First look at Manchester's new cafe-bar in 'iconic' restored market hall that's like 'solarium'
First look at Manchester's new cafe-bar in 'iconic' restored market hall that's like 'solarium'
This is what Manchester's new 'iconic' cafe-bar and offices housed in a grade-II listed 'solarium' looks like.
The former Campfield market halls, on Liverpool Road in the city centre, will reopen as offices, studios, events spaces, and a cafe-bar-restaurant in late June.
Their multi-million-pound refurbishment is part of the wider St John's project, which developers hope will have a similar effect on Manchester as opening the Guggenheim gallery had on Bilbao in the late 90s.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
READ MORE: Pub slammed by customer for 'disgusting' service and 'incompetent staff' serves up CCTV response
READ MORE: The immersive experience and rooftop bar coming to Manchester that's 'part gallery, part fever dream'
The Local Democracy Reporting Service had a behind-the-scenes first look at the spaces, with the Lower Hall now just called Campfield.
Its central atrium is where Mancs will be warmly welcomed, as it's where a cafe-bar open to the public called Campfield House sits. It will serve a full menu of food, serve as a place to work and meet over coffee in the day, but become a trendy cocktail bar in the evening.
-Credit:Manchester Evening News
Final plans on the menu and seating areas are still under wraps, but bosses also say Campfield could soon do what it was designed for — markets.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
'We are going to do well-curated markets at weekends,' said Tanya Grady, executive director of Campfield for developer Allied London, on Wednesday (May 7).
'It will be a bit more curated than a maker's market. It could be a flower market or night market.
'If they are successful they could be regular. There's the ambition to do that and that's why we have designed it flexibly.'
-Credit:Manchester Evening News
Although much of Campfield will largely remain closed off to the general public as it becomes office space for the media and creative industries, Tanya added the firm 'will explore different cultural uses' from July onwards, meaning events could be hosted inside.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
Both the Upper and Lower halls, originally built in 1882 and 1878 respectively, started life as exhibition and market areas, but became a barrage balloon factory during the Second World War.
Thousands then visited the Lower Hall for decades when it housed the Science and Industry Museum's aerospace collection from 1985. But the museum left in 2021 as the hall needed 'substantial' restoration.
-Credit:Manchester Evening News
The work has involved enlarging the mezzanine level by more than a third, and creating interconnected bridges across the hall so people can move more freely. Wood panelling on the walls has been reused from when it was the Air and Space Hall of the museum.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
But the biggest change is in the ceiling, as teams 'repaired the roof and replaced' vinyl panels where needed.
-Credit:Copyright Unknown
The effect is that both Campfield and Campfield Studios — the new name for the Upper Hall — are flooded with light, even during the overcast day of the LDRS' tour.
'It's like being in a solarium. It makes you feel good being here,' explained Tanya.
Having a panoramic sunroof just off Deansgate also means the views looking out can be spectacular, with Beetham Tower clearly visible from Campfield Studios.
That view will be enjoyed by children's television royalty, too, as Campfield Studios is where Blue Peter will be filmed from September.
Ultimately, bosses want the buildings to become 'a cultural destination as well as an industrial destination' — so they will hope the BBC's arrival is the first of many big names, local brands, and Mancs to come inside.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
6 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Mark Carney revives tough talk about America and warns ‘a new imperialism threatens'
OTTAWA—Prime Minister Mark Carney, in unveiling $9 billion in new defence spending, revived tough talk against the United States Monday, describing America as hustling its allies to pay now or risk losing their ability to sell products to American consumers. Speaking in Toronto, Carney did not use words like 'grift' or 'hustle' but he also did not mince words when it came to describing the U.S. as abandoning its role as a powerful leader on the world stage in favour of flexing its market muscle. The sharper rhetoric comes at a time when the prime minister and his officials are scrambling to strike a new 'economic and security' agreement with President Donald Trump before next week's G7 leaders' summit. Canada's stated goal is to get Trump to lift tariffs the U.S. president levied on Canada and other global trading partners, even as Washington also demands NATO allies cough up billions more for military budgets. A Canadian government official told the Star Monday that it is 'difficult to say whether or not we'll get to a deal before the G7' with not much having changed since the most recent meetings in Washington last week. In fact, last week, Trump doubled down on tariffs, hiking surcharges on Canadian and other steel and aluminum imports to 50 per cent. Carney opted not to increase Canada's level of counter-tariffs in response, but on Monday he did amp up his political rhetoric several notches. Carney justified Ottawa's accelerated military spending as he outlined a 'darker, more competitive world' and an 'age of disorder' that he said requires Canada to better defend this country and diversify its security and economic partners. After the Second World War, Carney said, Canada grew more distant from Britain and aligned itself more closely with the U.S., a rapprochement that intensified after the fall of the Soviet Union established the U.S. as the leading world power. 'Its gravitational pull on Canada, always strong, became virtually irresistible and made the U.S. our closest ally and dominant trading partner,' said Carney. 'But now the United States is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contribution to our collective security.' At the same time, Carney said, global 'trade routes, allegiances, energy systems, and even intelligence itself are being rewired.' 'Rising great powers are now in strategic competition with America. A new imperialism threatens,' he said, adding at other points in the speech that threats from Russia, China, non-state actors and terrorist organizations are on the rise. 'Middle powers compete for interests and attention, knowing that if they are not at the table, they're on the menu.' Carney will host the leaders of the largest western democratic economies, the so-called Group of Seven, next week in Kananaskis, Alta. Trump has said he'll attend. Carney has also invited a range of 'middle powers' too. Leaders of Ukraine, India, Brazil, South Africa, and Australia are coming. Newly-elected South Korean President Lee Jae-myung, and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, have confirmed in the last two days they will attend. The Star has learned Carney has also invited Saudi Arabia Crown prince and prime minister, Mohammed bin Salman, the de facto ruler of the Saudi kingdom once tied to the order to kill a journalist, whom Trump met last month. The Saudi prince has not formally yet responded to the invitation, an official confirmed to the Star. WASHINGTON (AP) — The fist bump seems so long ago. Canada is focusing discussions at the summit on global economic and energy security among other concerns, as it looks ahead to the NATO summit at the end of June. On Monday, Carney said his sharp increase in military spending in one year — which he once said would take five years to achieve — is needed to protect Canada's security needs, not a move to meet Trump's demands. Yet it was clear the U.S. is a big factor in Carney's decision. The prime minister, who campaigned on criticism of Trump as someone who wanted to 'break us to own us' and often used to describe the integrated Canada-U.S. relationship as 'over,' had dropped that talk in the weeks since he won. When Carney met Trump in Washington, he flattered the president as a 'transformational' leader, and appealed to him to see the mutual benefit of renewed ties, saying Canada is the 'largest client' of the U.S. However, the talks to renew a more integrated relationship do not seem to be headed where Carney wants. Trump's ambassador to Canada, Pete Hoekstra, told the Toronto Star last week any new 'framework' nevertheless almost certainly still includes tariffs. 'This is discussing the level of tariffs, how broad they apply and these kinds of things,' Hoekstra said, 'not getting to zero' tariffs. Meanwhile, slim hope remains that direct talks between Trump and Prime Minister Mark Carney Roy Norton, a former Canadian diplomat who spent years in the U.S. and is now a professor at the University of Waterloo, said in an interview the prime minister's comments Monday reflect that 'Carney understands how all this is evolving. He understands that Trump is not going to change, that we do have to act dramatically, seriously, to strengthen our position globally, that the dependence is unhealthy in the current context, as in, Trump is not going to give us a break.' 'We've heard from the U.S. ambassador that we're just supposed to arrive at a deal, but some measure of tariffs will remain. So they breached the existing deal that he (Trump) signed and instituted tariffs that we consider to be illegal. And we're supposed to make concessions to arrive effectively at a new deal, with no indication that there's any reciprocality in terms of willingness on their part to negotiate any of our concerns and accommodate us. And most importantly,' Norton added, 'no indication that there will be a pledge to not do this again.' On Monday, Hoekstra welcomed Carney's decision to increase its military spending but he disputed Carney's characterization, telling CBC the U.S. is 'not squeezing' its trading partners, adding, 'we'll get past this.' 'We will have an agreement with the Canadians. You know that the timing and the, you know, and the content of when that agreement will be reached, you know, that's between the president and your prime minister,' he told Power and Politics host David Cochrane. Carney had earlier acknowledged that because Canada buys so much military materiel from U.S. defence manufacturers that any increase in spending will benefit them and continue the cross-border relationship. 'First and foremost, we're doing this for us. Relatedly, we're doing it as a strong NATO partner,' said Carney. 'And of course, the United States is a fundamental ally of the country, so I think it's very complementary to the process of developing that new economic and security partnership with the Americans.' However, he also said looking to others, like Europe, is 'just smart. It's better to be diversified. It's better to have options. It's better to have different supply chains and broader partners.'
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Canada pledges to meet Nato's 2% defence spending target within a year
Canada will significantly boost its defence spending to hit a Nato target of 2% of GDP years earlier than planned, Prime Minister Mark Carney has announced. In a speech at the University of Toronto on Monday, Carney said the action was required to ward off the "multiplying" threats from hostile governments, terrorist entities and cyber criminals. He also conceded his country was "too reliant" on the United States for defence, adding that Washington was "reducing its relative contribution to our collective security". Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte is pushing for members to agree to a new spending target of 3.5% of GDP at a summit later this month. In his address, Mark Carney said the world was at a "hinge moment" similar to the end of the Second World War. He said his country must act in the face of an aggressive Russia and China, and threats to Arctic security. He also accused Washington of looking to "monetise its hegemony" by making access to its market more costly. Canada spent 1.4% of its GDP on defence in 2024. GDP stands for gross domestic product, and is a measure of all the economic activity of companies, governments, and people in a country. During the election campaign earlier this year, Carney had pledged to hit the 2% spending target by 2030, while the previous government under Justin Trudeau had promised to meet it by 2032. However on Monday, Carney said the spending goal would be hit by March next year. The prime minister said Canada's equipment had aged, "hindering our military preparedness". Only one of four submarines were seaworthy and less than half the maritime fleet and land vehicles were in good working order, he said. Carney said the new strategy would have four pillars - investing more in soldiers and equipment, expanding the military's capability, strengthening the domestic defence industry, and diversifying Canada's defence partnerships. This is an age where "middle powers" must act to defend themselves knowing "if they're not at the table, they're on the menu", Carney said. Carney's announcement comes just a week before Canada hosts the G7 Summit from 15 to 17 June. Speaking to reporters later, Carney said the government's new plan includes a cash increase of C$9.3bn ($6.5bn, £4.8bn) for this fiscal year, which he said will bring Canada's defence spending to the Nato threshold. Some of it would be immediately "spendable" on personnel and equipment. This would include investing in new submarines, aircraft, ships, armoured vehicles and artillery, as well as new drones and sensors to monitor activity in the Arctic and seafloor approaches to the country, he said. Carney said the government would also create a new defence procurement agency, following criticisms of the current process as slow and unwieldly. The agency would "move more quickly in making procurement decisions" and would focus on building domestic capacity. A report by a parliamentary committee in June 2024 highlighted that delays, cost overruns, bureaucratic hurdles, a shortage of personnel and the politicisation of the defence procurement process raised concerns about the government's ability to provide the armed forces with the equipment it needed "in a timely and cost-effective manner". Nato members have for years pledged to meet the 2% target - now seen as the bare minimum - but Canada has long lagged behind its allies. Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte arrived in London on Monday where he said the military alliance needed a "400% increase in air and missile defence" to maintain a credible defence deterrence. Last week, Rutte proposed that Nato members spend 5% of their GDP on defence - something US President Donald Trump has called for in the past. Nato chief is determined to give Trump a win with 5% defence spending plan Talks ongoing over Nato defence target, says No 10 Canada proposes sweeping immigration and security bill
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
EDITORIAL: Meeting NATO's 2% target the right move
Provided it is done competently, we agree with Prime Minister Mark Carney's announcement Monday that Canada, at long last, will meet its NATO commitment to increase military spending to 2% of gross domestic product (GDP) in this fiscal year. That's five years ahead of Carney's previous promise to meet the 2% target by 2030. We're so far behind — Canada currently spends 1.4% of GDP on defence annually — that NATO is already considering a new target for member nations to spend 5% of GDP on defence. Canada's failure to meet the 2% target, set by NATO in 2006, has been a long-standing national embarrassment. It has eaten away at our credibility and our effectiveness on issues of global security and international conflicts. It has justifiably upset many of our NATO allies for not pulling our own weight and, most recently, angered U.S. President Donald Trump who, on this issue, has a valid point. At the end of the Second World War, Canada had the world's fourth-largest navy after the U.S., U.K and former Soviet Union. At the end of the Korean War, Canada was spending 7% of GDP on defence. Today, we have members of our military relying on food donations to make ends meet while being sent into armed conflicts — where they continue to serve honourably — with aging and obsolete equipment. This is a national disgrace. Canada's submarines, ships, aircraft, military vehicles and artillery are all in desperate need of upgrading, as is our military presence in the Arctic, given the growing interest in its mineral resources by hostile countries such as Russia and China. No country can claim to be a sovereign nation unless it has the ability to monitor and, where necessary, counter incursions into its territory. Our concern is with Carney's pledge to 'ensure that every dollar is invested wisely, including by prioritizing made-in-Canada manufacturing and supply chains.' EDITORIAL: Jobless numbers spell trouble EDITORIAL: Fighting wildfires a national priority That's not because of the intent — we agree with it — but because there are so many examples of military spending that have turned into fiascoes and boondoggles by previous governments. We're also concerned that Carney is making this major announcement on defence spending in advance of this year's federal budget and how the increased spending on defence will impact the government's overall finances.
