
Japan's Ishiba departs G7 with US trade deal and political future in doubt
KANANASKIS, Canada, June 18 (Reuters) - Japanese premier Shigeru Ishiba's bid to get U.S. President Donald Trump to relax tariffs imperiling his country's economy and his political future fell flat this week, underlining the gulf between the allies as more levies are set to kick in.
Ishiba traveled to the G7 summit in Canada hoping a direct appeal might get talks back on track after Japanese negotiators struggled to secure respite on a 25% tariff imposed on imported cars, according to two officials with knowledge of the matter.
While the sun beamed down as Ishiba and Trump reclined in lounge chairs in the foothills of the Canadian Rockies, Monday's brief encounter did little to alter the grim forecast for Japanese industry girding for broader 24% levies due on July 9.
The lack of progress could knock confidence in Ishiba's diplomacy just as he prepares to contest a dicey upper house election next month that some political analysts say could result in his ouster.
"Despite our persistent efforts to find common ground through serious discussions, yesterday's meeting with President Trump confirmed that we still have discrepancies in our understanding," Ishiba told reporters on Tuesday before his departure from Canada.
Trump earlier told reporters aboard Air Force One that "there was a chance of a deal" but appeared in little mood to cede ground. "Ultimately you have to understand we're just going to send a letter saying this is what you're going to pay otherwise you don't have to do business with us," he said.
The most pressing issue for Japan has been the impact of Trump's tariffs on its auto sector, which employs nearly one in 10 of the country's workers and accounts for a fifth of exports.
Japan's overall exports fell in May for the first time in eight months, piling pressure on its fragile economy, the world's fourth largest.
Toyota Motor Corp (7203.T), opens new tab, Japan's leading car company, has already flagged that tariffs have likely sliced off 180 billion yen ($1.2 billion) from its profit in April and May alone. Honda (7267.T), opens new tab has said it expects a 650 billion yen ($4.5 billion) hit to its earnings this year from tariffs in the U.S. and elsewhere, while Mazda Motor (7261.T), opens new tab declined to issue a full-year profit forecast, citing uncertainty due to tariffs.
Publicly, Ishiba's government has said it aims to win total exemption from Trump's auto tariffs, but behind the scenes its negotiators had been trying to convince Washington to knock them down to around 10%, the sources said, requesting anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter.
Trump's trade deal with Britain, where he agreed to allow a quota of cars to be subject to a lower 10% levy has provided somewhat of a template, although Japan is a far larger exporter of cars to the United States.
In exchange for relief on the autos sector, Tokyo had pledged to step up purchases of U.S. gas and other items to rebalance a trade deficit that has long irked Trump.
But just days before Ishiba was due to arrive in Kananaskis, Canada for the G7 summit, it became clear to Japan's negotiators that Washington was unwilling to budge, said one of the sources.
Ishiba likely miscalculated by raising expectation of an agreement with Trump, said Kenji Minemura, a senior researcher at the Canon Institute for Global Studies.
He will now have put a trade deal aside and focus on convincing Trump to extend the pause on the broader reciprocal levies, a senior lawmaker close to the premier said.
Otherwise, Ishiba faces the prospect of contesting elections next month with the full force of Trump's tariffs in effect. The combined tariffs could shave nearly 1% off Japan's gross domestic product, Mizuho Research & Technologies has estimated.
"The fact that nothing was agreed at the summit could raise doubts about the diplomatic skills of the Ishiba administration," said Hiroshi Shiratori, professor of contemporary political analysis at Hosei University.
His ruling coalition may struggle to hold on to its majority in the upper house vote, a repeat of the result in the more powerful lower house election in October, which could potentially trigger his ouster, political analysts say.
Even if the LDP limps on in minority rule, there is around a 70% chance the party would replace its leader, said Michael Cucek, a political science professor at Temple University in Tokyo.
"If they do have a significant loss then Ishiba has to go. You can't lose two elections in a row," he said.
Ishiba may get another chance to make progress with Trump later this month with the two leaders due to attend the two-day NATO summit in the Hague from June 24.
($1 = 145.2500 yen)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
US unemployment claims dipped to 245,000 last week, hovering at historically low levels
The number of Americans applying for unemployment benefits dipped to 245,000 last week, hovering at historically low levels, the Labor Department said Wednesday. U.S. jobless claims ticked down from 250,000 the week before Economists had forecast 250,000. The four-week average of claims, which smooths out week-to-week volatility, rose to 245,500, the highest since August 2023. The number of Americans collecting unemployment benefits the week of June 7 slid to 1.95 million. Weekly unemployment claim are a proxy for layoffs and mostly have stayed within a healthy band of 200,000 to 250,000 since the economy recovered from a brief but painful COVID-19 recession in 2020, which temporarily wiped out millions of jobs. In recent weeks, however, claims have stayed at the high end of range, adding to evidence that U.S. job market is decelerating after years of strong hiring. So far this year, employers are adding a decent but far from spectacular 124,000 jobs a month, down from an average 168,000 last year and an average of nearly 400,000 from 2021 through 2023. The slowdown is partly the drawn-out result of 11 interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve in 2022 and 2023. But Trump's aggressive and often-erratic trade policies — including 10% taxes on imports from almost every country on earth — are also weighing on the economy, paralyzing businesses and worrying consumers who fear they'll mean higher prices. The Fed, satisfied that an inflation was coming down, cut rates three times last year. But the central bank has turned cautious in 2025, worried that Trump's tariffs will rekindle inflationary pressures. The Fed is expected to leave rates unchanged as it wraps up a two-day meeting Wednesday.


Evening Standard
13 minutes ago
- Evening Standard
Starmer to chair Cobra meeting amid confusion over advice to Britons in Israel
The high-level meeting follows the Prime Minister's return from the G7 summit in Canada at which he and other world leaders reiterated their 'commitment to peace and stability' but stopped short of calling for a truce between Israel and Iran.


The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Tech taxes: the real cost of being missold ‘digital transformation'
Symphony Commerce is a Business Reporter client Big promises, broken systems, and hidden tech taxes of buying 'digital transformation' tools that didn't deliver? Here's your escape plan. You said yes to the pitch. The demo was slick. The sales deck promised transformation. But six months later, no one's using it – or worse, your teams are actively working around it. Sound familiar? You're not alone. A recent survey revealed that nearly 60 per cent of companies regret at least one software purchase made in the past 12 to 18 months. Over half reported significant financial setbacks due to these decisions, and two in five felt that a poor software choice reduced their competitiveness. But here's the kicker: you didn't make a bad decision. You were missold the dream. Under pressure to modernise and stay ahead, most leaders fall into the same trap: chasing software instead of strategy, features instead of fit. It's time we stopped beating ourselves up for making the wrong tech choices and started asking better questions. How it happens – again and again The mistake isn't in choosing the wrong tool. It's in being told a tool alone will change anything. Most tech regret follows the same pattern: a team identifies a pain point, finds a promising platform, gets excited by the promise of automation or AI or integration – and pulls the trigger. What doesn't happen? Deep alignment. Cross-functional planning. A cold, hard look at whether the tool fits the bigger picture. So, the new system is rolled out. Training is patchy. Internal champions aren't fully on board. The data doesn't sync quite right. Reports are harder to pull than expected. Before long, the platform becomes just another login in the stack – or worse, a barrier teams have to work around. It's no wonder. Leaders are making decisions under huge pressure. Pressure to innovate. To digitise. To not fall behind competitors. When transformation becomes a breathless race, it's easy to reach for the fastest-looking solution. But chasing transformation piecemeal – one app, one dashboard, one feature at a time – often creates more complexity than it actually solves. Disconnected tools lead to duplicated effort. Quick wins become long-term liabilities. And somewhere along the way, the whole organisation starts to feel… tired. Tired of workarounds. Tired of workaround tools for the workarounds. Tired of hearing 'we're transforming' while nothing really changes. And that costs. A lot. The (not so) hidden costs of poor tech decisions When technology investments falter, the consequences extend far beyond the initial financial outlay. A 2024 study by WalkMe revealed that companies lost an average of $104 million (around £77 million) to ineffective software adoption, inefficient workflows and failed IT initiatives. Moreover, a global study found that 58 per cent of business leaders report their companies use inaccurate data for significant decisions, and 65 per cent believe no one in their organisation fully understands the data collected or how to access it. These issues contribute to a broader problem: 70 per cent of digital transformation projects fail to meet their stated goals, leading to wasted resources and missed opportunities. As sociologist William Bruce Cameron once said, 'Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.' In the context of that (now somewhat ancient) buzzterm 'digital transformation', this underscores the importance of looking beyond the glittering prizes to the real jackpot: aligning technology investments with strategic objectives and ensuring that data quality and user adoption are prioritised. To make this actually happen, organisations should adopt a holistic approach to technology implementation, focusing on user engagement, data integrity and alignment with business goals. That's what is really meant by 'digital transformation'. So how do you get there? The real questions you need to ask before you buy When you're faced with a slick pitch, an exciting demo or a new 'must-have' feature, there's one question that should cut through the noise: Does this system actually fit our business? That doesn't mean: Does it integrate? Most tools claim they do. Does it look intuitive? That's what demos are built for. Does it solve the immediate pain point? Quick wins often lead to long-term complexity. The deeper (and often more painful) follow-up to consider is: will this support the way we price, fulfil, serve, and grow? Or will we need to bend our business to suit the tool? Because that's where things break. Most technology isn't built for your unique workflows. It's designed for generic use cases – the 'average' business, the 'standard' team. The more complex or cross-functional your business is, the faster those assumptions fall apart. The result? Teams build workarounds. Managers lose visibility. Data becomes siloed and incomplete. Innovation slows as every tweak becomes a risk. So before you buy, here's what you need to ask: Will this adapt to our processes - or demand we adapt to it? Will our teams use it naturally - or tolerate it reluctantly? Can it scale with our ambitions - or will it lock us in? The best platforms aren't the flashiest. They're the ones that quietly enable speed, alignment and growth – because they work with you, not against you. And that's born from communication. Genuine transformation partners do not offer one-size-fits all 'solutions'. They get to know your goals and blockers first. The resulting platform should be invisible and intelligent – stitched into every function, enabling your business to grow without dictating how it operates. If the provider you're looking at offers something 'bespoke' but doesn't tangibly show you how they'll supercharge both your front-end and back-end ambitions coherently, walk away. Fast. Transformation isn't about bolting on. It's about building outwards from a foundation that fits. The good news? There is a path through the transformation junkyard. And it starts by flipping the script: stop treating tech as a patch and start designing platforms as ecosystems. Stop chasing features and start solving problems Real transformation doesn't begin with the next big feature. It begins with a smarter foundation. Before you greenlight another piece of technology, take a step back and consider something that sounds obvious but rarely gets enough attention: What's the real problem we're trying to solve? Too often, businesses invest in new tools not because they're the right fit but because they're the most visible, the most hyped or the easiest to say yes to. The demo dazzles. The feature list checks out. A competitor just signed up. But here's the truth: real transformation isn't driven by features. It's driven by clarity. And clarity is hard. It means resisting the urge to act fast. It means challenging the biases that cloud big decisions – fear of missing out, loss aversion, the sunk cost of legacy tech. It means asking uncomfortable questions such as: Are we solving the root problem, or just soothing the symptoms? Will this new system simplify, or just add another layer of admin? Does it fit how we actually work, or how the vendor thinks we should? According to McKinsey, businesses with fragmented tech stacks are nearly three times more likely to miss their digital transformation goals. And Gartner reports that around half of new tech investments fail to deliver expected value, largely due to poor integration and misalignment with business needs. These aren't anomalies, they're the all-too-common crushing results of a business mindset problem. One where buying tech is seen as progress, and slowing down to ask why feels like falling behind. At Symphony Commerce, we help businesses shift that mindset. We start with strategy, not software. We look at how you price, sell, fulfil and grow and we build around your business logic, not force you to rewrite it. After all, the most powerful shift a business can make isn't technical, it's mental. It's the decision to stop reacting, start rebuilding and finally escape the tools that have been holding you back. Freedom from the tech tax starts with asking better questions. Avoid the tech tax: get your free Digital Commerce Decision Maker's Kit. Your no-nonsense pack to achieving true e-commerce freedom – tried and tested tools to help you escape tech sprawl, spot the real blockers and forge a better path with confidence