Iran warns war with Israel could resume at any time
'We must be prepared at every moment for confrontation; right now, we are not even in a ceasefire (agreement); we are in a cessation of hostilities,' said First Vice President Mohammad Reza Aref.
The fighting in June saw Israel bombard Iranian nuclear and military sites, as well as residential areas, killing more than 1,000 people, including senior commanders and nuclear scientists.
Iran retaliated with missile and drone strikes that killed dozens in Israel.
The United States announced a halt in fighting on June 24, two days after it joined the war by bombing Iranian nuclear facilities. But there was no agreement formalising the ceasefire, only an undeclared pause in hostilities.
On Sunday, Yahya Rahim Safavi, a military adviser to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, told Iranian media the country was 'preparing plans for the worst-case scenario'.
'We are not in a ceasefire now, we are in a war phase, it could break down at any time, there is no protocol, no regulations, no agreement between us and the Israelis, between us and the Americans,' he said in remarks carried by the Shargh daily.
'A ceasefire means ceasing attacks; that could change at any time,' he added.
Since then, Iranian officials have insisted the country is not seeking war but is ready for another confrontation.
Western powers accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons through its atomic programme, a charge Tehran strongly denies.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Trump rules out US troops for Ukraine
President Donald Trump on Tuesday ruled out sending US troops to back up any Ukraine peace deal but suggested air support instead, as European nations began hashing out security guarantees ahead of a potential Russia summit. In a flurry of diplomacy aimed at ending the war, Trump brought Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders to the White House on Monday, three days after his landmark encounter with Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska. But while Trump said Putin had agreed to meet Zelensky and accept some Western security guarantees for Ukraine, those promises have been met with extreme caution by Kyiv and Western capitals, and many details remain vague. Putin proposed holding the summit with Zelensky in Moscow, three sources familiar with the Trump call told AFP. One source said Zelensky immediately said no to meeting in the capital of his country's invader. Trump, long a fierce critic of the billions of dollars in US support to Ukraine since Russia invaded in 2022, said that European nations were "willing to put people on the ground" to secure any settlement. "France and Germany, a couple of them, UK, they want to have boots on the ground," Trump said in a Fox News interview. "We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably, if you talk about by air." Asked what assurances Trump had that US boots would not be on the ground, he replied: "Well, you have my assurance and I'm president." The White House later doubled down on Trump's statements -- but gave few new details on either the summit or the security guarantees. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Trump "has definitively stated US boots will not be on the ground in Ukraine" and that the use of US air power was "option and a possibility." Leavitt insisted that Putin had promised Trump he would meet Zelensky, and said top US officials were "coordinating" with Russia on a summit. Trump had dramatically interrupted his meeting with Zelensky and the Europeans at the White House on Monday to call the Russian leader. Allies have expressed doubts that Putin will go through with the meeting. The Europeans are however seizing on the possibility of a peace deal following the Trump talks. French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer brought together around 30 of Ukraine's allies known as the "Coalition of the Willing" for virtual consultations. Starmer told them coalition teams and US officials would meet in the coming days to "prepare for the deployment of a reassurance force if the hostilities ended," a Downing Street spokesperson said. The military chiefs of staff of all 32 nations in the NATO military alliance will meet by video Wednesday to discuss Ukraine, officials said. Russia has warned that any solution must also protect its own "security interests" and has ruled out Ukraine joining NATO. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov added that any meeting between the leaders "must be prepared very thoroughly." Lavrov's comments, and Putin's offer of Moscow as a summit venue, reinforced European fears that Russia was once again stalling.
Express Tribune
9 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Dispute resolution: China-led IOMed comes into being
On May 30, 2025, the international legal landscape experienced a quiet yet potentially transformative shift. The International Organization for Mediation (IOMed) was officially established through a signing ceremony held in Hong Kong, with representatives from 85 nations across Asia, Africa, Latin America and Europe participating in the event. During this ceremony, 33 countries, including Pakistan, signed the convention, thereby becoming founding signatory members. This insight examines the workings and objectives of IOMed to evaluate its geopolitical importance and the implications of this new forum for countries such as Pakistan. IOMed is the first intergovernmental organisation exclusively dedicated to the resolution of disputes through mediation. Currently, it concentrates on the peaceful resolution of three categories of disputes: state-to-state disputes; disputes between states and foreign investors; and commercial disagreements among and between parties. IOMed operates on principles such as respect for state sovereignty, equality, impartiality, non-interference in internal affairs, the rule of law and effectiveness. Its procedural process begins with the voluntary consent of all disputing parties — usually states, corporations or individuals involved in transnational conflicts. Once the parties agree to refer their dispute to IOMed, mediators are selected from two specialised panels: the State-to-State Mediation Panel, which comprises experts in diplomacy and international law for intergovernmental disputes; and the General Mediation Panel, comprising professionals skilled in commercial, investor-state and mixed disputes. The parties, in consultation with the Secretariat, appoint one or more neutral mediators from these panels. If a settlement is reached through mediation, it is formalised and finalised. If the parties agree to its terms and decide to give it legal effect within their jurisdictions, it then becomes binding. What truly distinguishes IOMed from other international dispute resolution organisations is its dedication to mediation as both a procedural and philosophical alternative to litigation and arbitration. Litigation, as practiced by institutions like the International Court of Justice (ICJ), is a formal judicial process that produces binding judgments through adjudication. Arbitration, employed by entities such as the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), involves arbitrators and decisions that are legally binding and enforceable in court. Both methods are adversarial, often involve complex legal procedures and are firmly rooted in Western legal traditions. Mediation, by contrast, operates on the principles of mutual consent, dialogue and non-binding outcomes. IOMed institutionalises this model at the intergovernmental level — an unprecedented move in global legal architecture. Instead of issuing enforceable verdicts, it helps facilitate negotiated settlements shaped by the parties themselves. This procedural difference reflects a more profound normative shift: IOMed's model values flexibility, cultural adaptation and voluntary resolution. Moreover, the creation of IOMed indicates a larger structural shift. Unlike the ICJ and PCA, which are based in The Hague and aligned with Euro-American legal standards, IOMed is located in Hong Kong and influenced by an ethos of multipolarism. Its strength is in its accessibility to states — especially from the Global South — that have long viewed existing mechanisms as expensive, unequal or culturally distant. The establishment of IOMed was led by China, representing a strategic move to strengthen the voice of the Global South within the international legal system. Its launch — occurring amid rising US-China tensions — highlights a larger goal of positioning China as a leader in a multipolar global order. Besides promoting dispute resolution, IOMed serves as a geopolitical tool for China to enhance its influence in global governance and support its interests in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Pakistan's foreign policy has long prioritised peaceful dispute resolution and international cooperation, making its role as a founding member of IOMed both logical and strategic. The organisation's core principles closely align with Pakistan's diplomatic stance, especially in multilateral settings. IOMed offers a potential platform for resolving longstanding disputes with India, particularly over the Indus Waters Treaty and Jammu and Kashmir, where dialogue has been stalled due to India's resistance to formal negotiations. In such situations, a non-binding, voluntary and non-coercive forum like IOMed could serve as a valuable space for dialogue. That said, the effectiveness of IOMed in such matters ultimately depends on India's willingness to become a signatory to the convention. Currently, IOMed remains in its early stages, with its institutional structures, credibility and global recognition still developing. Its influence is limited, as many major world powers have yet to sign the convention. Additionally, several countries involved in China-led initiatives, such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) and BRICS, have not become signatories. Given its early stage, it is perhaps premature to make definitive judgments about its impact and significance. Ultimately, its relevance will depend on its capacity to mediate a high-profile case with neutrality and transparency. If IOMed can demonstrate impartiality, particularly in light of China's leadership, it may gain the credibility necessary to become a significant player in resolving international disputes.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Iran warns war with Israel could resume at any time
TEHRAN: A senior Iranian official warned Monday that war with Israel could erupt at any moment, describing the current lull after June's 12-day conflict as only a temporary halt. 'We must be prepared at every moment for confrontation; right now, we are not even in a ceasefire (agreement); we are in a cessation of hostilities,' said First Vice President Mohammad Reza Aref. The fighting in June saw Israel bombard Iranian nuclear and military sites, as well as residential areas, killing more than 1,000 people, including senior commanders and nuclear scientists. Iran retaliated with missile and drone strikes that killed dozens in Israel. The United States announced a halt in fighting on June 24, two days after it joined the war by bombing Iranian nuclear facilities. But there was no agreement formalising the ceasefire, only an undeclared pause in hostilities. On Sunday, Yahya Rahim Safavi, a military adviser to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, told Iranian media the country was 'preparing plans for the worst-case scenario'. 'We are not in a ceasefire now, we are in a war phase, it could break down at any time, there is no protocol, no regulations, no agreement between us and the Israelis, between us and the Americans,' he said in remarks carried by the Shargh daily. 'A ceasefire means ceasing attacks; that could change at any time,' he added. Since then, Iranian officials have insisted the country is not seeking war but is ready for another confrontation. Western powers accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons through its atomic programme, a charge Tehran strongly denies.
