logo
Move faster on firms' public contracts ban, Grenfell survivor urges Government

Move faster on firms' public contracts ban, Grenfell survivor urges Government

Wales Online13-06-2025
Move faster on firms' public contracts ban, Grenfell survivor urges Government
Bereaved and survivors of the blaze will gather on Saturday in west London for the annual commemoration of the disaster
(Image: NETFLIX )
Efforts to ban companies linked to the Grenfell fire from public contracts must speed up, a survivor of the fire has said ahead of the eighth anniversary.
Bereaved and survivors of the blaze will gather on Saturday in west London for the annual commemoration of the disaster which claimed 72 lives.

It is likely to be the final anniversary which takes place with the tower still standing in its current form, as demolition work could begin in September.

Former tower resident Edward Daffarn, who had previously raised safety concerns and predicted a "catastrophic event" at the tower seven months before the fire, said this year's memorial will be "all the more poignant" for that reason.
But Mr Daffarn is hopeful a new documentary about the blaze, due to air on Netflix next week, will spur Government efforts to take action against companies linked to fire.
He told the PA news agency: "One thing that this documentary needs to do is it needs to put pressure on the Government to ensure that the companies involved are not able to access public funding, and I'm hoping that this documentary will accelerate that process."
Article continues below
The Cabinet office confirmed in February that seven companies were facing possible bans – cladding firm Arconic, insulation firm Kingspan, former Celotex owners Saint-Gobain, fire inspectors Exova, design and build contractor Rydon, architect Studio E and subcontractor Harley Facades.
It is understood investigations were launched into all of them in March, looking into whether any engaged in professional misconduct for the purposes of the Procurement Act 2023, potentially leading them to be debarred from public contracts.
No timeline has been given for how long it might be before outcomes are known.

The final Grenfell Tower Inquiry report, published in September, concluded victims, bereaved and survivors were "badly failed" through incompetence, dishonesty and greed.
The west London tower block was covered in combustible products because of the "systematic dishonesty" of firms who made and sold the cladding and insulation, inquiry chairman Sir Martin Moore-Bick said.
He called out "deliberate and sustained" manipulation of fire-safety testing, misrepresentation of test data and misleading of the market.

Mr Daffarn said the documentary will be the first "that truly exposes and brings into people's living rooms" the "cowardice of the corporates and how profit was put before people".
He said; "I hope that people who watch the documentary come to understand that although Grenfell happened eight years ago, there's a lot that still hasn't been resolved and, as a consequence, the companies involved with Grenfell just seem to want to brush everything under the carpet and carry on making money.
"And I think the documentary clearly exposes how little these companies and individuals have been held to account for their roles in Grenfell."

On Government efforts, which Sir Keir Starmer first announced last September, to debar companies, Mr Daffarn said the process is "too slow" and bereaved and survivors are "still waiting" for companies to face consequences.
He said anyone left angered by the documentary could avoid buying products from companies criticised in the report to "make sure that those companies understand that there is a consequence of their actions".
Bereaved and survivors have long campaigned for criminal charges to be brought over the disaster.

Police and prosecutors have previously said investigators would need until the end of 2025 to complete their inquiry, with final decisions on potential criminal charges by the end of 2026.
The near 10-year wait for justice has been described by families as "unbearable".
The decision to bring the tower block down was confirmed earlier this year and prompted mixed reaction, with some people feeling their views had not been properly taken into consideration.

Sharing his own opinion, and acknowledging the difficulty others feel in seeing the tower regularly, Mr Daffarn said: "I think the anniversary is made all the more poignant by the fact that this is the last time that we will meet with the tower in situ.
"We haven't got justice yet. It feels wrong to be pulling the tower down while so much remains unresolved."
The Government said while some had hoped the building could remain in place as a reminder of what happened, others had reported this would be "too painful".
Article continues below
The demolition process is expected to take around two years.
A Government spokesperson said: "As we approach the eighth anniversary of the Grenfell Tower tragedy, our thoughts remain with the bereaved families, survivors and the immediate community.
"This government remains committed to ensuring that what happened at Grenfell is never forgotten, and to delivering the change needed so it can never happen again."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why is British horse racing going on strike?
Why is British horse racing going on strike?

BBC News

time5 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Why is British horse racing going on strike?

British horse racing will stage a one-day strike in protest against the government's proposed tax rise on betting on the fixtures will take place on 10 September after four meetings were rescheduled by the British Horseracing Authority (BHA), which says a tax hike would hit revenue and is an unprecedented move but what does it mean, what will happen on the day and how have we got here? What fixtures have been rescheduled? The following meetings have been switched to leave a blank day on Wednesday 10 Park (afternoon) - 8 September (afternoon)Carlisle (afternoon) - 9 September (evening)Uttoxeter (afternoon) - 11 September (evening)Kempton Park (evening) - 15 September (evening) What will happen on 10 September? There will be no racing in Britain, with leading jockeys, trainers and owners instead attending an event at Westminster where they will lobby is the eve of the four-day St Leger meeting at Doncaster, which Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer attended last year, and is the first time the sport has voluntarily refused to race in its modern will be held in the Republic of Ireland, where the sole fixture takes place at Cork. What are the government proposals? The Treasury is looking to bring existing online betting duties into one single could increase the 15% tax rate paid by bookmakers on racing and align it with online gaming, such as casino and slot games, which is currently taxed at 21%.A Treasury spokesperson said: "We are consulting on bringing the treatment of online betting in line with other forms of online gambling to cut down bureaucracy."It is not about increasing or decreasing rates, and we welcome views from all stakeholders including businesses, trade bodies, the third sector and individuals." How would tax rises hit horse racing? Horse racing is the second-biggest spectator sport in Britain, behind football, with more than 1,400 fixtures a leaders fear increased costs for betting operators would lead to less promotion and sponsorship of the sport, worse odds and reduced bonuses for customers – making betting on racing less attractive, and potentially turning people towards the black turnover has already been hit by affordability checks for punters aimed at limiting problem turnover has a knock-on effect as major bookmakers must give 10% of racing profits via a levy, which raises more than £100m a year, and is used toward race prize money and helping the sport in other and some MPs believe increased taxes could help fund welfare spending and tackle harmful analysis commissioned by the BHA has shown that aligning the current tax rate paid by bookmakers on racing with online games of chance could see a £330m revenue hit to the industry in the first five suggests 2,752 jobs will be put at risk in the first year alone. What has the reaction been to the strike? Leading jumps trainer Nicky Henderson is among those to back the action."I am not necessarily a person who is in favour of using strikes as a tool, but the message has got to get across that this tax could be crippling," he said."It is not a weapon I would ordinarily suggest we turn to, but under the circumstances I would say we probably have little choice."But the Betting and Gaming Council (BGC), which represents betting shops, online betting and gaming operators and casinos, says it was not consulted."Racing's decision to reschedule fixtures was taken without consultation with betting operators, whose support for the funding of the sport is mission critical," it said in a statement."We are concerned that futile political gestures will only antagonise the government and frustrate punters instead of delivering a solution to a shared challenge facing both racing and betting." Will the strike action cost the sport? The impact will be offset by the fixtures being rearranged, but there will be an estimated cost of around £200,000 in lost revenue on the chief executive Brant Dunshea told BBC Radio 5 Live: "It's certainly not a decision we have taken lightly."The industry is united in saying that cost is a small price to pay for ensuring we send a clear and loud message to government."The sport believes racing betting, which sees punters study form and use their knowledge to place bets, should be treated differently to online games of chance which offer fixed-profit margins for operators."Racing is more than just a sport, it's a cherished part of our culture and we are a major employer. We are different to online casinos," said Dunshea. Is this a one-off strike? No more strikes are planned as things action is designed to publicise the BHA's 'Axe the Racing Tax' campaign. Its petition against the tax proposals had around 10,000 signatures when the strike was announced on 16 article is the latest from BBC Sport's Ask Me Anything team. What is Ask Me Anything? Ask Me Anything is a service dedicated to answering your want to reward your time by telling you things you do not know and reminding you of things you team will find out everything you need to know and be able to call upon a network of contacts including our experts and will be answering your questions from the heart of the BBC Sport newsroom, and going behind the scenes at some of the world's biggest sporting coverage will span the BBC Sport website, app, social media and YouTube accounts, plus BBC TV and radio. More questions answered... What is the 'going' in horse racing?Why does football have Saturday 3pm TV blackout in UK?How will the new Match of the Day work?

Opposition to plans for Glasgow congestion charge revealed
Opposition to plans for Glasgow congestion charge revealed

Glasgow Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Opposition to plans for Glasgow congestion charge revealed

Last week, the Glasgow Times reported how the council was to push forward with plans to develop a charge on motorists who live outside the city A charge would be levied at the city boundary, while people who live in the city would be exempt. READ NEXT:Cleansing night shift in Glasgow gets boost with new recruits City Treasurer, Ricky Bell, has been an advocate of using additional revenue-raising schemes, like a congestion charge, to help the council raise cash in the face of budget cuts. The plan will be discussed at a council meeting this week and the main opposition party said it will speak out against it. Labour said a charge would see residents from outside forced to pay to visit Glasgow for work, family, or social reasons. Rashid Husain, Labour group leader, said: 'It's true what they say – People Make Glasgow. 'And that's not just our current residents. It's our families, friends and visitors from across Scotland who come here to enjoy our culture, parks and attractions, use health facilities and spend money in local businesses. 'These proposals do nothing except hit workers, services and growth.' READ NEXT:SPT reveal changes to cut price rail travel scheme revealed The councillor said he policy is unfair, unworkable and divisive and council officers should not be asked to waste time developing it. He added: 'An extra charge just to visit loved ones, get to work or attend key services such as the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital is simply unacceptable. Everyone knows Glasgow's public transport is not yet reliable, frequent or affordable enough to provide a genuine alternative. If the SNP and Greens were serious about tackling congestion, they would be fixing buses and trains – not hitting drivers with another tax.' He said the UK Government has given the Scottish Government 'the largest budget settlement in history', adding: 'Where is Glasgow's fair share?'

Opposition to plans for congestion charge on drivers entering Glasgow
Opposition to plans for congestion charge on drivers entering Glasgow

The Herald Scotland

time9 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Opposition to plans for congestion charge on drivers entering Glasgow

A charge would be levied at the city boundary, while people who live in the city would be exempt. City Treasurer, Ricky Bell, has been an advocate of using additional revenue-raising schemes, like a congestion charge, to help the council raise cash in the face of budget cuts. The plan will be discussed at a council meeting this week and the main opposition party said it will speak out against it. READ MORE: Glasgow councillors to advance 'congestion charge' plans Traffic congestion in Highland town at 'crisis point' Russell Findlay calls for 'pause' on new energy projects in Highlands Labour said a charge would see residents from outside forced to pay to visit Glasgow for work, family, or social reasons. Rashid Husain, Labour group leader, said: 'It's true what they say – People Make Glasgow. 'And that's not just our current residents. It's our families, friends and visitors from across Scotland who come here to enjoy our culture, parks and attractions, use health facilities and spend money in local businesses. 'These proposals do nothing except hit workers, services and growth.' The councillor said he policy is unfair, unworkable and divisive and council officers should not be asked to waste time developing it. He added: 'An extra charge just to visit loved ones, get to work or attend key services such as the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital is simply unacceptable. Everyone knows Glasgow's public transport is not yet reliable, frequent or affordable enough to provide a genuine alternative. If the SNP and Greens were serious about tackling congestion, they would be fixing buses and trains – not hitting drivers with another tax.' He said the UK Government has given the Scottish Government 'the largest budget settlement in history', adding: 'Where is Glasgow's fair share?'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store