skip Hulett, Chief Legal Officer of NatureSweet. 'That's why we're the #1 branded tomato in the U.S. Consumers trust us for consistent flavor, quality, safety, and integrity —and we're committed to maintaining those standards.'
NatureSweet will continue to do everything possible to minimize price impacts and safeguard quality, but the company is calling for a collaborative, long-term solution that benefits growers, retailers, and consumers alike.
Hulett adds 'Let's not turn a trade dispute into a food crisis. Let's fix this—before the damage becomes permanent.'
About NatureSweet® (NS Brands, Ltd.)
NatureSweet® is the leading brand in snacking tomatoes and a trusted provider for greenhouse-grown vegetables. As the largest vertically integrated controlled environment agriculture company and greenhouse grower in North America, it operates on more than 1,500 acres of greenhouse space, growing premium tomatoes, cucumbers, and sweet peppers. The company's team of nearly 10,000 associates ensures every product is handpicked at peak freshness, delivering exceptional quality and flavor to supermarkets across the U.S., Mexico, and Canada. Its mission is to transform the lives of agricultural workers in North America through a profitable business model that encourages other companies to replicate it. With a commitment to sustainability and social responsibility, NatureSweet has earned B Corp, Fair Trade, and Equitable Food Initiative (EFI) certifications.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
Youth sports business model hurts kids. New poll shows parents are fed up.
Parents want a youth sports system that prioritizes childhood development, family balance and accessibility. From the WNBA All-Star Game to the British Open Championship, sports fans had ample opportunities to see elite athletes in action this past weekend. Many of those watching are children with dreams of their own athletic success. Youth sports is a $40 billion a year industry with tens of millions of American kids participating in baseball, basketball, football, golf, soccer and other athletic competitions. Emphasis on the word 'industry.' There is much more to the competitiveness than participation alone. In recent years, youth sports have attracted unprecedented investments from private equity giants, family foundations and other entities, whether it means buying a baseball camp or building a flag football field. Youth sports have become a big business Sky-high investments are creating entire youth leagues from scratch, attracting boys and girls as a rite of passage. This is not our parents' youth sports system, where local offshoots of Little League Baseball and Pop Warner reigned supreme. It is an entirely new ecosystem, bringing big bucks and forcing many families to pay up. Where kids see a (slim) chance to turn pro one day, there is also (cautious) optimism about a return on investment via college scholarships or name, image and likeness checks. But the investment itself is not cheap. The average U.S. sports family spends more than $1,000 on a child's primary sport − a 46% increase since 2019. Then there are the second and third sports − more scratches on the lottery ticket. For growing numbers of parents and kids, the feeling is stress, stress and more stress. According to new research from The Harris Poll, conducted for USA TODAY, parents overwhelmingly want youth sports to promote balance, character and inclusion. Instead, they're navigating a high-pressure, high-cost system that serves a select few, at the expense of kids who are thrust into high-stakes situations at a young age. The numbers don't lie. Nearly two-thirds (63%) of parents say their child's sports team travels more than necessary − a burden that hits time-strapped, lower-income families especially hard. Almost 8 in 10 parents support reducing travel, while 72% want a model with fewer games and more practice. A similar percentage (73%) say youth sports have lost sight of their original purpose: Fostering fun and teaching teamwork. Parents are not delusional. Only 8% of parents claim that the goal of youth sports should be a college scholarship, while just 12% say it means preparing for a pro career. Nearly 9 in 10 parents (89%) believe that it is important for their child to enjoy playing sports. And yet, the youth sports ecosystem − now driven by private equity − often behaves as if celebrity status and monetary gain are the primary goals. Just ask parents, 61% of whom believe that youth sports organizations prioritize profit over purpose. Even more (63%) feel that sports-related costs and time demands undermine the spirit of play. While most parents are realistic about their kids' long-term prospects in sports, they will continue to make sacrifices for them to participate − from missing work to skipping family vacations. What they need in return is a youth sports ecosystem that better suits their time and budget constraints. Youth sports puts strains on family life The ever-growing commercialization of the early specialization in sports has a wide range of consequences, including academic strain and stress on the family unit. Our need to 'keep up with the Joneses' can be a challenge for entire communities navigating a high-stakes environment, as yet another mega-sports complex pops up down the road. For the sake of kids, parents are calling for a reset. They don't want to see a broken youth sports system. What they want is an ecosystem that prioritizes childhood development, family balance and accessibility at a time when finances are already pulled in too many directions. The status quo is serving a select few who could one day become WNBA All-Stars or major championship winners in golf. But what about the rest of America's sports families? The system may not be broken for the few, but it's looking more and more so for most. Will Johnson serves as CEO at The Harris Poll.
Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
F-35 Myths Debunked as Foreign Faith in US Fighter Jet is Tested
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. U.S. President Donald Trump's triumphant strides back into the White House put NATO's European countries, as well as Canada, on edge. His historic skepticism about the alliance was one thing, but military planners in countries buying U.S. hardware began questioning whether the F-35—the world's most expensive weapons program—had been the right choice. The Lockheed Martin-made F-35 is the only real option for Western militaries outside the U.S. to get hold of a fifth-generation stealth fighter aircraft, and many of the 20 nations operating or buying them are NATO members. Fifth-generation planes are the most advanced currently in operation, with sixth-generation aircraft in the early development stages. As Trump settled back into the Oval Office, rumors of a "kill switch" started floating around in defense circles. There was—according to the whispers—effectively a button the U.S. could press to control the aircraft bought and operated by recipient countries. Although the Pentagon and analysts quickly tamped down on such talk, when paired with the Trump administration's at times abrasive and unpredictable approach to foreign policy, it made many think twice about just how wise it was to put all the fifth-generation eggs in the F-35 basket. A F-35B Lightning II fighter. The American-made F-35 Joint Strike Fighter has become arguably the most coveted fighter jet across the globe. A F-35B Lightning II fighter. The American-made F-35 Joint Strike Fighter has become arguably the most coveted fighter jet across the globe. Chris Hanoch/Lockheed Martin Corporation For now, after months of uncertainty for many U.S. allies, the worries seem to have cooled—at least for now. The U.K. announced at NATO's biggest summit of the year in June that it was buying at least 12 F-35A fighter jets, adding to the F-35B variants it already has. This means the country's Royal Air Force could join NATO's dual capable aircraft fleet, featuring jets certified to carry American tactical nuclear weapons as well as conventional bombs and missiles. The same month, Israel showed what the F-35 can do in combat when it began its campaign against Iran's nuclear sites and scientists. Israel's F-35s were vital in slicing away air defenses and clearing a path into Iranian territory for the rest of its aircraft—and, later, for U.S. forces—to target Tehran's most sensitive sites. But while panic has abated around U.S. trustworthiness as an ally to F-35 countries, the hard look at many nations' dependence on the U.S. shouldn't be cast away so soon, according to some. "The concept of a kill switch has been debunked, but there will always be concerns of over-reliance on a single supply source," retired Air Marshal Greg Bagwell, a former senior commander in the U.K.'s RAF, told Newsweek. The Qualms While experts and officials were quick to downplay concerns over a kill switch as they surfaced in early 2025, they conceded that the U.S. could have a very noticeable impact on how well these expensive aircraft operate, should it choose to influence software upgrades or halt access to intelligence and mission data. NATO has observed the U.S. cutting off its vital military aid deliveries to Ukraine several times and also choke Kyiv's access to American-derived intelligence in a bid to bend Ukraine to its will, namely to join ceasefire talks. Ukraine, U.S. allies could see, was backed into a corner by its dependence on the U.S. "If an F-35 user wanted to use the jets in a way that the United States was not happy with, then that would be a limited capability, because Lockheed Martin would be very soon able to turn off the support tap to the particular nation in question," Andrew Curtis, a retired RAF air commodore, told Newsweek. "So even though there might not necessarily be an actual 'kill switch,' the United States definitely has the capability to make things very difficult for F-35 users." A European official from one of the Baltic states, which stare down Russia directly, said in May there was growing concern that the U.S. could curtail sovereign decision-making for military operations should Russia invade and the eastern flank need to defend itself. The memory of how the U.S. treated Ukraine is still fresh, the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told Newsweek. The person was referring to all military supplies but indicated a broader worry about the rapprochement with Russia that Trump pursued from the start of his second term. More recently, the president has become more publicly frustrated with Russia as ceasefire negotiations made little headway. "If I were sitting in the Baltics at the moment, I would be thinking very seriously about the F-35 and the constraints that might be put on me" in the long term, Sir Christopher Coville, a retired U.K. air marshal, told Newsweek. A central European official involved with defense planning told Newsweek earlier this year that the countries operating F-35s in Europe had reassured one another their commitment to the fifth-generation stealth fighters was "ironclad." Dutch defense minister Ruben Brekelmans said in March it was in the "interest of all" for the F-35 to succeed. "I don't see any signs of the United States backtracking," Brekelmans added. Munitions are loaded on to an F-35A Lightning II during a 'hot' integrated combat turn on June 11, 2025, at Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla. Munitions are loaded on to an F-35A Lightning II during a 'hot' integrated combat turn on June 11, 2025, at Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla. Airman 1st Class Amanda Alvarez/U.S. Air Force The Pentagon had not signaled any intention that the U.S. would restrict use of partner nations' F-35s, the central European official said at the time. To do so would undermine U.S. defense exports across the world, they said, but added Europe's efforts to increase spending and production will gradually sideline all U.S. military imports. The Political Moves Adjusting to hostile messaging from the White House and a trade war at the start of the year, Canada put its planned procurement of 88 F-35 fighter jets under review. Portugal's outgoing government said in March that Lisbon needed to consider the new "geopolitical environment" when considering a recommendation to purchase F-35s, which cost roughly $100 million apiece. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said in June the review would be wrapped up by the end of the summer, and that Ottawa had discussed fighter jet and submarine purchases with NATO allies. Trump has repeatedly called Canada the "51st state," a label slapped away by Ottawa. But the hint that the administration could annex Canada has lingered, albeit as an unlikely prospect. Retired Lieutenant General Yvan Blondin, commander of the Royal Canadian Air Force from 2012 until 2015, has advocated for a long, hard look at Canada's F-35 order. It is worth examining whether fourth-generation alternatives could work, he told Newsweek, but said "there's no better military option" than the U.S. stealth jet. Sixth-Generation Fighters Several different sixth-generation programs are in the works, piecing together manned fighter jets designed to be even harder to detect than their predecessors. Expected to come into service from the mid-2030s, they are also more automated and kitted out with more advanced avionics and weapons. The U.K., Italy and Japan have banded together on a sixth-generation fighter program called the Global Combat Air Programme—an industrial partnership underwritten by government treaties. On July 17, British defense giant BAE Systems unveiled the demonstrator aircraft for GCAP, expected to be able to fly within the next three years, and testing technologies that will go into the jet, called Tempest. France, Germany and Spain are working on a Future Combat Air System project, or FCAS, although it is currently expected to produce a sixth generation jet up to 10 years after GCAP. And there was tension last month after France told Germany it wanted a workshare of 80 percent in the project. The U.S. has two main programs, one for the Air Force, one for the Navy. Trump unveiled the Air Force's F-47 at a March briefing. "We're confident that it massively overpowers the capabilities of any other nation," he said. The Pentagon hopes to prioritize F-47 development over the Navy's parallel program, F/A-XX. It believes pursuing two programs at once could slow down both, Bloomberg reported in June. But Trump, in the same briefing, said the version of the "most advanced, most capable, most lethal aircraft ever built" sold to allies would be "toned down" by 10 percent. It is widely accepted that the U.S. has blunted its cutting-edge technology before it is shipped abroad, experts and officials said. It was the overt acknowledgment of something that had for decades been expressed in private that threw allies and prospective buyers, said the central European official. "This is not a great selling point for the F-47," said Blondin. An F-35 is assembled at Lockheed Martin Fort Worth Texas. An F-35 is assembled at Lockheed Martin Fort Worth Texas. MSgt USMC ret Randy A. Crites/Lockheed Martin Corporation There is a "bigger incentive" now for European NATO members to be involved in European-led sixth-generation programs, the central European official previously told Newsweek. They said they expected more countries to want to have a look-in at the development of these aircraft, and particularly to have their domestic industry contribute to sixth-generation programs. There will certainly be more interest in the jets' development on the continent now than before Trump was reelected, said Gabrielius Landsbergis, who served as Lithuania's foreign minister until November 2024. "There will be an increased pressure on pan-European projects, that is for sure," Landsbergis told Newsweek.
Business Insider
18 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Diode Computers is designing circuit boards with AI. It just raised $11.4 million, led by Andreessen Horowitz.
Green, copper skeletons — sometimes no thicker than a piece of printer paper — are the literal core of today's electronics. The printed circuit boards, or PCBs, that power most devices on our planet, from smartphones to drones, can be slow and costly to produce, according to a startup hoping to automate the design and manufacturing process. Diode Computers, a startup that uses artificial intelligence to create custom PCB designs in code rather than mapping out designs in pictures, claims it can slash the time and manpower required to create boards for specific products — a timeframe the startup says used to take weeks to months, but may now happen in a matter of days. "The people that have the ability to generate circuit boards are retiring, and so now you have a very small set of people that can generate correct designs from experience — and a ton of people that would love to learn, but there's not enough manpower to actually teach them," Diode cofounder and CEO Davide Asnaghi told Business Insider. The startup raised $11.4 million in a Series A funding round led by Andreessen Horowitz, known as a16z, with participation from Caffeinated Capital, Box Group, and startup mentorship program Y Combinator. The round brings Diode's total funding to just over $14 million. Diode's cofounders, Davide Asnaghi and Lenny Khazan, were in the summer 2024 Y Combinator cohort. There, they came up with the idea to help companies generate circuit board designs from scratch using AI. Instead of designing PCBs using pictures or diagrams, Diode translates PCB layouts into code using open-sourced AI software the company created. The startup says the software makes it easier to spot mistakes on the circuit boards, quickly reconfigure them for specific products, and scale production. Diode uses OpenAI and Anthropic large language models, but it's also using reinforcement learning to train smaller models to spot circuit board design mistakes, Asnaghi said. Diode charges its customers for custom designing and manufacturing circuit boards. The startup outsources production to partners in California and on the East Coast, but Asnaghi's long-term goal is to become a "one-stop shop" that will design, manufacture, and deliver PCBs to clients: "Our eventual vision is that our customers should be able to push code to us in the same way that you deploy on AWS, and we will take that code and generate a physical product that gets shipped back to their assembler or their factory," he said. The startup is focused on working with robotics, medical device, and aerospace companies because "these three industries are very interested in manufacturing in the US," Asnaghi said. AI robotics startup Physical Intelligence and autonomous maritime startup Saronic are both Diode customers, the company said. Diode hopes to tap into Silicon Valley's renewed focus on scaling American manufacturing, particularly for aerospace and defense. Venture capitalists and founders building hard tech discussed this trend at the Reindustrialize Summit, a conference hosted in Detroit in July. "In terms of conflict and warfare, you need to be able to iterate on your hardware and electronic systems as quickly as you're iterating on your design," Erin Price-Wright, a partner with A16z's American Dynamism practice — which invests in aerospace, defense tech, public safety, and other national security startups — told BI. "Instead of designing one PCB board that's going to be in an airplane for the 50-year lifetime of an airplane, you're thinking about having to redesign a new electronic stack every couple of months of a drone being deployed onto a battlefield." The PCB design market is pretty crowded. Cadence Design Systems and Altium both make PCB design software. And Quilter, another startup that makes AI-powered PCB design software, raised a $10 million Series A led by venture firm Benchmark in February 2024. Before launching Diode, Asnaghi designed custom silicon chips at Chromatic, a stealth hard-tech startup. There, he experienced what he now sees as a recurring holdup in electrical engineering: PCB design errors that stalled production. "It was insane to me that you had this wonderful complex device, which is the custom silicon, and then the simpler node created unforeseen delays for no reason," he said. Asnaghi also previously worked as an embedded software engineer at Apple and Butterfly Network, a medical imaging company. He earned his master's in engineering at Berkeley and studied engineering in college in Italy and at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, where he was an exchange student. His interest in electrical engineering, he told BI, stems from meeting the founder of the open source electronics platform Arduino. "Electronics is the most magical of the engineering disciplines," he said. "You can take software, which is somewhat ethereal, and make it do things in the real world." Asnaghi met Diode cofounder and chief technology officer Lenny Khazan at Butterfly Network, where Khazan was an intern. He previously worked as a software engineer at Chromatic and Instabase, an AI data company. "We are seeing a rise in the importance of physical products," Asnaghi said. "There's more need for infrastructure — data centers, power generation, all of these things rely on prepared circuit boards on some level. Virtually any product that has some electronics in it will have a circuit board."
