Tighter control of apartment master keys moves forward in ‘Miya's Law'
'Miya's Law,' named for a 19-year-old Florida woman who was killed by an apartment maintenance worker in 2021, was passed by the Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor. Senate Bill 114 (SB114) initially applied to complexes with 200 or more apartments. An amendment brought that down to 100 units as the bill was approved in a work session Thursday.
The bill also requires landlords to keep a log to account for the issuance and return of each key, along with written policies and procedures regarding their use.
During a bill hearing on Monday, Miya Marcano's mother and father urged Nevada lawmakers to make Nevada the third state to pass legislation that could have saved their daughter. Florida and Virginia already have similar laws.
'What happened to Miya is not just my personal tragedy. It's a public safety failure,' Miya's mother, Yma Scarbriel, said. 'No parent should have to go through what we went through. No family should have to bury their child because basic housing protections were not in place.'
Her father, Marlon Marcano, said, 'Let Miya's name represent action, not tragedy.'
The man who killed Miya had a criminal conviction involving the detonation of a bomb at a school, according to a representative of the Miya Marcano Foundation.
Lawmakers were reminded of a similar case in Nevada. In 1982, an 18-year-old student in Carson City was found dead in her apartment, a victim of strangulation. The case went unresolved until a DNA match in 1999 connected her death to David Mitchell, who worked at her apartment complex.
Sheila Jo Harris was the reigning Miss Douglas County when she was killed. She had moved from Gardnerville to Carson City to be closer to school. Harris was killed five days after she moved in.
SB114, sponsored by Democratic Sen. Julie Pazina, now advances to the full Senate for consideration.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
New Illinois law gives media better ability to curb retaliatory lawsuits
Gov. JB Pritzker signed into law Thursday a measure specifically granting journalists greater protection to fight off costly retaliatory lawsuits designed to chill their work in reporting on and investigating Illinois governmental units. The new law is an attempt to bolster efforts to combat what are known as 'strategic lawsuits against public participation' or 'SLAPPs' used by political figures as acts of intimidation that use the courts to try to forestall criticism of their governmental actions. In a statement accompanying his signing of the bill, Pritzker, a potential 2028 presidential aspirant, cited President Donald Trump's efforts to try to weaken the work of journalists investigating his presidency and administration. 'As Trump and his friends continue their frivolous and targeted attacks on members of the free press, we are working to protect and empower Illinois journalists as they keep the general public informed,' the Democratic governor said. 'This law will strengthen our anti-SLAPP legislation in Illinois — ensuring press don't have to fear retaliation for reporting the truth and reminding all Illinoisans that their free speech is safe, valued and protected,' he said. The new law is an outgrowth of a 2024 Illinois Supreme Court ruling that rejected an attempt by the Chicago Sun-Times to use the state's current anti-SLAPP Citizens Participation Act to dismiss a 2007 defamation lawsuit filed by a former executive director of the state's Property Tax Appeal Board involving a $1 million reduction in the assessment of the Trump International Hotel & Tower on the Chicago riverfront. The state's highest court concluded 'that an objective person would not find defendants' publication of the articles was reasonably calculated to elicit favorable government action or outcome,' thus failing to meet the current law's requirement that the actions be ''in furtherance' of government participation.' The new law specifically states that by the press 'opining, reporting, or investigating matters of public concern,' it is 'participating and communicating with the government.' The new law takes effect immediately, but applies only to legal cases beginning on or after Jan. 1.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Democrats face challenge in countering Trump on crime
Democrats are struggling to mount a response as Trump has federalized Washington, D.C., and seized control of the Metropolitan Police Department while threatening to take similar actions in other Democratic cities. In interviews with The Hill, some Democrats have expressed frustration with their party's emphasis on decreasing crime rates instead of focusing on the way voters feel walking the streets of their city. 'These crime statistics, as impressive as they are, are no substitute for how people feel and what they see, and Washington residents still feel like crime is too high and too pervasive, and … that reality has created this opening for Donald Trump,' said Democratic strategist Anthony Coley, who resides in the nation's capital. 'Now that is no excuse for this political stunt he is trying to do, but from a raw political perspective, you never want to give your political opponent an opening to address a real concern that your constituents have.' In a press conference last week, Trump signaled that Washington was just the start of his federal crackdown on crime and Democratic cities across the country could be next. 'You look at Chicago, how bad it is. You look at Los Angeles, how bad it is,' Trump said. 'We have other cities that are very bad. New York has a problem. And then you have, of course, Baltimore and Oakland. We don't even mention that anymore — they're so far gone.' 'We're not going to lose our cities over this, and this will go further,' Trump added. Trump appealed to voters' perceptions of crime during his 2024 campaign — even though crime rates in cities around the country were at multidecade lows. Now he is doubling down on his campaign rhetoric. A YouGov poll last week found that 89 percent of Americans think crime in U.S. cities is a problem. The poll also showed that more than half of Americans think crime in U.S. cities has increased since 2020. 'One of the reasons that Trump has taken to this is because there's this impression that Democrats are soft on crime and that progressives are too lax on criminals and criminal activity,' Democratic strategist Basil Smikle said. 'I think that it's important to say that crime has gone down in part because communities did respond to the high crime rates. … It wasn't just more policing, and I think that's a very important point that they need to hammer home.' In recent days, mayors of Democratic strongholds in Los Angeles, Oakland, New York, Chicago and Baltimore have pointed to their city's decreasing crime rates, calling Trump's moves baseless and power hungry. Many of them have also highlighted the policies they've implemented. 'From my first day in office, public safety has been my top priority,' Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said in a statement Sunday. 'In just two years we have made historic progress, driving down homicides by more than 30 percent and reducing shootings by almost 40 percent in the last year alone.' 'If President Trump wants to help make Chicago safer, he can start by releasing the funds for anti-violence programs that have been critical to our work to drive down crime and violence,' Johnson added. 'Sending in the National Guard would only serve to destabilize our city and undermine our public safety efforts.' And some Democrats say that's really all they can be doing — at least until they're able to take the battle to the courts. 'This is more about who you are going to believe,' Democratic strategist Rodell Mollineau said. 'There's a lot of dog-whistle in there, and if people are susceptible to believing that, then it's hard to combat it.' 'It's hard to say that you should respond with anything but the truth, even if some people don't want to hear the truth,' Mollineau added. 'This is performative, and it's not actually getting the results. I think that's where we need to go, but I do think that there's going to be a population that's never going to believe us.' At the same time, because Democrats have struggled with voters on crime, some strategists say now is the time for them to fine tune their policies — closing gaps that Trump could try to fill. 'I do think, though, that there are legislative fixes and tweaks that many lawmaking bodies and democratically held cities should revisit, even as the data continues to fall,' Coley said. He argues local government officials in D.C., in how they handled crime during and after the pandemic, created a political opening for Trump. 'So I think other cities should do what they can to further improve how people feel about public safety in their jurisdictions,' he added. 'And they should do that now.' Some Democrats say officials in their party have already done the work successfully and that sending that message to voters is what will ease their perceptions of unsafe streets. 'I don't think [Democrats] are out of touch because crime has gone down in these cities, so they know how to police their cities,' Smikle said. 'They have to just remind voters that they brought crime down in their cities, and they know how to do that.' Either way, Democrats say they will have to do something to convince voters they are competent on crime, but they say the political consequences could be low for Trump. 'Most of America has little to no sympathy for Washington, D.C. That became evident during the DOGE cuts,' said one Democratic strategist of the mass-layoffs by Trump's Department of Government of Efficiency. 'So while Americans should be concerned about an authoritarian power grab, I'm not sure it will resonate.' 'D.C. is on its own,' the strategist added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
No, Zohran, selling sex is not legitimate ‘work'
Realizing that his pro-prostitution posturing won't fly with city voters, Zohran Mamdani is trying to hide behind . . . Bill de Blasio. Seriously. Mamdani's record is too clear to shake: He has said over and over that he wants to decriminalize prostitution — or 'sex work,' as he and his fellow radicals call it, as if the euphemism somehow makes the reality any less awful. They want you to imagine high-end hookers, not the far greater numbers of women forced to sell their bodies to benefit brutal pimps, nor the countless girls kidnapped and otherwise trafficked into the trade. Asked Wednesday about his longtime support for this rancid industry, Mamdani deflected, saying it's about 'the outcomes of public safety.' As if there's any 'safety' in women selling their bodies for money. The Democratic nominee added that he'd look to Mayor Bill de Blasio's approach to prostitution because 'it created far more safety' than we've seen since. In fact, de Blasio only joined the rush to embrace 'sex work' as his mayoralty was ending and the left was trying to expand the 'reform' thinking that had already given New York the no-bail law, 'violence interrupters,' a let-'em-lose Parole Board, pot legalization and a host of other dubious 'progress.' Please note: Andrew Cuomo, who's now preaching on the horrors of hookers to embarrass Mamdani, in early 2021 signed a law repealing statutes against loitering for the purpose of prostitution. Progressives, in short, laid the ground for the explosion of prostitution that soon followed along Roosevelt Avenue in Queens and in the 'Penn Track' section of Brooklyn. As always, gang activity, illegal-drug dealing and other disorder rushed in along with the flesh trade. In other words, it's precisely Mamdani's favored 'decriminalization' approach that's brought the 'outcomes of public safety' he now deems inferior. Incidentally, this is an area where Mamdani and his Democratic Socialists don't want to follow Scandinavia. You see, the 'Nordic model' on prostitution looks to 'curb demand' by arresting pimps and clients, while offering prostitutes pro-social options to leave 'the life.' That's no good, per Mamdani, because 'it guarantees continued police raids at sex workers' places of business.' Well, yeah: That's how you catch people breaking the law. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters But: 'You can't police customers without policing sex workers,' insists top Mamdani ally City Councilwoman Tiffany Caban (D-Astoria), as if policing were inherently oppressive. Of course, 'oppressive' is just what Caban and Mamdani believe about policing, though Zohran's now doing his best to fudge on that, too. You needn't be some hidebound traditional moralist to see having sex for money as inherently dehumanizing; it's the advocates who insist it's 'empowering' who've left reality behind. Mamdani is committed to a host of absurd beliefs that he's now trying to conceal, but the most repulsive may be the ones that would welcome New York City becoming a magnet for the kind of scum who sell women.
