With billions on the line, New NM federal funding legislative subcommittee meets for the first time
Members of the recently created Federal Funding Stabilization Subcommittee met for the first time Wednesday for briefings on how federal funding is funneled into New Mexico and how current and future cuts might impact the state
The subcommittee formed in response to the loss of funds and threats of cuts from the Trump administration to programs that affect state residents, including Medicaid, federal nutrition programs and programs run by the various state agencies. Lawmakers started with an overall look at where federal funding is allocated throughout the state.
New Mexico Department of Finance Secretary Wayne Propst explained to the committee that according to a Federal Funds Information for States report released last week, New Mexico is the top state receiving federal funds. The report is based on data from fiscal year 2023.
'The study confirmed that New Mexico is number one in terms of federal funding coming into the state,' Propst said. 'For every $1 in taxes that we send to the federal government, we receive approximately $3.21 back in New Mexico. That includes those direct payments, but it also includes the funding for our military bases, our national labs and other items.'
He said the state's overall budget for Fiscal Year 2026 is $33.16 billion, with 43.5%, $14.44 billion, funded by federal money. The Health Care Authority receives the most federal money — more than $11 million, which makes up about 74% of its annual budget this fiscal year.
Propst also noted that if Congress ends up passing the budget bill — which made its way out of the U.S. House of Representatives last week and will now be considered by the Senate — New Mexico will see impacts to Medicaid; a $290 billion reduction in funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; and a reduction in the federal oil and gas royalty rate from 16.67% to 12.5%.
NM reps say GOP bill will gut Medicaid and also reduce oil money that could help state save it
Eric Chenier, principal analyst for the Legislative Finance Committee, further broke down federal funding by state agencies, including the Early Childhood Education and Care Department, Higher Education Department, Department of Transportation and Department of Health. Chenier noted that as of May, the University of New Mexico, New Mexico State University and New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology reported losing $36 million, $27.2 million and $2.5 million in federal grant revenue respectively.
Legislative Education Finance Committee Director John Sena delved into how federal funds are used for public education in New Mexico. He explained that the state is aware of several areas that have lost federal funding, including $12.3 million for Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief, which was awarded to the state during the COVID-19 pandemic; $5.1 million for the Teacher Quality Partnership Program, which funded residency programs and mentoring for 68 people; and $5 million for school-based mental health services, which supported programs in Silver City and the Central Region Educational Cooperative and puts 18 positions at risk.
AG Torrez joins lawsuit over federal education funds
Sen. Bill Soules (D-Las Cruces), co-chair of the subcommittee, added that he wants to see flexibility from the group as more changes are announced from the Trump administration.
'There are going to be things that come up that we haven't thought about. For instance, we're getting into fire season and lots of the fire response often comes from the federal government. That's somewhat more in question now. Is the state going to be responsible to uphold all of those? That could be a major budget area,' Soules said. 'There also, I think, are areas where already we're seeing some of our small businesses, because of tariffs, are closing down, pulling back, have lower amounts and stuff, which means that's less revenue coming in on the state level as those businesses close or have to lay off workers or things of that sort.'
The next subcommittee meeting is scheduled for July 1 and 2 in Santa Fe.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
DC police allegedly downplay violent crimes to make stats look more favorable: ‘Completely agree' with Trump
The Metropolitan Police Department in Washington, DC, is facing accusations it routinely manipulates statistics on crimes such as stabbings, shootings and carjackings to create the appearance that violent offenses are dropping. At least one high-ranking officer has been suspended so far over the disturbing allegations, which the DC Police Union has said effectively reflect standard operating procedure. Michael Pulliam, police commander of the DC's 3rd District, was put on paid leave in mid-May, allegedly for manipulating local crime statistics to make them appear more favorable. 'When our members respond to the scene of a felony offense where there is a victim reporting that a felony occurred, inevitably there will be a lieutenant or a captain that will show up on that scene and direct those members to take a report for a lesser offense,' DC Police Union Chairman Gregg Pemberton told NBC Washington last month. 'So instead of taking a report for a shooting or a stabbing or a carjacking, they will order that officer to take a report for a theft or an injured person to the hospital or a felony assault, which is not the same type of classification.' The department confirmed to the outlet that Michael Pulliam, commander of the city's 3rd District, was put on paid leave in mid-May — and unnamed law enforcement sources said he was being investigated internally for making questionable changes to crime data. Pulliam allegedly falsified violent crime statistics to make them appear more favorable for the city, an accusation he denies. President Trump last week invoked section 740 of DC's Home Rule Act to place the capital's police force under federal control for 30 days, citing an out-of-control rise in violent crime, particularly among youthful offenders. President Trump evoked a section of Washington, DC's, Home Rule Act to put law enforcement authorities under federal control in the district for 30 days and has deployed 700 National Guard troops. AP 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people,' Trump said Monday. 'And we're not going to let it happen anymore. We're not going to take it.' Trump said the crime crackdown — which he dubbed 'Liberation Day' for DC — would include the deployment of 700 National Guard members, with an additional 750 coming from GOP-led South Carolina, Ohio and West Virginia in the days to come. The move provoked swift condemnation from liberals, who rushed to left-leaning news outlets such as CNN and MSNBC to accuse the president of everything from 'federal overreach' to 'a power grab' to using the federal takeover as a ploy to get late powerful pedophile Jeffrey Epstein out of the headlines. Prominent Democrats including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York City and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took to social media to parrot the MPD's crime stats, which have been thrown into question pending the results of the Pulliam investigation. 'Violent crime in Washington, DD, is at a 30-year low,' Jeffries said Monday. 'Donald Trump has no basis to take over the local police department. And zero credibility on the issue of law and order. Get lost.' Clinton posted on X last week, 'As you listen to an unhinged Trump try to justify deploying the National Guard in DC, here's reality: Violent crime in DC is at a 30-year low.' The District of Columbia has the fourth-highest murder rate per capita in the US, according to a February report by Rochester Institute of Technology, seeing 265 murders — a 20-year high — in 2023 and 186 in 2024. Even with the 30.7% drop in homicides between 2023 and 2024 as recorded by the MPD, DC remained the fourth worst US city for murders per capita, edging out well-known homicide hot spots like Compton, California; Newark, New Jersey and even Chicago. In announcing the crackdown, President Trump noted that DC's murder rate even eclipses those of crime-challenged Mexico City and Bogota, Colombia. The MPD's data also asserts that violent crime in DC dropped 35% across the board between 2023 (5,345 reported incidents) and 2024 (3,469 incidents). Pemberton said during an interview on Fox Business that the police union 'completely agree[s]' with Trump's decision to federalize the city's police force. 'Crime in the district is out of control and something needs to be done about it. This concept that crime is down is really an old trope,' he said. 'They're using statistics in a way that makes it appear that crime is going down, but our rank-and-file officers know that we're going call to call to call for armed carjackings, stabbings, robberies, shootings, homicides and the crime isn't going anywhere.' The Post reached out to the union Sunday but did not immediately hear back.
Washington Post
29 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Florida GOP scraps ‘Deport Depot' merch after Home Depot objects
The Republican Party of Florida was pushing a new line of merchandise Friday: Baseball caps, T-shirts, mugs and insulating drink sleeves with 'THE DEPORT DEPOT' in blocky stencil font diagonally across a bright orange square.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP Rep. Blasts Trump in Newspaper the President Is Suing for $10 Billion
A Republican congressman has broken party ranks to very publicly criticize Donald Trump in an opinion piece for the same newspaper the president seems to hate more than any other media outlet right now. John Moolenaar, a GOP House Representative for Michigan who enthusiastically backed Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' as a piece of 'vital legislation' earlier in July, offered a near-surgical dissection of the MAGA leader's recent deal with a U.S. tech giant in a letter to the Wall Street Journal—titled 'Trump Takes a Wrong Turn on Nvidia's Chips.' Trump is suing the WSJ for a cool $10 billion, claiming the newspaper's July article about a bizarre and sexually suggestive birthday card he's alleged to have once sent convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein was 'false, malicious, and defamatory.' Moolenaar's letter took a scalpel to the president's decision last week to permit AI computer chip manufacturer Nvidia to sell advanced hardware to China, in exchange for the tech giant paying 15 percent tariffs to the White House on sales to the authoritarian Asian country. The arrangement followed after Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, whom Trump has described as 'my friend,' begged the MAGA leader to overturn a Commerce Department policy, implemented in April, that had otherwise restricted those exports, costing Nvidia an estimated $5.5 billion in the process. Trump personally owns at least half a million dollars' worth of Nvidia stock, the Washington Post reported this week. Moolenaar described allowing U.S. companies to sell 'export-controlled technologies to China, while paying the government a percentage of the sales,' as a worrying 'departure from precedent' given such technologies are 'controlled because of their potential to harm national security should they fall into nefarious hands.' To win in the budding AI arms race, as well as triumph in 'our broader rivalry with China,' the Michigan representative suggested it is imperative to 'treat advanced chips as strategic assets, not ordinary trade goods.' He went on to say 'the president's proposal also raises constitutional concerns,' given he is of the view 'Congress, not the executive branch, has the authority to tax, raise revenue and appropriate funds,' adding that legislation Trump has himself signed into law, namely the 2018 Export Control Reform Act, 'explicitly forbids charging fees for export licenses.' 'Taking a percentage of sales revenue in exchange for a license violates that—regardless of whether it is labelled 'license condition' or 'revenue sharing,'' he concluded.
