T-Mobile ending DEI programs as it seeks US FCC approval for 2 deals
Wireless carrier
T-Mobile
US said on Wednesday it is ending its diversity, equity and inclusion programs, under pressure from the Trump administration as it seeks regulatory approval for two major deals.
T-Mobile said in a letter to
Federal Communications Commission
Chair Brendan Carr made public on Wednesday that the wireless company is ending its DEI-related policies "not just in name, but in substance."
T-Mobile said it will no longer have any individual roles or teams focused on DEI, is removing any references to DEI on its websites and has removed references to DEI from its employee training materials.
Carr said in a text message he was pleased with the changes. "This is another good step forward for equal opportunity, nondiscrimination and the public interest."
T-Mobile is awaiting
FCC
approval to buy almost all of regional carrier United States Cellular's wireless operations including customers, stores and 30% of its spectrum assets in a deal valued at $4.4 billion.
The FCC is also weighing a separate transaction in which T-Mobile would establish a joint venture with KKR to acquire internet service provider Metronet, which reaches more than 2 million homes and businesses in 17 states.
T-Mobile plans at closing to invest about $4.9 billion to acquire a 50% equity stake in the joint venture and 100% of Metronet's residential fiber retail operations and customers.
FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, a Democrat, criticized T-Mobile's action saying "in yet another cynical bid to win FCC regulatory approval, T-Mobile is making a mockery of its professed commitment to eliminating discrimination, promoting fairness, and amplifying underrepresented voices."
The FCC in May approved Verizon Communications' $20 billion deal to acquire fiber-optic internet providers Frontier Communications after the largest U.S. telecom company agreed to end its DEI program and after the FCC opened an investigation.
Carr, a Republican designated by Trump in January as chair, told Comcast in February he was opening a probe into the NBC News-parent company's promotion of DEI programs.
In January, Trump issued sweeping executive orders to dismantle U.S. government DEI programs, and pressured the private sector to join the initiative.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
22 minutes ago
- Economic Times
US Supreme Court clears way for Trump to gut Education Department
Synopsis The US Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to proceed with dismantling the Education Department. This reverses a lower court order. The move enables the administration to transfer functions to other agencies. Critics fear this will harm the department's ability to fulfill its duties. Supporters claim it returns power to the states. Legal challenges continue in lower courts. Reuters FILE PHOTO: The sun sets at the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S., November 29, 2021. The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for President Donald Trump's administration to resume dismantling the Department of Education, part of his bid to shrink the federal government's role in education in favor of more control by the states. In the latest high court win for Trump, the justices lifted a federal judge's order that had reinstated nearly 1,400 workers affected by mass layoffs at the department and blocked the administration from transferring key functions to other federal agencies. A legal challenge is continuing to play out in lower courts. The Supreme Court's action came in a brief, unsigned order. Its three liberal justices dissented. A group of 21 Democratic attorneys general, school districts and unions behind a pair of legal challenges had warned in court papers that Trump's shutdown efforts threatened to impair the department's ability to perform its core duties. Democracy Forward, a liberal legal group representing the school districts and unions, said the court's action "dealt a devastating blow to this nation's promise of public education for all children." "We will aggressively pursue every legal option as this case proceeds to ensure that all children in this country have access to the public education they deserve," said Skye Perryman, the group's president and CEO. Created by Congress in 1979, the Department of Education's main roles include administering college loans, tracking student achievement and enforcing civil rights in schools. It also provides federal funding for needy districts and to help students with disabilities. Federal law prohibits the department from controlling school operations, including curriculum, instruction and staffing. Authority over these decisions belongs to state and local governments, which provide more than 85% of public school funding. The department's Republican critics have portrayed the department as a symbol of bureaucratic waste, underlining the need for smaller federal government in favor of greater state power. In March, Trump sought to deliver on a campaign promise to conservatives by calling for the department's closure. "We're going to be returning education, very simply, back to the states where it belongs," Trump said on March 20 before signing an executive order to close the department to the "maximum extent" allowed by law. Trump said that certain "core necessities" would be preserved, including Pell grants to students from lower-income families and federal funding for disadvantaged students and children with special needs, though he said those functions would be redistributed to other agencies and departments. Trump in March directed that the department transfer its $1.6 trillion student loan portfolio to the Small Business Administration and its special education services to the Department of Health and Human Services. Although formally eliminating the department would require an act of Congress, the downsizing announced in March by Education Secretary Linda McMahon aimed to slash the department's staff to roughly half the size it was when Trump took office in January. McMahon called the court's action on Monday a "significant win for students and families." "The U.S. Department of Education will now deliver on its mandate to restore excellence in American education," McMahon wrote in a social media post. In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the Supreme Court's action had handed the president "the power to repeal statutes by firing all those necessary to carry them out." "Lifting the (lower court's block) will unleash untold harm, delaying or denying educational opportunities and leaving students to suffer from discrimination, sexual assault, and other civil rights violations without the federal resources Congress intended," wrote Sotomayor, who was joined by fellow liberal Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Boston-based U.S. District Judge Myong Joun, an appointee of Democratic former President Joe Biden, had concluded in a May 22 ruling that the mass firings would "likely cripple the department." He ordered the affected workers to be reinstated and also blocked the administration's plan to hand off department functions to other federal agencies. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on June 4 rejected the Trump administration's request to pause the injunction issued by the judge. The Justice Department in a court filing asking the Supreme Court to lift Joun's order, accused him of judicial overreach. The plaintiffs had warned that mass firings at the department could delay the disbursement of federal aid for low-income schools and students with special needs, prompting shortfalls that might require cutting programs or teaching staff. They also argued in court papers that Trump's shutdown effort would undermine efforts to curb discrimination in schools, analyze and disseminate critical data on student performance and assist college applicants seeking financial aid.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
32 minutes ago
- First Post
‘India, Pakistan were going to nuclear war in a week': Trump claims success in ‘settling' military conflicts
The US president has time and again staked a claim in ending hostilities between India and Pakistan after the former's Operation Sindoor that was launched in response to the Pahalgam terrorist attack, which killed 26 people read more US President Donald Trump has once again said that he negotiated a peace deal between India and Pakistan that ended the military conflict following the Pahalgam attack. His comments came during a meeting with Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte on Monday. Trump said, 'We've been very successful in settling wars. You have India and Pakistan. You have Rwanda and the Congo, that was going on for 30 years. India, by the way, Pakistan would have been a nuclear war within another week, the way that was going. That was going very badly, and we did that through trade.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD VIDEO | US President Donald Trump (@POTUS) on India and Pakistan military conflict says, "We've been very successful in settling wars. You have India and Pakistan. You have Rwanda and the Congo, that was going on for 30 years. India, by the way, Pakistan would have been a nuclear… — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) July 14, 2025 The US president has time and again staked a claim in ending hostilities between India and Pakistan after the former's Operation Sindoor that was launched in response to the Pahalgam terrorist attack, which killed 26 people. While New Delhi has repeatedly denied such claims, Islamabad has thanked Trump for his mediation. What has India said? Earlier this month, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar denied US role in mediation between the two neighbouring countries. In an interview with Newsweek, Jaishankar said, 'I can tell you that I was in the room when Vice President Vance spoke to Prime Minister Modi on the night of May 9, saying that the Pakistanis would launch a very massive assault on India…We did not accept certain things, and the Prime Minister was impervious to what the Pakistanis were threatening to do.' 'On the contrary, he (PM Modi) indicated that there would be a response from us,' he added. The next communication with Washington occurred the following morning, when the Foreign Minister spoke with the US Secretary of State. During the conversation, Marco Rubio conveyed that 'the Pakistanis were ready to talk,' Jaishankar added. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Later that afternoon, Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations, Major General Kashif Abdullah, directly contacted his Indian counterpart, Lieutenant General Rajiv Ghai, to request a ceasefire.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
India's long-term growth story intact, market outlook constructive: Sumit Bhatnagar
"In terms of sector preferences, we're increasingly positive on the consumption theme. We believe consumption is at an inflection point, driven by improvements in both rural and urban demand. Rural consumption is benefiting from a good monsoon so far, healthy reservoir levels, and higher MSPs. This should lead to a continued pickup in rural economic activity," says Sumit Bhatnagar , Fund Manager, LIC MF . by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Quote Undo At present, we consider India to be a safe haven amid global tariff uncertainty. But one thing is certain — Trump's tariff-related moves and the associated uncertainties are likely to continue growing. What is your short- and long-term perspective on the domestic markets? Sumit Bhatnagar: As far as global markets are concerned, we've been witnessing intermittent bouts of volatility, driven by both economic and geopolitical factors. Regarding Trump, this issue has been ongoing for the last two to three months. So, a large part of it is already priced in, barring some short-term surprises that may arise from his announcements related to countries like Mexico or Brazil. However, when it comes to India, the outlook remains positive. Domestically, we are constructive on Indian markets simply because we expect economic activity to pick up. Along with that, we anticipate a corresponding improvement in corporate earnings — supported by lower interest rates , ample liquidity, and valuations that are more or less in the fair zone, especially when looking at the broader indices. From a medium- to long-term perspective, India remains very well-positioned. So, you're strongly backing the India growth story. But having said that, I'd like to know about your sector-specific strategies. There's been a lot of rotation happening — so what's on your radar? Which sectors are the hits and misses for you? Sumit Bhatnagar: In terms of sector preferences, we're increasingly positive on the consumption theme. We believe consumption is at an inflection point, driven by improvements in both rural and urban demand. Rural consumption is benefiting from a good monsoon so far, healthy reservoir levels, and higher MSPs. This should lead to a continued pickup in rural economic activity. Live Events Additionally, tax cuts that have already been implemented are expected to play out over the next six to nine months. On top of that, regulatory rollbacks by the RBI for lending institutions, lower interest rates, and ample liquidity should also support consumption growth. Looking ahead, the upcoming pay commissions will be a key driver as well. The central pay commission is due next year, followed by state pay commissions the year after — together putting nearly ₹3 lakh crore into the hands of consumers. There is also talk of GST rationalisation in the FMCG space, which should provide an incremental benefit. All of this suggests that after five years of underperformance, FMCG may be at the start of a recovery. While this quarter's numbers may be muted, our outlook for the next two to three years is positive. Accordingly, we've increased our exposure to consumption in our portfolios. We've just seen the WPI numbers come in at -0.13%, which puts us in deflationary territory for wholesale prices. CPI, too, remains well below the 4% benchmark. In the current scenario — where crude is stable around $70 and the interest rate trajectory is relatively clear — which sectors do you see getting re-rated, and where do you expect de-rating? Sumit Bhatnagar: When it comes to re-rating, we are optimistic about sectors like cement and consumption. In cement, if pricing holds and demand picks up post-monsoon in the second half, we could see earnings improve. As discussed earlier, we also expect a significant pickup in consumption, both rural and urban, in the second half of the year. These two sectors — cement and consumption — are where we foresee meaningful re-rating going forward. On the other hand, sectors exposed to global dynamics, like IT and metals, could face de-rating. This would be driven by continued global uncertainty and economic weakness in key markets such as the US, China, and Japan — which are critical drivers of demand for commodities like metals. So, those would be the sectors where we see potential for de-rating.
