logo
Erin Patterson's suppressed evidence uncovered; deadly fungi PDFs, a plot to kill her husband with chicken curry and odd Facebook posts

Erin Patterson's suppressed evidence uncovered; deadly fungi PDFs, a plot to kill her husband with chicken curry and odd Facebook posts

Time of India08-08-2025
Erin Patterson
's triple-murder case has taken a new turn after previously suppressed pre-trial evidence was made public.
Patterson
, 50, was convicted in July of killing three people and attempting to kill a fourth with a poisoned beef Wellington lunch in 2023.
It is also revealed that the alleged Australian
mushroom killer
tried to poison husband with chicken curry, pasta, and wrap.
Productivity Tool
Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide
By Metla Sudha Sekhar
View Program
Finance
Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory
By Dinesh Nagpal
View Program
Finance
Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code
By CA Rahul Gupta
View Program
Digital Marketing
Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel
By Neil Patel
View Program
Finance
Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading
By Kunal Patel
View Program
Productivity Tool
Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide
By Study at home
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
The evidence, once ruled inadmissible by Justice Christopher Beale, included a
Facebook post
prosecutors said showed Patterson's long-standing interest in poisonous mushrooms.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Meet The Lover Of Cliff Richard - Try Not To Gag
Outlier Model
Undo
According to pre-trial material, reportedly by the Nightly, the prosecutors alleged Patterson uploaded a photo of a cat eating mushrooms about 18 months before the first alleged poisoning in November 2021. The post read: 'My cat chewed on this mushroom just now. He is having a vomit. Was in grassland near trees, I'm in Victoria Australia.'
Prosecutors claimed Patterson did not own a cat and that the post was dishonest. They planned to use it to argue she had a focused interest in poisons. Defence lawyers objected, saying the post's reliability was questionable and that the source of the screenshot had previously manipulated images.
Live Events
Justice Beale ruled the evidence out, agreeing it could unfairly prejudice the jury.
Other suppressed evidence
Victoria Police
digital investigators found thousands of files on devices seized from Patterson's home, searching for terms like 'death,' 'mushroom,' and 'poison.'
According to news.com.au, among them was an appendix from a 2007 book, Criminal Poisoning: Investigational Guide for Law Enforcement, Toxicologists, Forensic Scientists, and Attorneys, found on a Samsung tablet.
It detailed properties and lethal doses of substances, including antifreeze, arsenic, and cyanide. Prosecutors alleged Patterson had access to it in 2019.
The Nightly stated that another PDF, an Overview of Fungi in Melbourne, contained images of
death cap mushrooms
. The defence maintained that it had little value as it did not mention poisonous mushrooms.
Disposals not shared with jury
The jury heard Patterson disposed of the dehydrator used to dry the deadly mushrooms after leaving the hospital on August 2, 2023.
But they were not told she visited Koonwarra transfer station the day of the fatal lunch to dispose of cardboard, or that she put her bins out for collection that same day as per the Nightly report.
Both points prosecutors had argued were incriminating conduct in pre-trial hearings.
Patterson remains convicted of murdering Don and Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson, and attempting to murder Ian Wilkinson.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Haryana Police book 10 social media operators in teacher's death case
Haryana Police book 10 social media operators in teacher's death case

Hans India

timea few seconds ago

  • Hans India

Haryana Police book 10 social media operators in teacher's death case

Chandigarh: Haryana Police have served notice to 10 social media account operators for allegedly spreading false news on social media platforms like Instagram, Facebook and YouTube in the death case of a playschool teacher. An official spokesperson said that the police have also registered FIRs against social media account operators for publishing inflammatory, false and misleading information on social media accounts. These social media accounts run reports and news without any official confirmation. The account operators are also facing criminal charges for publishing inflammatory posts, false news and misleading information without verification, uploading videos, and thereby disturbing law and order in the district, the spokesperson said. Opposition parties and social activists gathered at Bhiwani's Dhigawa village on Sunday, where family members of a 19-year-old play school teacher have been protesting. The family and villagers are demanding the arrest of those responsible for the "murder". Her family claimed that the police initially refused to lodge a missing persons complaint. However, a case was registered after her body was found. The teacher was found dead with her throat slit in the fields of Singhani village on August 13. The protesters blocked the Delhi-Pilani road, calling for justice for the victim. The blockade lasted for nearly two hours as police intervened to pacify the agitators, following which the blockade was lifted. The case took a U-turn after police said that a suicide note was recovered from the teacher's bag. According to the post-mortem report, no cut marks were found on her throat, the police said. The police added that the autopsy report has denied sexual assault, and that samples have been taken for further forensic examination. Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini has transferred the Bhiwani SP and suspended five policemen over the handling of the case. However, opposition leaders allege that the measures are insufficient.

Udupi police book activist Mahesh Shetty Thimarody for inflammatory comment on B.L. Santosh
Udupi police book activist Mahesh Shetty Thimarody for inflammatory comment on B.L. Santosh

The Hindu

timea few seconds ago

  • The Hindu

Udupi police book activist Mahesh Shetty Thimarody for inflammatory comment on B.L. Santosh

Brahmavar police have booked activist Mahesh Shetty Thimarody for a statement allegedly denigrating BJP national general secretary B.L. Santosh. In the complaint to Brahmavara police, Rajiv Kulal, president of Udupi Rural BJP Mandal, accused Mr. Thimarody of making personal comments and maligning the character of Mr. Santosh, who has spoken openly against the 'smear campaign' on Dharmsthala temple citing the ongoing investigation into the mass burial allegation. Considering comments against Mr. Santosh as done to provoke breach of peace, Brahmavar police registered a case against Mr. Thimarody for offences under Sections 352 and 353 (2) (statements conducive to public mischief) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Case for re-posting comments Kota police registered a case against Sharath Shetty Vaddarse for reposting, on his Facebook page, the post of Vasanth Giliyar, a journalist and convenor of Punyakshetra Samrakshana Samiti. On a compliant, the Belthangady police had booked Mr. Giliyar for offences under Sections 196 (1)a and 353(2) of BNS for the post on his Facebook page showing the area of Dharmasthala in green, and highlight the number of mosques in red in that area. Sharath Shetty Vaddarse was accused of re-posting this post on his Facebook page.

This Airline fined Rs 5139851882 for illegal layoffs, not Noel Tata's Air India, Indigo, it is…
This Airline fined Rs 5139851882 for illegal layoffs, not Noel Tata's Air India, Indigo, it is…

India.com

timea few seconds ago

  • India.com

This Airline fined Rs 5139851882 for illegal layoffs, not Noel Tata's Air India, Indigo, it is…

Qantas Airways has been fined 90 million Australian dollars (USD 59 million) for illegally terminating more than 1800 ground staff at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic. The penalty comes on top of the AUD 120 million (USD 78 million) compensation the airline had already agreed to pay affected employees. Federal Court Justice Michael Lee described the outsourcing of 1,820 baggage handler and cleaner roles in late 2020 as the 'largest and most significant breach' of Australian labour laws in more than a century. Last December, Qantas agreed to the compensation payout after the High Court unanimously upheld an earlier ruling that outsourcing the jobs was unlawful, rejecting the airline's appeal. What Federal Court Said On Fine? The Transport Workers Union, which took the airline to court, had argued the airline should receive the largest fine available AUD 121,212,000 (USD 78,969,735). Lee ruled that the minimum fine to create a deterrence should be AUD 90 million (USD 59 million), noting that Qantas executives had expected to save AUD 125 million (USD 81 million) a year through outsourcing the jobs. Lee questioned the sincerity of Qantas's apology for its illegal conduct, noting that the airline later unsuccessfully argued that it owed no compensation to its former staff. 'If any further evidence was needed of the unrelenting and aggressive litigation strategy adopted in this case by Qantas, it is provided by this effort directed to denying any compensation whatsoever to those in respect of whom Qantas was publicly professing regret for their misfortune,' Lee said. 'I do think that the people in charge of Qantas now have some genuine regret, but this more likely reflects the damage that this case has done to the company rather than remorse for the damage done to the affected workers,' Lee added. Qantas Former CFO On Fine Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson, who was the airline's chief financial officer during the layoffs, said in a statement after Monday's decision: 'We sincerely apologise to each and every one of the 1,820 ground handling employees and to their families who suffered as a result.' 'The decision to outsource five years ago, particularly during such an uncertain time, caused genuine hardship for many of our former team and their families,' she said. 'Over the past 18 months we've worked hard to change the way we operate as part of our efforts to rebuild trust with our people and our customers. This remains our highest priority as we work to earn back the trust we lost,' she added. Lee ruled that AUD 50 million (USD 33 million) of the fine go to the union, because no Australian government agency had shown interest in investigating or prosecuting Qantas. (With Inputs From Agencies)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store