Tory leader Kemi Badenoch says Josef Fritzl case made her ‘reject God'
Mrs Badenoch said she was 'never that religious' while growing up but 'believed there was a God' and 'would have defined myself as a Christian apologist'.
But this changed in 2008 when she read reports that Fritzl had imprisoned and repeatedly raped his daughter, Elisabeth, in his basement over 24 years.
Mrs Badenoch, whose maternal grandfather was a Methodist minister, told the BBC: 'I couldn't stop reading this story. And I read her account, how she prayed every day to be rescued.
'And I thought, I was praying for all sorts of stupid things and I was getting my prayers answered. I was praying to have good grades, my hair should grow longer, and I would pray for the bus to come on time so I wouldn't miss something.
'It's like, why were those prayers answered and not this woman's prayers? And it just, it was like someone blew out a candle.'
But she insisted that while she had 'rejected God', she had not rejected Christianity and remained a 'cultural Christian', saying she wanted to 'protect certain things because I think the world that we have in the UK is very much built on many Christian values'.
During her interview, which is due to be broadcast on Thursday evening, Mrs Badenoch also said her tenure as Conservative leader was going 'well', adding her job was to 'make sure that people can see that we are the only party on the centre-right'.
In an apparent dig at Nigel Farage's Reform UK, she said: 'There are pretenders. We're the only party on the centre-right, and we're the only ones who still believe in values like living within our means, personal responsibility, making sure that the government is not getting involved in everything so it can focus on the things it needs to look at, like securing our borders.'
She went on to defend previous comments saying the fact she had worked at McDonald's made her working class, saying: 'I had to work to live.
'That, for me, is what being working class is. It's the lifestyle that you have. You have to work, to survive.'
And she argued that parents who were 'worried about their children getting stolen or snatched' had created a younger generation that lacked the 'resilience' to deal with problems in life.
Responding to figures suggesting a quarter of people aged 16-24 said they had a mental disorder, Mrs Badenoch said: 'I think they think they have a mental disorder, I don't think they all have a mental disorder.'
She added: 'I'm not a medical expert so it is not my expertise on exactly what we need to do to get them into work, but we should be trying to get them into work.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
10 minutes ago
- The Sun
Magistrate called Mr Bean has been ticked off for interrupting court to complain about a lack of parking
A MOANING magistrate called Mr Bean has been slapped on the wrist after interrupting a court to complain about the lack of parking. Alfred Bean JP of the Cheshire Bench, launched his gripe after he struggled to find a parking space outside court. But he was accused of doing so 'in a loud, rude and bullying manner'. His whingeing was similar to that of his namesake, hilarious TV character Mr Bean played by Rowan Atkinson, who always has issues parking his yellow Mini. Mr Justice Keehan heard two complaints were made by members of court staff about interactions they had with Mr Bean. 'One reported that Mr Bean had interrupted a court session to complain about the lack of parking in a loud, rude and bullying manner. 'The other described being subject to an aggressive rant by Mr Bean, in which he spoke over them in a raised voice. 'Both reported Mr Bean stating he would leave court if the issue occurred again in future,' the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office said. A spokesman for the office said Mr Bean had explained the stress caused by the parking situation, as well as his personal circumstances. He denied shouting or being aggressive but admitted his voice may have been slightly raised due to his stress and frustration. Mr Bean also maintained that he was unaware the court session had begun. The spokesman added: 'He expressed regret about his behaviour, which had fallen below his usual standards, and stated that he did not intend to be rude or disrespectful. Mr Bean's funniest moments - from getting his head stuck in a turkey to the laundry mix up 'He added that he had attempted to apologise soon after but was told not to contact the complainants. 'He highlighted his 12-year unblemished conduct record and ongoing commitment to his role as a magistrate.' A member of the North West Region Conduct Advisory Committee decided Mr Bean 'was not sufficiently circumspect in his conduct and should have remained calm and professional, despite his frustration.' The magistrate has been issued with formal advice for misconduct over his poor behaviour. 1
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Nice house? Labour wants to tax it, Kemi Badenoch tells Middle England
Kemi Badenoch warns today that Labour is plotting a tax raid on homes for the billions needed to fill the fiscal black hole. The Tory leader says Rachel Reeves saw property as a 'cash machine' to plug the gap in the public finances. The Chancellor is coming under pressure from both flanks of the Labour Party to bring in a 'wealth tax'. She must find £50billion in tax rises or spending cuts to balance the books, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) said last week. Writing in the Daily Mail, Mrs Badenoch warns that Labour could change council tax bands or introduce a tax on the value of land, adding: 'A home is more than bricks and mortar. It is the reward for years of hard work, saving and sacrifice. It is security for our families. And it should not be treated like a cash machine for the Chancellor.' She says a plan by Labour's Welsh government to target property wealth by revaluing homes and pushing them into higher council tax bands could be introduced in England. And she raised concerns Labour could adopt a suggestion in the NIESR report that the party should introduce a 'land value tax'. The respected think-tank said the Chancellor should consider reforming council tax or even replacing it altogether with a land value tax. This tax, once championed by the party under Jeremy Corbyn, would replace stamp duty and council tax by introducing a flat levy on the price of land. The idea was last seriously proposed by David Lloyd George in 1909, but fears that it could become a new poll tax have deterred successive governments. Ms Reeves is under pressure from the Left and Right of her party to reform property taxes as MPs warn that the current system is unfair. Blue Labour, an influential faction within the party that is economically Left wing but culturally conservative, wants an overhaul of taxation on homes. Earlier this year it urged the Chancellor to consider changing council tax rules so that poorer parts of the country were not hit unfairly, adding: 'Our tax system needs reform to reflect new realities, including that most value is tied up in land and assets rather than income. 'We should consider taxes on assets, and updating council tax bands to ensure it no longer disproportionately hits those in poorer parts of the country.' Mr Corbyn's new party is expected to call for a land value tax to replace council tax. Other supporters include Labour peer Dame Margaret Hodge, Tory chairman Kevin Hollinrake and the TaxPayers' Alliance. But a Treasury source had 'not heard' that such a tax might come in. Housing Secretary Angela Rayner is planning the biggest shake-up of local government funding in more than a decade to divert money from the South to more deprived areas. The Treasury said: 'The best way to strengthen public finances is growing the economy, which is our focus. Thanks to our planning reforms, the Office for Budget Responsibility has said the economy is expected to grow by the end of the decade.' During the general election Labour said it was not planning to reform council tax and ruled out rebanding properties.
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
£35bn! Chagos surrender deal 'will cost Britain ten times more than what the Prime Minister claimed'
The Chagos deal will cost ten times what Labour said it would – according to the Government's own figures, it was reported last night. Official documents are said to show the UK will pay some £35billion to hand the islands over to Mauritius – compared to the £3.4billion previously stated by Sir Keir Starmer. Dame Priti Patel, the Shadow Foreign Secretary, accused the Government of 'tricking' the public after the figures, seen by the Telegraph, were released under Freedom of Information laws. She told the newspaper: 'Instead of owning up to the costs, Labour have used an accountancy trick to claim the amount was only a mere £3.4billion. 'We've all known it's a terrible deal with huge costs to hard-pressed British taxpayers. But for months, ministers in public and Parliament have sought to cover up the true amounts.' Dame Priti is expected to demand a correction and apology over the 'cover-up' from the Prime Minister when MPs return from their summer break on September 1. She said the cost was almost double the entire annual policing budget or could pay for ten brand new aircraft carriers, 70 hospitals or a 5 per cent income tax cut. The deal for the British Indian Ocean Territory was branded a 'surrender' by the Conservatives, who have warned against giving up the islands which are also home to a US military base. Under the terms of the controversial agreement, the UK will cede sovereignty of the islands by the end of this year and then lease back the Diego Garcia base. Sir Keir previously claimed that this will cost £3.4billion over 99 years, but the Tories always argued it would be more like £30billion. The Prime Minister told Parliament that estimates it would cost between £9billion and £18billion were 'absolutely wide of the mark' and suggested they were too high. However, the official document, which was produced by the Government Actuary's Department, shows the cost of the deal was first estimated at £34.7billion. The document shows civil servants were first instructed to lower the cost on paper to £10billion, to account for an estimated annual inflation rate of 2.3 per cent over 99 years, the Telegraph reported. Foreign Office sources told the paper that ministers had used a 'standard' calculation for long-term government spending and denied accusations that it was part of a 'cover-up'. MPs have previously requested the document in Parliament, but ministers have refused to release it. A Government spokesman said: 'The Diego Garcia military base is essential to the security of the UK and our key allies, and to keeping British people safe. The average cost is £101million per year, and the net present value of payments is £3.4billion – this is less than 0.2 per cent of the annual defence budget. 'The deal is supported by our closest allies, including the US, Canada, Australia and Nato. 'The costs compare favourably with other international base agreements, and the UK-US base on Diego Garcia is larger, in a more strategic location and has unparalleled operational freedom.' Last night a government source said the £35billion figure was 'inaccurate and misleading'.
