Southeast Asian Foreign Ministers Meet as US Tariffs Loom
The threat of U.S. tariffs has jolted the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, a 10-member bloc that includes some of the world's most trade-dependent economies.
Six ASEAN members are among the 14 countries that could see duties on their exports to the U.S. skyrocket on Aug. 1.
Launching the Association of Southeast Asian Nations foreign ministers' meeting, Anwar said the world is now witnessing an era where 'power unsettles principle' and 'tools once used to generate growth are now wielded to pressure, isolate and contain.'
Without mentioning the U.S. by name, he again urged ASEAN to work together to respond to trade threats.
'Our cohesion must not end at declarations,' he said, calling for members to increase intra-ASEAN trade, invest in regional integration, and reduce strategic dependencies on external powers. 'This is no passing storm,' he said. 'It is the new weather of our time.'
Trump first announced tariffs in April, but then delayed them for 90 days to allow for deals. On Tuesday, he announced new tariff with rates of between 25%-40% on 14 countries, which will go into effect Aug. 1 unless new deals are struck. He also threatened to increase tariffs if any countries retaliate.
Many ASEAN members have launched bilateral talks with the U.S., but officials have said they plan to hold an ASEAN-U.S. summit later this year to seek a common position.
So far, only Vietnam has secured a deal, bringing down its tariffs from 46% to 20%.
The list threatens 36% tariffs for Thailand and Cambodia, 32% for Indonesia, 25% for Malaysia, and 40% for Laos and war-torn Myanmar.
In addition to confronting trade fallout, the bloc faces mounting internal challenges. The ongoing civil war in Myanmar and a border dispute between Thailand and Cambodia are also on the agenda.
The gathering in Malaysia will be immediately followed by a series of critical meetings with ASEAN's major trade partners, including the United States, China, Japan, Russia, India, and the European Union, scheduled for Thursday and Friday.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who last week cancelled trips to Japan and South Korea, will arrive Thursday for the talks on his first visit to Asia. Others visiting foreign ministers include China's Wang Yi and Sergei Lavrov of Russia.
Analysts said these talks will test ASEAN's ability to assert its voice amid escalating geopolitical tensions.
The bloc hopes to reinforce its commitment to a rules-based trade order while resisting pressure to align exclusively with any one global power.
'ASEAN must be among those who choose to stand for rules, even when others choose retreat,' Anwar said.
Analysts said Rubio's presence signaled renewed U.S. engagement in the region.
It will be a reminder to 'the region that Washington remains its most vital economic and security partner,' said Collins Chong Yew Keat, a foreign affairs, strategy and security analyst with Universiti Malay. But he said that U.S. support may now come with clearer expectations.
'Trump's administration, while still offering the strongest military deterrence and market access, expects ASEAN to stop exploiting this security umbrella while cozying up economically to China,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
6 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Rare Earths Are the Key to Winning the China-US Trade War
To accumulate industrial leverage over the U.S., China played the long game. The U.S. must do the same. Imagine the China-U.S. trade war as two opposing armies exchanging bursts of gunfire, one volley after another. Responding to China's unfair trade practices, the United States imposed tariffs on a broad range of Chinese exports. In turn, China restricted rare earth exports necessary for American automotive and defense manufacturing. The U.S. retaliated by freezing jet engine sales, technology that China can't find anywhere else. Then came a lull. In June, President Donald Trump announced that China would resume exports of rare earths, in return for the U.S. providing China with the student visas it wanted. Subsequently, the U.S. and China announced a formalized agreement to resume Chinese heavy rare earth exports, while the United States will resume jet engine, software, and ethanol exports. But this isn't a truce. It's only a ceasefire in a trade war that is likely to erupt again and again in the coming years. China left its growing infrastructure for export controls in place: rare earth export licenses require sensitive information disclosures and only last for six months. And once the trade war breaks out again, the United States may find that China has more ammunition than it does. To accumulate this much industrial leverage over the U.S., China played the long game. The U.S. should take this pause in the trade war to begin doing the same. As China grew to become an industrial superpower over the last three decades, it encouraged other manufacturing countries, particularly the U.S., to rely on it as the primary supplier for dozens of critical minerals. The dependence is even more stark in rare earths: China's export licensing regime caused U.S. imports of high-performance magnets to fall by 93 percent. This adds up to Chinese leverage in the short, medium, and long term. Right now, it can choose to cut off access to minerals and slow the pace of U.S. reindustrialization. The short-lived rare earth restrictions already forced a Ford plant to halt production, and the company, like many other carmakers, is scrambling to find a supply of magnets. In the coming months and years, this dynamic could force manufacturers to move American industry to China, if that remains the only way of accessing strategic materials. More than just slowing reindustrialization, China's export controls could cause further deindustrialization in the U.S. Over the long term, China's intent is clear: keep the rest of the world hooked on Chinese raw materials. As long as the United States' most essential commercial and military products rely on Chinese strategic materials, the U.S provides Beijing with an informal veto over American foreign and domestic policy. Absent U.S. action, this dynamic won't change. The U.S. can't afford to sit by while China begins to exert the leverage that it has built up over the last few decades. The U.S. response should similarly be framed over short-, medium-, and long-term goals. The United States' immediate need is to retain access to strategic materials from China and keep the manufacturing base alive. This is why Trump's agreement with China was so important: the U.S. can't reindustrialize without using Chinese raw materials in the near term. But now with temporary access, the medium-term goal must be developing alternative supply chains to meet the United States' military and commercial industrial needs. Time is an imperative: the search for a perfect set of critical policies induces a costly paralysis. Policymakers need to acknowledge trade-offs. In some cases, this means trying out a range of programs, some of which will ultimately fail. Now that the Senate has passed Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill, there's a wide-open space for consequential policies. Undoing the theory that developing the electric vehicle supply chain would boost critical mineral resilience, the bill repeals EV subsidies and sunsets provisions of the advanced manufacturing tax credit. But the bill leaves the door open to new investment by allocating billions for critical mineral and industrial base financing. That funding needs to flow to effective programs. The United States' long-term goal should be independence – not from the rest of the world, just from China. On some level, the American people recognize this. Between 1990 and 2020, the American public went from thinking of China as a Japan-type competitor to a Soviet Union-like threat. But over that period, the scale and character of U.S. trade with China remained much closer to that of Japan than the Soviets. A fundamental readjustment of the United States' trade patterns with China isn't just necessary, it's long overdue. To that end, the United States should play both defense and offense in trade. Defensive measures insulate the U.S. from the Chinese supply shocks and unfair trade practices that contribute to the forcible deindustrialization of the American heartland. Offensive strategies would increase the number of technologies that China relies on the U.S. for, gradually rebalancing leverage away from Beijing. The Department of Defense's recent investment in MP Materials, a U.S. rare earth producer, offers a roadmap for the future. The terms of the deal include $400 million equity investment from DOD, more than $1 billion in public-government loans to construct new processing facilities, and establishing a price floor for MP's rare earth output. In the intervening days, Apple and MP announced a $500 million commitment to purchase magnets and develop a recycling plant in Texas. With DOD and other government agencies leading the way in investment, offtake agreements, and permitting, U.S. firms will help adjust the supply and demand constraints necessary for developing a fully integrated domestic supply chain. While the specifics will vary from mineral to mineral, deals like these will be the way forward. But if the U.S. does nothing to shift this balance of power, China will always be able to use the leverage that it built up over the past few decades. China could use access to raw materials to stop us from imposing further restrictions on advanced technologies, or even force the U.S. to loosen advanced technology transfer restrictions. The United States would be able to do little about it. In gray-zone economic warfare, trade leverage becomes its own kind of armament. The United States should arm itself aggressively to pursue strategies that take ammunition away from the Chinese. When that next round of trade war sniping breaks out, the U.S. will want more firepower than it has now.
The Diplomat
10 hours ago
- The Diplomat
US Solar Manufacturers Seek New Tariffs on Imports From India, Southeast Asia
Previous tariffs have prompted Chinese manufacturers to shift their operations to Indonesia and Laos, while low-cost Indian solar imports are also on the rise. A group of American solar panel manufacturers has asked the U.S. Commerce Department to impose tariffs on solar imports from Indonesia, Laos, and India, a month after Washington imposed hefty tariffs on solar products from four Southeast Asian nations. According to Reuters, the complaint was filed by the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee, a group representing several major solar equipment producers, including South Korea's Hanwha Qcells USA Inc. and the U.S. firm First Solar Inc. The complaint requests investigations into 'illegal trade practices by largely Chinese-owned manufacturers operating in Laos and Indonesia, as well as companies headquartered in India,' according to a statement from the Alliance. It accuses companies based in three nations of receiving unfair government subsidies and of selling their products below the cost of production in the United States, which threatens to undercut U.S. producers. 'We have always said, vigorous enforcement of our trade laws is critical to the success of this industry,' Tim Brightbill, the lead attorney for the Alliance, said in the statement. As PV magazine noted, the new cases 'extend a marathon struggle begun in 2011 that has focused on imports from Chinese companies. As they have relocated factory assets ahead of tariffs resulting from the cases, the domestic industry has refocused on litigation against imports from new country targets.' In May, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) ruled in the Alliance's favor in two similar complaints regarding solar imports from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. In its ruling, the Commission determined that the U.S. solar industry had been 'materially injured by reason of imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules,' from the four nations. The Commerce Department subsequently imposed a series of varied tariffs on solar products from the four countries, which reached as high as 3,500 percent in the case of some solar panels and components from Cambodia. The tariffs came into effect on June 16. However, as with previous rulings, this action merely prompted agile solar manufacturers to relocate their operations to nations not yet subject to U.S. tariffs. Trade data showed a sharp decline in U.S. solar imports from Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Thailand after the initiation of the complaint in April 2024. Meanwhile, even before the latest batch of complaints had been concluded, 'the same Chinese-backed companies wasted no time shifting operations to Laos and Indonesia, and companies in India joined in to continue undercutting American producers,' Brightbill said in the statement. 'We have always said vigorous enforcement of our trade laws is critical to the success of this industry.' The Alliance cited figures showing that solar imports from the three nations combined were $1.6 billion last year, up from just $289 million in 2022. However, the Alliance's campaign against cheap imports has not been universally supported. Opponents, including the Solar Energy Industries Association, which testified to the USITC against the petitioners in its last case involving imports from Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand, and Malaysia, said that the May decision was 'concerning for American solar manufacturers' and would harm 'solar module producers that depend on access to imported solar cells.' This is especially the case given the broader policy orientation of the Trump administration, which, in an executive order signed by President Donald Trump on July 7, announced that it was tightening up on access to federal solar and wind credits. 'For too long, the Federal Government has forced American taxpayers to subsidize expensive and unreliable energy sources like wind and solar,' the order stated. 'Ending the massive cost of taxpayer handouts to unreliable energy sources is vital to energy dominance, national security, economic growth, and the fiscal health of the Nation.' Today, Politico reported that 'solar and wind energy projects must now get Interior Secretary Doug Burgum's personal sign-off to receive permits across the hundreds of millions of federal acres under his department's control,' citing an internal memo from the Department of the Interior. It said that the memo 'puts wind and solar projects under heightened scrutiny, potentially slowing approvals and construction across vast swaths of some of the most sun- and wind-rich portions of the country.'
Yomiuri Shimbun
12 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
A New Mural in France Shows the Statue of Liberty Covering Her Eyes in a Swipe at Trump
ROUBAIX, France (AP) — As statements go, it's a big one. A towering mural in France of the Statue of Liberty covering her eyes is racking up millions of views online with its swipe at U.S. President Donald Trump 's immigration and deportation policies. Amsterdam-based street artist Judith de Leeuw described her giant work in the northern French town of Roubaix, which has a large immigrant community, as 'a quiet reminder of what freedom should be.' She said 'freedom feels out of reach' for migrants and 'those pushed to the margins, silenced, or unseen.' 'I painted her covering her eyes because the weight of the world has become too heavy to witness. What was once a shining symbol of liberty now carries the sorrow of lost meaning,' de Leeuw wrote in a July 4 post on Facebook, when Americans were celebrating Independence Day. Her depiction of the Statue of Liberty, a gift from the French people in the late 1800s, has inspired some sharp criticism. Rep. Tim Burchett, a Republican lawmaker from Tennessee, wrote in an angry post on X that the work 'disgusts me.' He said he had an uncle who fought and died in France, where U.S. forces saw combat in both World War I and World War II. In an interview with The Associated Press, de Leeuw was unapologetic. 'I'm not offended to be hated by the Donald Trump movement. I am not sorry. This is the right thing to do,' she said. The town stood by the work, with its deputy mayor in charge of cultural affairs, Frédéric Lefebvre, telling broadcaster France 3 that 'it's a very strong and powerful political message.' Since returning to the White House amid anti-immigration sentiment, Trump has launched an unprecedented campaign that has pushed the limits of executive power and clashed with federal judges trying to restrain him. People from various countries have been deported to remote and unrelated places like South Sudan and the small African nation of Eswatini. Polling by Gallup released last week showed an increasing number of Americans who said immigration is a 'good thing' and decreasing support for the type of mass deportations Trump has championed since before he was elected. The mural in Roubaix is part of an urban street culture festival backed by the town. Roubaix is one of the poorest towns in France. It was economically devastated by the collapse since the 1970s of its once-flourishing textile industry that used to attract migrant workers from elsewhere in Europe, north Africa and beyond.
