EDITORIAL: Meeting NATO's 2% target the right move
Provided it is done competently, we agree with Prime Minister Mark Carney's announcement Monday that Canada, at long last, will meet its NATO commitment to increase military spending to 2% of gross domestic product (GDP) in this fiscal year.
That's five years ahead of Carney's previous promise to meet the 2% target by 2030.
We're so far behind — Canada currently spends 1.4% of GDP on defence annually — that NATO is already considering a new target for member nations to spend 5% of GDP on defence.
Canada's failure to meet the 2% target, set by NATO in 2006, has been a long-standing national embarrassment.
It has eaten away at our credibility and our effectiveness on issues of global security and international conflicts.
It has justifiably upset many of our NATO allies for not pulling our own weight and, most recently, angered U.S. President Donald Trump who, on this issue, has a valid point.
At the end of the Second World War, Canada had the world's fourth-largest navy after the U.S., U.K and former Soviet Union.
At the end of the Korean War, Canada was spending 7% of GDP on defence.
Today, we have members of our military relying on food donations to make ends meet while being sent into armed conflicts — where they continue to serve honourably — with aging and obsolete equipment.
This is a national disgrace.
Canada's submarines, ships, aircraft, military vehicles and artillery are all in desperate need of upgrading, as is our military presence in the Arctic, given the growing interest in its mineral resources by hostile countries such as Russia and China.
No country can claim to be a sovereign nation unless it has the ability to monitor and, where necessary, counter incursions into its territory.
Our concern is with Carney's pledge to 'ensure that every dollar is invested wisely, including by prioritizing made-in-Canada manufacturing and supply chains.'
EDITORIAL: Jobless numbers spell trouble
EDITORIAL: Fighting wildfires a national priority
That's not because of the intent — we agree with it — but because there are so many examples of military spending that have turned into fiascoes and boondoggles by previous governments.
We're also concerned that Carney is making this major announcement on defence spending in advance of this year's federal budget and how the increased spending on defence will impact the government's overall finances.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Spend more or get ready to speak Russian, Nato chief warns UK
People in Britain had 'better learn to speak Russian' if the Government does not ramp up defence spending, Mark Rutte has suggested. The Nato secretary general also warned that Russia could attack Nato by 2030 in a speech in London on Monday. Asked by The Telegraph if Rachel Reeves should increase taxes to fund a defence budget of 5 per cent of GDP, Mr Rutte said: 'If you do not go to the 5 per cent, including the 3.5 per cent for defence spending, you could still have the NHS…the pension system, but you better learn to speak Russian. That's the consequence.' The Nato secretary general has for weeks been pressuring allies to boost spending on defence and security to a combined 5 per cent in order to placate Donald Trump, who has threatened to withdraw American troops from Europe. Mr Rutte, who also met Sir Keir Starmer in Downing Street on Monday, was speaking hours after Russia launched its largest-ever drone attack against Ukraine, triggering Nato to scramble jets in Poland. 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,' Mr Rutte said. He added that Nato needs 'a 400-percent increase in air and missile defence' to maintain credible deterrence and defence. 'The fact is, we need a quantum leap in our collective defence,' he said. He said 'we are all on the eastern flank', referring to the border with Russia, adding that the distance between European capitals is 'only a few minutes' for Russian missiles. Last Monday, as part of the Strategic Defence Review, the Prime Minister pledged to spend 3 per cent of GDP on defence by the end of the next parliament. However, less than 24 hours later, Nato said the figure would have to rise to a minimum of 3.5 percent, which Sir Keir has agreed to without confirming how this will be achieved. Sir Keir will be under renewed pressure to explain how this uplift will be funded ahead of the Chancellor's spending review on Wednesday. The Defence Secretary has previously refused to rule out tax rises to fund an increase in defence spending. One of the central messages from Mr Rutte's speech in London urged alliance members to boost capabilities to produce materiel, arguing that Nato armies needed 'thousands more armoured vehicles and tanks'. 'Russia produces in three months what the whole of Nato produces in a year,' he said, which was followed by another stark warning: 'Russia could be using military force against Nato in five years.' But Mr Rutte also conceded that Vladimir Putin knows an attack on Nato would carry 'devastating consequences'. He said: 'We are deadly serious that if anyone tries to attack us, the consequences of that attack would be devastating, be it Russia or anyone else. 'This is not only about money and weaponry but mentality. We do realise there is a lot at stake here. The people trying to act against us must understand that.' Mr Rutte warned that China is developing its military power at breakneck speed. 'The main long-term threat against Nato is Russia. There's no doubt. But there is more than Russia. Nato was never established only to fight the Soviet Union,' he said. 'It was about protecting Nato from anyone who wants to attack us. What you see in China is an enormous build up of their military.' Taking questions after his speech, Mr Rutte insisted that the US remained committed to Nato. But he also admitted that the US had carried 'too much of the burden' in propping up the alliance as he urged Europe and Canada to spend more on defence. 'American allies have broad shoulders. Europe and Canada will do more for our shared security. That will be backed by America's rock-solid commitment to Nato,' he told the audience at Chatham House. As Mr Rutte was speaking, Canada announced it would pour extra billions into its armed forces and hit Nato's spending target five years earlier than promised. Canada has been under pressure from the United States and other Nato allies for years to increase military funding. Canada currently spends about 1.4 per cent of GDP on defence. 'Now is the time to act with urgency, force, and determination,' Mark Carney, the Canadian prime minister, said in a speech in Toronto, reiterating promises to work more closely with Europe's defence industry. Thanks for following our live coverage of Mark Rutte's speech at Chatham House in London. Here's a reminder of what he said: Nato members should boost defence spending to five per cent or be prepared to speak Russian, Mr Rutte warned Mr Rutte also singled out Moscow as the most significant threat facing Nato 'Russia could be using military force against Nato in five years,' he warned Mr Rutte warned that China was developing its military power at breakneck speed Taking questions from the audience, Mr Rutte insisted that the US remained committed to Nato, despite reports that Mr Trump was planning to withdraw troops currently stationed in Europe later this year While Mr Rutte may paint a positive picture of the UK's position on defence, he paints a rather gloomy picture of world affairs. 'The world we thought we were entering in after Berlin Wall came down is definitely gone,' he warns. 'Vladimir Putin is clearly expansionist. His economy is on a total war footing.' Again, he stresses that while the Nato economy is 25x bigger than Moscow's, adding: 'Russia is outpacing us 4-1'. It is worrying and his concerns that Europe might sleep walk into a war it could win if it was well prepared are real. Some of the key themes that he will surely raise at The Hague summit will include the need for Nato to invest in Air defence systems, of which 'we simply do not have enough', he has said. 'We need five times as many systems to defend ourselves against missiles.' It is unclear if he thinks Nato can get there, but it is definitely something he will be pushing hard for in the coming weeks. Mark Rutte has said that Ukraine is still on an 'irreversible path' to Nato. 'It's my assumption it will be there after the summit' at the Hague in June, he told a journalist at Chatham House, who asked about whether the US would veto Kyiv joining the military alliance. Mark Rutte is very positive about the UK's recent Strategic Defence Review, more so than other commentators have been since it was published a week ago. He praised John Healey, the Defence Secretary, for investing is 6 new munitions factories. What keeps him up at night, he tells us, is Nato nations failing to invest in production. That what will lose a war with Russia are empty ammunition stockpiles, not spending a certain amount on defence. He said following a day spent with Mr Healey and the Prime Minister, he is confident with Britain's defence strategy. However, his comments do not diminish the need to reach 5% of gdp on defence. He insists he is confident Nato nations will get there and that they will resolve this at The Hague summit later this month. Which is a rather upbeat take on the state of defence right now. Mark Rutte has refused to say whether Sir Keir Starmer agreed to boost defence spending to 3.5 per cent during their meeting in Downing Street today. Asked about his meeting with the Prime Minister, Mr Rutte said: 'Every country is working in cycles to update its defence strategy.' He continued: 'I'm really impressed by the strategic defence review. It's exactly what we need. The drones, the latest technology, investing in six factories producing ammunition. This is at the core of the UK defence review, including spending targets.' As Mark Rutte delivered his speech at Chatham House, Canada announced it would pour extra billions into its armed forces and hit Nato's spending target five years earlier than promised. Canada has been under pressure from the United States and other Nato allies for years to increase military funding. Canada currently spends about 1.4pc of GDP on defence. 'Now is the time to act with urgency, force, and determination,' Mark Carney said in a speech in Toronto, reiterating promises to work more closely with Europe's defence industry. Mark Rutte has warned that any attack on Nato would carry 'devastating consequences', singling out Russia. 'We are deadly serious that if anyone tries to attack us, the consequences of that attack would be devastating, be it Russia or anyone else,' he said. 'This is not only about money and weaponry but mentality. We do realise there is a lot at stake here. The people trying to act against us must understand that.' Asked if Nato's main threat was Russia or China, he said: 'The main long-term threat against Nato is Russia. There's no doubt. But there is more than Russia. Nato was never established only to fight the Soviet Union. It was about protecting Nato from anyone who wants to attack us. What you see in China is an enormous build up of their military.' Mark Rutte will now take questions after delivering a speech at Chatham House in London. We'll bring you his answers as they come in. America has carried 'too much' of the burden of holding up Nato, the military alliance's chief has admitted. 'American allies have broad shoulders. Europe and Canada will do more for our shared security. That will be backed by America's rock solid commitment to Nato,' he said in a speech in London. Russia could attack Nato within five years, Mark Rutte has warned. The Nato chief, who is delivering a speech at Chatham House in London, said there was 'no longer east or west' given the speed and lethality of Russian missiles. 'We are all on the eastern flank now,' he said, adding: 'The distance between European capitals is only a few minutes.' Kicking off his speech at Chatham House, Mark Rutte said he welcomed the UK government's strategic defence review, which set out how the government will boost defence spending. 'I welcome that the UK government will spend more in the future,' he said. 'I know we can count on the UK as we start the next chapter for Nato.' Mark Rutte has now started his speech. You can watch him speak at the top of this page. The Kremlin has condemned Nato's plan to quadruple its spending on air and missile defence saying it is European taxpayers who will suffer. Mark Rutte, head of the Western military alliance, will today urge for a 'quantum leap' in defence capabilities including a '400 per cent increase' in aerial defences to shield Nato against Russia. In response to the expected speech, Dmitry Peskov, Vladimir Putin's spokesman, said Nato 'is demonstrating itself as an instrument of aggression and confrontation'. 'European taxpayers will spend their money to defuse some threat that they say comes from our country,' he said. Gaps in the alliance's air defences are considered one of the Western alliance's most pressing challenges. 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,' Mr Rutte will argue at Chatham House think tank in London, after a meeting with Sir Keir Starmer. Mark Rutte, the secretary general of Nato, is about to deliver a speech at Chatham House in London, where he will argue for members to boost defence spending to counter the threat of Russia. You will be able to watch the speech live at the top of this page when it starts. The head of Nato will today announce that the military alliance needs to increase air and missile defence spending by 400 per cent. Mark Rutte, who is on a visit to London, has been pushing members to boost defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, and a further 1.5 per cent security-related spending to meet Donald Trump's demand for a 5 per cent target. Mr Rutte believes the target will be agreed at the Nato summit in the Hague later this month, where the major air and missile defence boost will be top of the agenda. At a speech at the Chatham House think-tank, Mr Rutte will argue: 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies.' 'The fact is, we need a quantum leap in our collective defence. The fact is, we must have more forces and capabilities to implement our defence plans in full. The fact is, danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends.' Gaps in Nato's air defences are considered one of the Western alliance's most pressing challenges. Errol Musk, father of Elon, has been pictured sitting next to Sergei Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, at a ultra-nationalist conference in Moscow. Mr Musk is one of a number of controversial attendees at the conference, which also includes Alex Jones, the American conspiracy theorist. Volodymyr Zelensky has said that a fresh prisoner exchange with Russia is ongoing and will take place in several rounds over the 'coming days', announcing that Kyiv had received the first group of captives from Russia. 'Today, an exchange began, which will continue in several stages over the coming days,' the Ukrainian president said on social media. 'Among those we are bringing back now are the wounded, the severely wounded, and those under the age of 25,' he added. The deal to exchange prisoners of war and repatriate the bodies of killed fighters was the only concrete agreement reached at talks in Istanbul earlier this month. Russia is 'too weak' to attack Nato because it cannot even defeat Ukraine, the Hungarian prime minister has said. Asked if the war in Ukraine could spill into a conflict with Nato, Viktor Orban said: 'The Russians are too weak for that. They are not capable of defeating Ukraine, so they are not capable of attacking Nato.' But Mr Orban also said that Ukraine was losing the war and that it cannot be resolved by Europe. 'Neither the Europeans nor the Ukrainians can reach an agreement with the Russians. There will have to be an agreement between the Russians and the Americans,' Mr Orban added. A United Nations investigation has found that Russia committed war crimes by launching drone strikes on civilian areas in Kherson, which residents said turned the city into a 'human safari'. The Telegraph previously spoke to one Kherson resident, Tatiana, who survived a kamikaze drone attack in the middle of a street packed with civilians. Anastasia, a 23-year-old aid worker and Tatiana's niece, said at the time that she felt her home city had become increasingly dangerous because of Russian terror attacks. 'More and more residents of the city cannot leave the house, even for food, because there is a great possibility that they will not return home,' she told the Telegraph. 'It was so lucky my aunt came home unharmed.' The Kremlin said on Monday that an advance by Russian forces towards Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region was partially motivated by a desire to create a 'buffer zone'. Russia said on Sunday its forces had advanced to the edge of the east-central Ukrainian region, a claim which Kyiv has denied. If true, it would mark the first time Russian troops have reached the region in the three-year war. Its capital, Dnipro, is a major military hub for Ukraine. Asked if the advance was designed to create a buffer zone, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: 'Without a doubt that is part of it.' Gaps in Nato's air defences are considered one of the Western alliance's most pressing challenges. If using the war in Ukraine as the blueprint for a future conflict with Russia, cities, military bases, logistical hubs and factories will all be targeted in long-range attacks. Previous estimations have suggested that Nato's militaries only have enough air defence systems to cover 5 per cent of its Eastern flank with Russia. Some allies, like Britain, do even take surface-to-air systems particularly seriously. For example, the UK's armed forces employ the Sky Sabre system, but only have access to a handful of them. It is believed one is on loan in Poland, and another protecting the Falklands. When Mark Rutte, Nato's secretary-general, delivers a speech at the Chatham House think tank later on Monday, he will warn air defence systems need to be increased four-fold across the alliance. They are at the centre of his new capability targets, agreed by Nato defence ministers last week, which will see defence spending jump up to 3.5 per cent across the alliance. Other crucial gaps to plug include long-range missiles, heavy and light armour and the logistics needed to move vast numbers of forces rapidly from west to east in the event of a Russian invasion into Nato territory. The Kremlin said that Nato's plan for a huge boost in air and missile defence was an 'instrument of aggression and confrontation'. The Western military alliance 'is demonstrating itself as an instrument of aggression and confrontation', Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters in Moscow. Mark Rutte, Nato Secretary-General, is due to say in a speech in London on Monday that the alliance needs a 400 per cent increase in air and missile defence. Russia launched 479 drones at Ukraine in the biggest overnight drone bombardment of war, the Ukrainian air force said on Monday. As well as drones, 20 missiles of various types were fired at different parts of Ukraine, according to the air force, which said the barrage targeted mainly central and western areas of Ukraine. Ukraine's air force said its air defences destroyed 277 drones and 19 missiles on Sunday night, claiming that only 10 drones or missiles hit their target. Officials said one person was injured. It was not possible to independently verify the claims. We will be bringing you all the latest updates from Nato chief Mark Rutte's statements in London and the war in Ukraine.
Hamilton Spectator
3 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Mark Carney revives tough talk about America and warns ‘a new imperialism threatens'
OTTAWA—Prime Minister Mark Carney, in unveiling $9 billion in new defence spending, revived tough talk against the United States Monday, describing America as hustling its allies to pay now or risk losing their ability to sell products to American consumers. Speaking in Toronto, Carney did not use words like 'grift' or 'hustle' but he also did not mince words when it came to describing the U.S. as abandoning its role as a powerful leader on the world stage in favour of flexing its market muscle. The sharper rhetoric comes at a time when the prime minister and his officials are scrambling to strike a new 'economic and security' agreement with President Donald Trump before next week's G7 leaders' summit. Canada's stated goal is to get Trump to lift tariffs the U.S. president levied on Canada and other global trading partners, even as Washington also demands NATO allies cough up billions more for military budgets. A Canadian government official told the Star Monday that it is 'difficult to say whether or not we'll get to a deal before the G7' with not much having changed since the most recent meetings in Washington last week. In fact, last week, Trump doubled down on tariffs, hiking surcharges on Canadian and other steel and aluminum imports to 50 per cent. Carney opted not to increase Canada's level of counter-tariffs in response, but on Monday he did amp up his political rhetoric several notches. Carney justified Ottawa's accelerated military spending as he outlined a 'darker, more competitive world' and an 'age of disorder' that he said requires Canada to better defend this country and diversify its security and economic partners. After the Second World War, Carney said, Canada grew more distant from Britain and aligned itself more closely with the U.S., a rapprochement that intensified after the fall of the Soviet Union established the U.S. as the leading world power. 'Its gravitational pull on Canada, always strong, became virtually irresistible and made the U.S. our closest ally and dominant trading partner,' said Carney. 'But now the United States is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contribution to our collective security.' At the same time, Carney said, global 'trade routes, allegiances, energy systems, and even intelligence itself are being rewired.' 'Rising great powers are now in strategic competition with America. A new imperialism threatens,' he said, adding at other points in the speech that threats from Russia, China, non-state actors and terrorist organizations are on the rise. 'Middle powers compete for interests and attention, knowing that if they are not at the table, they're on the menu.' Carney will host the leaders of the largest western democratic economies, the so-called Group of Seven, next week in Kananaskis, Alta. Trump has said he'll attend. Carney has also invited a range of 'middle powers' too. Leaders of Ukraine, India, Brazil, South Africa, and Australia are coming. Newly-elected South Korean President Lee Jae-myung, and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, have confirmed in the last two days they will attend. The Star has learned Carney has also invited Saudi Arabia Crown prince and prime minister, Mohammed bin Salman, the de facto ruler of the Saudi kingdom once tied to the order to kill a journalist, whom Trump met last month. The Saudi prince has not formally yet responded to the invitation, an official confirmed to the Star. WASHINGTON (AP) — The fist bump seems so long ago. Canada is focusing discussions at the summit on global economic and energy security among other concerns, as it looks ahead to the NATO summit at the end of June. On Monday, Carney said his sharp increase in military spending in one year — which he once said would take five years to achieve — is needed to protect Canada's security needs, not a move to meet Trump's demands. Yet it was clear the U.S. is a big factor in Carney's decision. The prime minister, who campaigned on criticism of Trump as someone who wanted to 'break us to own us' and often used to describe the integrated Canada-U.S. relationship as 'over,' had dropped that talk in the weeks since he won. When Carney met Trump in Washington, he flattered the president as a 'transformational' leader, and appealed to him to see the mutual benefit of renewed ties, saying Canada is the 'largest client' of the U.S. However, the talks to renew a more integrated relationship do not seem to be headed where Carney wants. Trump's ambassador to Canada, Pete Hoekstra, told the Toronto Star last week any new 'framework' nevertheless almost certainly still includes tariffs. 'This is discussing the level of tariffs, how broad they apply and these kinds of things,' Hoekstra said, 'not getting to zero' tariffs. Meanwhile, slim hope remains that direct talks between Trump and Prime Minister Mark Carney Roy Norton, a former Canadian diplomat who spent years in the U.S. and is now a professor at the University of Waterloo, said in an interview the prime minister's comments Monday reflect that 'Carney understands how all this is evolving. He understands that Trump is not going to change, that we do have to act dramatically, seriously, to strengthen our position globally, that the dependence is unhealthy in the current context, as in, Trump is not going to give us a break.' 'We've heard from the U.S. ambassador that we're just supposed to arrive at a deal, but some measure of tariffs will remain. So they breached the existing deal that he (Trump) signed and instituted tariffs that we consider to be illegal. And we're supposed to make concessions to arrive effectively at a new deal, with no indication that there's any reciprocality in terms of willingness on their part to negotiate any of our concerns and accommodate us. And most importantly,' Norton added, 'no indication that there will be a pledge to not do this again.' On Monday, Hoekstra welcomed Carney's decision to increase its military spending but he disputed Carney's characterization, telling CBC the U.S. is 'not squeezing' its trading partners, adding, 'we'll get past this.' 'We will have an agreement with the Canadians. You know that the timing and the, you know, and the content of when that agreement will be reached, you know, that's between the president and your prime minister,' he told Power and Politics host David Cochrane. Carney had earlier acknowledged that because Canada buys so much military materiel from U.S. defence manufacturers that any increase in spending will benefit them and continue the cross-border relationship. 'First and foremost, we're doing this for us. Relatedly, we're doing it as a strong NATO partner,' said Carney. 'And of course, the United States is a fundamental ally of the country, so I think it's very complementary to the process of developing that new economic and security partnership with the Americans.' However, he also said looking to others, like Europe, is 'just smart. It's better to be diversified. It's better to have options. It's better to have different supply chains and broader partners.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Canada to hit NATO spending target this year as it shifts defense focus toward EU
Canada will reach NATO's defense spending target of 2% of GDP this year, five years ahead of schedule, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced on June 9. Speaking at the University of Toronto, Carney said the move is part of a strategic pivot away from reliance on the U.S. and toward deeper cooperation with the European Union, citing growing security threats from Russia, China, and other adversaries. Carney said Canada's current military capabilities are inadequate, noting that only one of four submarines is operational and much of the maritime and land fleet is outdated. To reverse this trend, his government is launching a $6.8 (9.3 billion Canadian dollars) boost to the defense budget for 2025-26. The investment will be tabled in Parliament through supplementary estimates and directed toward rebuilding the Canadian Armed Forces, upgrading equipment, and expanding domestic production capabilities. The new defense posture includes reassessing major procurement decisions, such as the planned purchase of U.S.-made F-35 jets, and prioritizing partnerships with European firms for equipment acquisitions. Carney emphasized that three-quarters of Canada's defense capital spending has gone to the U.S., a pattern he said must end. "We're doing this for us," Carney was quoted as saying. "Relatedly we're doing it as a strong NATO partner, we're a firm believer in NATO, and we're standing shoulder to shoulder with our NATO allies, we'll continue to do so. ." Carney's announcement comes just ahead of the NATO leaders' summit in late June, where member states are expected to commit to higher defense spending thresholds of up to 5%. The prime minister said Canada would support a new NATO defense industrial pledge and participate in the EU's ReArm Europe initiative. He added that future cooperation with the EU will be a major theme of the upcoming Canada-EU summit. Read also: Ukraine war latest: Ukraine shoots down nearly 500 drones, missiles in Russian record strike, Air Force says We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
