Bill package would ban gender-affirming care for minors in Michigan
LANSING, Mich. (WLNS) — A package of bills banning gender-affirming care for minors has been introduced in both chambers of the Michigan legislature—causing controversy and splitting public opinion.
'Well, we are going to oppose it with every fiber of our being, because it's cruel, callous, dangerous, and it's discriminatory.' That's what Jay Kaplan, a staff attorney of the LGBTQ+ Project of the ACLU of Michigan, said in response to the bills introduced by State Sen. Thomas Albert (R-18) and State Rep. Brad Paquette (R-37) that would ban gender-affirming treatment for minors.
Jay Kaplan speaks with 6 News over Zoom. (WLNS)
Lawmakers want to ban gender-affirming treatments for minors because they say the procedures have negative or even consequential side effects and outcomes. These lawmakers have introduced House Bills 4466 and 4466, as well as Senate Bills 289 and 290.
Paquette went even further to explain that children could file a lawsuit against their doctors up to 20 years after the initial treatment, which could result in doctors losing their licenses.
Former case manager of the Washington University Transgender Center Jamie Reed spoke at a press conference in Lansing Wednesday, saying that the effects these treatments have on the body can be permanent and long-lasting, which is why lawmakers need to step in.
'It is critical that legislative bodies step in to protect children in this state from these dangerous and reckless practices,' said Reed.
Jamie Reed speaks at a press conference in Lansing. (WLNS)
Reed said that she was once allied with these treatments, but now is completely against the system that the university followed when treating transgender children.
'I was complicit in harming patients because the protocol itself harms patients,' said Reed. 'There is no safe or legal way to sterilize the child, and there is no safe way to medically disrupt the function of the endocrine system.'
The bills don't have complete bipartisan agreement, with at least one lawmaker, State Rep. Emily Dievendorf, voicing opposition to the legislation.
Dievendorf said in a statement to 6 News that 'this package represents more attacks on our kids that ignore science and facts, go against best practices for medical care, and aim to dehumanize our most vulnerable neighbors. (What is…) especially offensive today is that the neighbors targeted for hateful rhetoric are now our children. This package is going nowhere fast and exists solely to defend hate and bigotry. Let's make hate abhorrent again.'
Tess Miller, member of St. Johns Call–In Coalition and mother of a transgender son, says this is the reason she is not seeing any progress with her son's doctors, because of the fear that they may lose their license or might not be able to give consistent treatment altogether.
Miller says she doesn't see gender affirming care for children as harmful, but as necessary care to ensure her child can be who he is meant to be.
Tess Miller speaks to 6 News in-studio. (WLNS)
'When my son came out as trans in 2020, I realized that no matter how comfortable I was making him out in the world, if he wasn't feeling comfortable on the inside, then there was a chance he might not be able to go on and live a healthy, productive life,' said Miller.
Activists say the legislation is a distraction from lawmakers who want to single out the transgender community rather than work on more pertinent issues, such as affordable housing or grocery prices.
'What are you doing to solve the real problems for the residents in the state of Michigan?' said Kaplan. 'Do your job and quit bullying transgender youth – they are some of our most marginalized and vulnerable populations. Who make up less than half a percent, maybe 1% at most of Michigan's population.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to WLNS 6 News.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
16 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Consultant on trial for AI-generated robocalls mimicking Biden says he has no regrets
LACONIA, N.H. (AP) — A political consultant told a New Hampshire jury Wednesday that he doesn't regret sending voters robocalls that used artificial intelligence to mimic former President Joe Biden and that he's confident he didn't break the law. Steven Kramer, 56, of New Orleans, has long admitted to orchestrating a message sent to thousands of voters two days before New Hampshire's Jan. 23, 2024, presidential primary. Recipients heard an AI-generated voice similar to the Democratic president's that used his catchphrase 'What a bunch of malarkey' and, as prosecutors allege, suggested that voting in the primary would preclude voters from casting ballots in November. 'It's important that you save your vote for the November election,' voters were told. 'Your votes make a difference in November, not this Tuesday.' Kramer, who faces decades in prison if convicted of voter suppression and impersonating a candidate, said his goal was to send a wake-up call about the potential dangers of AI when he paid a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording. He was getting frequent calls from people using AI in campaigns, and, worried about the lack of regulations, made it his New Year's resolution to take action. 'This is going to be my one good deed this year,' he recalled while testifying in Belknap County Superior Court. He said his goal wasn't to influence an election, because he didn't consider the primary a real election. At Biden's request, the Democratic National Committee dislodged New Hampshire from its traditional early spot in the 2024 nominating calendar but later dropped its threat not to seat the state's national convention delegates. Biden did not put his name on the ballot or campaign there but won as a write-in. Kramer, who owns a firm specializing in get-out-the-vote projects, argued that the primary was a meaningless straw poll unsanctioned by the DNC. At the time the calls went out, voters were disenfranchised, he said. Asked by his attorney, Tom Reid, whether he did anything illegal, Kramer said, 'I'm positive I did not.' Later, he said he had no regrets and that his actions likely spurred AI regulations in multiple states. Kramer, who will be questioned by prosecutors Thursday, also faces a $6 million fine by the Federal Communications Commission but told The Associated Press on Wednesday that he won't pay it. Lingo Telecom, the company that transmitted the calls, agreed to pay $1 million in a settlement in August. The robocalls appeared to come from a former New Hampshire Democratic Party chair, Kathy Sullivan, and told voters to call her number to be removed from the call list. On the witness stand earlier Wednesday, Sullivan said she was confused and then outraged after speaking to one of the recipients and later hearing the message. 'I hung up the phone and said, 'There is something really crazy going on,'' she said. 'Someone is trying to suppress the vote for Biden. I can't believe this is happening.' Months later, she got a call from Kramer in which he said he used her number because he knew she would contact law enforcement and the media. He also described his motive — highlighting AI's potential dangers — but she didn't believe him, she testified. 'My sense was he was trying to convince me that he'd done this defensible, good thing,' she said. 'I'm listening to this thinking to myself, 'What does he thing I am, stupid?' He tried to suppress the vote.'
Washington Post
18 minutes ago
- Washington Post
National Guard troops have temporarily detained civilians in LA protests, commander says
WASHINGTON — National Guard troops already have temporarily detained civilians in the Los Angeles protests over immigration raids , the commander in charge said Wednesday, but they quickly turned them over to law enforcement. Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, speaking in an interview with The Associated Press and one other media outlet, also said about 500 of the National Guard troops have been trained so far to accompany agents on immigration operations . Photos of Guard soldiers providing security for the agents have already been circulated by immigration officials.
Washington Post
18 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Permitless concealed carry in North Carolina faces uphill battle after some GOP pushback
RALEIGH, N.C. — A bill to let adults carry concealed handguns without a permit cleared the North Carolina legislature on Wednesday, however the path to joining the majority of U.S. states with similar laws remains uncertain. The GOP-backed legislation faces a likely veto from Democratic Gov. Josh Stein, as well as pushback from a handful of Republicans who voted against the legislation in the state House. House Speaker Destin Hall acknowledged those concerns after Wednesday's vote.
