Bill package would ban gender-affirming care for minors in Michigan
'Well, we are going to oppose it with every fiber of our being, because it's cruel, callous, dangerous, and it's discriminatory.' That's what Jay Kaplan, a staff attorney of the LGBTQ+ Project of the ACLU of Michigan, said in response to the bills introduced by State Sen. Thomas Albert (R-18) and State Rep. Brad Paquette (R-37) that would ban gender-affirming treatment for minors.
Jay Kaplan speaks with 6 News over Zoom. (WLNS)
Lawmakers want to ban gender-affirming treatments for minors because they say the procedures have negative or even consequential side effects and outcomes. These lawmakers have introduced House Bills 4466 and 4466, as well as Senate Bills 289 and 290.
Paquette went even further to explain that children could file a lawsuit against their doctors up to 20 years after the initial treatment, which could result in doctors losing their licenses.
Former case manager of the Washington University Transgender Center Jamie Reed spoke at a press conference in Lansing Wednesday, saying that the effects these treatments have on the body can be permanent and long-lasting, which is why lawmakers need to step in.
'It is critical that legislative bodies step in to protect children in this state from these dangerous and reckless practices,' said Reed.
Jamie Reed speaks at a press conference in Lansing. (WLNS)
Reed said that she was once allied with these treatments, but now is completely against the system that the university followed when treating transgender children.
'I was complicit in harming patients because the protocol itself harms patients,' said Reed. 'There is no safe or legal way to sterilize the child, and there is no safe way to medically disrupt the function of the endocrine system.'
The bills don't have complete bipartisan agreement, with at least one lawmaker, State Rep. Emily Dievendorf, voicing opposition to the legislation.
Dievendorf said in a statement to 6 News that 'this package represents more attacks on our kids that ignore science and facts, go against best practices for medical care, and aim to dehumanize our most vulnerable neighbors. (What is…) especially offensive today is that the neighbors targeted for hateful rhetoric are now our children. This package is going nowhere fast and exists solely to defend hate and bigotry. Let's make hate abhorrent again.'
Tess Miller, member of St. Johns Call–In Coalition and mother of a transgender son, says this is the reason she is not seeing any progress with her son's doctors, because of the fear that they may lose their license or might not be able to give consistent treatment altogether.
Miller says she doesn't see gender affirming care for children as harmful, but as necessary care to ensure her child can be who he is meant to be.
Tess Miller speaks to 6 News in-studio. (WLNS)
'When my son came out as trans in 2020, I realized that no matter how comfortable I was making him out in the world, if he wasn't feeling comfortable on the inside, then there was a chance he might not be able to go on and live a healthy, productive life,' said Miller.
Activists say the legislation is a distraction from lawmakers who want to single out the transgender community rather than work on more pertinent issues, such as affordable housing or grocery prices.
'What are you doing to solve the real problems for the residents in the state of Michigan?' said Kaplan. 'Do your job and quit bullying transgender youth – they are some of our most marginalized and vulnerable populations. Who make up less than half a percent, maybe 1% at most of Michigan's population.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to WLNS 6 News.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Valley View ISD calls for $65M bond election
Voters within the Valley View school district will have the opportunity to weigh in on a $65 million bond. VVISD trustees last week made the call to add the proposition on the Nov. 4 ballot, with projects designed to meet growing enrollment and counteract capacity issues by 40%. The maximum tax impact of the 2025 bond referendum would be an additional 28.35 cents per $100 of taxable property value. Based on the current population and property valuations, the average homeowner would see a tax increase of $49.11 per month. Taxpayers aged 65 or older, or disabled, who have filed the appropriate exemption, will see no increase to the school district portion of their property taxes on their primary residence. The proposal includes construction of a new high school, new spaces for Career and Technical Education, relocation of the baseball field, adding parking and fire lanes and land acquisition. The bond proposal was developed with input from a bond planning committee made up of approximately 30 community members, including parents, alumni, educators and local leaders. The committee met 10 times over the past year to study facility capacity, student enrollment trends, community survey data, potential project solutions and associated costs. The maximum tax impact of the 2025 bond referendum would be an additional 28.35 cents per $100 of taxable property value. Based on the current population and property valuations, the average homeowner would see a tax increase of $49.11 per month. Taxpayers aged 65 or older, or disabled, who have filed the appropriate exemption, will see no increase to the school district portion of their property taxes on their primary residence. Cooke County voters living within Valley View ISD boundaries are eligible to participate in the election. Voters are encouraged to verify their registration status by visiting prior to the registration deadline on Monday, Oct. 6. Early Voting begins Monday, Oct. 20, and Election Day is Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2025. For more information, visit Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Xavier Hernandez death: El Paso DA gets investigation, likely to go to grand jury
An investigation into the death of Xavier Guadalupe Hernandez during an arrest on the side of a freeway is now in the hands of the El Paso District Attorney's Office. It will likely go to a grand jury to determine if criminal charges will be filed against police officers. Hernandez, 30, died in a controversial case recorded on an El Paso Police Department body camera video that raised criticism over how police handled what started as a call about a pedestrian on Interstate 10 and ended with Hernandez's death on July 13. More: El Paso medical examiner rules man who died in police struggle as a homicide El Paso District Attorney James Montoya, in an emailed statement on Wednesday, Aug. 20, said his office has now received the investigation conducted by El Paso police. "While the case is pending, we cannot offer any other comment about it specifically," Montoya stated. "However, it is the policy of the DA's Office to present all in-custody deaths and officer-involved shootings to a grand jury of El Pasoans for their review and determination of potential criminal liability." EPPD body camera video released this week showed Hernandez in an agitated state on the shoulder of the busy freeway in a situation that quickly escalated into a struggle as an officer repeatedly shocked him with a Taser. "Officer, what's your badge number?" Hernandez repeatedly yells in the video, which shows Hernandez stop breathing while handcuffed behind his back and held facedown on the asphalt by officers. An autopsy by the county medical examiner's office deemed Hernandez's death a homicide caused by "asphyxia due to chest compression during law enforcement subdual and restrain" with cocaine toxicity as a "significant" factor. DA: Grand jury to look at police deadly force cases Montoya, a Democrat, took office in January after defeating former Republican DA Bill Hicks in the November 2024 election. Montoya previously had an unsuccessful run for DA, losing to Yvonne Rosales in the 2020 Democratic primary. Rosales later ended up resigning from office amid accusations of incompetence and Hicks was appointed by Gov. Greg Abbott to fill in the remainder of her term. During the 2020 campaign, police brutality was a hot topic amid the George Floyd protests, Black Lives Matter movement and the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2020, Montoya said in an El Paso Times interview that incidents in which police use deadly force should be automatically investigated. "Whether that is a discharge of a firearm, some kind of chokehold, any type of deadly force, including a Taser, which I believe is deadly force, will be presented to an El Paso grand jury for their review for potential criminal charges," Montoya said in 2020. Daniel Borunda may be reached at dborunda@ and @BorundaDaniel on X. This article originally appeared on El Paso Times: El Paso police bodycam video death case likely to go to grand jury
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Veradigm Amends and Extends Stockholder Rights Plan
CHICAGO, August 20, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Veradigm® (OTCMKTS: MDRX), a leading provider of healthcare data and technology solutions, today announced that its Board of Directors (the "Board") has approved an amendment to extend the Company's existing Stockholder Rights Plan for an additional six months (the "Rights Plan"). The Rights Plan, adopted on February 26, 2024, was due to expire at 5:00PM New York City time on August 20, 2025. Under the terms of the amendment to the Rights Plan, the scheduled expiration date of the Rights Plan has been extended to February 20, 2026. In addition, the amendment to the Rights Plan changes the triggering threshold such that the rights would become exercisable only if a person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 20% or more of the outstanding shares of Company common stock (including in the form of synthetic ownership through derivative positions) in a transaction not approved by the Board, whether or not such person or group is an eligible passive investor. The Board's decision to extend the Rights Plan is based on its determination that many of the underlying risks and conditions that existed upon the initial adoption of the Rights Plan continue to be present. Accordingly, the Rights Plan is being extended to continue to ensure that all Veradigm stockholders have the opportunity to realize the full potential value of their investment. The Rights Plan does not prevent the Company from pursuing any offer that is fair and otherwise in the best interests of stockholders. The Board currently intends to terminate the Rights Plan no later than the time that the Company becomes current in its financial reporting and has applied for relisting of its shares of common stock on a national stock exchange, which is expected to occur in 2026. Further details about the Rights Plan, as amended, will be contained in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. About Veradigm® Veradigm is a healthcare technology company that drives value through its unique combination of platforms, data, expertise, connectivity, and scale. The Veradigm Network features a dynamic community of solutions and partners providing advanced insights, technology, and data-driven solutions for the healthcare provider, payer, and biopharma markets. For more information about how Veradigm is fulfilling its mission of Transforming Health, Insightfully, visit or find Veradigm on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube. © 2025 Veradigm LLC and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cited marks are the property of Veradigm LLC and/or its affiliates. All other product or Company names are the property of their respective holders, all rights reserved. Disclaimer and Forward-Looking Statement Information This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the Company's expectations with respect to the timing of the relisting of its common stock on a national securities exchange. These forward-looking statements are based on the current beliefs and expectations of the Company's management with respect to future events, only speak as of the date that they are made, and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Such statements can be identified by the use of words such as "future," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "predicts," "will," "would," "could," "continue," "can," "may," "look forward," "aims," "hopes," and "seeks" and similar terms, although not all forward-looking statements contain such words or expressions. Actual results could differ significantly from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, among others: a further material delay in the Company's financial reporting or ability to hold an annual meeting of stockholders; an inability of the Company to timely prepare its delinquent financial statements; unanticipated factors or factors that the Company currently believes will not cause further delay; the Company's remediation efforts and preparation of financial statements or other factors that could cause additional delay or adjustments; the possibility that ongoing remediation work or the audit of the Company's financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 or the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 may identify additional errors and material weaknesses or other deficiencies in the Company's accounting practices; the likelihood that the control deficiencies identified or that may be identified in the future will result in additional material weaknesses in the Company's internal control over financial reporting; risks relating to the Company's voluntary disclosure to the SEC of certain information relating to the investigation by the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors, the SEC's investigation, and the additional information the Company has continued to provide to the SEC based on discussions with the SEC; changes in the financial condition of the markets that the Company serves; the Company's ability to hire qualified individuals to serve in senior leadership roles on a permanent basis, including a chief financial officer; and other factors contained in the "Risk Factors" section and elsewhere in the Company's filings with the SEC from time to time, including, but not limited to, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the impact of circumstances or events that may arise after the date of the forward-looking statements, or other changes over time, except as required by law. View source version on Contacts For more information contact: Investors:Jenny Media:Rick Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
