
Trump's electronics tariff exemption is temporary, Commerce Secretary says
Why it matters: The announced carveout was a win for companies like Apple, which assembles most of its iPhones in China. But the relief is only temporary, officials clarified Sunday.
Driving the news: Lutnick said in a Sunday interview on ABC's "This Week" that semiconductor tariffs are imminent — meaning that products exempt from Trump's broad reciprocal tariffs are not free from new levies.
"All those products will come under semiconductors, and they're going to have a special focus type of tariff to make sure that those products get re-shored," Lutnick said.
"We need to have semiconductors, we need to have chips, and we need to have flat panels, we need to have these things made in America," he continued.
What's next: He said a notice could be expected in the Federal Registry this week and that semiconductor and pharmaceutical tariffs will arrive in "the next month or two."
Lutnick explained that the products are exempt from reciprocal tariffs, but that the sector tariffs are a separate issue which "are not available to be negotiated away by countries."
"These are things that are national security, that we need to be made in America," Lutnick added.
Zoom out: National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett explained on CNN's "State of the Union" that items included under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 were "always excluded" and were not covered by the new actions.
The New York Times reported that the administration had previously signaled it was considering semiconductor tariffs under Section 232, which gives the president the power to adjust imports that are deemed to threaten national security.
Trump has already used the statute to place 25% levies on imported steel, aluminum and automobiles.
Yes, but: U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer noted on CBS News' "Face the Nation" Sunday that for "national security tariffs," an investigation is necessary as part of the process of imposing such levies.
He said the administration has not determined the outcome, but he added, "we expect there will have to be some kind of tariff."
Catch up quick: The clarification comes after a U.S. Customs and Border Protection bulletin was published Friday night designating electronics that would be exempt from the steep tariffs on Chinese imports and the global 10% rate Trump implemented.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should You Consider Adding Taseko Mines (TGB) to Your Portfolio?
Diamond Hill Capital, an investment management company, released its 'Small-Mid Cap Fund' second-quarter 2025 investor letter. A copy of the letter can be downloaded here. In Q2, the market surged uniformly for the rest of the quarter following a sharp decline in April due to President Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs announcement. The portfolio returned 5.60% (gross) and 5.37% (net) compared to an 8.59% return for the Russell 2500 Index. For more information on the fund's top picks in 2025, please check its top five holdings. In its second-quarter 2025 investor letter, Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund highlighted stocks such as Taseko Mines Limited (NYSE:TGB). Taseko Mines Limited (NYSE:TGB) is a mining company that operates mineral properties. The one-month return of Taseko Mines Limited (NYSE:TGB) was 0.93%, and its shares gained 43.42% of their value over the last 52 weeks. On August 15, 2025, Taseko Mines Limited (NYSE:TGB) stock closed at $3.27 per share, with a market capitalization of $1.039 billion. Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund stated the following regarding Taseko Mines Limited (NYSE:TGB) in its second quarter 2025 investor letter: "Despite markets' relatively sharp bounce following April's downward volatility, we were able to initiate several new positions in the quarter at what we consider compelling valuations: Generac Holdings, Alaska Air Group, Knife River Corporation, Taseko Mines Limited (NYSE:TGB), Century Communities and FTI Consulting. Aerial view of the Yellowhead copper project, the scale of the landscape revealed. Taseko Mines Limited (NYSE:TGB) is not on our list of 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 10 hedge fund portfolios held Taseko Mines Limited (NYSE:TGB) at the end of the first quarter, which was 12 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of Taseko Mines Limited (NYSE:TGB) as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. In another article, we covered Taseko Mines Limited (NYSE:TGB) and shared the list of best gold penny stocks to buy according to hedge funds. In addition, please check out our hedge fund investor letters Q2 2025 page for more investor letters from hedge funds and other leading investors. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Do You Believe in the Value Creation Ability of Knife River (KNF)?
Diamond Hill Capital, an investment management company, released its 'Small-Mid Cap Fund' second-quarter 2025 investor letter. A copy of the letter can be downloaded here. In Q2, the market surged uniformly for the rest of the quarter following a sharp decline in April due to President Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs announcement. The portfolio returned 5.60% (gross) and 5.37% (net) compared to an 8.59% return for the Russell 2500 Index. For more information on the fund's top picks in 2025, please check its top five holdings. In its second-quarter 2025 investor letter, Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund highlighted stocks such as River Corporation (NYSE:KNF). Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF) is an aggregates-based construction materials and contracting services provider based in Bismarck, North Dakota. The one-month return of Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF) was 11.10%, and its shares gained 19.38% of their value over the last 52 weeks. On August 15, 2025, Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF) stock closed at $89.99 per share, with a market capitalization of $5.099 billion. Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund stated the following regarding Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF) in its second quarter 2025 investor letter: "Despite markets' relatively sharp bounce following April's downward volatility, we were able to initiate several new positions in the quarter at what we consider compelling valuations: Generac Holdings, Alaska Air Group, Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF), Taseko Mines, Century Communities and FTI Consulting. A worker in a safety helmet and bright orange vest surveying a construction site from a crane. Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF) is not on our list of 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 28 hedge fund portfolios held Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF) at the end of the first quarter, which was 27 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF) as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. In another article, we covered Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF) and shared the list of stocks expected to beat the market by 20 percentage points this year. In addition, please check out our hedge fund investor letters Q2 2025 page for more investor letters from hedge funds and other leading investors. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Los Angeles Times
12 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Newsom's redistricting plan is a power grab. But the GOP objections are rubbish
SACRAMENTO — One accusation hurled at Gov. Gavin Newsom for his retaliatory redistricting move against President Trump and Texas Republicans is that he's overriding the will of California voters. Rubbish. The flawed argument goes like this: Californians — once upon a time — voted overwhelmingly to ban partisan gerrymandering and strip the task of drawing congressional seats from self-interested legislators. In a historic political reform, redistricting was turned over to an independent citizens' commission. Now, Newsom is trying to subvert the voters' edict. 'It is really a calculated power grab that dismantles the very safeguards voters put in place,' California Republican Party Chairwoman Corrin Rankin said in a statement last week, echoing other party members. 'This is Gavin the Gaslighter overturning the will of the voters and telling you it's for your own good.' Again, baloney. Power grab? Sure. Overturning the voters' will? Hardly. Newsom is asking voters to express a new will–seeking permission to fight back against Trump's underhanded attempt to redraw congressional districts in Texas and other red states so Republicans can retain control of the U.S. House of Representatives after next year's midterm elections. First of all, that anti-gerrymandering vote creating the citizens' commission was 15 years ago. It was a wise decision and badly needed, and still a wonderful concept in the abstract. But that was then, this is now. Just because a ballot measure was passed one or two decades ago doesn't mean it has been cast in stone. Would Californians still vote to ban same-sex marriage or deny public schooling to undocumented children? Doubtful. Circumstances and views change. Second, that 2010 electorate no longer exists. Today's electorate is substantially different. And it shouldn't necessarily be tied to the past. Consider: PPIC researchers recently reported that 'partisanship now shapes the state's migration — with those moving out of the state more likely to be Republican and those moving in more likely to be Democrat. … This process makes California more Democratic than it would otherwise be.' So, Newsom and Democratic legislators are not thumbing their noses at the voters' will. They're asking today's voters to suspend the ban on gerrymandering and adopt a partisan redistricting plan at a Nov. 4 special election. The good government process of map drawing by the citizen's commission would return after the 2030 decennial census. The heavily Democratic Legislature will pass a state constitutional amendment containing Newsom's plan and put it on the ballot, probably this week. It would take effect only if Texas or other red states bow to Trump's demand to gerrymander their congressional districts to rig them for Republicans. Trump is seeking five more GOP seats from Texas and Gov. Greg Abbott is trying to oblige. Republicans already hold 25 of the 38 seats. Newsom's plan, released Friday, counters Texas' scheme with a blatant gerrymander of his own. It would gain five Democratic seats. Democrats already outnumber Republicans on the California House delegation 43 to 9. Neither the governor nor any Democrats are defending gerrymandering. They agree it's evil politics. They support redistricting by the citizens' commission and believe this high-road process should be required in every state. But that's not about to happen. And to stand by meekly without matching the red states' election rigging would amount to unilateral disarmament, they contend correctly. 'It's not good enough to just hold hands, have a candlelight vigil and talk about the way the world should be,' Newsom declared at a campaign kickoff last week. 'We have got to recognize the cards that have been dealt. And we have got to meet fire with fire.' But polling indicates it could be a tough sell to voters. A large majority believe the bipartisan citizens commission should draw congressional districts, not the politicians who they don't particularly trust. 'It'll be complicated to explain to voters why two wrongs make a right,' says Republican strategist Rob Stutzman, a GOP never-Trumper. Former GOP redistricting consultant Tony Quinn says: 'There is no way to 'educate' voters on district line drawing. And Californians vote 'no' on ballot measures they do not understand. … It's sort of like trying to explain the basketball playoffs to me.' But veteran Democratic strategist Garry South doesn't see a problem. 'The messaging here is clear: 'Screw Trump',' South says. 'If the object is to stick it to Trump, [voter] turnout won't be a problem.' Gerrymandering may not be the voters' will in California. But they may well jump at the chance to thwart Trump. The must-read: Newsom's decision to fight fire with fire could have profound political consequences The TK: Trial in National Guard lawsuit tests whether Trump will let courts limit authority The L.A. Times Special: Hundreds of Californians have been paid $10,000 to relocate to Oklahoma. Did they find paradise? Until next week,George Skelton —Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to get it in your inbox.