After US action on political debanking, #RacistBanksMustFall calls for reform in South Africa
Image: Ayanda Mdluli
The #RacistBanksMustFall movement in South Africa has called for immediate legislative intervention in the wake of a US executive order designed to prevent banks from closing accounts based on political or religious beliefs.
The Trump administration's executive order, expected to be signed this week, aims to tackle the controversial practice of debanking, where financial institutions deny services to individuals or businesses based on political affiliation.
The order directs federal banking regulators to remove vague "reputational risk" guidelines that have often been used to justify account closures, particularly targeting conservative and crypto industry figures in the US.
Reuters reported Trump as saying he believes that banks, including JPMorgan and Bank of America discriminate against him and his supporters.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
In South Africa, banks, including major institutions like Nedbank, have come under fire for selectively closing accounts under the guise of "reputational risk".
Nedbank's 2023 annual report revealed that it had closed accounts for nearly 200 individuals and businesses, a practice that critics argue is politically motivated and disproportionately targets dissenting voices.
Among the most high-profile cases is that of Sekunjalo Group, which has fought against the closure of its bank accounts, claiming that the action is part of an ongoing effort to silence politically inconvenient businesses and individuals.
Campaign leader of #RacistBanksMustFall, Crown Prince Adil Nchabeleng, said: "South African banks have been selectively racist and are using the banking institution to target and silence political dissents."
He pointed to the case of Dr Iqbal Survé, prominent businessman and media mogul, whose companies have faced repeated account closures by South African banks, claiming they were seen as a "reputational risk" due to Survé's political views and media influence.
According to the current regulatory frameworks, banks are obliged to notify customers and provide them with the opportunity to make representations before terminating their accounts.
In South Africa, the Supreme Court of Appeal in Bredenkamp v Standard Bank set the standard for the unilateral termination of the bank-customer relationship on the grounds of reputational risks.
The judgement sets out several principles South African banks have relied on when terminating relationships with their customers.
Over the years these principles have been challenged in courts, where customers have instituted legal proceedings to prohibit banks from closing their accounts, requiring banks to keep accounts open against the banks' wishes.
Cosatu Parliamentary Coordinator, Matthew Parks said, 'The rights of banking consumers in South Africa is guided by the Financial Intelligence Centre Act. It is critical that such legislation is clear with regards to consumers' rights and banks' obligations."
The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) is moving forward with the Conduct of Financial Institutions (COFI) Bill, which aims to provide a fair process for bank account closures, following a series of delays.
Cape Argus
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
23 minutes ago
- IOL News
Gauteng department faces scrutiny over R8. 4 million contracts to questionable 'military veterans'
Gauteng's Department of Sports, Arts, Culture, and Recreation faces criticism for awarding contracts to companies falsely claiming veteran ownership, raising serious concerns about misuse of public funds. The Gauteng Department of Sports, Arts, Culture, and Recreation (SACR) is slated after awarding over R8.4 million to companies claiming to be owned by 'military veterans,' despite records showing some directors were born in the 1990s. The Military Veterans Act of 2011 defines a military veteran as any South African citizen who falls into one of the following categories: Those who rendered military service to any of the military organisations involved on all sides of South Africa's liberation war from 1960 to 1994; Those who served in the Union Defence Force before 1961; and Those who became members of the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) after 1994 have completed their military training, no longer perform military duties, and have not been dishonourably discharged from the military. Following questions raised by the Democratic Alliance (DA) in the Gauteng Provincial Legislature (GPL), the party stated that Gauteng MEC for Sports, Arts, Culture, and Recreation, Matome Chiloane, confirmed that the department awarded contracts to 24 companies owned by military veterans over the past three financial years. Kingsol Chabalala, DA Gauteng Shadow MEC for Sports, Arts, Culture and Recreation, stated that the awarded companies have provided a range of services, including security at libraries such as Driezik and Kagiso, as well as managing events for wreath-laying ceremonies and celebrations for Human Rights and Heritage Day. He highlighted that the documents, in possession of The Star, exposed a troubling trend of false claims, pointing out that many companies on the list are directed by individuals born in the 1990s, which disqualifies them from being considered genuine military veterans. 'A closer inspection of the entities reveals a disturbing pattern of misrepresentation. Notably, several listed companies have directors who were born in the 1990s, making them far too young to be categorised as military veterans. For instance, the director of RE DLALA GAME TRADING, which received R459 156.46, was born in 1990; the director of Intellectditcom, backed with R147 700, was born in 1995; and the director of MATHABATSEME ENTERPRISE, which received R486 349.50, was born in 1996.' Chabalala further asserted that this represents a clear abuse of procurement processes to secure profitable contracts, exposing how certain individuals within the department are prepared to exploit veterans' legacy and public resources for personal benefit. He further stated that the DA will contact Chiloane to seek clarification on how this clear inconsistency was ignored or tolerated. 'The DA will write to MEC Chiloane, urging him to clarify how such a blatant discrepancy went unnoticed or permitted to persist under his watch. We will also demand that he conduct an urgent investigation into those responsible for awarding these contracts and ensure that they face appropriate consequences. This process must be carried out transparently and without bias,' Chabalala added. Responding to the concerns, Mxolisi Mkhonza, spokesperson for the Department of Military Veterans, explained that serving members of the SANDF qualify as military veterans once they leave the armed forces and are registered on the South African National Military Veterans Database. This includes individuals who have completed the Military Skills Development System (MSDS), which annually recruits citizens into the SANDF. Mkhonza also noted that the department is considering amending the registration process. 'Therefore, there will be no need for an investigation as these are legitimate military veterans according to the Act in its current state. The DMV is, however, looking to begin the process of amending the Military Veterans Act in order to circumvent such gaps, which are being exploited by certain individuals.' He added that the application and verification process for recognition as a military veteran involves several requirements, beginning with proof of having served or trained as a soldier, details of which are available on the DMV website. Once approved, individuals are listed on the South African National Military Veterans Database and issued a confirmation letter. This letter enables them to apply for various benefits outlined in Section 5 of the Act, provided they meet the qualifying criteria. Mkhonza explained that the DMV can not comment on other departments' procedures but works with them across government to deliver benefits. 'As a coordinating department, we work with various other government departments at all spheres of government in rolling out benefits. Each department may then have its criteria on how to go about issuing benefits to individuals specifically earmarked as military veterans. The DMV cannot speak on processes followed by other departments, such as the SACR.' The Star's attempts to get a comment from SACR were unsuccessful. We had not received a response by publication time. The Star
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Trump using Africa as ‘dumping ground' for convicts
A controversial Trump-era US deal to deport five convicted criminals to eSwatini has sparked outrage in the kingdom and fears that, once released, the offenders may cross into South Africa. Image: X Donald Trump and his US administration are facing significant criticism over what has been called a 'third country' scheme to send criminals to Africa. Activists, analysts, and human rights organisations are concerned about the security dangers that the deportation of hardened convicts could pose to Swaziland itself and the Southern Region. The mountainous Southern African kingdom borders South Africa and Mozambique. Without sharing their names, Washington, through its Department of Homeland Security assistant secretary, Tricia McLaughlin, last month confirmed the five convicted nationals were from Vietnam, Jamaica, Laos, Cuba and Yemen. Kelly Stone, Senior Consultant, Justice and Violence Prevention at the Institute for Security Studies, highlighted that these actions appear to be focused on identifying more authoritarian leadership styles and exploiting the desperation or instability of certain countries. She suggested that the primary security challenge lies in the potential destabilisation of Eswatini's national stability and its relationship with South Africa, rather than the immediate threat posed by the five individuals. Although Stone stated there is likely no legal recourse for South Africa as a third party regarding the deal between Eswatini and the US, she emphasised South Africa's obligation to closely monitor the security implications given its bordering relationship with Eswatini. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading She suggested that Trump's transactional approach to governance might be setting up African countries to compete for US favour, potentially disrupting regional relations through varied import tariff rates. What does Eswatini gain from accepting these criminals, noting the undisclosed nature of the deal? Stone confirmed that the terms are secret and assumed that, similar to El Salvador, the benefits could be financial and political, such as White House visits or endorsements for ruling parties. She stated that it is not a capacity issue, as the US has sufficient resources to incarcerate these individuals, but rather a fulfilment of a campaign promise by the Trump administration to expel violent foreign criminals. Stone suggested that Trump's actions are driven by a campaign promise to "make America great again" by removing foreign nationals convicted of crimes, as they believe that porous borders have led to such individuals being in the US, adding that Trump is not interested in international humanitarian law or US obligations under it. ''What we're seeing is that he's particularly targeting countries that have more authoritarian leadership. Rwanda has held up its hand and said it's willing to take 250 deportees. We know that the human rights abuses and repression in Rwanda are very well documented. He's not going to places like South Africa, Botswana, Kenya, that are much more robust in their human rights architecture.'' Wandile Dludlu, a pro-democracy activist and deputy president of Eswatini's largest opposition movement, the People's United Democratic Movement (PUDEMO), recently stated to Al Jazeera: 'The US government views us as a criminal dumpsite and undermines the Emaswati [the people of Eswatini].' Dludu criticised the release of convicted criminals as "distasteful and fraudulent behaviour by His Majesty and his government amid the unprecedented public healthcare crisis" in the country. PUDEMO is a banned organisation in Eswatini. On its X account, the government of Eswatini maintained: "As a responsible member of the global community, the Kingdom of Eswatini adheres to international agreements and diplomatic protocols regarding the repatriation of individuals, ensuring that due process and respect for human rights is (sic) followed." Political analyst, Anda Mbikwana, also weighed in on the matter, saying it represents a troubling law in immigration policy that exposes both strategic shortsightedness and moral contradictions. ''This 'third-country' deportation" programme sends individuals from various countries to cash-strapped African nations, essentially paying them to warehouse criminals that America claims it cannot manage despite its vast resources and extensive prison system. The arrangement smacks of neocolonial exploitation, with wealthy America exporting its problems to impoverished Africa. ''The irony is particularly stark given America's simultaneous efforts to attract Africa's brightest minds. While actively recruiting the continent's doctors, engineers, and entrepreneurs — contributing to devastating brain drain — America now dumps its most problematic residents on African soil. This treats Africa as both a talent mine and a human waste repository. ''Beyond geopolitical implications lie serious human rights concerns. Reports indicate these individuals face solitary confinement for undetermined periods, conditions that international organisations classify as torture when prolonged. If America believes in rehabilitation and human dignity, shipping problems abroad while importing talent represents the ultimate rejection of these principles.'' Mbikwana added that this deportation policy creates dangerous precedents. ''The approach externalises costs while abandoning responsibility, undermining America's moral authority to criticise other nations' treatment of migrants. This is not confident superpower behaviour but a nation unwilling to face its challenges,'' he concluded. Refugee deportation has been an ongoing issue. According to Reuters, the UK had explored third-country deportation policies as part of its efforts to manage irregular migration and asylum claims. Under the previous Conservative government, the UK partnered with Rwanda in 2022, planning to relocate asylum seekers to Rwanda for processing. The UK committed £370 million ($497 million) in development funding over five years in exchange for this arrangement. In November 2023, the UK Supreme Court declared the plan invalid, citing violations of international human rights norms due to Rwanda's inadequate asylum system and concerns regarding human rights. Similarly, Israel had implemented a third-country deportation policy targeting African asylum seekers by sending them to countries like Rwanda and Uganda from 2013 to 2018. The Israeli government offered $3,500 per person to those who agreed to leave.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
South Africa Holds Hope for Review of US Import Tariffs After High-Level Call
Import tariffs by the United States could still be reconsidered, following direct communication between President Cyril Ramaphosa and US President Donald Trump. Image: Mandel NGAN / AFP The South African government remains optimistic that recently imposed import tariffs by the United States could still be reconsidered, following direct communication between President Cyril Ramaphosa and US President Donald Trump. In a phone call held on Wednesday, the two leaders discussed trade relations between the two countries, with a focus on the new tariffs that have raised concern among South African exporters. The conversation marks a significant diplomatic step as Pretoria seeks to protect local industries affected by the changes in US trade policy. While details of the discussion remain limited, government officials have confirmed that President Ramaphosa used the opportunity to raise concerns about the impact of the tariffs on South African businesses and jobs. According to sources familiar with the matter, Ramaphosa highlighted the long-standing partnership between the two nations and expressed hope that the tariffs could still be reviewed in a spirit of cooperation. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The tariffs in question have placed added pressure on several key sectors in South Africa, particularly agriculture and steel. Exporters of these goods have already reported increased costs and reduced competitiveness in the American market since the duties came into effect. Business leaders have warned that unless the situation changes, some companies may be forced to scale back operations or even cut jobs. In response, the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition has been engaging with its counterparts in Washington, hoping to find a resolution that will allow continued access to one of South Africa's most important trading partners. Officials say they are exploring all diplomatic and legal options available under international trade agreements. Minister of Trade Ebrahim Patel said the government remains committed to finding a way forward through dialogue. 'We believe that the relationship between South Africa and the United States has always been one of cooperation and mutual benefit. We are confident that, with continued engagement, we can address these recent trade developments in a way that supports both economies.' South Africa and the United States share a strong trade relationship under the African Growth and Opportunity Act, which gives eligible African countries preferential access to the US market. However, new tariff measures introduced by the Trump administration have threatened to disrupt that arrangement, especially for goods that are now facing additional duties upon entry into the US.
